UW Dawg Pound: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
New Blog: Cowboy Altitude for Wyoming Fans!

Pac 10 NY blitz a success

Fifty years ago what has become the Pac 12 conference used to be pretty innovative in how they promoted the start of the conference football season. Sports writers from all over the region were flown in a jet chartered by the Pac 8 conference to take in a practice at every single school over an eight day period.

The tour allowed the writers to get an up close look at each program on the field. It also built relationships between the writers and the coaching staffs because the party started soon after practice. For the writers it was a week of serious content and hangovers. For the coaches it was the opportunity to loosen up, promote their team, and develop relationships with media.

The tour died because leadership at the newspapers and TV stations thought that the relationship was a little too cozy. If the league was paying for travel and accommodations they feared it was creating a conflict of interest. When the newspapers started picking up the tab the tradition continued for awhile but as advertising revenues dwindled the cost made the tour prohibitive.

Flash forward to 2010 and the major sports media in the country resides in New York and Los Angeles. The footprint of the nation has shrunk due to the electronic wiring of the country. Instead of the writers flying around to visit the Pac 10 is taking the coaches and top players directly to the top national and regional scribes.

Now that the New York version of the trip is finished the unanimous decision is this has been a great thing and why didn't anyone think of doing this before? Credit Oregon for thinking about Madison Avenue before anyone else in the conference did. The billboards in Times Square promoting the Ducks while drawing smirks where a great example of out of the box thinking.

Former Pac 10 Commissioner Tom Hansen didn't think out of the box. He was the last of an old guard which kept the conferences image stodgy and conservative over the last twenty-five years. Pac 10 media day became a progressive yawn under Hansen and it appeared that it would only be a matter of time until the participants just joined each other in a conference call rather than meeting together at a single venue.

Larry Scott gets it from a media perspective and that is why he was hired. He is doing all the groundwork necessary to make sure that the Pac 12 gets a fair share of national and regional tv revenue. Instead of sitting back waiting for the networks to come to him with an offer he is out beating the streets improving the visibility of the product before negotiations begin.

Scott won't get everything 100% right. There will be wins and losses along the way but the Pac 12 in only 12 months has gone from being the old Dodge mini van in the car port to being a marketing Ferrari that isn't afraid to take the game directly to the big boys on Madison Avenue.

0 recs  |  Comment 20 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Pac 12 Revolution

I think it’s about damn time we became proactive. I had grown tired of watching college football evolve while we sat and did nothing. One thing I am pleased about during the Hansen administration is that he insisted on keeping the tradition of the Rose Bowl virtually locked up for the Pac 10 and Big Ten champions as it should be.

I like Larry Scott! At first I had my doubts that a guy who was the CEO of women’s tennis could take a stangnant West-based college football league and turn it into a juggernaut league. We’re not there yet, but we are making up a lot of ground with ground breaking headlines. I have a feeling Larry Scott is going to become the most influential person in college football very soon.

All I saw was purple

by crazidawg on Jul 29, 2010 1:03 PM PDT reply actions  

yeah let's not go overboard criticizing Tom Hansen

Tom Hansen was mostly an excellent leader, college football just changed drastically during his tenure.

by 206 on Jul 29, 2010 1:39 PM PDT via mobile reply actions  

No, he really wasn't
In one a-ha moment, Scott was stunned when he learned from ESPN/ABC executives that the conference had turned down the reverse mirror option for split telecast football games on ABC. Reverse mirroring allows the portion of the country that doesn’t get a particular game on ABC to watch that game on one of ESPN’s family of networks. For example, if 33 percent of the country is getting Oregon-USC and 66 percent of the country is getting Michigan-Iowa on ABC, the east-coasters and Midwesterners who want to watch the Ducks and Trojans could simply tune to ESPN2. So instead of exposing the entire country to its product, the previous Pac-10 regime had forced Pac-10 football to remain largely a regional entity. Scott immediately corrected that mistake, telling ESPN that for the remainder of the existing contract, it could reverse mirror Pac-10 games at no extra charge

From Andy Staples. I cannot even begin to describe how stupid not mirroring is.

At the same time, every university president is also to blame for the conference falling behind.

by Brian Floyd on Jul 29, 2010 1:48 PM PDT up reply actions  

yes, not reverse-mirroring was a bad decision

I still stand by everything i wrote. The Conference of Champions proved college athletics was much more than football under his leadership…and he protected the Rose Bowl’s status from the BCS upheaval. A few bad decisions doesn’t change that.

by 206 on Jul 29, 2010 2:29 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions  

When You See...

…how much college football brings in, you realize how archaic he really was.

Washington Husky Football-Undefeated 1991 National Champions 12-0!

by dawgfan22 on Jul 29, 2010 6:46 PM PDT up reply actions  

Tom Hansen was mostly an excellent leader

by Sundodger on Jul 29, 2010 1:51 PM PDT up reply actions  

Disregard the above post.
Tom Hansen was mostly an excellent leader

What would you point to as evidence of that?

by Sundodger on Jul 29, 2010 1:52 PM PDT up reply actions  

I guess you could point to the athletic successes during his tenure

But at the same time, any great leader could parlay that into better exposure and better revenue for the conference. We had teams in the final four and football national championship frequently, it seemed, yet we had the worst TV deal and terrible exposure.

by Brian Floyd on Jul 29, 2010 2:06 PM PDT up reply actions  

From A Football Point...

…of view, and that’s where the $bucks$ are, he was stuck in the past. We needed this change and a forward thinking leader.

Washington Husky Football-Undefeated 1991 National Champions 12-0!

by dawgfan22 on Jul 29, 2010 6:50 PM PDT up reply actions  

yeah let's not go overboard criticizing Tom Hansen

Tom Hansen was mostly an excellent leader, college football just changed drastically during his tenure.

by 206 on Jul 29, 2010 1:40 PM PDT via mobile reply actions  

I agree

I think the thing that got the Pac 10 motivated to be proactive was the fact that other BCS leagues were taking in double the revenue we were. When we finally realized that their is substantial tv money to be had, Hansen abruptly retired, thus we brought in the new Pac 12 czar in Scott.

Hansen did a remarkable job, we were nationally competitive in every sport and this includes the money maker of football.

All I saw was purple

by crazidawg on Jul 29, 2010 2:26 PM PDT up reply actions  

There Is A Problem..

…when that is the case.

the fact that other BCS leagues were taking in double the revenue we were.

Washington Husky Football-Undefeated 1991 National Champions 12-0!

by dawgfan22 on Jul 29, 2010 6:51 PM PDT up reply actions  

Hansen stayed on ten years too long

IF he had retired ten years earlier he would have been venerated.

by John Berkowitz on Jul 29, 2010 2:25 PM PDT reply actions  

Your guys' inability to be objective on Hansen is stunning.

I didn’t say he was without fault.

Reality Check-
Hansen wasn’t a buffoon.
He wasn’t incompetent.
He wasn’t average.
The college presidents were extremely happy with his performance, thus his long tenure.
 
And yes he gets credit for the PAC10’s stellar athletic performance in ALL SPORTS during his tenure.

Get real guys.

by 206 on Jul 29, 2010 3:02 PM PDT via mobile reply actions  

There's Culpability There Too
The college presidents were extremely happy with his performance, thus his long tenure.

Who are we kidding here? If a CEO is bringing in half the revenue of his competitors he’s failed. Should I compare Hansen to a CEO? Probably not, but to ignore the economic realities of competing in Big Time Divison 1 Sports is ludicrous.

Washington Husky Football-Undefeated 1991 National Champions 12-0!

by dawgfan22 on Jul 29, 2010 6:56 PM PDT up reply actions  

Like I said, the college presidents were part of the problem
The college presidents were extremely happy with his performance, thus his long tenure.

As far as conference commissioners go, he was fine to begin with, but the game passed him. He was average at best, in his last 10 years.

by Brian Floyd on Jul 29, 2010 3:12 PM PDT reply actions  

He may have had a policy that reflected the presidents policy

Policy: Don’t fix it if it ain’t broken

Really what were we missing out on besides television money? Television money is what is pushing for expansion, pushing Larry Scott to go to NYC, pushing for a new Pac 10 website, pusihng for a new logo. I doubt we realized the potential of television revenue 5 years ago.

So besides the television money, what were we losing out on? We had the Rose Bowl locked in like we wanted, we have great reputations involving both academics and athletics, and we’ve competed on the national level more then any other league involving all college sports. Hansen accomplished what the university presidents wanted during his tenure.

Now if you ask the average nutty college football fan, it’s likely that they would respond as saying Hansen was a complete idiot for not expanding when everybody else did. Bottom line is that their was no reason to expand until we realized the revenue potential that could be earned thru tv contracts. Hansen did a great job and if I stand alone on that, I’m cool with it.

All I saw was purple

by crazidawg on Jul 29, 2010 4:30 PM PDT up reply actions  

It was broken

It’s not expansion, we were fine at 10. We whiffed incredibly badly on TV contracts, allowing the rest of the conferences to thrive while we toiled on the low end of the TV money. It’s not acceptable to use the excuse that he just didn’t realize the potential of television revenue. That revenue is what drives college athletics.

What he completely missed was the ability to use national television to push the product to a national level. We are a regional conference that is largely ignored by the rest of the country. Not allowing ESPN/ABC to mirror games was a monumental screw up by Hansen. It’s such a simple way to reach the rest of the country, yet was gone untapped.

If the status quo was fine with university presidents, that’s their own fault. The conference commissioner needs to lead the charge and continue to find ways for the conference to evolve in an ever changing athletic landscape. That did not happen.

by Brian Floyd on Jul 29, 2010 5:40 PM PDT up reply actions  

Taste of Hansen on the way out
Q: Will Larry Scott someday be running the Pac-12? Pac-16?

A: I don’t think. It certainly won’t be soon. The reason a conference expands is to extend or enlarge its football for football television reasons. As we learned back in the 1990s, the only real attractive place we could go was Texas. Texas then had, and likely still does, about seven percent of the nation’s television homes. The other institutions within out footprint would bring no gain. Nearby, including in the state of Utah, there aren’t enough television homes to make those institutions attractive. The prospects just aren’t there.
 
Q: Does the idea of a conference championship game cancel some of those factors?

A: Our athletic directors have looked at that, and they’re not in favor. They would rather play nine games, and play a complete schedule. In addition, and this is a big thing, they’re not interested in dividing into divisions. There is a strong desire for all our members to play in Los Angeles every year, and having one of the L.A. schools play in their stadium. They get great exposure in the second-largest market in the country, and their coaches get their teams to play in a great area for recruiting. It’s an extremely valuable thing for our schools.

The Sporting News

by John Berkowitz on Jul 29, 2010 7:12 PM PDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the UW Dawg Pound an unofficial site for Washington Husky fans.
Start posting about the Huskies »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Dawg_small
Keeping it simple stupid..
Small
My Pac 10 picks and why
Rainer_small
RECRUITING SPACE LEFT
Small
FSN Northwest: Will they show the BYU game?
New_picture_small
Gekko's Three-Putt
Scnw_logo_small
New Confrence Alignment Dynasty for 360
Learjet31a_1_jpg_small
The 2010 Husky Football Season as seen from 45,000'
Rainbow_small
Narrative of Husky Stadium remodel
Small
BYU Road Trip
Rainbow_small
Interesting comment from Locker on ESPN.

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SBNation.com Recent Stories

Boise State running back D.J. Harper (6), left, and Boise State wide receiver Titus Young (1), celebrate a Harper touchdown run during the third quarter of an NCAA college football game against Virginia Tech on Monday, Sept. 6, 2010 in Landover, Md.  (AP Photo/Evan Vucci) +14 updates

Boise States Its Case: Broncos Blow 17-Point Lead, Come Back To Beat Hokies, 33-30

Maryland's Adrian Moten (1) celebrates with fans in the stands after Maryland defeated Navy 17-14 during an NCAA college football game, Monday, Sept. 6, 2010, in Baltimore. (AP Photo/Rob Carr) +1 updates

Maryland's Goal Line Stand Stops Navy, Terps Win 17-14

TCU safety Alex Ibiloye, right, and safety Tejay Johnson, center rear, combine to knock Oregon State running back Jacquizz Rodgers (1) out of bounds just shy of the end zone in the second half of an NCAA college football game, Saturday, Sept. 4, 2010, in Arlington, Texas. TCU won 30-21. (AP Photo/Tony Gutierrez)

Inside The Pac-10: Beavers, Huskies Fall Short; Ducks,Wildcats Devastate

More from SBNation.com >


Managers

1959_huskies_small John Berkowitz

Dubs_small thecassino