Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Ray Allen Fighting Age, Injury And His New Role

Locker vs. Wright: A small dish of revenge.

Early in the second quarter, on 4th and 1 on the USC 31-yard line, Locker ran a designed run left in the same fashion that a QB would in a traditional 3-option play, and ran for 16 yards, only it wasn't an option play.

After Locker quickly and successfully negotiated through a traffic of blockers led by Chris Polk and a gaggle of USC defenders, he had only one man to beat on the way to the end zone: Shareece Wright, who was keyed in one Locker like a missile silo.

Wright put a shoulder into Locker after he gained 16 yards, knocking him out of bounds and ending the threat of a Locker home run. I assume Wright didn't like that, because it seemed to me thereafter that he vowed not to let Locker beat them with his legs, especially on key downs, like the 4th down play that Locker had just successfully converted.

Wright's play thereafter supports this theory.

Most everyone will remember later in the quarter, the 54-yard Jake Locker run in the second quarter where Shareece Wright grabs him by the horse-collar to slow Locker down and punch the ball out from underneath Locker's arm. Most would have thought that Locker scoring on that play was close to a done deal. However, Wright prevented this.

It certainly seemed like Wright was determined not to allow Locker to score.

Many wanted a penalty on the play on Wright for grabbing the horsecollar, but the officials had it right: There was no penalty on the play. For a horse-collar penalty to be assessed, it has to be committed in the open field and a tackle must be made/completed by the horse-collar grab. (If a defender lets go before the tackle is made, he will not be penalized). In this case, the play happened in the open field, but there was no tackle that was made on the play, and therefore, no penalty. Instead, there was a forced fumble, which was ruled to have entered the endzone and out of bounds, the result being a touchback for USC.

Overall, a very excellent, excellent play by Wright.

Then perhaps a good number will remember Wright aggressively shoving Locker out of bounds later on in the same quarter on a quarterback draw where Locker took off to the left and subsequently talking trash to Locker while he was getting up and then getting right back in Locker's face to get a few words in while Locker was returning to the huddle.

A personal rivalry between Locker and Wright appeared to be brewing, though it appears that was the case more so for Wright, because Locker, as is his tendency, just let it fall off his back like a drop of rain off a duck's feathers. Locker didn't respond; he didn't say anything or do anything. He just went right back to playing. I am under the impression it would take a lot more than good forced fumble and a bit of trash talk to make Locker take things personally on the field.

However, I couldn't help but wonder that Locker had at least a hint of personal satisfaction in exacting a small bit of revenge on Wright at the end of the third quarter. Maybe he did, maybe he didn't. Nevertheless, he made Wright pay.

Star-divide

Heading into the play, the Huskies had gotten the ball with 4:36 left in the 3rd quarter on their own 32-yard line, and had drove all the way to USC's 31-yard line thanks to a couple of key plays they used to convert two long 3rd down plays, one of them being the 20-yard yard pass to Jermaine Kearse on 3rd and 14 on the previous play.

1st and 10, ball on the USC 31-yard line.

The Huskies open this play with a creative use of personnel. The formation isn't anything new under the sun; it is a 3-WR shotgun formation. The TE (Marlion Barnett) is lined up strongside left. Polk is lined up offset to Locker's right. One WR is wide left (which is Jesse Callier). The other WR's are Devin Aguilar, who is in the slot on the right, and Cody Bruns is wide right.

Far as I can recall, the Huskies have never played a single down with this personnel. I don't think anyone could have known what to expect with two halfbacks, one of them the back up HB lined up as a WR, and a back up WR. One could always go with an educated guess, and perhaps get it right, but this use of personnel forces the defensive coordinator to quickly determine whether the second HB is a decoy or a passing option.

USC goes with  4-3 man coverage with a 5-yard cushion off of the WR's.

Locker motions the WR on the left (Jesse Callier) to the right. Wright, who was on Callier, doesn't follow. Instead, he lines up next to the right DE, and the LB's shift defensive left slightly.

Ball is snapped.

The O-line pulls right. Kelemete doesn't take the DE on his side, but this is by design. He successfully helps the rest of the O-line push the pile right and create a classic pocket. This puts Barnett on the DE, who he immediately loses.

Polk recognizes this and picks him up quite successfully, which is impressive, given the size disadvantage that he had. There is now a huge hole opening up left for Locker.

Polk's block had taken place just after Locker completed his 3-step drop. Locker scans the defense quickly, and takes off "northward" and to the left, switching the ball from his right hand to his left, and holding it securely this time. Wright, who disengaged from the LOS into coverage 5 yards off and into the flat, breaks to his left towards Locker with the perfect angle. He is the only one in Locker's vicinity.

Locker sees Wright converging on him, and seeking to lose Wright, Locker stutter steps and brakes, tilts his head right, which Wright bit on, and Locker dashes left, leaving Wright vainly trying to arm-tackle Locker, before going "northward" diagonally toward the left sideline for 20 yards. 

Locker's demeanor had no change, except that he had some bounce to his step in returning to the huddle. It is open to interpretation as to whether he enjoyed doing that to Wright, but he made Wright pay on that play.

Comment 28 comments  |  1 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

More from UW Dawg Pound

Dot...Dot...Dawg (5/22)

May 2012 by Gekko Mojo - 1 comment

Dot...Dot...Dawg (5/18)

May 2012 by Gekko Mojo - 16 comments

Dot...Dot...Dawg (5/13)

May 2012 by Gekko Mojo - 16 comments

Dot...Dot...Dawg (5/12)

May 2012 by Gekko Mojo - 2 comments

Comments

Display:

No, but I wish I did.

I would be grateful for any techno wizard who could provide us with such a visual aid.

Golden!

by Carl Shinyama on Oct 3, 2010 9:58 PM PDT up reply actions  

If you can get portions of the game digitized into a .wmv, .avi, .mov or some other computer video format, I can take it into Premiere and convert it into an animated .gif.

by kirkd on Oct 3, 2010 10:36 PM PDT up reply actions  

not sure

I’d have to look online and see what options there are. I think one way would be playing the online replay from ESPN3 on your computer while running capture software like Fraps.

by kirkd on Oct 4, 2010 11:47 AM PDT up reply actions  

Seattle Times Photo's

I am pretty sure we can’t use these here. We do have permission to run AP and Getty Photo’s as long as we show the credits.

UW Dawg Pound - SBN Seattle

by John Berkowitz on Oct 4, 2010 9:03 AM PDT reply actions  

They actually used that same personnel group a few times against Nebraska.

Callier had at least one carry out of it, and Barnett had a catch.

Nice point on Polk’s block on the play you reference. Polk’s blocking is drastically underrated. He’s willing to step up and fill, whether it’s against a DB, a LB, a DE or a DT. No fear. He just gets the job done.

by Sundodger on Oct 4, 2010 9:54 AM PDT reply actions  

Thanks, I'll have to keep an eye out for that.

I just couldn’t recall Barnett, Polk, Callier, Bruns, and Aguilar ever being out on the field for the same play.

Golden!

by Carl Shinyama on Oct 4, 2010 2:24 PM PDT up reply actions  

Actually, I think I'm wrong.

I didn’t read what you wrote close enough. Substitute Kearse for Bruns, and that was a package against Nebraska. I glossed over it being Bruns the first time through.

by Sundodger on Oct 4, 2010 4:27 PM PDT up reply actions  

Patting his facemask?

This play happens with :35 left in the 3rd. But can anyone explain to me what Jake was doing after he goes out of bounds? As he is coming back on the the field he pats his facemask about 5 times, which to me looks like he is saying he is hungry and wants a hot dog.

Purple in Pullman

by Harry the Husky on Oct 4, 2010 11:03 AM PDT reply actions  

The Locker vs. Wright Issue Dates to 2007

Remember this? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jnhFY3BkXMI

As a football official myself, I’m still wondering how Wright didn’t get tossed for this hit, nearly two yards out of bounds. Gutless officiating by the two guys working the USC sideline, who were right on top of the play

by Purple Reign 91 on Oct 4, 2010 1:07 PM PDT reply actions  

thug hit indeed

If officials really want to protect players from unnecessary hits and injuries, this would be the sort of thing worthy of ejection. Wright barely had his right foot inbounds and his left foot well out of bounds when he broke down for his hit on Locker, and he turned to his left to deliver the blow. Wright should have known he was clearly out of bounds as he was about to deliver the hit, and if he didn’t, getting ejected would have driven the point home to him that he should know.

He’s a great talent, but he’s also dirty and somewhat out of control. He’d be perfect on a Dennis Erickson team…

by kirkd on Oct 4, 2010 1:34 PM PDT up reply actions  

He would be perfect on our team.

We somebody nasty on defense.

We lack an enforcer.

UW Dawg Pound - SBN Seattle

by John Berkowitz on Oct 4, 2010 2:30 PM PDT up reply actions  

Enforcers are fine...

dangerous and dirty players like Wright are not. There is a distinct pattern of late hits dating back to 2007…and not just Locker.

I like Vontaze Burfict in that role, he hits late a bit, but it’s mostly clean hustle plays. He just hurts ASU with penalties alot. After last years game I’m pretty sure I’m the only UW fan with that take on him though.

by B Money on Oct 4, 2010 3:04 PM PDT up reply actions  

An enforcer at the corner back position...

What a concept.

I’m not sure I agree with you about Wright’s hit, kirkd. It deserved a flag, and it got one. Requiring that an aggressive player look down to see that he’s 18 inches out of bounds in the fraction of a second between Locker heading down the sideline to pick up additional yardage, and pulling to his right and out of bounds is a bit much. Not only that, but you’re making Wright lower his head to look, which puts both he and Locker at increased risk of injury.

Is Wright out of control? Maybe, a bit. But I don’t think he’s dirty. He’s aggressive as hell, though, there’s no doubt. I used to be okay with a few of those a year when the Dawgs played like that (“To the echo of the whistle”), and I would be again if they ever get that kind of intensity.

by Sundodger on Oct 4, 2010 4:37 PM PDT up reply actions  

we'll disagree on this one

I’d be shocked if Wright didn’t have enough awareness to know where he was and the situation – he was clearly looking to deliver a blow even if he knew it was against the rules.

The new rule this year about targeting is a tougher one for a player IMO. I’m thinking back to the play in the USC/Hawaii game when the Warrior starting QB was knocked out. That was a bang-bang play where the QB cut back into the path of the LB, and I don’t think there was a damn thing the kid could have done to prevent hitting him around the head. IMO, if that kind of thing is going to be a point of emphasis for officials, then hits like Wright’s should be punishable by ejection.

I like hard-nosed players, but that hit by Wright was crossing a line (literally).

by kirkd on Oct 4, 2010 6:48 PM PDT up reply actions  

Wright knew EXACTLY where he was

The coaches box is three yards wide…Locker was two yards out of bounds, had clearly turned out, and had pulled up. I’ve been officiating football since 1989, and NEVER had a hit like that, so far out of bounds. Players know where they are, and Wright didn’t have to look down. That’s why—as an official—I was disgusted that Wright wasn’t tossed.

In any event, he is an enforcer, and I had no problem with anything he did last Saturday. Good, hard-nosed football that says “you come this way, you’re losing your helmet”, the likes of which I honestly don’t think we’ve seen in Purple and Gold since Tony Parrish and Lawyer Milloy.

by Purple Reign 91 on Oct 4, 2010 8:47 PM PDT up reply actions  

If they would've tossed him, I wouldn't have argued against it.

And I won’t make too big a stink that they didn’t. It was close.

It’s tough to judge intent, though. I fully agree with you that Wright’s intent was to deliver a big hit on a guy, even though he was close to the sidleines and the smart play was probably to let up. I don’t think the intent was dirty, though. He began the act of making the tackle right as Locker was cutting out of bounds. Locker’s foot just touches the sideline prior to the contact between the two. There was a split second for Wright to decide to continue with the blow or pull back. He made the wrong choice. Really, the fact that Wright’s foot is out of bounds is of little consequence, as he took the right football position (a broad base) to make the tackle.

I probably have as big a problem with the fact that Wright went at Locker’s head as I do with the lateness of the hit. Maybe that compounds the issue to you.

Like you said, we can disagree on this. I just don’t see this one as falling into the category of “thug hit.”

by Sundodger on Oct 5, 2010 11:47 AM PDT up reply actions  

check these out

A little something I put together after that game as my suggestion for new/retro uniforms:

Alternate version, adding a stripe to the helmet:

Also, I would change the material on the pants to provide more sheen to really look like gold instead of the current flat “prairie tan” look we have. See UCLA’s pants as an example of the color and sheen we should be going for.

by kirkd on Oct 4, 2010 3:38 PM PDT up reply actions  

I like it better without the stripe.

A few alternate unis’ are always fun. We need more choices al ’la Oregon…..just not that extreme.

Semper Fi'
WatchKalibRun.com
Pain don't hurt...

by RolloTomasi on Oct 4, 2010 4:10 PM PDT up reply actions  

Now THAT's what I'm talking about!

I like the helmet better without the stripe :)

Gold numbers works better, methinks.

Golden!

by Carl Shinyama on Oct 4, 2010 4:36 PM PDT up reply actions  

yep

In that 2nd one with DTN, I tried to color correct the numbers to more of a gold. But I loved the dark jerseys that night, though I admit it may be tough to do a purple that dark in a jersey (issues with the color dyes apparently). I also loved the old-school number font, and the simplicity of everything. Have to have the block “W” on the helmet though – that’s a classic that shouldn’t ever go away.

by kirkd on Oct 4, 2010 6:51 PM PDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the UW Dawg Pound, an unofficial site for Washington Husky fans.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Learjet31a_1_jpg_small
Question of the Day:
T9odawgtest_small
A few Spring Game thoughts.
P1010006_small
Who Said College Basketball Recruiting was Supposed to be Clean?
Dubs_close_small
The Future Of Husky Basketball
Small
Updated: Arizona loses at home, Cal faceplants in style.
Dubs_close_small
PAC 12 Pickem Final Results
Dubs_close_small
UW Dawg Pound Tournament Challenge
Small
PAC 12 Tournament Tickets
Dubs_close_small
PAC 12 Pickem Results/Conference Tournament Schedule
Dubs_close_small
Tournament Challenge

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

1959_huskies_small John Berkowitz

Dubs_small thecassino

Editors

W_logo_small kirkd

New_picture_small Gekko Mojo

Beastquakerwallpaper_small Ben Knibbe

Profpic_small JLee2025

Authors

Learjet31a_1_jpg_small Lear Pilot

Dubs_close_small CODawg

Coda_head_shot_250_small S_o_Smith

2721_small ToddWilliams206

P1010006_small Randall Floyd