Final Trip to Mac Court
The final road trip of the season begins tonight for the Huskies with a rematch with the Oregon Ducks.
In the first meeting with the Ducks, the Huskies had no answer for Malcolm Armstead and Michael Dunigan. Since then, two big things have changed:
1) Justin Holiday has moved to the starting lineup. The Oregon game was the last game he played in that he didn't start, and since becoming a starter his minutes have gone up, and he has been shutting down Pac-10 players weekly. It will be interesting to see if the much longer Holiday (6-6) draws the assignment on Armstead (5-10), as last meeting Venoy Overton had some trouble keeping him out of the lane. Overton will get his looks, but I'd expect Holiday to match up with Armstead the majority of the time.
2) Matthew Bryan-Amaning has arrived. MBA is playing the best basketball of his career, and as of right now you could make the argument that he's as good as any big man in the conference. Additionally, Michael Dunigan is nursing a hip injury, and won't be in the starting linuep. That's a huge swing in the Huskies favor.
Oregon is a dangerous team, but struggle to put whole games together, and don't play well for long stretches. If a couple of players get hot, they can beat better teams though. Tajuan Porter (perhaps the most overrated player in the conference) is one of those shooters who if he hits 2, he can hit 10, however he's more likely to shoot his team out of the game. He offers virtually nothing aside from shooting 3 pointers, and Isaiah Thomas needs to stay in his face the entire game. If he gets by, that's fine because Porter struggles to shoot inside the arc (.357 from 2 pt.).
Take the Huskies, 82-72.
0 recs |
46 comments
|
Comments
No TV
…Can’t believe this game is the first one not on TV this season…..I heard Romar was willing to move the starting time to accomadate TV. Do you know why it didn’t make it?
Because the Ducks are terrible this year and nobody should be forced to watch them play.
Well Canzano, maybe your parents didn’t believe in you.
Addicted to Quack
by Matt Daddy on Mar 4, 2010 3:35 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
Blame FSN
They’ve done a terrible job of airing Thursday games all season. We’re just lucky that we’re one of the big market teams, as well as being one of the better teams in the conference. WSU, for instance, has had a ton of games that haven’t been aired. We’ve been pretty lucky, and are in no position to complain, though it still sucks.
Not that much longer til this awful TV deal is up though.
Thanks...
…I agree, it will be nice to move on to a better TV situation. One that is a little more profesional looking too. (ESPN)…Sometimes I feel like I am watching minor league TV on FSN. Maybe it’s just me but it sure has that feel.
by Dawgs71 on Mar 4, 2010 4:00 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
It isn't just you
FSN broadcasts are an embarrassment to all parties involved.
*Possible exception applying to Mariner games.
Does anyone know?
If there is a way to watch this game on the internet or anything?
Roast the ducks
The Dawgs played like they were on the road when they played the ducks in January. Please crush these guys on your way to an Oregon state sweep and warm up for the conference tourney. It took a long time for MBA to wake up, but I’m glad he’s on board now.
Thanks Cassino
for running score. Followed to the end. Your pregame prediction was pretty much right on.
big win – 3 more and maybe the ncaa – 4 wins we are in for sure. Big game for Qpon need another one at osu.
23 and 10
That would not be a bad record. Everyone is hating on the Pac 10 this year, but I think that the Pac 10 is much better now than it was at the start of the season.
That’s because lately they’ve only been playing against Pac 10 competition. Trust me, the Pac is TERRIBLE this year. One team should get a bid. Based on tradition, 2 might. But no one is going to much of anything in the tourney this year.
Well Canzano, maybe your parents didn’t believe in you.
Addicted to Quack
The conference isn't as bad as the media thinks
The problem is that many teams weren’t healthy in the beginning of the season, and lost some games they may have otherwise won, then they got healthy for Pac-10 play and started beating each other up.
The conference isn’t as bad as the media thinks
I’m not sure if you are trying to convince yourselves of that so that you can get your hopes up for an at large bid to the NCAA’s, but it’s just not true.
I’m sorry but when you have teams like Cal (conference champs) losing to teams like OSU, and when UW (probably 2nd best team in the Pac) loses at home to Oregon. And when a team that is on suspension from post season play is actually vying for a conference championship… this is not a good year.
I like Cal, and think they are a good team. But they would not win ANY of the other major conferences this year. The Pac is bad. They got raped of all their talent through years and years of NBA drafts. Most teams in the conference are really young. It won’t be like this for long, but right now, this conference can’t hold a candle to the Big 12, Big 10, ACC, Big East, SEC, MWC, etc.
Well Canzano, maybe your parents didn’t believe in you.
Addicted to Quack
I did, and it’s not that injuries were the main culprit to why the Pac looked terrible this year. It’s also not that we just starting beat up on each other. It’s the fact that the teams on a whole are reeeeeally young. Most of the good talent has been taken to the NBA over the last couple of years.
The upper eschelon of the Pac this year would be run of the mill teams in most other conferences.
Well Canzano, maybe your parents didn’t believe in you.
Addicted to Quack
The upper echelon of teams in the Pac
would be top 3 in the WAC or MWC and would be in the tourney. It’s the same argument about the BCS AQs. The Pac-10 is not a terrible league, there are no standout teams which causes parity. But does parity make all the teams terrible?
I still draw similarities to last years SEC
It was a 2 bid league, but MSU ran the tourney and they got 3
by cougfan on Mar 5, 2010 12:19 PM PST via mobile up reply actions
Right now according to ESPN's bracketology, Richmond is a 7 seed.
San Diego State is a 13 seed.
I don’t see how anyone can make much of a case for either being better than Washington.
I can
Look at their schedule and wins. You can make the case for both to be in.
That said, UW is higher in Pomeroys ranking. Both those teams, however, have resume building wins
by cougfan on Mar 5, 2010 4:33 PM PST via mobile up reply actions
Really?
What are SDSU’s “resume building wins”? New Mexico and UNLV? Ok, that Ill buy. After that their next best win is Arizona… strange but I recall UW beating Arizona as well, in addition to a couple teams that are better than both New Mexico and UNLV, and not to mention that even this year the Pac-10 would still murder the MWC heads up.
No way is SDSU a better at large candidate than UW.
You know how I look at rankings
And its the same as you. I look at Pomeroy and like I said, UW has a higher. I’m just saying I understand how people can perceive those two as being in
by cougfan on Mar 5, 2010 8:59 PM PST via mobile up reply actions
I dont disagree
I wouldn’t say much much better but they are better none the less. The perception of our league sucks and that’s probably why you’re seeing the bracketology you are
by cougfan on Mar 5, 2010 10:27 PM PST via mobile up reply actions
the fact that the Pac 10 has parity does not mean it is all of a sudden "bad"...
… we are still talking about the same coaches, the same talent pipelines and many of the same players that have produced several tournament teams … and a few final four teams to boot … over the past several seasons.
The locking of the Pac 10 out of the top 25 early in the season was unreasonable and created a snowball effect that kept the better Pac teams from scoring wins against their in-conference “ranked” rivals.
Several selection committee members have been quoted as saying that they expect three teams to make it from the Pac 10. Unless Cal or UW win the Tourney, I expect that this will be the case. We shall see.
Damn, my eyeball tastes good.
I think two get in
Maybe 3 but not just 1. Nobody has a resume at all. If anything, UW has a better resume than ASU strictly on the fact that they have a win over A&M. If Cal runs the tourny, though, I have no clue who the selection committee takes
by cougfan on Mar 5, 2010 12:17 PM PST via mobile up reply actions
That'll be the deathblow of the Pac for this year
if Cal runs the table. If UW/ASU manage to meet in the title game it should get us three teams in.
UW and ASU cant meet in the title game
The way its seeded now they’re playing in the semis so if that plays out the winner gets bid two I think
by cougfan on Mar 5, 2010 12:43 PM PST via mobile up reply actions
I agree with you completely Gekko
It was decided early in the season that the pac ten is terrible. Its much better now, but because of the start of the season any loss to a pac ten team looks very bad.
WOO! HOO!
The DAWGS are getting momentum at the right time! Great win!
Washington Husky Football-Undefeated 1991 National Champions 12-0!
Signs of Good O'l Days Returning
Hopefully Football is not far along.
The Tunnel is Hallowed and Sacred Ground
by bigdawgdaddy999 on Mar 5, 2010 8:01 AM PST up reply actions
Also, Quincy Pondexter went for 34.
on 14/18 shooting. 10 rebounds and 6 assists. Just though that deserved a mention.
Pac-10 POY?
POY
Quincy might of had too many hotter-than-fire and colder-than-ice games this season to be POY. He’s been more consistent than any other time in his career but it still might not be enough.
When are the votes taken? Are the coaches already putting them in?
So Quincy probably didn’t do himself any favors by putting up 7 points against WSU this past Saturday….Hopefully the coaches are all procrastinators!
The ballots are due on Sunday
I’m sure the coaches will be responsible enough to hold off on their submissions until Saturday’s games are done. (And I think the word you were looking for was “prognosticators”).
hahaha
Yes, just like those “responsible” football coaches that submit their ballots every week without ANY help.
And no, I believe he was correct with procrastinators. He’s (along with me) hoping that the coaches didn’t immediately fill out and return their ballots before Quincy had a chance to put up another huge week.
Definition of procrastinate:
To postpone or delay needlessly. I’m pretty sure that’s not the correct word. And I think coaches take their own conference’s end of season awards more seriously than the weekly top 25 poll, which consists mostly of teams they’ve never seen play.
That is sWeet!...
…great for him, being a senior and all! GO DAWGS!! Keep it rolling!
Washington Husky Football-Undefeated 1991 National Champions 12-0!
Breshers
Is it an error or did he get four fouls while only playing four minutes?

by 













