2010 USC Preview
The 2000's were definitely the decade of the Trojans. USC under Pete Carroll put together one of the best runs in college football history during the past ten years. He took a storied program to a different level during his tenure and it will be quite awhile till we see that type of juggernaut put together in the Pac 10/12 again.
The party ended during the off season when Pete Carroll left to take a job with the Seattle Seahawks. The other shoe dropped when the NCAA hit the Trojans as hard or harder than anyone they have penalized in the last twenty years. The impact won't be felt on the field immediately but it will take the Trojans most of the decade to recover once scholarship reductions begin.
Lane Kiffin was named head coach after half a dozen better qualified candidates took a pass on the job. Kiffin had one controversial year at Oakland (NFL) and one at Tennessee before being handed the Trojan job.
Kiffin has most of the tools on hand to compete for a conference championship in 2010. He put together a great coaching staff led by his father Monte and former SC assistant Ed Orgeron. Collectively this staff knows how to coach and recruit at the highest level. They will be challenged immediately to motivate because USC will not be eligible for a bowl this season.
On offense the Trojans will be led by So QB Matt Barkley. Matt was an immediate starter out of high school and that was one big reason the Trojan offense struggled all year long. The other reason for the struggle was the lack of a consistent power running game to take the pressure off the young quarterback.
Barkley won't experience as many growing pains this season. Reports from spring practice were extremely positive. It seems that Matt has settled down and is no longer a deer in the headlights. He is lighter, faster, and the game has begun to slow down for him which is bad news for Trojan opponents.
Sr TB Allen Bradford returns to lead the USC running game. Uber frosh Dillon Baxter will press him for playing time immediately this fall. Baxter could be the next Reggie Bush without the sports agents. Stan Havili returns as the Pac 10's most dangerous fullback.
Sr Ron Johnson leads a talented bunch of returning wide receivers. Fr Kyle Prater has the ability to make an immediate impact. Sr Dave Ausberry has been plagued by the injury bug but has as much potential as anyone in the conference if he can stay healthy. Jr Blake Ayles will be the man at TE but Fr Xavier Grimble may push him right away if he can get the blocking schemes down.
USC has enough quality blockers to field a quality starting unit but there are depth concerns. Sr center Kris O'Dowd returns to anchor a line flanked by Sr guard Butch Lewis and Jr tackle Tyron Smith. Sr guard Zach Heberer has starting experience and So Matt Kalil looked like he nailed down a starting job at tackle this spring. Beyond the starting five USC has some serious questions if starters are injured. They don't have a lot of experienced depth.
The Trojans have experienced beef on the defensive line. They will be able to put together a good looking rotation inside while developing younger ends on the outside. JR Armond Armstead returns after an injury plagued year in 2009 to anchor one of the ends. So Nick Perry, So Wes Horton,and Jr Malik Jackson are also in the mix on the other side. On the inside Sr Jurrell Casey has AA potential, but Sr NT Christian Topou will miss the season because of a knee injury. Juniors DaJohn Harris and Hebron Fangupo will have to pick up the slack in his absence.
USC returns three starters at LB with a boatload of talent lined up behind them. Jr Chris Galippo, So Devon Kennard, Sr Michael Smith, So Jarvis Jones, Sr Michael Morgan, and Juco Shane Horton give the Trojans a two deep that most teams in the country would envy.
With all four starters gone, there will be a lot of opportunities for a relatively young group of talented defensive backs. What these guys lack in experience they may be able to make up in potential. As usual the Trojans will be reloading with kids who were HS All Americans.
So Byron Moore was moved to safety last spring. Jr Marshall Jones will likely fill the other safety spot. Sr Shareece Wright and Jr TJ Bryant are the leading candidates at the corners. Nothing is written in stone back here. Competition for all four starting positions will continue till the opener.
Washington vs USC
Can Washington beat USC?
Sure they can and the Huskies proved it last season at Husky Stadium. That being said the Huskies aren't close yet from an overall talent and depth perspective to teams like Troy. The Trojans have as much potential as Nebraska does on defense and the offense has to be better than last year given that Matt Barkley now has a year of experience under his belt.
Super frosh Dillon Baxter has the ability to come in and spark a USC running game that has been very average over the past couple of years. If USC can create more balance it will give Barkley the opportunity to use the multiple tools that surround him in the Trojan arsenal.
Beating USC or anyone in the conference on the road is always a challenge and the Huskies will be a decided underdog going into this one even if they somehow get by the opening gauntlet of BYU, Nebraska, and Syracuse. If Jake Locker is healthy Washington can stay competitive the entire game and like last year the team that plays best in the fourth quarter will win the game.
25 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
That about says it all....
Though I would add a sub-plot to the mini-drama of …. Trojan payback for last years loss? vs payback for stupid accusations of Sark trying to steal Dillon Baxter from U$C? (can I get a witness to 3 Baxter fumbles?!) Here’s to a 4-0 start!
USC is still ridiculously talented, and it will take a while before the scholarship limitations will drag the Trojans back to mortal status. I don’t think much of Lane Kiffin as a coach, but his staff is excellent. This is a team that has the talent to run the table and motivation to do so.
That said, if they stumble early, they could also mentally fall apart. Since they can’t go bowling, the best thing they can do is go undefeated and prove to the country that regardless of sanctions, they are the best team in the country. If they lose that possibility of going undefeated, it could lead to a spectacular collapse though, especially if they lose early in the season (though that appears unlikely given their schedule).
Assuming Barkley is healthy, I have a hard time seeing UW winning this game in L.A.
Ya...
I think that we will be in it in the fourth quarter….winning…well we need a few things to go our way.
On paper I think USC is a much better overall team than Nebraska…way more balance.
by John Berkowitz on Jul 3, 2010 5:18 AM PDT up reply actions
"in L.A."
that’s what worries me the most. USC isn’t going to overlook us this year, last year we woke them up and now we have their attention. Beating USC in Seattle is one thing, but it’s doesn’t happen nearly as often in LA.
"Legends are made on the shores of Lake Washington"
"BOW DOWN TO WASHINGTON"
USC is just too talented, also with it being at USC, I don't think the Huskies could pull this one out.
"I hope he arouses the fire that's dormant in the innermost recesses of my soul. I plan to face him with the zeal of a challenger."
-Ichiro on Dice-K
I think the Huskies can pull it out . . .
but you have a good point, being in LA is going to make it very, very difficult.
"Legends are made on the shores of Lake Washington"
"BOW DOWN TO WASHINGTON"
LA LA LAND
Their attendance and noise level is nowhere near Husky stadium. Then you have the lying SOS___ LK. Death penalty looming.
True, but . . .
Our record in L.A. has never been very good.
"Legends are made on the shores of Lake Washington"
"BOW DOWN TO WASHINGTON"
Hate to say this but...
…I remember a game not so long ago with Willingham at the helm that we should have won.
Washington Husky Football-Undefeated 1991 National Champions 12-0!
USC attendance
They average over 80,000 per game.
by John Berkowitz on Jul 4, 2010 10:06 AM PDT up reply actions
RANSOM
LK is holding Seantrell for ransom refusing to release him from LOI even though he lied to his face. No ethics at all at the Univ. of $$$$$$$$$. I expect a lawsuit against U$C soon or else the floodgates open.
Haha, no
The university has no obligation to release a kid from an LOI. Good luck trying to sue because of an LOI.
Yeah, I have little sympathy for Henderson on this one. He was under no obligation to sign his LOI when he did – he could’ve waited to see what penalties were handed down first, but decided instead to take Kiffin’s word.
Yeah, they clearly didn’t have much respect for the NCAA investigation. Their arrogance over the whole thing came back to bite them hard. Which is interesting, because there have been a number of Husky fans that insisted the school should’ve taken a defiant attitude with the NCAA over Neuheisel and all his incidents. The USC case would suggest that such a plan may not have worked out so well for the Huskies…
Eh, there are reasons to dog Kiffin, but the fact he hasn’t (yet) released Henderson from his LOI isn’t one of them IMO.
NCAA
We’ll see if Seantrell or his father files a complaint with the NCAA. Interesting if lying is an acceptable recruiting practice?
Theyll get laughed out of the room
Come on. Seantrel Henderson isn’t a reason to crucify Kiffin.
by Brian Floyd on Jul 3, 2010 11:10 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions
Were they really lying?
I don’t mean to sound like a lawyer, but if USC truly thought they’d skate, then they were just telling him what they honestly believed. Obviously, they were VERY wrong, but that doesn’t mean they were lying.
Disclaimer: I fully believe that Lane Kiffin and Ed Orgeron are the scum of the earth, and will say anything to get a recruit.
"Legends are made on the shores of Lake Washington"
"BOW DOWN TO WASHINGTON"
They wouldn’t release him at UW either.
by John Berkowitz on Jul 4, 2010 10:07 AM PDT up reply actions
After Four Games
I expect the Huskies to be 2-2 and would be very happy with 3-1. My expectations are that we will defeat Syracuse and lose to USC and split between BYU and Nebraska. I also expect wins against Arizona State, Stanford, Washington State, and UCLA. Losses against Oregon State and Oregon- until we can show something against them, I’m not confident in victory, though I have some hope against Oregon State.
That puts us at 6-4. The true success of our season hinges on the Arizona and California games. Both road games.
Washington has an 80% chance of bowling this year, but whether we skim by at 6-6 or have a good season at 8-4 that points to real progress will rest on us winning the games we need to win. We should have beaten Arizona State and UCLA last year, Stanford won’t have the same sort of running game(though I do expect them to be full of fight) and we should beat the Cougars. I can’t get excited about the Beaver game- though I think we have a shot, hard to get excited when they anally probed us hard last year. Oregon in Eugene is a total wash until the Huskies can show they can stop the run, which I don’t have confidence in.
We will go to Arizona this year in one of the games that I think will define our season. Last year, at home, we needed luck to win. I expect the Huskies to be improved against the pass and have a fantastic offense, but I still worried. Last year we dealt with California quite easily, but that was an aberration and I don’t believe we should expect another easy game.
Those games will define our season, but only if we beat the teams we must. 8-4 is a realistic goal, but we could sadly also see a 6-6 record. 8-4 must be the goal- 6-6 will show barely any progress from where I stand, especially when last year the team easily could have been 8-4.
I think a lot of it...
…depends on what kind of defense develops for us. The Husky offense with “Jake 3.0” gives me a ton of confidence on that side of the ball.
Washington Husky Football-Undefeated 1991 National Champions 12-0!
It is a very tough schedule so finding six or more wins will be difficult because there really isn’t any gimme’s
by John Berkowitz on Jul 4, 2010 10:09 AM PDT up reply actions

by 














