Week 1 Sightlines: a Retrospective
Casting a critical eye towards our past contributions to the sports blogosphere is an activity that few, if any, of us participants in this extended community ever engage in. And, why should we? Most of our contributions were brilliant at the time that we made them, so why revisit perfection? Thus, it makes the exercise I'm about to engage in fruitless. No matter, it is the story arc of my life.
Last week I posted on things that I'd be watching for in Pac 12 over the weekend. I was able to watch or track about half the games. After the jump, I'll let you know how the sightlines I was focused on played out.
ASU 48 UC Davis 14: I got to this one a little after the fact. Thus, no sightline. Can't help but to mention how impressed I was with the overall speed of their D, even if I was less impressed with Osweiler's balls (literally and figuratively).
Cal 36 Fresno State 21:
I'm watching QB Zach Maynard
If Zach were white and right-handed, we would swear that we were watching a young Jake Locker. Zach got off to a rough start and was wildly inaccurate at times, but he made big plays at opportune times with his arm and with his legs. He worked his two stars - Keenan Allen and Marvin Jones - to the tune of 100 yards for each of them. It wasn't a perfect debut, but he looked like a playmaker that can do some damage.
Arizona 41 Northern Arizona 10
it has to be Arizona offensive line
In hindsight, I can't believe I wrote that. Who gives a flying-eff about what the UA o-line does against some club team from Flagstaff? I should have been watching for the new cheer talent in Tuscon. Am I an idiot? Don't answer that BMoney.
Hawaii 34 Colorado 17
I'm going to be focused not on Colorado, but on what Hawaii QB Bryant Moniz may have added to his arsenal over the offseason
Moniz did add something to his arsenal - wheels. Despite the fact that he ran for 102 yards during all of 2010, Moniz ran for 121 yards and three TDs (although almost all of that was in the first half) in just one game vs a Pac 12 opponent. This kid is a beast and he has given UW coaches something more to game plan for this week. AND, he's got awesome hair.
WSU 64 Idaho State 21
My sightline for WSU will focus on what kind of offense they plan to run.
"So, Coach Wulff, what offense do you plan to run on Sat?"
"Yes"
That was about it. Despite losing Jeff Tuel to a broken clavicle, WSU went off against the lowly Bengals. They racked up nearly 600 yards in total offense and it was almost exactly split between ground and air. They were in the no huddle scheme most of the night and they played, from what I can gather, a lot of sets with a TE on the field. The headwinds will stiffen a little with UNLV next week and SDSU after that, but they can beat those teams with performances like Saturday.
USC 19 Minnesota 17
I'm especially interested in seeing how the Barkley to Woods connection has developed in the off-season.
Asked and answered. Woods broke Johnny Morton's long-standing record of 15 receptions in a game by catching 17 balls for 177 yards. Most of his production (14 catches) were in the first half. Minnesota clearly adjusted their D to him in the second half and, not surprisingly, completely shut down the USC offense in doing so.
Dear Nick,
that is called a half time adjustment.
Sincerely,
Jerry Kill
Houston 38 UCLA 34
I'll be focusing on their front seven, in particular.
I did as I promised, and I almost puked Sierra Nevada as a result. The Bruins had more offense that I predicted, but they might as well have thrown out the Dawgpound All-stars to play D. I'm pretty sure a front seven of Carne Guisada, Rollo, BigDave, Snostrebla, Willie Mays Hayes, Hawnk and JoeinFW would have put up more of a fight. Keenum passed for 300 yards and, honestly, I can't remember him getting sacked at all. I think UCLA will be better, but this was an ugly start.
Utah 27 Montana State 10: Utah was the other Thur game I missed a sightline for. I must say, after Saturday, I'm guessing the fanbase is feeling a lot better about their team in the South.
Sacramento State 29 Oregon State 28
....
Some of you may have noticed that I neglected to note a sightline for Oregon State. You might guess that this was an administrative oversight. That's only what I want you to believe. If I had given away my premonition of the outcome of this game, you guys would have come to recognize my innate supernatural abilities and, frankly, you'd never leave me the eff alone.
Stanford 57 San Jose State 3
I'll be watching the sidelines and looking at how the staff interacts with the players. Will the intensity be there despite the inferior opponent?
I didn't get to see this game, but the outcome was clearly pretty workman like. A bunch of sacks and three forced furmbles led to the Spartans' demise. Stanford actually started out pretty slow in this one before unleashing the pain. There were some red flags that KirkD would never forgive me for if I failed to point out. The points scored look gaudy, but Stanford only had 330 yards of total offense and were a pedestrian 5-13 on third down conversions. Luck only averaged 6 yards a completion and the yards per rush were just 3.5 yards. Of course they kept most of the playbook out of the gameplan, but this was still San Jose St. I would have expected better execution of the offense.
LSU 40 Oregon 27
I think that Chip Kelly has trouble winning games where his opponents have interior size advantages
This game was pretty interesting. The score looks bad, but the reality was that this was pretty evenly played but for a 1.5 quarter period of time starting in the second quarter and extending through the entire third period. DeAnthony Thomas's back-to-back fumbles turned into 14 points and that was the ball game. But there was more to watch. LSU did break down that Oreegon O-Line all night. They forced DT to read "hand-off" and they forced LMJ to read "middle gap" on a lot of the option plays. That forced the runner into the strength of the LSU defense all night. That, in turn, made Oregon into a passing team and exposed how green that receiving corps for the Ducks really is (pun intended). This is the exact gameplan that Auburn used and is clearly the best strategy to run against Oregon, even if you don't have the athletes of the SEC on your line.
EWU 27 UW 30
I choose to focus on the TE play.
Not much to say here. The TEs were a non-factor catching three balls between Austin Seferian-Jenkins and Michael Hartvigson. I don't recall either having much of an imapact as a blocker in the run game. This is one area where you could truly argue that youth was a factor and I'm hoping to see more vs Hawaii.
47 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
LMFAO!
“Dear Nick, that is called a half time adjustment”
I love it!!
My feelings exactly!
Gekko – Keep up the great work, I love the stuff you are adding to the blog. Who would have guessed that giving you admin privileges would be a brilliant move?! I would have thought all the Oregon fans would be banned by now!
"Winning isn't everything, it's the only thing."
"Legends are made on the shores of Lake Washington"
JB wisely withheld those powers from me.
Damn, my eyeball tastes good.
@chrislandon
by Gekko Mojo on Sep 6, 2011 10:50 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions
I just don't understand why!
"Winning isn't everything, it's the only thing."
"Legends are made on the shores of Lake Washington"
Me neither...
Despite my average physical stature, I like to think of myself as a rational, empathetic, patient and benevolent sentinel serving this Dawgpound.
Who could possibly disagree?
Damn, my eyeball tastes good.
@chrislandon
It's all love Gekko
I just worry about your blood pressure.
by B Money on Sep 6, 2011 7:30 AM PDT via mobile reply actions
I know it. Only Duck fans hate me ... and even some of them have come to acknowledge the softer side of my Mojo
Damn, my eyeball tastes good.
@chrislandon
While we are recapping week one . . .
I went back through the thread asking us who we thought would score the first touchdown of the season. Hat’s off to Jonathan Amosa for scoring the first TD, although NOBODY predicted it would be him!
"Winning isn't everything, it's the only thing."
"Legends are made on the shores of Lake Washington"
by Lear Pilot on Sep 6, 2011 11:22 AM PDT reply actions 1 recs
my first thought
after Amosa’s TD was if anyone picked him. I just didn’t bother to look it up.
Concerning Tuel playing, he is the starter, he wanted in, and his illness might have affected his play, but it didn’t make his shoulder weaker. Tough break for both him and Wulff.
Important Question...
Why the heck did Wulff even have Tuel in that game? Tuel was sick, and the coogs were playing just fine with Lobbestael in there at QB.
Tuel said he was good to go.
Wulff said all along that the plan was to have Tuel in for a series or two and than get him out. You have to get your starters a few series of snaps in the opener, no matter how inferior the opponent.
Attractive, Intelligent, Smart A**
by Neil Vincent Roberts on Sep 6, 2011 2:10 PM PDT up reply actions
Well, he is the starting QB
It’s the same as Sark putting in Polk bs EWU
Damn, my eyeball tastes good.
@chrislandon
by Gekko Mojo on Sep 6, 2011 3:58 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions
NOBODY predicted it
Gregory Ducre scored first TD. My pick.
Support our student athletes, have faith in the coaches! "...it's how you play the game!"
Huh?? What are you talking about?
Ducre recovered the muffed punt, but the TD did not count. Amosa scored the first TD on a pass from Price.
Just say NO to drugs!
"Winning isn't everything, it's the only thing."
"Legends are made on the shores of Lake Washington"
Just say YES to drugs
just ask for better ones ;)
"I call the big one Bitey."-Homer J. Simpson
by Willie Mays Haze on Sep 6, 2011 5:28 PM PDT up reply actions
You guys seem like a playful bunch...
I’d love to eat beef jerky and pop paper bags by Sasquatch’s head with you guys.
Proving my stupidity, one comment at a time.
by I'mSureI'veSeenWorse on Sep 6, 2011 7:07 PM PDT up reply actions
Hmmm...
What kind of balls?
Proving my stupidity, one comment at a time.
by I'mSureI'veSeenWorse on Sep 7, 2011 12:36 AM PDT up reply actions
Okay. I was worried there for a second.
Yeah, I’m good to go.
Proving my stupidity, one comment at a time.
by I'mSureI'veSeenWorse on Sep 7, 2011 9:43 PM PDT up reply actions
ya see ...
… I was playing off of the avatar photo of your hand holding a golf ball that says “it takes balls to play golf” and I thought it would be funny to call you out as having balls
man, my smart-ass comments really fail when the victim of my sarcasm doesn’t get the wise-crack.
Damn, my eyeball tastes good.
@chrislandon
I was kind of playing around there as well but it was all lost...
Either way, I really liked your article. Keep it up. It’s good work.
Proving my stupidity, one comment at a time.
by I'mSureI'veSeenWorse on Sep 8, 2011 8:51 AM PDT up reply actions
Used 2
Where is purple pyrarmid LSD when I need it?
by The Dude 4 Real on Sep 6, 2011 11:07 PM PDT up reply actions
And I say, "Hey, Lama, hey, how about a little something, you know, for the effort, you know."
And he says, “Oh, uh, there won’t be any money, but when you die, on your deathbed, you will receive total consciousness.” So I got that goin’ for me, which is nice.
sour grapes
ball was recovered and ran in for a TD. It was called back but that doesn’t change the fact it was first TD, WINNER!!!
No changing the rules after the fact.
You must of ’et something smelly.
Support our student athletes, have faith in the coaches! "...it's how you play the game!"
second place
Maybe I qualify for closest to?
Support our student athletes, have faith in the coaches! "...it's how you play the game!"
Wasn't muffed, he made a football move and Trufant knocked it out -- Should have been a TD
but, that doesn’t change the fact that it wasn’t counted; so, for the purposes of our ‘game’ Amosa wins.
I know I'm late but...
…was it just me or did the offensive line look a bit overweight? It may have been the fact that they were sleep walking through the game. I’m sure other guys made mistakes but Kholer seemed to stick out to me. Maybe the competition will ratchet up for that position?
Washington Husky Football-"Hear the bark, feel the bite!"
Maybe Kohler, but not in general
These guys are much, much leaner than our OL was under Ty. Still not quite where we need to be, but far better than we’ve seen in recent years. Let’s take a look at the Cascade Front in another year or two under Ivan.
yep
None of the guys on the OL look sloppy, and some of them are definitely lean & mean. Kelemete is closest to that ideal. Porter is strong as an ox and will never be “lean”, but he doesn’t really seem to be carry much extra baggage. Hatchie is actually a bit too lean – still needs to add more muscle. Tanigawa & Schaefer are in good shape. Kohler might be a little less ideal than those other guys, but I wouldn’t call out any of them as being “overweight” by any significant stretch.
Overweight?????????????
Whoever said that obviously never attended a practice. As a group, eleven, I think are all tall and in fantastic shape for their age. As they mature, yes it takes time, we will have first and second team road graders.
Support our student athletes, have faith in the coaches! "...it's how you play the game!"
The new officials
Hey guys (Berkowitz, Sundodger) – how about something about the new officials? I didn’t have any serious complaints with the UDub game, and that is new. Another reason to think Scott is doing a good job by hiring people who can do their jobs. Not that the officials will not make mistakes – but they used to be terrible and now they might be OK.
Oh yah, about the “muffed” punt. I thought the punt returner made a football move, so shouldn’t that have been a fumble? I don’t know the rule. Do you?
fumble
It definitely was a fumble and cost me a contest winner. Bummer.
Support our student athletes, have faith in the coaches! "...it's how you play the game!"
I believe he has to have posession, which he didn't have
the ball is live as soon as it touches somebody on the receiving team, but it cannot be advanced unless it is possessed and fumbled. I think that’s the rule.
Hardly even noticed the officials.
And that’s about the best thing you can possibly say. They didn’t make themselves part of the game.
B Money is right about the muff versus fumble rule. I’d say that play was close, but it looked like a muffed punt to me.
by Sundodger on Sep 7, 2011 11:44 AM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Officials
“Hardly noticed” is what you want from officials officiating a game. Nothing was mentioned and for a brief moment I said "who the hell are these guys? At first I thought they were Big Sky officials. If these guys are the new breed Pac 12 officials I like them. They were completely transparent to the game they were officiating. And not one seemed to hold any biases or grudges that spewed from the old, out of shape clowns who lingered over our league like a dark shadown. Very refreshing, where did they come from? That would be nice story on the Dawgpound.
All I saw was purple
There you go again
And not one seemed to hold any biases or grudges that spewed from the old, out of shape clowns who lingered over our league like a dark shadown.
And you know that how? Just making stuff up again?
"Winning isn't everything, it's the only thing."
"Legends are made on the shores of Lake Washington"
Ah, who cares
The refs in previous years have been so consistently bad that every fan base thought they got intentionally screwed a few times. Go ask Oklahoma fans what they think about Pac-10 refs…
Completely agree
The ref’s were much better last week. Saying more than that is just making stuff up.
"Winning isn't everything, it's the only thing."
"Legends are made on the shores of Lake Washington"

by 


















