the Gekko File: Nebraska
The old line "Familiarity breeds contempt" is one that is so common that nobody is credited with quoting it. It is true, however, that Mark Twain was credited with noting that "Familiarity breeds contempt – and children". While I can’t speak to the procreation habits of my fellow blogmates (or, at least I choose not to), I can assure you that there ain’t no football program in the nation that we are more familiar with than the Nebraska Cornhuskers. With that notion of familiarity in mind, I will give you another familiar quote credited to one George Sand: "Admiration and familiarity are strangers." Not only should you interpret that to mean that I do not admire any of my fellow Dawgpounders, but you should also take it to mean that I’ve about had it up to my eyeballs with the Cornhuskers … and I’m pretty sure the feeling is mutual (although, gosh darn it, I will miss the gentlemanly visits by JDHusker to our little blog). With this lack of admiration in mind, I offer you some some Nebraska tidbits and a preview generated from this week’s Gekko File.
- Everyone knows that Nebraska and UW split two games last year making this year’s matchup the rubber game of the "series". However, it is also the rubber game of the all-time series as UW and Nebraska have played each other to a 4-4-1 all-time record. Surprisingly, Nebraska has had less luck with the Cougars – they are 1-3 against them all-time (but, they are 5-1 vs the Ducks!)
- The 2011 Cornhuskers are a familiar group to Husky fans. They will once again feature stars Taylor Martinez, Alfonzo Dennard and Jared Crick from a team that has won 10 games or more for two straight years. However, this team has lost some key pieces including RB Roy Helu, K Alex Henery, CB Prince Amukamara, WR Niles Paul, QB Zac Lee, QB Cody Green and three of their starting O-Lineman from last year. This is a different team, for better or worse, than what we saw in the Holiday Bowl.
- The Cornhuskers have the nation’s longest consecutive bowl game appearance streak going right now. They are the model of consistency, just like their highway system.
- Florida gave us GatorAde. Nebraska gave us Kool-Aid. You all drink purple Kool-Aid. You all look like Kevin Bacon. There you have it.
- Nebraska’s offensive and defensive lines are known for their girth. Some attribute it to all of the corn grown in that God-forsaken state. However, it may also be a comprehensive conspiracy. After all, Nebraska has the largest weight room in all of the NCAA – it covers almost ¾ of an acre.
- Nebraska's cheerleaders are also known for their girth. There, I said it. You were thinking it. Let's move on.
- The state motto of Nebraska is "Equality Before the Law". This has been an important rallying cry for Huskers, but it presents a bit of a quandary. The general public is so unequal in terms of overall intellect that the entire society has devolved into a bunch of degenerate criminals. Lawrence Phillips comes to mind.
- That said, the University does like to cite the fact that they have produced more Academic All-Americans than any other Division 1 school. What they don’t tell you is that they are the only school that still references the term "Division 1" and, therefore, are the only team that still produces "Division 1" Academic All-Americans. Those sneaky Huskers.
- Nebraska has had some awesome players come through its program over the years. There can be no debating that the cream of that crop is Dave Rimington, an offensive linemen who played at Nebraska between 1979-1982. Rimington won the Outland trophy twice, the Lombardi trophy once and actually finished fifth in the Heisman voting in 1982, as an Offensive Center! The Rimington Trophy was first awarded in 2000 and honors the nation’s best center every year.
- Defense – the Blackshirts – is the tradition at Nebraska. Almost 2/3 of all Nebraska players drafted in the NFL draft since 1990 have been defensive players.
- Nebraska has claimed five national championships including three in a span of four seasons between 1994-1997. That was an unbelievable run.
- I was really saddened to hear that superstar recruit, Bubba Starling, decided to pass on the opportunity to play QB for the Cornhuskers so that he could play baseball for the Kansas City Royals. Very, very heartbroken. Matt Tuiasosopo. Sorry, instinctual reaction.
- Father Edward Flanagan founded Boys Town in Nebraska in 1917…and the Catholic Church has never been the same. Ok, that was too easy. And I’m Catholic.
Washington at Nebraska: A Preview
We all know how this game is going to be played out given how familiar each team is with the other. Despite six new starters on offense and five new starters on defense, the Nebraska gameplan is pretty easy to predict. On offense, I expect that we will see a lot of Taylor Martinez and Rex Burkhead running the ball with Taylor looking to take shots selectively against what is currently the worst statistical pass defense in the NCAA. The Huskies will counter with a more consistent rotation of DL’s than what Nebraska saw last year including heavy doses of two new faces in Lawrence Lagafuaina and Danny Shelton as this promises to be the first run-oriented offense that UW will see this year. The ability (or inability) of these two young players to step up and shine is going to be a key element in this game. The passing game is going to be interesting to watch. The Cornhuskers feature Junior TE Kyler Reed, Senior WR Brandon Kinnie and a bunch of talented young guys who are still trying to find their games (look out for Sophomore Quincy Enunwa and Freshman Jamal Turner). I’m not sure if they will have it all worked out by the time Washington arrives, but expect them to test our inconsistent secondary as long as the O-Line can give Martinez a pocket.
Defensively, the Huskers are still dominant no matter what happened last week against Fresno State. Chris Polk embarrassed them in the Holiday Bowl and it is a certainty that Bo Pelini has reminded his stud DTs of this fact repeatedly. That front seven has had this game circled and I expect that they’ll rise to the challenge. I sense that this game is going to be put into the hands of our QB and our deep WR corps early. Their ability to respond positively is probably the only prayer we have at generating some offense and getting the Blackshirts on their heels. No doubt that Keith Price's performance against Hawaii has opened the Huskers' eyes, but expect them to play that aggressive form of man-to-man nonetheless. To counter that, we will probably see the Huskies spread it out more frequently and look for opportunities to run out of three and four wide sets in order to add deception to our gameplan. Unlike last year, the Dawgs have third, fourth and fifth receivers who matchup favorably against Nebraska's LB/Secondary. In addition, the Huskies will add a TE rotation to the mix that will be a new twist for the Huskers to cope with.
If the Huskies can keep the game close, they have a decided advantage in special teams as the Huskers are breaking in both a new punter and a new kicker along with several new role players. Keep an eye on this situation.
Prediction: UW 20 – Neb 28
I expect UW to hang with Nebraska for a good chunk of this game mostly because I sense that Nebraska will have trouble running the ball against our front line defense and I'm gaining confidence in Keith Price's ability to manage a game. He just seems to know how to keep it close. However, I do expect our offense to have a lot more trouble with the Blackshirts and field position will likely become a big advantage for the Huskers. The Huskers are a well-conditioned bunch and they know how to put a game away in the fourth quarter (see 21 points in the fourth quarter against Fresno St).
My Prediction: the Dawgs will put up a good fight and go home having left it all on the field. Reports from traveling Dawgfans will focus on the hospitality of the Husker fans and the strange liquor that Corn Nation Blogger Jon Jonston served up to his guests from the Northwest. Husker Mike will pop over to the Dawgpound and take back anything he ever said about the Huskers losing the Holiday Bowl because "they didn’t want to be there" and JDHusker will be the good sport he always is and wish us the best in 2011 (to which I respond in a Corn-Liquor-drunken-haze "go %$#@ a cow").
Other Predictions:
…Chris Polk will have a nice but not dominating game - averaging 3.7 yards a carry and one TD
...Rex Burkhead will break off two runs over 15 yards each, but otherwise get contained
…Taylor Martinez will break contain and make some big plays
...Taylor Martinez will get hit and get hit hard. Freshman Brion Carnes will get some play.
…Bo Pelini will yell at his offensive coordinator. Many times. Using bad words.
…Austin Seferian-Jenkins will get schooled on a few blocking assignments, but make at least three catches that make us all forget about it.
…The Huskers will record four sacks in a game that serves as another wakeup call for Coach Coz
…The UW secondary will pick off two Taylor Martinez passes, one each by Sean Parker and Quinton Richardson
...The Huskers will commit more penalties that UW, including three PI's, which will keep UW in the game til the end
89 comments
|
2 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Fantastic job...
I love the fact that you are doing the previews…it works great!
UW Dawg Pound - SBN Seattle
by John Berkowitz on Sep 14, 2011 5:10 AM PDT reply actions 1 recs
You forgot ....FIRST!
Damn, my eyeball tastes good.
@chrislandon
by Gekko Mojo on Sep 14, 2011 6:11 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions
Keep 'em coming.
These are great, Gekko.
by Bugs Dodger on Sep 14, 2011 1:15 PM PDT up reply actions 2 recs
Great write-up
Fun read and good analysis.
I am anxious to see how our team handles the pressure of their first road game, especially playing in this venue. I think if they can keep this close early, they’ll get enough confidence to stay in it throughout. I have a suspicion that the NE offense will come out in a no huddle attack, and test our pass defense early to hopefully loosen things up for the running game. If we can withstand that, and sustain some drives of our own, we’ve got a shot.
Well done
I love the playful, yet informative content in these previews. If we can hang with them early, it should be a really exciting game that goes down to the wire. Is it Saturday yet?
Much as I would like to predict a win...
We’re still pretty green to go pull a win out of Lincoln. Jake was a big brutal difference maker in the Holiday bowl, rushing like a man possessed. I do NOT want Keith Price to attempt any of those kamikaze Locker runs. Not this week, preferably not ever.
If we are to win it, it will take breakout performances from ASJ and/or Kasen, because I just don’t see us winning any low-scoring game with our secondary.
We are pretty green, but I think we have a more diverse attack this year so hopefully we can keep the ball moving sans kamikaze runs at the end zone by our QB. The NEB D-line is going to be out to get Polk, but I think our O-Line has developed enough to give Price a little time to find the playmakers through the air.
by ToddWilliams206 on Sep 14, 2011 9:10 AM PDT up reply actions
Nebraska must be destroyed at all costs.
There are no other options.
Fie upon the unbelievers. You too shall be judged when End Times come.
Huskies 91, Huskers 2
Gekko, good one
Hopefully, we are past the blow outs . We actually have a chance for victory. Make N one dimensional
Agreed. At least blow outs that have us on the losing end. ;)
by ToddWilliams206 on Sep 14, 2011 9:05 AM PDT up reply actions
I like Washington's chances in this one...
I don’t see anything about Nebraska that really screams out that they are better than us.
UW Dawg Pound - SBN Seattle
by John Berkowitz on Sep 14, 2011 7:22 AM PDT reply actions 1 recs
Secondary? Linebackers? HFA? Maybe not screaming, but persistently suggesting.
I think we’ve got a clear edge at receiver, and perhaps a slight tilt on both lines. And we’ve got #1.
The only thing I worry about...
is whether we contain Martinez. If we can do that, we can win. He was a bit slow in the Holiday Bowl with his ankle issue, but hopefully we can keep him bottled up like we did in that game.
by Carne Guisada on Sep 14, 2011 8:30 AM PDT up reply actions
Weren't we sort of responsible for those ankle issues?
I mean what with putting him in to the turf several times.
I think we finished him off...
but he was trying to recover from ankle injury much of the second half of the season and used the break before the Holiday Bowl to recover, only to get pummeled in the Holiday Bowl. At least that’s how I remember it.
Hopefully we can pummel him early in this game to make sure he’s not as fast as he’s looked the last two games.
by Carne Guisada on Sep 14, 2011 11:33 AM PDT up reply actions
I agree…I don’t see a blow out either way. Should be a hell of a game!
by ToddWilliams206 on Sep 14, 2011 9:08 AM PDT up reply actions
Agreed.
I think I’ll put $200 on the money line.
Money line has settled in at -800/+550
$1100 looks nice, I just don’t see a win. I’m gonna give 2 or 2.5 points and see if I can get my line to the +110 range.
Good preview
I completely agree except for one bit…
If the Huskies can keep the game close, they have a decided advantage in special teams as the Huskers are breaking in both a new punter and a new kicker along with several new role players. Keep an eye on this situation.
Brett Maher punts and kicks, and he has proven that he can do both very well. So far he’s 4/4 on field goals including a 50 yarder kicked into the wind that he made look easy. The only question is if he can make the big kicks in big situations, but he’s definitely capable. He’s also had some great punts.
As far as our return game goes…meet Ameer Abdullah (on that return he slowed down toward the end because he was having some major cramping) …anyways, he’s as quick and shifty of a player as we’ve seen in Lincoln for a long time. On punt returns, he almost always makes the first guy miss and sometimes that’s all it takes. The kid is a big play waiting to happen. He set the school record for return yards in one game against Fresno State…in his second game ever. You probably don’t want to see the ball in his hands on kick & punt returns.
Our kick coverage is probably the biggest question, and last week they gave up a punt return TD. But after that they seemed to adjust, so it will be interesting to see how they do against UW.
Great write-up Gekko
ASJ will get schooled on some assignments, and since I LOVE the kid, I’m willing to accept it’s bound to happen… however he has the ability to play a perfect game, which is alot to expect, but it’s possible.
UW by 10
Somehow Gekko missed Abdullah. Billgrip, most Dawgs really hope to introduce you to Bishop Sankey in open field.
by Jon Snow of House Stark on Sep 14, 2011 8:15 AM PDT up reply actions
With Polk
getting the lions share of touches, it’s tuff to feed boy wonder. It would be a great breakout game for Bishop to get the rok 4 or 5 times on designed plays.
by Jon Snow of House Stark on Sep 14, 2011 8:18 AM PDT up reply actions
Would you really rather see Sankey get any touches over Polk and Callier?
Sure he looked alright in fall camp, but in a close game I think it is a missed opportunity every time you take a carry away from Polk. 5 carries for Sankey probably means 3 fewer for Polk and 2 fewer for Callier. If they didn’t feel the need to give him the ball in the first two games I’m not sure how they could justify it against Nebraska.
by UW11Bowdown on Sep 14, 2011 10:28 AM PDT up reply actions
Dim the spotlight!
I don’t think this is the platform to showcase Sankey. I would imagine both the Eastern and Hawaii games would’ve been better games to get him involved. However, the way those games played out, could we afford to take carries away from Polk and Callier? I think the best time to insert him woud be when the stakes are not very high. Less pressure placed on him to produce. If he fails when the pressure of carrying the rock is huge, in a big game, how does that effect his self confidence and our confidence in him? Bring him up slowly, figure out his niche in the offense when the spotlight isn’t so bright. In that regard he will gain more confidence and we’ll gain more confidence in him as playmaker.
All I saw was purple
When aren't the stakes high
During this six game win streak, we haven’t blown anyone out. I think the Holiday bowl was the largest margin of victory last year. He’s not a quarterback, his confidence isn’t gonna be hurt by subbing briefly in for a touch and subbing out.
by Jon Snow of House Stark on Sep 14, 2011 4:11 PM PDT up reply actions
True Freshmen Chris Polk at Autzen comes to mind
Chris Polk looked spooked as a true freshmen vs. Oregon, then got injured and had to redshirt. He wasn’t ready for it and was inserted in a high stakes game. I want Sankey to get some touches and gain confidence in running hard between the tackles. The kid isn’t replacing Polk or Callier this year any way you look at it. But it would be beneficial to get him going at some point in the near future so we can figure out where he fits in this offense. Callier last year wasn’t replacing Polk and we found a productive niche in the offense for Jessie. Same could apply this year with Sankey.
All I saw was purple
I didn't say it would be easy
Rather I’d like to see him get the ball in open field. Think of it as a wish list and no I wouldn’t be mad at Sark if Sankey subbed in 3 to 5 times during the game.
by Jon Snow of House Stark on Sep 14, 2011 4:06 PM PDT up reply actions
I'd like to see all of our players get the ball in the open field
I just don’t see anyway you can justify playing him in the Nebraska game if he didn’t get any carries in the first half against Eastern or Hawaii. Playing DAT under the bright lights didn’t work out well for Oregon against LSU, I don’t think it would go well for us either.
I hope that Polk ends this game with 35 carries or so and and that Callier has another 5 or 6. I would rather see a few screens to Fogerson before giving Sankey his first carry in this game. Do you think that Sankey is so good that he gives us a better shot of moving the ball than Polk or are you just interested in seeing what he can do? I’m plenty interested to see how well he plays, but not in games where we will need every yard in order to win. I have a hard time watching Callier take carries from Polk, I have to remind myself he isn’t actually a machine that gains 5 yards every time he touches the ball and that he needs a break every once in a while.
I guess what I'm interested to hear is
What situation are you envisioning that you think it would be to our advantage to play Sankey over Polk, Callier, or Fogerson?
The only situation I can think of is any time when the game is not close, or is against an obviously inferior opponent. Neither of those will apply this Saturday.
I've been thinking(perhaps wishfully)
this about several young players we haven’t seen much from in the early games. Here’s to secret weapons! Shirley, Shelton, Sankey, perhaps even Tokolahi, Laga(I’m not even going to try)!
by hairofthedawg on Sep 14, 2011 6:00 PM PDT up reply actions
Tokolahi
From today’s briefing with Sark, sounds like Tokolahi is getting more reps. Whether that means he sees the field this weekend I don’t know – I’d guess Lagafuaina and Shelton will be the guys that get most of the snaps spelling Ta’amu and perhaps playing some 3T (depends on where they want to line up Everrette). Wouldn’t surprise me at all to see them play a big line with Ta’amu at NT, Laga/Shelton at 3T and Everrette & Jamora at the ends. Nansen noted that part of the reason Ta’amu was more effective in the Holiday Bowl than the first meeting was they rotated guys in more frequently to keep them fresh.
I’m disappointed that they’ve played Sankey but not actually given him a handoff yet. The kid probably has the best breakaway speed on the team with Cooper injured again – I’d like to see what he could do.
I don’t know if this is really a great game for Shirley to get more playing time – seems like his strength is pinning his ears back and pass-rushing.
Sorry for not using reply
uggh, still learning
by Jon Snow of House Stark on Sep 14, 2011 8:25 AM PDT up reply actions
yeah, Bishop Sankey is a true freshman...
that surprised fans/coaches with his speed and cutting ability in camp, but he hasn’t seen much action other than some on special teams.
by Carne Guisada on Sep 14, 2011 11:35 AM PDT up reply actions
Yes Bg
True frosh. Abdullah looks explosive. They look similar, but for now Abdullah is obviously the X factor in a sort of way that Sankey could be. I feel for the coaches, cuz I know they’d like to get him the ball. Sark promises to use him, since they decided on not to use the red shirt. Past two weeks, when you thought we might see him…. just hasn’t happened.
Bet yes Ameer looks filthy.
by Jon Snow of House Stark on Sep 14, 2011 8:24 AM PDT reply actions
Speaking of Matt Tuiasosopo
He was cut by the Mariners and is currently a free agent. He probably has a couple more years to give AAA baseball a shot, but it makes you wonder whether he’d be interested in going back to school…
I don't know if I'd want him at this point.
He’d need to shake off the rust and beat out Montana, Miles, and Lindquist in the next few years. Not sure I see that happening.
by huskies2010 on Sep 14, 2011 10:46 AM PDT up reply actions
And with all due respect to the athletic MLB players
it doesn’t keep you in the best physical condition.
Grady Sizemore hurts too
Although it’s harder to be mad about Sizemore as he actually turned out to be a pretty good MLB player.
Good one!
I agree with your preview. I think having a tight end capable of catching the ball (even if he does mess up those 3 blocking assignments!) is going to be huge for the Huskies offensive attack, let alone the depth at the wide receiver position. Neb’s D-line is going to be hungry, but I like how our line is progressing and don’t see them tearing us up on the line like they did in Seattle, but it would be hard to be as dominate running as we were in the Holiday Bowl.
by ToddWilliams206 on Sep 14, 2011 9:03 AM PDT reply actions
Tip my cap to Gekko
Very well done preview. I enjoy your analysis!
by NewHuskyBeliever on Sep 14, 2011 10:39 AM PDT reply actions 1 recs
i think this will be a much closer game than the media and vegas are predicting. it could come down to the final few minutes of the 4th quarter. given the fact that Martinez is not a very good passer (49% against 2 sub-par teams) and that UW has a solid run defense, i think we have reason to believe that we could come out with the win.
Don't put to much stock in any statistical analysis of 2 games
I agree, just not because Martinez hasn’t completed passes yet.
Tough game to call
The overwhelming key for a Husky victory is our running game. If Keith Price and the offense is one demensional, NOT GOOD! I don’t think Chris Polk has to go off to win. But I do think our O line has to open some holes so that Polk is productive out of the backfield. I think if Polk can rack up 80+ yards I like our chances and our chances of winning go up with more yards above that. Running the football will allow us the control the clock which in turn keeps T Magic off the field. Less big Cornhusker plays is beneficial to us. 1st meeting last season T Magic and the Huskers kicked our ass early and often due to a lot of big plays early and often. We can limit their ability of making big plays if our offense can stay on the field.
Defensively we have to stop T Magic and do a great job of stopping the run. That is going to be a big challenge and I’m not sure which group wins that battle. Nebraska overhauled their O line, where our D line is a savvy returning group. The key is our LBs. Dennison is a stud (not worried about him), but our 2 starters outside are going to have to have unbelievable games. The idea is to contain T Magic and not allow the Husker running game to simply go off on us. Getting this done will force T Magic to throw and I’m confident that we will see a splash of bubble screens and jail break screens, diagnose it early and squash it. Yet if Pelini is studying the Eastern and Hawaii films, he is going to see us playing a soft cushion. The underneath routes in Pelini’s eye will be open all day. If this is true then again our mission should be to kill the big play before it has a chance to go to the house. Our secondary has to tackle well, better yet we have to tackle great. anything less then great is a big play and Nebrasks loves to build momentum with big plays.
Only one good thing has come out of our soft coverage. We haven’t given up the big play and we are 2-0. Trend or coincidence? Who care’s it’s working. The matchup is too unpredictable, I will wait til later in the week to decide who I am guessing will win. Homefield does look sexy at this point though…
All I saw was purple
You keep using the term "T-Magic" to make me spit vomit, don't you?
Damn, my eyeball tastes good.
@chrislandon
I felt the same
I couldn’t even finish the post. T magic is super lame.
by Jon Snow of House Stark on Sep 14, 2011 4:16 PM PDT up reply actions
Running ability will be especially key in the 4th quarter...
if we expect to win this game. We have to be able to run out the clock which we haven’t been able to do the first two games.
by Carne Guisada on Sep 14, 2011 11:38 AM PDT up reply actions
I thinik it’s important to realize that this was our 2nd game of the young season. And everything doesn’t run effectively on offense until probably the 4th game of the season. But I agree with your point, we have to be able to kill clock with a lead in close games.
All I saw was purple
I agree...
with no preseason, there’s always a few things that take some time to get rolling and hopefully our ability to close down games and get off the field on third downs see improvement this week so we are rolling on most/all cylinders for the conference games.
by Carne Guisada on Sep 14, 2011 4:43 PM PDT up reply actions
can we stop using yards allowed as our default pass defense metric?
I contend that the Huskies are not the worst pass defense team. Pass Efficiency isn’t a perfect metric, but it’s a lot better than just yards allowed, and in that we rank #72 (out of 120). Not great, but not the worst either.
Considering we played to aerial dominant spread teams
that’s not bad at all. I expect those numbers to improve to the 50ish range once we have the pleasure of playing UCLA, OSU, NU, and Utah. Frankly, I don’t care if we’re #121 if we keep winning. If we can gut one out in Lincoln, we have a very real shot of starting the year 6-0.
don't forget...
dominant vs. dominate (verb used as an adjective)
rediculous
various examples of apostrophe abuse
You must of been
hoeing his ex-wife’s garden.
by hairofthedawg on Sep 14, 2011 11:18 PM PDT up reply actions
your knotty!
I am obviousy not the only person in this thread who studied English at the University of Nebraska, but I am willing to bet that I am the only one who studied English twice — at UNL and at Eastern. As such, my English is doubly woeful, and it is a foregone conclusion that all your illiteracy belong to us!
… until the Ducks get here.
I've been overseas most of my life.
Sometimes I’m glad. Especially for the “Me love you long time”. Speaking of which…off to Thailand in a couple of weeks.
by hairofthedawg on Sep 15, 2011 10:22 AM PDT up reply actions
As long as we're on the subject,
• effect is a noun; affect is a verb,
• the listener (or reader) infers; the speaker (or writer) implies,
• nothing is ever between “whomever and I;” between is a preposition, and prepositions always takes an objective case, which, if we’re using the first person, is me (that’s between you and me),
• no one who “graduated high school” should have; we graduate from school; schools graduate us,
• their is a plural pronoun; it is neither an accepted nor an acceptable gender-neutral singular pronoun,
• and, ain’t is a word. It is the evolution of “am not” and properly used with the first person: I ain’t kidding.
This has been Grammar Time with Bugs. Next week, “Semi-Colons: Friend or Foe?”
please, if you would, also give a tutorial on apostrophes
Way too much apostrophe abuse out here on the interwebs.
I would if it would make a difference.
The best of us are prone to typos (especially if we’re writing about grammar (Muphry’s law)). Even when professional writers post directly to the blogs that they write for, posts usually sidestep editors and typos creep in. As readers, we read all of it, much of it grammaticality and syntactically inconsistent, and it frazzles our brains. Younger readers and writers are still learning the finer points of grammar and syntax and spelling. We learn to read and write by osmosis. Those of us who are older learned to read a standard American English from books and newspapers. The internet is teaching the digital natives a host of dialects rather than one single and consistent written dialect. The individual dialects found in the intertubes aren’t even normally consistent within themselves. I worry that many of the digital natives might not learn any kind of grammar at all. I don’t mean that they’ll learn a grammar that we old farts consider “wrong;” I mean that they may not learn any grammar and, as a consequence, lack the ability to apply a consistent set of rules to their use of language. Pragmatically, the larger worry is how our intuitive skills with language could carry over into similar learned skills, like higher math and programming and — more worrisome — designing and running football plays.
iphones are the worst thing to ever happen to apostrophes
Damn, my eyeball tastes good.
@chrislandon
Agree
I’m with kirkd on this. Pass efficiency or passer rating is much more reflective of how good a defense is as opposed to total yards. Not to bring up a sore subject, but look at Oregon’s defense last year. Pretty good, but gave up more yards due to their style of play than effectiveness of the defense. Or if people would prefer, consider basketball defense. Romar plays an up tempo game, and will give up more points than other teams. However, the team generates turnovers and lower shooting percentage. Still, the pass defense needs to improve for this team to be what we want them to be.
Benno
we are quibbling...
… yards surrendered are highly correlated to points surrendered. Pass efficiency simply puts the bias towards yards per attempt and gives the defense credit for not surrendering passing TDs and getting INTs.
Bottom line here is that UW is 103 in overall defense (yards per game) and 84th in scoring D. They are 107th in First Downs surrendered.
This is, statistically, a bad defense no matter how you cut it. Obviously, stats after two games don’t mean much, but there is no doubt that we are among the worst in the nation so far.
Damn, my eyeball tastes good.
@chrislandon
sort of
I agree our defense hasn’t been great so far this year. And I definitely agree our pass defense needs to get a lot better. We’ll find out this week if our run defense is any good, or has just not been tested so far.
But while you are correct that there is a pretty strong correlation between yards surrendered and points surrendered, you didn’t look at whether other measures feature a stronger correlation.
I have little doubt that statistically minded places like Football Outsiders have more sophisticated defensive metrics that measure pass efficiency and run efficiency into a meta-metric that is a better correlation than yards allowed.
I guess my bottom line is I object to classifying our pass defense as the ‘worst’ in the country at this point.
Agreed.
We also most likely don’t have the #7 rushing defense in the country.
It's gonna be one hell of a game in Lincoln
Attractive, Intelligent, Smart A**
by Neil Vincent Roberts on Sep 14, 2011 2:53 PM PDT reply actions
but if I’m Pelini, I’d take my physical corner play against the UW receivers until they prove they can beat you.
And leave the middle wide open for our TEs. Yah bring it on.
NE is fumbles and floaters leading to a lot of Husky points.
Support our student athletes, have faith in the coaches! "...it's how you play the game!"
Great write up Gekko!!!
This was a very entertaining read from top to bottom, like the cheerleader line because I was thinking it. This game has a feel of going one of two ways, Nebraska scores quick and often and we are somehow not ready for the situation or Huskies actually play how we think they can play and it resembles the Holiday bowl with more points scored. I think the first quarter in this thing is key and how Holt plans to call the D, I think Sark is ready for this game as the PC, but is the offense ready to execute in this environment. All I know is Saturday can’t get here soon enough
Last PAC-10 Rose Bowl winner not named USC....Washington
So, I am a little confused now...
So here I am reading Bob’s blog when I stumble on to this quote from Sark:
Asked the keys to working against press coverage he said: "It’s scheme, first of all. It’s technique second-you’ve got to use proper technique. And third is mentally, you’ve got to believe, you’ve got to know you are going to beat the guy. So when you can bring all three of those things together you’ve got a great chance.’’
He added that he thinks the Huskies are "much improved from where we were last year to where we are now’’ in beating press coverage. "It’s been a big point of emphasis for us this off-season and all the way into training camp and again into this week. We are fortunate we’ve got good press corners that can help our receivers get prepared for it.’’
No w am I reading this right? “We are fortunate we’ve got good press coners”, have I missed something this year from my seats in Husky stadium?
Last PAC-10 Rose Bowl winner not named USC....Washington
Nice job Gekko
One of the things I’m struck by now that we’re doing this for the third time is so many of the incorrect assumptions about each other’s teams are now largely gone from these conversations.
Anyway it’ll be a great measuring stick for both problems. UW needs to find out how their offense will function in a tough road environment and how good their run defense is. NU fans are looking to have their fears of an impotent offense (UTC and 3 quarters of Fresno) and a pedestrian defense (4 quarters of Fresno) assuaged.
It’s been said a hundred times that there’s no excuses if NU goes down this time. We’ve got home field and every reason to take the Huskies seriously. If NU drops this one, the alarms are going to be going off in Lincoln (not a bash on UW, but a home loss to UW combined with mediocre performances in our first two games would not bode well for our goal of making the Rose Bowl first year in the Big Ten).
"My hardest job is to convince the people of Nebraska that 10-1 is not a losing season." - Tom Osborne
No Secrets
This is going to be a mano to mano slugfest won by the team that wants it most….17.5 point spread….bet UW and the house on that.
UW Dawg Pound - SBN Seattle
by John Berkowitz on Sep 14, 2011 9:01 PM PDT up reply actions
Yeah I don't get that spread either
I mean I suppose anything can happen, but that’s true for any football game. It’s just a weird spread to me.
All I can think of when it comes to what the bettors were thinking is:
-Revenge factor
-NU showed improvement on offense
-In Lincoln
-Young UW QB
-Nebraska has a depth and athletic advantage
???
That’s grounds for NU to be a favorite, but not a huge one especially considering:
-We’re offensively reliant on big plays
-Alfonzo Dennard’s return is still a ?
-We don’t appear to be particularly good at anything on defense right now
-Especially run defense, the same place UW zinged us last December
"My hardest job is to convince the people of Nebraska that 10-1 is not a losing season." - Tom Osborne
I kind of understand it
UW on the road against a top 10 (or 11 or whatever it actually is) team.
Plus the common assumption that UW is worse without Jake Locker (if he couldn’t pass on you who can???).
Holiday Bowl was a fluke where you weren’t up for it.
Martinez back to 100%
Add in the Lincoln factor.
To the casual better who hasn’t actually watched our teams play it would seem like you would crush us. The reality will probably (I hope) be far from it.
Hit Martinez in the Mouth, Hard and Often
A bit out of character for me, but fact is that while Martinez is very quick and fast, he is NOT all that tough.
Hit him reallly hard a dozen times, and NE offense will slow to a crawl.
Best isn’t
mental breakdowns
the slip ups in the first two games are what will keep me from favoring uw in this one, not so much the lineups. mason foster seemed to me to be the factor in the holiday bowl, not to take away from #10 and #1, and we have missed him mucho in the ewu and hawaii games. but to my point, it’s the 99 yard interception return last week, the way both sides of the ball seem to let up when they gain some traction or get ahead on the board – or get a lucky break – the sort of lame seattle sports mentality of starting strong and finishing weak, that has me skeptical. nebraska is big and fast and their fans are loud. if uw plays four hard quarters they have a chance. it’s hard for me to say this, considering the smack i’ve already talked to NU friends, but i don’t think the dawgs are at a place where they can be expected to go 100% on every single down, especially in what will be as hostile an environment as pullman or eugene. uw 14 – nu 35

by 















