Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: NFL Owners Vote to Change Trade Deadline

Huskies looking for a strong finish to PAC12 schedule

For the second strait year the Huskies find themselves looking for answers after a brutal stretch in the middle of the season. The difference for this season is the Huskies ability to make themselves bowl eligible before facing the ranked teams in the PAC-12 conference. Was the Huskies initial hot start due entirely to a softer schedule, or is the team actually regressing?

 

While the Huskies started out hot record wise, there first couple of games were anything about overwhelming victories, and in retrospect gave us all a hint of what to expect later on. Not being able to blow out a division 2 team and a mediocre Hawaii team should have given us this hint this was not a top 25 team yet.

 

Washington came into the season with the looming question, 'Would Keith Price be able to take over for Jake Locker?' Even though he did not pass for a lot of yards against Eastern Washington, he was efficient, and that became the surprise story for the Huskies as the season got rolling.

Star-divide

Everyone knew about Chris Polk by this point, but the balanced passing attack directed by Price showed signs of gelling into a unit that could put up some serious numbers. The talent of the targets Price works with seems to be improved from the Locker era. The veteran receivers were playing even better, and were being pushed by the younger guys on the roster. Price also had the benefit of a real

threat at tight end, something Locker lacked his senior season.

 

Despite the loss against Nebraska, Washington really were starting to look like a top 25 team to start out the season. Although Nebraska was on the verge of a complete blow out, the Huskies fought back and were able to make it somewhat respectable in the end, showing signs that this team was mentally tougher and ready to make the next step.

 

Washington cruised through the early part of the PAC-12 schedule, and stood 5-1 when they made the trip to Palo Alto, California to meet the Stanford Cardinal. That is where this Husky team started to show that while they are an improved team, they are still not quite top 25 quality.

 

Stanford blew UW out of the water in an embarrassing 65-21 blow out, the type of game that was supposed to be behind the Huskies this season. To this teams credit, they dusted themselves off and picked up a victory against a more evenly matched opponent in Arizona.

 

The Huskies then had another chance to prove they had worked their way back into the top 25 when Oregon came to town for the final game at Husky Stadium before renovation. The game was set up to be a turnaround for the team. While the Huskies played the Ducks closer than they had in years, in the end it turned into an emotionally deflating 8th strait loss to the Ducks.

 

After an emotional loss to Oregon the Huskies traveled to Southern California with one last shot to take out a top 25 team during the 2011 regular season. Again, the Huskies came out flat and were handled easily by the Trojans, who had no lack of motivation considering the Huskies had taken the last two in the series.

 

Now as we head to the final two games of the season the Huskies are out of opportunities to show they can beat a top 25 team in the regular season. While that was a step many felt Washington would be able to make this season, the Huskies have certainly made progress this season. Beating the teams you are supposed to beat is a step along the rebuilding ladder, and the Huskies have a chance to complete that with only Oregon State and Washington State left on the schedule.

 

Make no mistake, how the Huskies do in these last two games is going to drastically affect the perception of this team. Losing even one of these final games will give credibility to the argument that the Huskies have regressed during the season. If the Huskies are able to finish the season with two victories, it will make the argument that they simply ran into more talented teams more plausible.

 

After the 5-1 start it was easy for Husky fans, and the team itself, to start dreaming big. Washington was brought back down to reality these last few weeks, but as long as they are able to finish strong, this rebuilding project is still on track. An 8-4 regular season finish with the possibility of a 9-4 season after the bowl game still shows a team that is trending upward.

 

Rebuilding can be a frustrating experience, but there a lot of positives that can be taken from this season. Washington has a chance to reaffirm those positives in these last two games, or wipe away all the goodwill they had built up before the Stanford game. Look for these Huskies to finish the season in similar fashion to the 2010 season, letting Polk and the rest of the run game lead you to a successful finish. A bowl bid might be on the line this time around, but there is plenty left to prove.

Poll
What will be the Huskies record going into Bowl Season?
8-4
151 votes
7-5
41 votes
6-6
9 votes

201 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 34 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

More from UW Dawg Pound

Dot...Dot...Dawg (5/22)

May 2012 by Gekko Mojo - 1 comment

Dot...Dot...Dawg (5/19)

May 2012 by Gekko Mojo - 2 comments

Dot...Dot...Dawg (5/18)

May 2012 by Gekko Mojo - 16 comments

Dot...Dot...Dawg (5/13)

May 2012 by Gekko Mojo - 16 comments

Comments

Display:

We pretty much already clinched a Bowl

What most of us are worried about is finishing the season 6-6 going into the bowl. I don’t want to see that. I have to say if Sarkisian keeps calling the type of games he has been calling offensively, which has been a piss poor gameplan, we will lose both of these last games. Sark has gotten too cute, too many passes, too many receiver screens. He has totally neglected the best played we have in Chris Polk. Let’s run the ball down the Beavers throats and never let them catch their breathe.

You are certainly right, any Dawg fan would love the prospect of 8-4 going into our bowl. I mean that would be awesome. Let’s go Huskies!

by datboyeddiep on Nov 18, 2011 6:13 AM PST reply actions  

I am confident

In finishing 8-4 and said before the season that was probably our ceiling. Now lets finish it up Dawgs

by CODawg on Nov 18, 2011 6:56 AM PST up reply actions  

I can't put all the blame on Sark

the O-line has been flat-out destroyed in our losses. I don’t think Polk would have been able to do much except get beaten up. I would have liked to see a little more over the top passing instead of the WR screens to the outside that just get eaten up time and time again, but I would not call the game plan “piss poor”

by SeaHuskies on Nov 18, 2011 10:21 AM PST up reply actions  

+1

Against bothe the Beavs and Cougs, establishing the running game is the key on offense. Our O-line loves to run block, and see there buddy, Chirs Polk, pile up lots of yardage. The better we run, the easier the passing game will be, as we all know that this opens things up.

Now with Nick getting the start this Saturday, the odds are really good that there are going to be a lot of hand-offs. And the fact the KP is able to get into the game if needed, is just huge. This takes a lot of pressure off both NM and Coach Sark.

This Dude is really liking our chances on Saturday.

by The Dude 4 Real on Nov 18, 2011 10:30 AM PST up reply actions  

Piss poor may sound harsh

but it is the best explaination that I can give for it. Sark was trying to set up the run with the pass, which would be fine. But Keith Price has shown, now in three big games, that he has way too much pressure being placed on him. Our best player, and I mean by far, is in the backfield. We have got to set up Keith and the passing game with Chris Polk. This will relieve a lot of the pressure on him and will keep the defense honest. Our greatest weapon is running the ball, power I formation. Sarkisian has gotten cute with weird motions and spread formations and all this other crap he has put out there. Last time I checked we are a pro style offense. Against USC we got away from that. Also piss poor describes trick plays on the first play of the game on the road when we have the best back in the nation.

I do not agree at all that the O line has been bad at run blocking. I actually think against USC they opened Chris some nice holes. On one play he almost took it to the house but someone shoestring tackled him at the last second. We only gave him the ball 9 times, OUR BEST PLAYER! Sark himself knows his gameplan was horrible against USC. If we don’t run the ball, which I doubt will happen, but if we don’t we will lose this game.

by datboyeddiep on Nov 18, 2011 10:53 AM PST up reply actions  

I think

Sarkisian was living in the moment, saw how great Keith performed early in the year, and has really gotten away from the power running style we should have been from day one. Too many passes, too many screens. Hopefully he has gotten his head outta the clouds and back down to reality.

One thing about Harbaugh at Stanford, I actually heard this on a comment on this very site before. He said that his team was going to be tough and physical, run the ball, pass to tight ends. They have been doing just that ever since. Sarkisian promised the same thing and came through, providing 4 wins to end last season. He has gotten away from what he has preached and it makes me angry! I do not like watching us in some bs spread making backwards passes to wideouts who in turn look to pass the ball downfield. My God hand the ball off!

by datboyeddiep on Nov 18, 2011 10:57 AM PST up reply actions   1 recs

Ding! Ding! Ding! I think we have a winner!?

Well put…It really IS that simple. Pound The Polk! Once it’s clear that he’s coming at you play after bell ringing play….sure,play action to your bag full of playmakers…but, until The beast is brought to the feast….you’re just tying one hand behind your back….and that’s not Jake Locker running away from the pressure!

by gliderdawg on Nov 18, 2011 11:15 AM PST up reply actions   1 recs

Good write up agree

I am back on the purple kool aid wagon again. I voted 8-4 it is all purple hart felt though my confidence is way down in this coaching staff – but I think they and the team are good enough to beat two of the bottom teams in the PAC 12 .

IMHO Sark at year end really needs to look at Holt and the entire husky D – evaluate and make a tough decision – and ask if this coaching staff can bring this program to the level to compete against the better teams.

by lorenzothedog on Nov 18, 2011 6:56 AM PST reply actions  

I think OLine is a bigger problem

Although I think youth is still playing a factor

by CODawg on Nov 18, 2011 7:05 AM PST up reply actions  

I don't think the "problem" is one unit.

It’s about getting young guys bigger and stronger (in some cases a lot bigger and stronger) and establishing some decent depth so that practices can produce some much more game-like competition.

by Sundodger on Nov 18, 2011 8:03 AM PST up reply actions  

The problem is the same that it's been for a few years running.

We have fantastic offensive skill players, up and down; a set that can run with any in the country. But while those positions are the most important on an individual basis, none of our defensive units are outstanding, and there are holes there. The offensive line is… not fantastic.

M's fan newly relocated to SF My homepage

by lailaihei on Nov 18, 2011 10:14 AM PST up reply actions  

It sounds like we have quite a few guys that redshirted that will be competing for playing time next year.

Lets hope they can add some of that depth and get playing time next year because they are THAT good and not because we are thin in their position!

"The same thing that will make you laugh will make you cry." Ray Lewis

by Carne Guisada on Nov 18, 2011 5:28 PM PST up reply actions  

on the O-line

Things ought to look a bit better next year. While we lose our best OL in Kelemete, everyone else returns a year older, and hopefully stronger. I would expect to see the following:

LT: Likely to be Micah Hatchie who will be a RS-So; he’s got big shoes to fill in a critical spot
LG: Colin Tanigawa is the incumbant and will be a RS-So; depending on what happens with the Tackle spots, you might see Erik Kohler battling Tanigawa here
C: Drew Schaefer is the incumbant and will be a RS-Sr
RG: Colin Porter is the incumbant and will be a true Jr; he might also get some time working at C as a backup to Schaefer
RT: The biggest question mark – will Erik Kohler (the incumbant) hold on to his job as a true Jr, or does he get moved inside to where he’s probably better suited? The early talk this past spring was that Ben Riva (who will be a RS-So) was looking pretty good here, but he hasn’t really gotten any significant snaps

The rest: There’s been a lot of rumbling about the coaches being excited about Dexter Charles who will be a RS-Fr next year – he might be a factor at one of the tackle spots. I think Mike Criste (will be a RS-So) has seen most of his practice work at C. Big James Atoe (will be a RS-So) has been seeing most of his work at G I believe – not sure how close he is to contending for playing time. Haven’t heard any scuttlebutt on Siosifa Tufunga (will be a RS-Fr); expectation is he’ll be an interior player.

If the Huskies land either (or both) of Josh Garnett & Zach Banner, I wouldn’t rule out the possibility that they could contend for starting jobs as true frosh. Garnett especially is going to come in particularly strong and polished, while Banner has immense physical potential. I expect we’ll sign Bern Brostek’s kid Shane, but chances are he’ll get the luxury of redshirting.

When you look at the OL moving forward, I think 2013 & 2014 are setting up to be seasons where we could feature an above-average, possibly even top-shelf OL. That 2010 OL recruiting class is going to be critical to Sark achieving the kind of success in the next couple of years that he’s hoping for.

by kirkd on Nov 18, 2011 6:15 PM PST up reply actions  

Don’t sleep on Nathan Dean.

by Snostrebla on Nov 18, 2011 10:22 PM PST up reply actions  

We need to be done with true freshmen playing on the lines.

With the very, very rare exception, those guys need to redshirt.

by Sundodger on Nov 19, 2011 9:33 AM PST up reply actions  

Could not agree more.

"Winning isn't everything, it's the only thing."
"Legends are made on the shores of Lake Washington"

by Lear Pilot on Nov 19, 2011 9:38 AM PST up reply actions  

I think Dean will be good

But I don’t expect him to play as a true freshman.

by kirkd on Nov 19, 2011 11:27 AM PST up reply actions  

Look for the Huskies to finish well

But might not look great doing it. I believe we will win both games, but they will be close. OSU is on the road, and its always tough to play on the road. Also, look for OSU to believe they can win this game after the prior showings. WSU is always a tough game, and playing it at Qwest/C-Link/Seahawks stadium means it isn’t the home game Husky stadium would be.
There are a lot of units that need to step it up. O-Line and D-Line are the obvious candidates for better play.

Benno

by Benno on Nov 18, 2011 9:33 AM PST reply actions  

If we can finish at 8-4 and then look good in a bowl game...

it will be another step toward returning to being a Top-25 team. I don’t think many picked us to win more than 8 games this year. We may have won a few of them ugly, but that’s what good teams do. Until we are back at an elite level, we have to live with the fact that if we don’t play our best game against inferior teams, they will be able to play us close. We definitely need to step it up against the top teams next year though.

Lets have a strong finish and get some momentum going into the bowl season and finish with a strong recruiting class complete with a couple of local stud linemen! Go Dawgs!!!

"The same thing that will make you laugh will make you cry." Ray Lewis

by Carne Guisada on Nov 18, 2011 9:55 AM PST reply actions  

I'm not as optimistic

about 8-4 as I was 4 weeks ago. At this point in time, 6-7 after the bowl game wouldn’t surprise me not that that is what I’d like to see…just saying.

by T9ODawg on Nov 18, 2011 10:41 AM PST reply actions  

Where is all of the sudden admiration/fear/respect for the Cougs coming from?/

I know they just won a big game against a good ASU team, but I am surprised that so many people are scared of them.

If they can replicate that kind of effort with Halliday against a good Utah defense (that now has tape on him), then I think we can start fearing the worst (Apple Cup loss). Till then, I think we still can feel good about our team being at least better than the Cougs.

But then, maybe I’m missing something about the Cougs. They have been slightly more competitive against good teams like the Furd and Oregon, but I don’t get the pessimism about this team.

Personally, I’d like to see WSU pull out a win against Utah, setting up a huge Apple game, that the Huskies can hang their cap on for the season with a win.

thisjustinlee.wordpress.com

by JLee2025 on Nov 18, 2011 10:55 AM PST up reply actions  

Getting beat up does that to you

I am very confident we can beat Wazzou. The problem is the way we played against USC. It wasn’t the loss or the final score but if you watched that game, which I know you did, it was ugly. Ugly. I mean damn, it was pathetic. It was in my opinion the worst loss in the Sarkisian era. I think we lost a lot of respect and if I was a recruit, they would have lost me on that game. It was scary to see us go down like that. Made me instantly realize where we stood, a team still rebuilding and much farther off than I realized.

I think we have got to rebound from that game. I have absolutely no doubt that Sark will get us to rebound, but it’s just scary. I’m anxiously awaiting Saturday’s game to see it.

by datboyeddiep on Nov 18, 2011 11:04 AM PST up reply actions  

And beating the Cougs should not be our prize

This was the year we knocked off a top 25 opponent. I’m always happy when we beat the Cougs but that is kinda disappointing. Hopefully we can win our Bowl game, that’s always a boost going into next season. A 9 win season? Shit that my friend is worth celebrating, no matter how ugly some of it was.

by datboyeddiep on Nov 18, 2011 11:07 AM PST up reply actions  

Winning Out

Yep, winning out the season would restore a lot of optimism and confidence. If NM has the good game that Sark and many of think he is very capable of, and we can get past the Beavs without several stress attacks, then the momentum will be good for the Apple Cup.

Then spaing the Cougs in Seattle, regardless of the stadium, would be a great way to end the regular season. If these reasonable expectations can be met, then all it takes is a top-25 match-up in a bowl game, and finaly beating a ranked team.

OMG, how sweat would that be?!

by The Dude 4 Real on Nov 18, 2011 11:42 AM PST up reply actions  

Exactly.

Besides the Utah win, though, there haven’t been any wins where I feel like we’ve risen up to the occasion and competed in a big game. The Utah game had a lot of emotion attached to it, and the Huskies rose up and flourished. That’s what I’m looking forward to if the WSU game ends up holding more meaning than just the yearly rivalry.

thisjustinlee.wordpress.com

by JLee2025 on Nov 18, 2011 11:42 AM PST up reply actions  

I agree

The Utah game Dawgs came to play. But it turned out Utah was not as good as ESPN always had put them out to be.

by datboyeddiep on Nov 19, 2011 9:50 AM PST up reply actions  

I don't fear the coogs

I fear the psyche of our team.

by T9ODawg on Nov 18, 2011 11:55 AM PST up reply actions   1 recs

Fortunately the team has a much better psyche than our fan base.

If our fan base was playing football, they wouldn’t be able to pick themselves off the mat after a bad game. Unlike the fan base, football players believe in themselves, and are much more optimistic than the general public, and these players definitely believe in their coaching staff.

The fan base has no control of the outcome of a game, which leads them to being more anxious than the players are. The players know the preparation they have put in and dwell much less on the last weeks game than the fan base does.

"The same thing that will make you laugh will make you cry." Ray Lewis

by Carne Guisada on Nov 18, 2011 1:23 PM PST up reply actions  

Well then

Why were they so timid at SC?

by T9ODawg on Nov 18, 2011 4:32 PM PST up reply actions  

I didn't see anyone playing timid.

I saw a few busted assignments for big plays, a trick play, and our inability to block on the O-line allowing them to get a big lead, and then trying to play catch-up with a back-up quarterback.

I don’t see that happening this week, although I wouldn’t be surprised if Rodgers makes a play or two.

"The same thing that will make you laugh will make you cry." Ray Lewis

by Carne Guisada on Nov 18, 2011 5:26 PM PST up reply actions  

Now that you're in your late 30's...

…I think you’re forgetting the resiliency of youth.

by Sundodger on Nov 18, 2011 2:08 PM PST up reply actions  

Yep

Real late 30’s…lol

by T9ODawg on Nov 18, 2011 4:33 PM PST up reply actions  

They looked scared to me

Not sure we were watching the same game. We played timid, scared, hid under the benches hoping that the whooping would end soon. I still think we will bounce back but we straight up didn’t come to play against USC. As a fan base we should expect to win every game. We should at least expect to be competitive against every opponent we face.

by datboyeddiep on Nov 19, 2011 9:53 AM PST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the UW Dawg Pound, an unofficial site for Washington Husky fans.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Learjet31a_1_jpg_small
Question of the Day:
T9odawgtest_small
A few Spring Game thoughts.
P1010006_small
Who Said College Basketball Recruiting was Supposed to be Clean?
Dubs_close_small
The Future Of Husky Basketball
Small
Updated: Arizona loses at home, Cal faceplants in style.
Dubs_close_small
PAC 12 Pickem Final Results
Dubs_close_small
UW Dawg Pound Tournament Challenge
Small
PAC 12 Tournament Tickets
Dubs_close_small
PAC 12 Pickem Results/Conference Tournament Schedule
Dubs_close_small
Tournament Challenge

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

1959_huskies_small John Berkowitz

Dubs_small thecassino

Editors

W_logo_small kirkd

New_picture_small Gekko Mojo

Beastquakerwallpaper_small Ben Knibbe

Profpic_small JLee2025

Authors

Learjet31a_1_jpg_small Lear Pilot

Dubs_close_small CODawg

Coda_head_shot_250_small S_o_Smith

2721_small ToddWilliams206

P1010006_small Randall Floyd