Bye Week Musings
If there ever was a week to take off to go up to Canada to do some fishing this was the week to do it. It was a great time to take a break from Husky football. I bet Sark, his staff, and the players wish that they had the same opportunity to get away from it all to recharge and forget that nightmare.
Since I have been gone I have kept up by reading the opinions of those on this blog and also over on the boards at Dawgman. There aren't a lot of happy campers and obviously there shouldn't be. The Nebraska game was a complete disaster and as Sark mentioned in his press conference some of the players to say the least didn't give the type of effort needed to make a game out of it when things started going sideways.
"One of his biggest disappointments in reviewing the Nebraska loss was some of the lapses in the team's competitive nature,'' especially as the deficit grew in the second half. Sarkisian promised that that "will never happen again'' and said it's on him to make sure that it doesn't. UW will always compete for 60 minutes from here on out I can promise you that.''
Lets face it for the first time in Sark's tenure this team quit on a Saturday. He and his staff are faced with the immediate task of repairing that. Quitting is a cancer that is hard to eliminate once it starts or in this case resurfaces.
Quitting was the hallmark of Willingham's tenure at Washington. His teams did not play up to their ability and to make matters worse they often quit when faced with adversity. More than anything else that ended his career as a football coach more than a decade earlier than he expected.
As I said above quitting is a hard habit to break and in this program it dates back to Keith Gilbertson's first season as head coach. Obviously the upper class-men in this program have only known losing and quitting because with the exception of last season those are the two things that have defined Husky Football for close to a decade.
How many of you honestly thought that Sark or any other coach would have gotten this turned around completely after only one season? There are going to be ups and downs in year two because for the most part he is playing with inherited talent which simply isn't up to par mentally or in many cases physically.
Take the offensive line for instance. This is a seasoned and veteran line. How many of these guys are keepers with the exception of Senio Kelemete? Erik Kohler is starting as a freshman. He is grading out higher than his more experienced line-mates.
What does that tell you? It shouts out that the talent they are bringing in is better than what they already have. It is just a matter of getting it seasoned and out on the field as soon as possible. Haouli Jamora is a good example of this over on the defensive side of the ball. He is outplaying guys that have been in the program for 4-5 years.
Look for the 14 players who they chose not to redshirt to get increased playing time as the season progresses. Washington is still playing for 2010 but they are doing it with an eye sharply focused on 2011 and beyond. I still think this team will win more than they lose this season but what they accomplish during the two week gap between Nebraska and USC is critical to achieving that goal.
The fan base needs to be patient because the coaching staff recognizes the problem. The first step in solving any problem is to identify it and acknowledge it. I think Sark did a pretty good job of doing that on Monday. This staff isn't trying to spin anything. They are going to address the problem and work on it till it gets fixed.
Washington is very capable of beating USC next weekend in Los Angeles. The Trojans are undefeated but struggling against weaker opponents. It is a trend that may continue tomorrow in Pullman. USC is going to win by 2-3 touchdowns but it will be a rougher than expected ride against one of the weakest teams in the BCS.
Win or lose next Saturday we need to see the return of four quality quarters of effort by every single member of this team. If that doesn't happen it is going to be a long and painful season. This team isn't talented enough to simply mail it in on game day.
The Huskies can still turn this around. They are not nearly as bad as they appeared last week. They need to give the maximum effort each week or they are going to lose the majority of games left on the schedule. If Sark can deliver on the promise that UW will compete from hear on out for 60 minutes each week this team has a good chance of rebounding during conference play and going to a minor bowl game.
I think in general with the exception of Oregon, Arizona, and Stanford the conference is down this year. I think Washington can beat teams like USC, Cal, WSU, UCLA, ASU, and even Oregon State. This season isn't over and if Washington can use this bye week to get healthy and solve some problems the Huskies can still be a factor in the conference race come November.
My advice to Husky fans is to be patient and reserve judgment on the direction this coaching staff is taking this team until the end of the season. Sark and his staff understand the urgency a lot more than the common fan does. This staff is fully vested in making this program a winner sooner than later and I sincerely believe that they will be successful over the long term.
25 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I agree 100%, John
And it has been a thought I’ve had from almost game 1. Many of these kids are either not physically or mentally up to the task put in front of them. Even with a year of Ivan Lewis and Coach Coz I don’t think many of the starters on the O-Line were going to be very good college players, the lack of athleticism is just too big and no amount of training can change that.
I’m excited from what I’ve seen from our younger players and I can’t wait to see what some of them look like in a year or two. I think we need to be patient, like you said, John, and take this all in stride as the level of athletes on our roster continues to rise.
"I call the big one Bitey."-Homer J. Simpson
by Willie Mays Haze on Sep 24, 2010 1:03 PM PDT reply actions
The fan base needs to be patient because the coaching staff recognizes the problem.
We haven’t even reached the “be patient” point yet.
What the fan base needs to do is stop with the knee-jerk reactions to every little thing that happens, right or wrong.
Progress is decidedly not linear, until you have enough data points to suggest a trend. 15 isn’t close to enough for Sarkisian, nor is 3 enough for Locker.
by Sundodger on Sep 24, 2010 1:38 PM PDT reply actions 1 recs
only 3 for Locker, huh? vs. 15 for Sark?!?
i think your thumb is on the scale there, buddy.
by 206 on Sep 24, 2010 6:06 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions
It may happen in year three...
…or 4 or 5, Who knows but I wouldn’t really count the year that he comes in, patches together what’s left of Willingham’s class and fills it with whatever is left on the board! This guy is a Mondo recruiter and that is so critical to building a program. They need support of ALL Husky fans to build that continuity. GO DAWGS!!
by doubledeucedawg on Sep 24, 2010 3:55 PM PDT reply actions
well-written John, and i actually agree...
but Fact is that NEB game was scary. This is Sark’s first true crisis and it will be a good barometer on how how good his Blueprint is.
by 206 on Sep 24, 2010 6:11 PM PDT via mobile reply actions
johnb, a quit game
I think the first one I witnessed was on Rick’s watch in Miami. After the bad start, that team literally rolled over and died.
REAL OR PRETEND FANS
I saw a quote a few days ago warning of people on this blog pretending to be Husky fans and then trashing the program, coaches and players.
I think 80 percent are Yucks fans disguised as Dawgs.
Trying to ignore them is impossible as they dominate every post.
We need posts just on recruiting updates so we can bypass the flakes.
I didn’t include Cougs as they actually have better things to do with their time.
Just another in a string of articles that shows you what a “DICK” Kiffin is.
UW Dawg Pound - SBN Seattle
by John Berkowitz on Sep 24, 2010 8:18 PM PDT up reply actions
Good points, but....
All good points today, but the frustruation was not just about the team “quitting”, let’s be honest, Sark and Holt were completely outcoached in that game. We should not have been forcing the pass game, you need to adjust to the game and to what the defense gives. We should have run Polk, Jake, and the fullback until they get out of a defense with 5-7DB’s.
Holt did not have the defense ready and should take some heat. Do we match them talent wise? No. Could we have played a lot better with a better scheme. Yes.
Fan frustration is that the team was not ready and was outcoached. It happened against BYU and happened again against Nebraska. I love the new coaching staff, but hope they learn from those two games.
by Fighting Husky on Sep 24, 2010 10:07 PM PDT reply actions
and hope they learn very quickly.
"Legends are made on the shores of Lake Washington"
"BOW DOWN TO WASHINGTON"
When your special teams allows Nebraska to start their drives around mid field most of the day it puts a lot of strain on the defense. You can pick it apart as much as you want but this was a team loss….coaches, players…everyone shares equal responsibility.
One good thing though….you don’t see any of the coaches shirking that responsibility.
UW Dawg Pound - SBN Seattle
by John Berkowitz on Sep 25, 2010 11:45 AM PDT up reply actions
I think you’ve missed the point of the post. Yes our special teams absolutely stink but that doesn’t excuse what looked like a bad game plan on offense. On defense I don’t think we could have stopped them regardless of game plan but whatever we did was merely a speed bump for NB on their way to the end zone.
Tamu and Elisara
I’m still not sold on those guys. We just don’t have the horses up front yet. Tokalahi and Patoae may end up being beasts but their freshman. This is gonna take some time. The question is can Husky fans have enough patience for this?
by doubledeucedawg on Sep 25, 2010 10:55 AM PDT reply actions
Ta'amu
Ta’amu has been respectable. He almost always commands a double-team, and still often gets push. He’s unlikely to be a guy that ever gets a lot of sacks, but if we had a decent 3-tech next to him we’d see better numbers for both. It’s a little shocking just how ineffective Elisara has been considering the attention paid to Ta’amu. I think it’s only a matter of time before Potoa’e is starting ahead of Elisara.
Habben
To me that guy hasn’t shown me anything. IMO very disappointing.
by doubledeucedawg on Sep 25, 2010 10:57 AM PDT reply actions
QB Recruit
I saw that somewhere, anybody have any info on this kid? The 4.3 40 is eye opening but I’m sure it’s one of those inflated times.
by doubledeucedawg on Sep 25, 2010 11:01 AM PDT reply actions
Me too!
While it was easy to get caught up in the hype of the preseason, something in my gut told me I’d be very happy with a 6 or 7 win season. Sark and crew performed a miracle last year in taking a 0 win team and being competitve in almost every game. Unfortunately that masked the lack of overall talent in the upper classes as I think we can all agree that the only decent class Ty recruited was his last one.
In most cases it takes at least until the 3rd year for any coach to acheive success (see James and Owens) as it takes that long to bring in the players they need to implement what they want to do and to weed out those who won’t or can’t buy in.
But it appears that we are on an up trend. I am looking forward to the day it clicks for this team. In the case of James, it did not happen until the 5th game of his 3rd year when, after a 1-3 start, they went to Eugene and destroyed the Yucks 54-0. What I would give to see history repeated!
The bye is huge like John said
But I also think the Pac 10 is stronger then last year. The Pac 10 has looked impressive in non league action and that Texas beat down was not accident. Oregon looks as good as last season, OSU looks like the same tough team, Stanford looks better this season, Arizona looks solid again, USC looks to have slipped but still very good. The teams that looked to have improved? Ucla looks very physcial and Arizona State hung close to Oregon. The Cougs are the Cougs- no need to comment.
It’s going to be a meat grinder in conference. And what I’ve seen from UDub thus far is a little unsettling. Their was so much hype coming into the season. Folks were jumping on Pac 10 contentions and Heismans. Are ya kidding? The goal right now is to put a winner on the field. 6 or 7 wins. I honestly thought that was achievable prior to the season kicking off, but it’s looking gloomier as the season takes shape. Most everybody besides Cal and WSU look to have improved. We don’t have that new and improved look about ourselves. We’ve looked awful in so many ways and it’s unsettling when all the hype was there.
We need this bye week to fix somethings, get healthy and begin a new campaign. We can’t afford to look ahead. It’s time to refocus on the little things. And from here on out we have to concentrate on the next play. One play at a time. It’s all about execution.
All I saw was purple
The Pac 10 is down
Texas beat itself by mailing it in against a lesser opponent. You give the underdog five turnovers and chances are you are going to lose.
UW Dawg Pound - SBN Seattle
by John Berkowitz on Sep 27, 2010 7:56 AM PDT up reply actions
Unfair comparison to last year
Here is something to keep in mind when judging “progress” from last year to this year in the win column:
Last year we had 7 home games compared to 6 home games this year.
This could have a huge impact on the overall outcome of the season because our guys have yet to prove they can pick up wins on the road. As much as I crave a bowl game this year, I believe that going 5-7 this year would still be considered an improvement over last year due to the extra home game we had.
A very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very minor improvement.
"Legends are made on the shores of Lake Washington"
"BOW DOWN TO WASHINGTON"

by 














