Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: How The Kings Beat The Coyotes: Lather, Rinse, Repeat

UW Bowling: Preview and Open Thread

A few days ago, there was an open debate raging in the comments thread about what kind of opponent UW ought to aspire to play in what appears in all likelihood to be the Alamo Bowl. With the blowouts of Texas and Oklahoma by Baylor and OkSt yesterday, we now know that the field for likely Big 12 opponents in any Alamo Bowl matchup is between the threesome of Kansas State, Baylor and Oklahoma.

So, who do you want to play?

Star-divide

1) Kansas State

K-State is the most interesting of the three options as they are the highest ranked opponent and they also may be the most favorable matchup when you lay out strength on strength analysis. K-State features a run-first offense that, statistically speaking, is among the top 30 in the nation but only ranks in the 100's in terms of passing game. Their QB, Collin Klein, is their main weapon on offense and has shown a knack for knowing when to throw and when to tuck and run. He just barely leads the team in total rushing this season, just ahead of John Hubert. This team feels like Nebraska in how it executes its offense. They've had a remarkable year under the venerable Bill Snyder who, just three years into his return to the sideline, has them knocking on the door of a BCS bowl. That said, K-State is up to its familiar tricks in terms of scheduling. Their best win is their only one against a ranked opponent (I should count Texas ... but I'm not) - a one point squeaker vs Baylor - and they lost to both the Oklahoma schools rather convincingly. In addition, if you throw out Kansas, they've had only one other game this season (Kent St) where they have won by more than 7 points. This is a team that is good - but beatable - and has benefited from a lot of breaks throughout the season. They went into this weekend ranked #11.

2) Baylor

Baylor features, in my opinion, the best player in college football this season - Robert Griffin III. RG3 has had a remarkable season throwing for nearly 4000 yards and 36 TDs on 72% accuracy. His production is better than Matt Barkley, better than Trent Richardson and, sorry, way better than Andrew Luck. He deserves the Heisman. Baylor is fifth in the nation in passing and 18th in the nation in rushing. Their running attack is built on the legs of both RG3 (650 yds, 9 TDs) and RB Terrance Ganaway - a TB who has exploded for nearly 400 yds in his last two games (Texas Tech and Texas). Defensively, Baylor is very vulnerable - ranking around 110th in total D. Looking at the schedule, their signature wins this year are squeakers against TCU (one of the best games I've ever seen) and Oklahoma while they lost to Oklahoma St, K-State and Texas A&M. A matchup against Baylor would be a preview of every Apple Cup to come that involves Mike Leach.

3) Oklahoma

Oklahoma is a team just trying to hang on. They've suffered greatly this year on the injury front with season-enders to Heisman candidate WR Ryan Broyles and RB Dominique Whaley. The absence of these playmakers has put the onus on stud QB Landry Jones - the successor of some dude named Sam Bradford. Landry has not responded well. He has not thrown a TD pass in his last three games and has just 2 TDs vs 5 INTs over his last four. On the defensive side, Oklahoma has received much criticism - but the reality of it is that OK is a pretty good defensive team and absolutely has the talent to stand up against the better offenses in college football. Oklahoma has notched some good victories this year - including a big win against #5 FSU early in the year and a convincing clown stomp of K-State midseason. But it also has three losses including getting blown out in Bedlam as well as close ones to both Baylor and Texas Tech. This Oklahoma team is playing through one of their most difficult stretches under Bob Stoops. While they may be the most "down" team of the three, they would also be the most prestigious opponent - a criterion that is very important to some of us on this blog. Given their "wounded bear" status, Oklahoma may be the most dangerous of the three possibilities.

So, who do you want? and, who do you think will get it?

Poll
If UW goes to the Alamo Bowl, who would you like to see as their opponent?
Kansas State
117 votes
Baylor
202 votes
Oklahoma
139 votes

458 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 90 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

More from UW Dawg Pound

LOI Day Impressions

Feb 2012 by John Berkowitz - 104 comments

Grading the Game - Baylor

Dec 2011 by John Berkowitz - 67 comments

Baylor - Who are these guys?

Dec 2011 by John Berkowitz - 44 comments

The Monday Morning Wash

Dec 2011 by John Berkowitz - 49 comments

Comments

Display:

Alamo Bowl

Baylor and Kansas State doesn’t turn on televisions, at least not as many as Oklahoma does. I want Boomer Sooner!

All I saw was purple

by crazidawg on Dec 4, 2011 8:15 AM PST reply actions  

Me too!

I totally agree with you crazidawg and what Gekko posted. Ok is the most prestigious of the three teams and I’m inclined to think the best of the three teams. Despite OU being dumped on against OSU last night, they are a very good team. A win over them, would be huge for Udub. I want the Sooners, then I want them to die!

by datboyeddiep on Dec 4, 2011 9:23 AM PST up reply actions  

It doesn't matter

Who or where….I’ll be there, that said, I voted Oklahoma.

by T9ODawg on Dec 4, 2011 8:23 AM PST reply actions  

I should matter

OU gets the nation’s attention, ESPN is more giddy to cover them, and when you speak of the Big 12, OU traditionally co-exists as ruler with Texas. Kasnas State and Baylor don’t move the hype meter.

All I saw was purple

by crazidawg on Dec 4, 2011 8:26 AM PST up reply actions  

Kansas State

My criteria is the team we’re most likely to beat. I know OU has struggled mightily, especially without Broyles, but I still view them as being capable of demolishing good teams (see Texas, K-State games). I don’t think our D could get RG3 off the field. Give credit to K-State for winning close games, but I view them as a 7-5ish team that just had the breaks go their way this season.

by brownypts on Dec 4, 2011 8:53 AM PST reply actions  

Ben = even according to iPhone

Damn, my eyeball tastes good.
@chrislandon

by Gekko Mojo on Dec 4, 2011 9:06 AM PST reply actions  

Baylor...

I think that could be pretty entertaining.

UW Dawg Pound - SBN Seattle

by John Berkowitz on Dec 4, 2011 9:09 AM PST reply actions  

Very entertaining

I hope it would be entertaining for us though.

Being from Texas, Baylor is the only Texas team I root for. I’ve always loved them. RG3 is almost from my hometown. I don’t want to have to end Baylor’s season with a loss. Go Dawgs!

by datboyeddiep on Dec 4, 2011 9:24 AM PST up reply actions  

Baylor Is Likely

Baylor is a big story these days, as they have finaly evolved their football program in the past few years. This is also the team that seems most likely to get the Alamo invite.

by The Dude 4 Real on Dec 4, 2011 10:04 AM PST up reply actions  

Baylor

They don’t demand your attention like Oklahoma. They’ve had one good season, that doesn’t really move the hype meter. It reminds me of a 200 Rose Bowl vs. Purdue, sort of a yawn opponent.

All I saw was purple

by crazidawg on Dec 4, 2011 10:08 AM PST up reply actions  

Baylor

Seems a little similar to UW in that they have a nice offense but can’t stop anybody. This season, their defense had games where they gave up 48, 55, 59, 39, 38 and 42 points.

Statistically, their defense is worse then ours (114th in ypg vs. 94th, 109th in ppg vs. 99th).

When I was looking this up, I found out that Kansas gave up almost 44 points a game this year. That’s pretty amazing.

by zifnab32 on Dec 4, 2011 9:18 AM PST reply actions  

Baylor's D

is horrendous! It is way worse than ours. They made Texas’ offense look good yesterday. With that being said though, their offense is top 5 quality.

by datboyeddiep on Dec 4, 2011 9:25 AM PST up reply actions  

Oklahoma!

I always want what is best for the Dawgs. Oklahoma is a very prestigious university. K St and Bayor are not. I also think OU is the better of the three teams. I understand people on this blog wanting us to play the most beatable opponenet and take a W. Me, I want the hardest opponent with a chance to get a W against them. Something that will be a staple for the Return of the Huksies!. A win against OU would be just that.

The Dawgs are going to San Antonio! That is awesome, one hour away from me here in Austin. I will be in S.A., ready to put on a purple party. Let’s go Huskies!

by datboyeddiep on Dec 4, 2011 9:29 AM PST reply actions  

Understand

But they are definitely not a better team.

by datboyeddiep on Dec 4, 2011 11:28 AM PST up reply actions  

Stupid As Stupid Can Be

Baylor beat Oklahoma…….. PERIOD!!

by The Dude 4 Real on Dec 4, 2011 6:02 PM PST up reply actions  

and Oklahoma whooped A&M & Kansas St, who both beat Baylor

Head-to-head is only one piece of the puzzle. On that day, Baylor was slightly better than Oklahoma. Over the course of the season, there’s little to distinguish them.

by kirkd on Dec 4, 2011 6:28 PM PST up reply actions  

Dude

That don’t mean anything. Any team can beat any team any day. Is Iowa St better than Ok St? Of course not, that’s the beauty of college football. Baylor all around is definitely not Oklahoma.

by datboyeddiep on Dec 6, 2011 6:31 AM PST up reply actions  

My choice(s):

1) I want Boomer Sooner!
2) the highest ranked opponenet of the three.

All I saw was purple

by crazidawg on Dec 4, 2011 10:04 AM PST reply actions  

Be careful of what you wish for

ESPN showing OK vs UW in Alamo Bowl. Do we really want all the attention that OK will bring when we get our a** handed to us by OK? I do not think we match up well against OK another blowout waiting to happen.

by lorenzothedog on Dec 4, 2011 11:17 AM PST up reply actions  

You want to play the best

In the 1984 Orange Bowl the coverage was all about the Sooners this and the Sooners that. The media practically convinced the viewership that Oklahoma was the winner prior to kickoff. Washington won. Sort of like last year’s Holiday Bowl. Going into bowl games, I will always vote to play the best available opponent. Win or lose you want the most coveted opponent.

All I saw was purple

by crazidawg on Dec 4, 2011 11:28 AM PST up reply actions  

Hell yeah

Of course! That’s how great things happen.

by datboyeddiep on Dec 4, 2011 11:30 AM PST up reply actions  

Come on man!

We will dominate whatever fool wants to come and play the Dawgs! Where is the emotion? Where is the confidence? Get it together man! We have a bowl game to play!

by datboyeddiep on Dec 4, 2011 11:29 AM PST up reply actions  

Seeing clearer now

I took off the purple shades and swore off the purple kool aid after the OSU game. Just calling it the way I see it based on the beating we took against OSU – ORE – STAN – USC and NEB. No faith in this D against a good passing team or our OL against a good D.

by lorenzothedog on Dec 4, 2011 11:48 AM PST up reply actions  

None of the three opponents is significantly better than the other...

… This attitude of being afraid to get beat is chicken shit. A chance at a signature win is rare. The consequence of a blow out – other than making you feel bad, has no practical implication, especially if the opponent was pre season #1. Upside is way better than the downside – even before you factor in the risk of a “lesser” opponent beating the crud out of us.

Damn, my eyeball tastes good.
@chrislandon

by Gekko Mojo on Dec 4, 2011 12:05 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

I HATE this apparent trend of not wanting to play good teams.

Let’s rewind a year:

“God, I can’t believe we’re playing Nebraska in the Holiday Bowl! They stomped us last time – there’s no way we’ll even come close this time. We’re gonna get blown off the field.”

by huskies2010 on Dec 4, 2011 12:23 PM PST up reply actions  

i agree OK's D is more physical than our O

but who do we match up on Kendall Wright?

i want the Okies but being a Texas bowl i see the Alamo taking Baylor.

regardless buying airfare tonight.

by PandG on Dec 4, 2011 11:30 AM PST up reply actions  

A Texas thing

I agree with you PandG, I’m sure the Alamo Bowl committee will select Baylor. A Texas-based bowl is going to pick a Texas-based school. But that doesn’t stop me from wanting an Oklahoma matchup.

All I saw was purple

by crazidawg on Dec 4, 2011 11:38 AM PST up reply actions  

Me either

I think Baylor is going to the Cotton Bowl which is the second most intriguing bowl the Big 12 has. Bring OK our way for that whooping!

by datboyeddiep on Dec 4, 2011 12:35 PM PST up reply actions  

I picked Baylor

I watched their TCU game and a couple others. RGIII is one of the most fun players to watch in the NCAA.

by Edgar for Pres on Dec 4, 2011 10:16 AM PST reply actions  

Agreed...let's be honest

Neither D is shutting anyone down but… both teams are gonna beat up the scoreboard. And it will be very interesting and entertaining from a national perspective considering the two teams.IMO..

by gliderdawg on Dec 4, 2011 12:08 PM PST up reply actions  

Oklahoma! Vengeance for.....uh....(looks it up)

2006! Yes sir, we were tied at halftime on the road in Norman, and then something happened and we ended up losing.

by Will Kier on Dec 4, 2011 12:51 PM PST reply actions  

If I were you guys

I’d want OU. Biggest name, and right now, I think most beatable. Bowl season is so fun though. I think this day might be my favorite day of the whole football season.

"My hardest job is to convince the people of Nebraska that 10-1 is not a losing season." - Tom Osborne

by jdhusker on Dec 4, 2011 1:34 PM PST reply actions  

Any At All

Baylor would be a great matchup and I would love to watch that game – Kansas State has the highest ranking but I think they are beatable and Oklahoma brings the most exposure – I ended up voting for Oklahoma but I wouldn’t be sad about any of the matchups.

Roast Duck is a delicacy.

by PurpleHeart on Dec 4, 2011 2:25 PM PST reply actions  

Picked Oklahoma because I think they have the worst offense of the 3.

I trust our offense to perform well but I don’t want to see us get scorched for 600 yards and 6 touchdowns on national TV. Plus Oklahoma is Oklahoma. And Baylor/K. State are… who again?

by JoeinFW on Dec 4, 2011 2:39 PM PST reply actions  

This should be fun.

I don’t mean that sarcastically or anything. NO DEFENSE ALLOWED.

by huskies2010 on Dec 4, 2011 3:19 PM PST reply actions  

dec 29 just so happens to be my bday

let’s hope RG3 doesn’t ruin it

by CAHusky on Dec 4, 2011 4:06 PM PST reply actions   1 recs

Over/under

If it is Baylor look for a shoot out. I think the over/under for yardage allowed by Husky D will be north of 600 – points allowed 45 and combined points 80.

by lorenzothedog on Dec 4, 2011 4:24 PM PST reply actions  

Condotta's blog is excellent.

The comments on Condotta’s blog are a cesspool.

by huskies2010 on Dec 4, 2011 6:14 PM PST up reply actions  

Ain't that the truth....

There’s maybe half a dozen posters that know their ass from their elbow.

by Hawnk on Dec 4, 2011 6:25 PM PST up reply actions  

I should've said "the comments section for anything on the Times is awful," actually.

As with most comments sections on the Internet. Sometimes I have to take a step back and realize how awesome most SBN communities are.

by huskies2010 on Dec 4, 2011 6:32 PM PST up reply actions  

Couldn't agree more.

Reading the comment section is wasting time from your life that you will NEVER be able to get back!

"Winning isn't everything, it's the only thing."
"Legends are made on the shores of Lake Washington"

by Lear Pilot on Dec 4, 2011 9:17 PM PST up reply actions  

Any Husky fan who thinks it's over

isn’t much of a fan! Right now I feel so good I’d take on LSU in a bowl. I’m confident and proud to be a Husky fan! We will smash Baylor back up I35 all the way to Waco! I only have an hour drive to the game, it will be my first Husky game ever! Very pumped man, I’ll hit RG3 myself. Don’t give me the opportunity! Let’s go Dawgs!

by datboyeddiep on Dec 5, 2011 10:53 AM PST up reply actions  

Hey...

I make a comment or two there on extremely rare occasion….

by JoeinFW on Dec 4, 2011 6:34 PM PST up reply actions  

Haha you read the times comments.

Well, you’ll know better next time.

by Drew_D on Dec 4, 2011 6:19 PM PST up reply actions  

For full list of bowls

Here it is

Last PAC-12 Rose Bowl winner not named USC....Washington

by DAWGFATHER91 on Dec 4, 2011 6:13 PM PST reply actions  

I saw that…good we’ll fly right in under everyones radar and pound Baylor just like we did Nebraska last year.

by Snostrebla on Dec 4, 2011 6:25 PM PST reply actions  

No pass rush + bad secondary = potential nightmare.

Fortunately for us, Baylor doesn’t know what defense is either.

by JoeinFW on Dec 4, 2011 6:31 PM PST reply actions  

I guess I'm just not sweating it.

… I think our secondary is serviceable and we’ll have a pretty good 1:1 matchup with Trufant vs Kendall Wright. The Dawgs have 15 practices to discover a pass rush and, may I suggest, that they look at film on how Oregon goes about getting their smallish ends in advantaged positions. they take risks, but those risks often pay off. We’ve had some good days against some good QBs in the second half – Barkley and Thomas come to mind.

All of this, of course, is secondary to stopping the run and that is going to come down to our ends and our LBs growing up a little bit. We know what our interior D-Line and MLB is going to give us.

Damn, my eyeball tastes good.
@chrislandon

by Gekko Mojo on Dec 4, 2011 6:43 PM PST up reply actions  

We've got some nice defensive parts.

Holt just has to put `em all together on the same page, at long last.

Price, Polk, ASJ, Kasen, et.al. WILL move the ball. Have a little faith.

by Hawnk on Dec 4, 2011 6:43 PM PST up reply actions  

they're even worse than we are on D

Some numbers of note:

Total Defense:
UW: 426.3 (94th)
Baylor: 477.5 (114th)

Scoring Defense:
UW: 33.3 (99th)
Baylor: 35.7 (109th)

Rush Defense:
UW: 142.6 (54th), 4.5 per rush
Baylor: 198.7 (102nd), 5.2 per rush

Pass Efficiency Defense:
UW: 136.0 (79th)
Baylor: 141.2 (95th)

Sacks By:
UW: 1.9 (56th)
Baylor: 1.6 (85th)

Total Offense:
Baylor: 571.3 (2nd)
UW: 392.3 (57th)

Scoring Offense:
Baylor: 43.5 (6th)
UW: 31.5 (36th)

Rush Offense:
Baylor: 215.1 (18th)
UW: 152.0 (67th)

Pass Efficiency Offense:
Baylor: 194.1 (1st)
UW: 153.3 (17th)

Sacks Against:
Baylor: 2.1 (70th)
UW: 2.8 (102nd)

Turnover Margin:
Baylor: +4 (32nd)
UW: +2 (42nd)

So basically UW beats Baylor in every defensive category that matters, and Baylor beats UW in every offensive category that matters. Baylor will probably be a slight favorite, but there’s no reason to think Washington can’t win this one by exploiting a terrible Baylor defense and winning the turnover battle.

by kirkd on Dec 4, 2011 6:51 PM PST up reply actions  

The Alamo Bowl: No Defense Allowed.

"Winning isn't everything, it's the only thing."
"Legends are made on the shores of Lake Washington"

by Lear Pilot on Dec 4, 2011 9:24 PM PST up reply actions  

Going to be a shoot out.

If we make Oregon State’s QB look like a Heisman candidate, I’m scared to think what an actually Heisman candidate will do to our defense!

That being said, I could see Chris Polk breaking the single game record for rushing yards!

"Winning isn't everything, it's the only thing."
"Legends are made on the shores of Lake Washington"

by Lear Pilot on Dec 4, 2011 9:20 PM PST up reply actions  

This was my choice...Two Great Offenses!

Plus two of my favorite QB’s! High energy bowl game….I’m hoping for the dance of the Polk-a!

by gliderdawg on Dec 4, 2011 6:51 PM PST reply actions  

Agreed.

"Winning isn't everything, it's the only thing."
"Legends are made on the shores of Lake Washington"

by Lear Pilot on Dec 4, 2011 9:20 PM PST up reply actions  

or even SAM

I’m not picky about which LB spot, but put him on defense first. If you watch his film, he’s a big hitter that wraps up and has good speed. I’m less impressed with his RB footage, though I wouldn’t be terribly upset if he ended up on that side (as long as he’s tried on defense first).

by kirkd on Dec 4, 2011 9:25 PM PST up reply actions  

I think it's a really good get

He has an impressive offer list (USC, UCLA, ASU, Arizona among others), has good size (~6’, 220lbs) and can run.

I’d like to see him get his first shot at LB, but if not he’ll likely end up as a big RB or FB. I think he has the potential to help us more at LB though…

by kirkd on Dec 4, 2011 8:12 PM PST up reply actions  

Wow - Just saw that Fresno St fired Pat Hill.

… that’s pretty much the end of football in Fresno. Pat Hill is a nice fall back option for a few schools (and, yes, I’m thinking about you UCLA). I can already hear Lear’s voice in my head squawking about P-Hill as a DC candidate (which is odd, since I’ve never heard Lear’s voice before).

Damn, my eyeball tastes good.
@chrislandon

by Gekko Mojo on Dec 4, 2011 7:00 PM PST reply actions  

My voice:

Did it sound like:

Terrain, Terrain, PULL UP, PULL UP . . .
or
Hey, watch this . . . .

"Winning isn't everything, it's the only thing."
"Legends are made on the shores of Lake Washington"

by Lear Pilot on Dec 4, 2011 9:22 PM PST up reply actions  

And no, I'm not a big Pat Hill fan.

He did some good things at Fresno, but never wanted him here. I’d like to see Jim Mora as DC, yes I know: Never.Gonna.Happen., but I can dream right?

"Winning isn't everything, it's the only thing."
"Legends are made on the shores of Lake Washington"

by Lear Pilot on Dec 4, 2011 9:23 PM PST up reply actions  

if Mora doesn't take a job this year...

…I wouldn’t be shocked to see him at the UW in 2013. If Sark does ever cut ties with Holt, he doesn’t exactly have a huge Rolodex built up of other assistants he’s worked with. That Mora is local and has met (if briefly) Sark before gives him a bit of an edge on other potential candidates.

by kirkd on Dec 4, 2011 9:28 PM PST up reply actions  

Where in Texas is this?

Polk footage from his Alamo bowl TD run in the 3rd Qtr? Or…4th?

by gliderdawg on Dec 5, 2011 8:09 AM PST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the UW Dawg Pound, an unofficial site for Washington Husky fans.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Learjet31a_1_jpg_small
Question of the Day:
T9odawgtest_small
A few Spring Game thoughts.
P1010006_small
Who Said College Basketball Recruiting was Supposed to be Clean?
Dubs_close_small
The Future Of Husky Basketball
Small
Updated: Arizona loses at home, Cal faceplants in style.
Dubs_close_small
PAC 12 Pickem Final Results
Dubs_close_small
UW Dawg Pound Tournament Challenge
Small
PAC 12 Tournament Tickets
Dubs_close_small
PAC 12 Pickem Results/Conference Tournament Schedule
Dubs_close_small
Tournament Challenge

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

1959_huskies_small John Berkowitz

Dubs_small thecassino

Editors

W_logo_small kirkd

New_picture_small Gekko Mojo

Beastquakerwallpaper_small Ben Knibbe

Profpic_small JLee2025

Authors

Learjet31a_1_jpg_small Lear Pilot

Dubs_close_small CODawg

Coda_head_shot_250_small S_o_Smith

2721_small ToddWilliams206

P1010006_small Randall Floyd