Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Most Dangerous Division in Sports

Dawgs Fall to Ducks in Oregon

This will be my shortest recap to date. Nobody who watched will blame me. I have no desire to relive this abomination. The Huskies were dominated by the Ducks. Conference-leading Washington was absolutely handled by Oregon tonight. Disgust is the only emotion I feel.

Sure we can say the Ducks were lucky. Shots went in that had no business rolling through the net. That much is for certain. The Huskies were sloppy. Passing was abysmal.

A few ticked off bullet holes:

  • The offensive "sets" tonight were nearly nonexistent against the Ducks' zones. Abdul Gaddy and Wroten had little trouble getting the ball past midcourt, after that the offense stalled. The ball was tossed around the perimeter repeatedly with Terrence Ross and C.J WIlcox running the baseline. That was The Husky offense versus the 3-2 zone, the 2-3 zone, the 1-3-1 zone, and if Oregon played a man and I was just too removed from the game to notice, that was also probably the offense that the Dawgs played.
  • Whenever Tony Wroten was around the rim defensively he looks lost. He never boxes out, and he cannot step up to slow drivers. There were multiple instances where half of a step would have made all the difference in the world, yet Tony never made that step. I understand that he is a perimeter player, which means interior defense will certainly not be his forte, but he should be able to step in front of a driving offensive player or put a body on someone when the ball goes in the air.
  • Tony had a bad night overall, his lay-ins weren't rolling in, and that is his offense. He took several threes and missed them all. This was a bad shooting night for the Dawgs altogether, shooting 36% and 39% (!) from the charity stripe. Terrence Ross was 4-13, Wilcox 4-13. Just bad.
  • Defense was also not terrible, the Ducks hit shots that they shouldn't have, then the effort took a nosedive at some point in the second half defensively. The shots were impressive by the Duckies, that much I must concede.
  • Before I leave you to your own devices, remember to keep a level head. One bad game doesn't mean Romar needs to be canned. One bad game does not mean that the Huskies have no chance at the post-season. It just means that the Huskies played a bad game when an opponent could do no wrong. Sure their at-large chances were just slimmed, but that doesn't mean that they do not exist.

CODawg may have some bullet holes of his own so stay tuned! Or go to bed, I think I am going to go to bed.

CODawg's bullet hole!

  • WTF

Comment 56 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Couldn't agree more with the last bullet hole.

If we get blown out on Sunday it will be time to get concerned. This one doesn’t hurt us too much. We weren’t going to go 7-0 the rest of the way. Hopefully the team can shake it off.

by UW11Bowdown on Feb 9, 2012 10:39 PM PST reply actions  

from the recap
The ball was tossed around the perimeter repeatedly with Terrence Ross and C.J WIlcox running the baseline.

this drove me damn near insane. stop…..STOP DOING THAT.

2/16 from 3, 7/13. guess which team?

by Will Kier on Feb 9, 2012 10:48 PM PST reply actions  

Uh yeah

I have always constantly complained of Romar’s offensive play calling, whether it is he or a asst coach calling the plays, against the zone. Every team that plays us knows if they go to zone, it shuts us down. I hate it. We have got to penetrate or go inside against the zone, we never do. We always dribble the clock down, always around the perimeter, to near nothing and throw up bad shots. I hate it. But, it is just one game, let’s get this thing rolling again, Go Huskies!

by datboyeddiep on Feb 10, 2012 7:02 AM PST up reply actions  

I have always been amazed

with our ineptness in the half court offense

by CODawg on Feb 10, 2012 12:48 PM PST up reply actions  

Definitely

Always too, not just this season. When we run, man watch out. when refs call stupid calls and slow our tempo, or when opponents play zone and slow down our tempo, yikes! It’s like pulling teeth!

by datboyeddiep on Feb 11, 2012 5:23 AM PST up reply actions  

I am sooo glad this game wasn't on TV in Florida.

No hard feelings, but I’m also glad I missed the thread and the ensuing pain.
Time for Romar to show his stuff and help our kids man up to finish the season strongly

by HuskyInExile on Feb 9, 2012 10:58 PM PST reply actions  

Sweep at home split on the road...

If they do that over the second half of the season they win the conference.

UW Dawg Pound - SBN Seattle

by John Berkowitz on Feb 10, 2012 4:28 AM PST reply actions  

WSU on road

not sure if we can beat WSU on their home court or beat AZ at home I think at best we look like a 10 loss team and at worst 12 loss team not sure if that gets us in NCAA.

by lorenzothedog on Feb 10, 2012 7:58 AM PST up reply actions  

Tourney champs = auto bid.

I think we have to clinch that to be 100% sure.

by CanisInvictus on Feb 10, 2012 8:12 AM PST via Android app up reply actions  

I think the PAC12 is so weak

that the auto bid is the only team to make it into the tourney this year. Regular season means absolutely nothing this year, except seeding in conference tourney.

by SeaHuskies on Feb 10, 2012 9:21 AM PST up reply actions  

I would bet

2 get in. Those two are still wide open though

by CODawg on Feb 10, 2012 12:49 PM PST up reply actions  

I don't know

the PAC 12 is usually screwed a bit, and there is currently only 1 team ranked in the top 64 in RPI (Cal @ 48). We also don’t get to play Cal again, making it harder to climb the ladder. I honestly think that Cal should be in, but if they win the conference tournament, I think they are the only ones that do get in. And honestly, based on quality of play, they are probably the only ones to deserve it. Maybe Arizona…

by SeaHuskies on Feb 10, 2012 2:07 PM PST up reply actions  

Yeah

but they also don’t have Cal, or any big hitters left on their schedule, so any losses would be considered a “bad loss”. I think they could get in, but they would have to play pretty flawless from here on.

by SeaHuskies on Feb 10, 2012 3:03 PM PST up reply actions  

I love my Bears

But I’d be surprised if they win the conference tourney. 3 wins in 3 games is not what the team was built for.

The #1 greatest threat to America: BEARS

by norcalnick on Feb 10, 2012 5:57 PM PST up reply actions  

This is true

I want another road sweep too though

by CODawg on Feb 10, 2012 12:49 PM PST up reply actions  

Ben

I envy you for even being able to write anything. It is hard after we get thrashed and look that bad. I appreciate it and agree with everything said. I get mad at Romar but he is Husky bball, I’d never want him fired.

On another note, let’s go Dawgs, let’s go get some Beaver!

by datboyeddiep on Feb 10, 2012 7:04 AM PST reply actions  

Romar's offense has "sets"?

And, it’s been time to get concerned for awhile now.

I'm so positive, you'll need AZT later.

by Steen on Feb 10, 2012 7:42 AM PST reply actions  

It truly has been

I’ve been complaining about it for a while. Free throw shooting and offensive play calling or sets kill us! I mean the lack of the two.

by datboyeddiep on Feb 10, 2012 10:12 AM PST up reply actions  

I wish Romar was a little more like Sark...

Open to switching things up when he sees an issue. I realize basketball coaching is essentially different from football, but there’s gotta be something that can be done. Romar can’t seriously believe that the status quo “playcalling” is working when we continue to fail so miserably against the zone. As soon as the guys see that zone D, they fall into some bad perimeter passing and failed lane cuts that don’t make sense given their skill set. I don’t know if that’s Romar or the guys on the floor, although it’s been occurring so frequently it seems like a coaching (or lack thereof) issue. Learn some more x’s and o’s, hire a new assistant coach, watch game tape and copy other teams – do anything to fix the issue at hand. Sark fired one of his good friends and dug deep to hire an amazing staff for the good of the team. I’d like to see some changes from Romar – offensive sets, new players coming in to mix things up, new ideas, and the willingness to say, “I’m wrong” and FIX the problem.

by CanisInvictus on Feb 10, 2012 8:08 AM PST via Android app reply actions  

But that's just my own humble, uneducated opinion.

I’ve never been a bball coach and I don’t know what goes into the process. Just hard to see the team fall apart at a fundamental level like that so frequently. They play a lot of sloppy ball and don’t mix things up a lot in terms of “plays.”

by CanisInvictus on Feb 10, 2012 8:11 AM PST via Android app up reply actions  

The zone thing is enormously frustrating.

Like, it’s been a problem for your entire coaching tenure. Clearly there’s something you’re not doing right coaching-wise. If you don’t know how to scheme against it, either learn or bring in assistants who can.

by huskies2010 on Feb 10, 2012 9:46 AM PST up reply actions  

Just to rub salt in the wound...

Cal beat USC by 26. We lost by 25. Given that Cal and Oregon are about the same team skill level – we looked like the worst team in the conference. Wash = USC is something I don’t want to hear unless it’s football wins.

by CanisInvictus on Feb 10, 2012 8:18 AM PST via Android app reply actions  

Team lacks leadership

One huge hole in this team is a clear leader. We lost IT, MBA, and Holiday last year. Suggs, Gant, and Gaddy were suppose to step up as leaders. But one can’t just be appointed at being leader, you have to have that mentality. I don’t see it in any of those fore-mentioned guys. When we were down early last night (or any other game for that matter), you rarely see Gant or Gaddy pull the guys together on the court and say “Hey, let’s get our sh*t together and start ballin!”

I’ve never liked Romar’s offensive system, but it’s usually worked because we’ve had guys that could make shots. With Ross and Wilcox struggling to hit shots, we really lack depth. I’m not asking for Romar’s head either. I almost knocked some dude out in NY after the Duke game for saying “Fire Romar.” But I think he really could benefit by getting better Asst. Coaches.

by unformatted on Feb 10, 2012 9:22 AM PST reply actions  

We do lack leadership

And for as much as I like Romar, he is not a great offensive coach, never has been. We play good defense, he needs some good help with the offensive side. Kinda similar to our football coahcing situation just different sides of the ball. We need a good offensive asst cause the zone hampers us all the time! It’s tiring!

by datboyeddiep on Feb 10, 2012 10:10 AM PST up reply actions  

Bus was late

When I heard the bus was late do to a road block, I feared the team wouldn’t be prepared to play. Fear not Husky fans, this was a slight hiccup on the way to winning the regular season title. Only bad things occur when the bus is late. Give credit to the Ducks for coming out ready to play a team that wasn’t. It was their day, nothing more … nothing less.

All I saw was purple

by crazidawg on Feb 10, 2012 10:35 AM PST reply actions  

I am just slightly perturbed about yesterday's game!

This is the most “Jekyll & Hyde” type Huskies team I’ve seen in a long time. We are up and down like a roller-coaster. We must establish consistency (first & foremost) on the defensive side of the ball, if we want to make it to the big dance this year. In Romar’s system, almost everything is derived from aggressive “in your face” type defense. And yesterday we were 180 degrees opposite of aggressive. I really hoped we could show some intestinal fortitude and kicked some Ducks’ ass on that ugly-ass court yesterday. But oh well, now I am left hoping that we can go into Corvallis and take all our aggression out on the Beavs!! What do you guys say, do you think if we pull off a win Sunday, we can still make it this year?

by Jake Locker on Feb 10, 2012 12:58 PM PST reply actions  

We have to win conference tournament

I hate to be a downer, but I just don’t see us being consistent enough to win 3 straight games away from home. I hope the dawgs can prove me wrong though

by SeaHuskies on Feb 10, 2012 2:03 PM PST up reply actions  

What other Pac-12 team's would you pick to win 3 or 4 straight?

Someone will win 3 in a row, we are actually one of the best poised to do it.

by UW11Bowdown on Feb 10, 2012 2:41 PM PST up reply actions  

If I were betting

on a “neutral” court I would take Arizona and Cal over us, then throw us in the mix with Oregon and Colorado as slightly less likely. Of course, that is all based on right now. All it takes is one team to get hot at the end. I just have a feeling we are too inconsistent to do it. This just isn’t quite our year. But as I said, I would love to be proved wrong.

by SeaHuskies on Feb 10, 2012 3:09 PM PST up reply actions  

Cal plays 5 players. I think they will have a tough time with 3 games in 3 days.

Arizona has played well lately, but they aren’t very consistent (or good) either. Colorado has played even worse than us away from home, and I think we are a better team than Oregon.

I think you are looking too hard at our problems because you watch us more often. The other teams in this conference are also very flawed.

by UW11Bowdown on Feb 10, 2012 3:48 PM PST up reply actions  

I agree with most of that

But as you said, all of the teams in the PAC are pretty flawed this year, and I guess I just don’t feel like any of them really deserve to play in the NCAA tourney. Will we get 2 teams in? Maybe. Do we deserve to send 2 teams? IMO, no. But maybe I’m being overly harsh.

by SeaHuskies on Feb 11, 2012 11:11 AM PST up reply actions  

Also

I would argue Arizona is more consistent than us. They have only one 2 losses by more than 10 points (lost by 10 to Ms St. and 11 to Gonzaga), and they have lost their last 3 by a combined 5 points. On the other hand, we have been absolutely blown off the court 3 times this year, losing by 18, 19, and 25 to not exactly stellar competition.

by SeaHuskies on Feb 11, 2012 11:17 AM PST up reply actions  

I see

us winning the next 5. then losing at UCLA.

by CODawg on Feb 10, 2012 2:13 PM PST reply actions  

Not seeing what you are seeing

I think we will beat OSU on the road but do not see us beating both AZ and WSU before meeting UCLA – this team is like Jekyll and Hyde – not sure who is going to show up.

by lorenzothedog on Feb 10, 2012 5:04 PM PST up reply actions  

Arizona is much better than mediocre.

And when Motum is on the Cougars are much better than terrible even with Aiden injured. Motum has been on fire.

by Ben Knibbe on Feb 10, 2012 6:06 PM PST via iPhone app up reply actions  

Wait a second, if Arizona is much better than mediocre what does that make us?

Are there any teams better than meidiocre in the entire conference? Maybe some of the top teams are decent, but there certainly aren’t any that are above average.

While I’ve been very impressed by Motum, WSU is very bad this year. While we will obviously have to play well to win, it isn’t a game I’m worried about 3 weeks before it happens.

by UW11Bowdown on Feb 10, 2012 6:57 PM PST up reply actions  

To me much better than mediocre is slightly above average.

I would put Utah and USC (due to injury woes) as terrible, WSU a peg above them, then with Motum being on recently it puts them above that by another peg or two.

by Ben Knibbe on Feb 10, 2012 7:51 PM PST via iPhone app up reply actions  

Ok, you're right. In calling WSU terrible I forgot to leave room for USC and Utah below them.

I guess if pressed I would put Utah and USC in the “Abysmal” category.

Motum is playing well, but it seems to me like it is a situation where any good team can let him do whatever he wants and as long as you shut down everyone else you’ll be fine.

by UW11Bowdown on Feb 11, 2012 1:51 PM PST up reply actions  

WSU is very tough to beat on Friel Court.

We have only lost once there and with the added intensity of a rivalry game I would not think the Cougars will be an easy win for the Huskies, even though UW is clearly more talented this year.

by Alex Kelly on Feb 12, 2012 4:50 AM PST up reply actions  

i absolutely

see us beating Arizona at home and WSU on the road. I was wrong about oregon though

by CODawg on Feb 13, 2012 11:45 AM PST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the UW Dawg Pound, an unofficial site for Washington Husky fans.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Learjet31a_1_jpg_small
Question of the Day:
T9odawgtest_small
A few Spring Game thoughts.
P1010006_small
Who Said College Basketball Recruiting was Supposed to be Clean?
Dubs_close_small
The Future Of Husky Basketball
Small
Updated: Arizona loses at home, Cal faceplants in style.
Dubs_close_small
PAC 12 Pickem Final Results
Dubs_close_small
UW Dawg Pound Tournament Challenge
Small
PAC 12 Tournament Tickets
Dubs_close_small
PAC 12 Pickem Results/Conference Tournament Schedule
Dubs_close_small
Tournament Challenge

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

1959_huskies_small John Berkowitz

Dubs_small thecassino

Editors

W_logo_small kirkd

New_picture_small Gekko Mojo

Beastquakerwallpaper_small Ben Knibbe

Profpic_small JLee2025

Authors

Learjet31a_1_jpg_small Lear Pilot

Dubs_close_small CODawg

Coda_head_shot_250_small S_o_Smith

2721_small ToddWilliams206

P1010006_small Randall Floyd