2010 Stanford Preview
by John Berkowitz on Jul 29, 2010 8:39 AM PDT
Email
PrintCardinal coach Jim Harbaugh is responsible for putting together one of the most impressive college football rebuilding jobs of the decade. In 2007 he inherited a 1-11 football team that was described during the 2006 season as being the worst the Pac 10 had seen in fifty years.
The only salve on the wound from that last Walt Harris coached season was an improbable road victory over a Ty Willingham's demoralized (suddenly senior) Washington team in Husky Stadium.
Harbaugh got the kids believing in themselves his first year. He also began to put together the kind of recruiting classes that hadn't been seen on the farm in decades. He has led the Tree to 4-8, 5-7, and finally a breakthrough 8-5 season which almost produced a Heisman Trophy winner. The campaign ended with a 31-27 loss to Oklahoma in the Sun Bowl.
The outlook is bright in 2010 but RB Toby Gerhart graduated early to move on to the NFL so Stanford will have to find a way to make up for the eye popping 1871 yards he put up rushing last season. Going into fall camp there is no defined leader and most think that the Cardinal run game this year will take a by committee (Stepfan Taylor, Jeremy Stewart and Tyler Gaffner) type of approach.
Things are fine at QB where So Andrew Luck transformed himself into a first-round NFL draft prospect after only one season. The 6-foot-4 235-pound redshirt sophomore has size, strength, agility and a solid arm. In 2009, Luck completed 56.3 percent of his passes for 14 touchdowns with 13 interceptions against only four interceptions. He also rushed for 354 yards and a pair of TDs.
Also back are wide receivers Ryan Whalen and Chris Owusu. Whalen paced the Cardinals with 57 catches for 926 yards. The more-explosive Owusu had 37 catches for 682 yards, averaging 18.4 yards per catch and hauling in a team-best five TD passes. Owusu also ranked fifth nationally in kickoff returns with a 31.5-yard average and scored three TDs.
The offensive line which manhandled Washington in 2009 returns four starters. Chase Beeler, David DeCastro, Jonathan Martin and Andrew Phillips make up one of the better lines in the conference. The Cards only allowed seven sacks last season.
Stanford was ranked 90th in the country in total defense last season. The Cardinal allowed 264.8 yards per game through the air to rank 110th in the country. Those numbers need to improve if Stanford is going to compete for a conference title in 2010. 24 year NFL assistant Vic Fangio has been brought in to remedy the situation.
Fangio installed a 3-4 defense this spring. Defensive ends Thomas Keiser and Case Baker will be outside linebackers in the new system. The inside backers include productive sophomore Shayne Skov and Owen Marecic who is moving over from FB. The talented Chike Amajoyi will also fit in as a rush backer.
The defensive backfield returns safety Delano Howell, cornerbacks Richard Sherrman and Johnson Bademosi.
Washington vs Stanford (after the jump)
The Huskies have the Cards at home so going into the season you would have to give the edge to Washington. Both teams match up well on offense. They both have mobile star quarterbacks and experienced receivers. Washington has a decided edge at RB while the Cardinal offensive line seems to be on paper better than the Huskies. For Stanford to beat Washington they need to find an alternative to Gerhart in the red zone.
On defense the Huskies have an advantage in the secondary. Washington hasn't been this deep and talented back here for a decade. The Cards have some talent at LB and want to exploit that using the 4-3. Even though Mason Foster and Cort Dennison return UW has some questions that needed to be answered at LB. The Huskies have some first and second year players that need to step up to fill out the depth. UW is basically starting all over out on the ends while the Cards return two quality starters.
Defensively the key to winning the game is putting constant pressure on Andrew Luck. Offensively the Huskies need to control the ball and take advantage of what has been a leaky Stanford pass defense. I have to give the nod to Washington by seven.
10 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Stanford was one of the teams I thought physically manhandled the Dawgs.
On both sides of the line. They probably had the best offensive line in the conference last season.
Unless the Dawgs have come a long way in shoring that up, Stanford is going to be a tough out regardless of who is carrying or throwing the ball. For either team.
They could make a run at the conference title.
Big physical line, doesn’t matter who the RB is, they will have a lot of success. Add on a good, efficient QB, could be a tough team to beat.
"Legends are made on the shores of Lake Washington"
"BOW DOWN TO WASHINGTON"
I think their running attack won’t be quite as good this year without Gerhart, but it won’t drop off by much. Gerhart was great at moving piles and breaking tackles, but if you look at their running numbers last year the backups were notching similar yards-per-carry averages to Gerhart. I attribute a lot of that to the OL and the threat of Luck’s arm.
I expect Stanford to still field a very effective running game.
Harbough using smash mouth principles
A vertical running game of toughness and grit is hard to matchup with, unless the defensive front seven is built to stop such offenses. Our defense wasn’t built to stop a roadgrader O line, nor a bulldozer runningback like Gerhart. We had problems slowing that down and so did Oklahoma as you could tell by the score of last season’s Sun Bowl.
Stanford will be a Pac 10 contender as long as Jimmy Harbough is around. That may change if RichRod doens’t pull his head out of his arss. I think many Michigan fans would love to have a Michigan Man coaching Michigan.
If some of our young beefy DTs can develope, we might be able to handle a big physical Furd O line. If we can handle the Furd O line it could potentially lead to more stops and putting Jake Locker and co. back on the field- that’s what we want in the end vs. everybody. The best defense is the one that get’s the most minutes on the sideline. The worst defense is the one that stays on the field longest, because they can’t stop anybody. Which defense are we going to have this season?
All I saw was purple
Yep
Can’t help but have a lot of respect for how Harbaugh has built that program back up from the depths of their awful 2006 season and the physical identity he’s instilled. Still remains to be seen if the success they had last year can be sustained or is an aberration, but it seems like Harbaugh is doing things the right way – recruiting very well and building off a type of football that should have long-term success.
Big key for the Cardinal is how well the defense progresses.
Also, very glad to see Randy Hart get picked up by Harbaugh
after the staff was let go at ND. One of the good guys who reputation was beaten down by TW regime.
Yep, a great hire for Stanford.
"Legends are made on the shores of Lake Washington"
"BOW DOWN TO WASHINGTON"
Comments For This Post Are Closed
Secondary Sidebar
User Tools
FanPosts
Community blog posts and discussion.
Certain photos copyright © 2012 by Associated Press or Getty Images. Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Associated Press and Getty Images is strictly prohibited.
