The Monday Morning Wash
We all were seeing the light at the end of the tunnel after the USC game. Some of us even thought we had come out on the other side of the tunnel. Well...word on the street is we are still in the tunnel and that bright light we saw was actually a freight train by the name of Toby Gerhart who put together a career high of 200 yards on 27 carries on Saturday night.
Gerhart is a decent back but he doesn't conjure up images of greatness in anyones mind. Washington's defense made him look great on Saturday by being out of position, not tackling well, and simply being out worked by a very physical Stanford defensive line. Lowell Cohn of the Santa Rosa Press Democrat describes Gerhart this way.
He is not as fast as a sprinter or as pretty as a ballet dancer or as lyrical as a poet. He’s just a good, hard runner — exactly what he’s supposed to be. He gets the ball and runs forward — no deception — and when it seems all those defenders adhering to him are about to nail him, he moves an inch or two and falls in behind his blocker and finds a crease or a tiny lane — whatever you want to call it — and somehow it’s him and the linebackers and maybe the defensive backs and they grab him, but grabbing him hurts and he drags them a while on his back and legs — you imagine the sound of grunting — and he falls down, but not before he’s got gobs of yards. And he does that again and again and again. Run, hurt, fall down.
In my preview I figured that Gerhart would get his 100 yards. I felt if UW limited him to around 100 yards on thirty carries it would switch the burden of winning the game over to QB Andrew Luck. The funny thing that happened on the way to the forum was Gephart had his 100 done by early in the second quarter and finished with 200 for the game. In addition to Gephart the Cardinal were able to find another 100 and some odd on the ground which controlled the clock to Stanford's advantage the entire game.
Washington had faced three pretty good running teams previously. They did very well against LSU and Idaho. They had a poor first quarter against USC but rebounded with three strong quarters. Washington didn't have the answers in this one and it produced four quarters of bad run defense. We all waited for Washington adjust but it didn't happen. This game may not have been about making the proper adjustments. It was about getting your ass kicked by a physical offensive line.
Amazingly enough Stanford only scored 34 points during the evening. That should have given Jake Locker enough leeway to pull it out or at least make it interesting for his team. What Jake came up with was three turnovers and enough passes off the mark to render his first round 2010 draft status moot. The Washington offense only scored seven points. Going into this game the plan should have been to attack a questionable Stanford secondary. The offensive line didn't give Jake enough time or Chris Polk enough room to get anything going. When there was time Jake didn't deliver the ball where it needed to be.
The offensive game plan was pretty conservative. I questioned it for awhile last week but why mention it after a 16-13 win over what may have been the best team in the country. This week is the time for questions. Washington kept going to the same hole too many times on running plays. They didn't attempt to spread out the field and let Jake throw on the run when the pressure up the middle was hampering the pro set. It wasn't Steve Sarkisian's greatest moment as a play caller. We didn't see them try to stretch the field horizontally or vertically to loosen up the Stanford defense. We didn't see them use Jake's legs effectively to counter the problems Polk was having running up the middle.
Jake was simply off on Saturday but he didn't get a lot of help from his receivers in terms of getting open or coming back for the ball. For some reason the entire offensive unit was out of sync most of the night. The turnovers of course are unexcusable but the lack of running was surprising and makes me think he has become a bit gun shy. Jake staying healthy for the long haul is the most important thing for this team but he needs to flash his wheels more on a night when things aren't working. Tough to say if that is a coaching decision or a Jake decision.
In the end of course it really isn't the play calling. It is the simple execution of running the plays that were called correctly. Washington was a couple of steps slow on both sides of the ball last night. Obviously the USC game took a lot out of them physically and mentally. The Dawgs only had so much left in the tank for this one. The minute they kicked the ball directly to Chris Owusu to start the game you knew the entire team wasn't going to exactly click on Saturday night.
When games like this happen, and they will continue to happen until Washington upgrades its overall talent base, it is simply time to regroup, watch film, and prepare to fight a better battle the next weekend. Most of us would have been thrilled in the pre-season to be 2-2 at this point. This team still has a good chance to win four more games this season and become bowl eligible.
Bad Stat of the Week
The weekly NCAA stats released Sunday had UW ranked last in the Pac-10 and 106th in the nation in run defense, allowing 195.75 yards per game and 5.8 per attempt.
Quote of the Week
Nick Holt:
"It's hard because you need more bodies, but you've got to play with what you have," Holt said. "So we've got to get what we have better because we can't make new ones. It's hard to see where the breakdown was all the time. But we just got blocked and stayed blocked and didn't do a very good job up front. The front four and the linebackers are getting blocked, and it starts up front."
Second best quote of the Week
Steve Sarkisian:"We needed to help our defense more and keep them off the field and we weren't able to that tonight,"
Ancient quote of the Week
“I don’t miss football. Sleep comes easily now, and I get up when I choose. The pressure, and it was terrific, is gone now. Sometimes I think football has gotten out of hand. I prefer the old-fashioned way when the game was played not so much for the gate receipts, but for itself.” ---- Gil Dobie
Around the Pac Ten
Parity is the Pac 10 Conference keyword this week. Anyone can beat anyone on a given week. No game was more surprising than Oregon's domination of California at Autzen Stadium. The Bears were exposed big time in this one. we all knew it had the makings of a trap game but nobody predicted domination.
It has been a long time since a two or three loss team won the conference but this could be that type of year. Home field advantage is going to be a deciding factor in a lot of games this season.
Oregon 42 California 3
Jeremiah Masoli threw for 253 yards and three touchdowns in Oregon's 42-3 upset of sixth-ranked California on Saturday. He completed 21 of 25 passes for the Ducks who had 524 yards in total offense! The former Heisman front runner Jahvid Best was held to only 55 yards and the Duck defense only allowed the Bears 206 total yards.
Georgia 20 Arizona State 17
The Bulldogs appeared headed for an easy one, racing to a 14-3 lead in the first quarter, but they committed three turnovers after halftime, two of which led to touchdowns for Arizona State. The Sun Devils led 17-14 heading to the fourth quarter after Jarrell Holman returned an interception 47 yards for a score. With the score tied at 17 Georgia blocked an ASU FG attempt which would have given the Sun Devils the lead with 5:30 remaining. Georgia drove back down the field and Blair Walsh kicked a 37-yard field goal for the Bulldogs as time ran out.
Arizona 37 Oregon State 32
Nick Foles passed for 254 yards and three touchdowns in his first start and the Arizona Wildcats shrugged off the loss of leading rusher Nic Grigsby to beat Oregon State 37-32 Saturday in the Pac-10 opener for both teams. Two turnovers for the Beavers ended up being the deciding factor in the game on offense. Defensively OSU couldn't stop a team with a new starting QB stripped of its two best complimentary tools. The Beavers are 109th in the country in passing defense.
USC 27 Washington State 6
Matt Barkley threw two long touchdown passes in 9 seconds during the first quarter on the way to 247 yards passing, and USC rebounded from its latest upset loss with a 27-6 win over Washington State. I don't think anyone in LA would have been happy with less than 40 points. The whispering about the Trojan offense wil continue another week.
Pac 10 Power Ratings
1.Stanford...The Cardinal are on top of the conference standings and the way they dominated Washington indicates they will be hanging around there the rest of the season. They have too many holes to run the slate but if teams can't slow down their running attack they are going to lose to these guys. Up next is UCLA at home. Can they draw 40,000 next week?
2. USC...The Trojans have some problems on offense and most of us were surprised by the low score of the WSU game. USC still has the best overall talent in the conference but they may lose a few more games this season. Next up is Cal on the road in a game that has lost some of its early season luster. We are talking must win for both schools.
3. Oregon...Who saw this one coming? Everyone had the Ducks ranked near the bottom of the conference till this weeks dominating win over California. The Ducks seemed to put it all together on both sides of the ball for the first time this season which is bad news for conference opponents. They have an exhibition game at home this week against WSU.
4. Arizona...Nice way to bounce back on the road after a tough loss in the Midwest. No way on paper the Wildcats win this game but they did. Oregon State made Nick Foles look like a Heisman candidate. The Widcats get a week off to prepare for a key game on the road against Washington.
5. California...Nobody saw this coming but I haven't been impressed with Cal's QB play or their defense. The Ducks stopped Jahvid Best and the Bears folded like an accordion. Cal has to avoid falling into an emotional slide that has plauged them the last couple of years. They get USC at home this weekend. Win it and they can salvage the season. Lose it and that emotional slide may be tough to prevent.
6. Washington...One week you are on top of the college football world and the next week you are back in the proverbial toilet. There will be better days for the Huskies. Fans have to keep in mind that there is a lot of parity in the conference this season. Washington isn't is bad as they looked on Saturday and they aren't as good as they looked like against USC. Next up is a Notre Dame team that is struggling but still finding a way to win games. Will Charlie Weis be smart enough to run the ball 40 times?
7. Arizona State...We found out that the Sun Devils can go on the road and compete in a big game against an intersectional rival. Beating that rival is a completely different thing. A blocked field goal kept ASU from pulling off an upset. Lets see how they do against Oregon State before we start moving them back into the first division.
8. UCLA...The Bruins had a bye this week while waiting to get beaten by Stanford this upcoming weekend.
9. Oregon State...Allowing Arizona to score 37 points on you at home is proof that the Beavers are rebuilding and not reloading on defense. Up next is ASU in Tempe. The Beaver offense needs to stop making mistakes and the defense simply has to start stopping someone.
10. Washington State...Holding the Trojans to under 30 points at home is a moral victory. The Coug's face Oregon next in Autzen in a season that should be named the Trail of Tears.
Pac Ten Offensive Player of the Week
TE Ed Dickson from Oregon - Dickson caught 11 passes for 148 yards and 3 touchdowns.
Pac Ten Defensive Player of the Week
The entire Oregon defense for holding Cal to only three points.
Husky Offensive Player of the Week
Jermaine Kearse continues to make clutch catches in an otherwise uninspired game for the Washington offense.
Husky Defensive Player of the Week
This is a real tough one. I think we will pass until next week. Chances are it was not one of the defensive lineman.
85 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Husky Stadium
I couldn’t help but think back to years ago when the Huskies played so much better at home than on the road. Just wondering how much of a factor that was? Especially after coming off that huge emotional win against U$C. I certainly hope that is part of the answer why the DAWGS played so poorly against the trees. Plenty to work on this week on ALL sides of the ball! GO DAWGS!!
Washington Husky Football-Undefeated 1991 National Champions 12-0!
cal v usc this weekend
a game which will relegate the loser to the Sun or lower bowl. The winner still has a chance particularly if its USC as they still get a shot at the ducks and the furd. And like last weeks game between zero and Kal, I really could care less who wins as the loser will slde down into the pack. The domination by Oregon surprised me too. Guess they had a good scout team running back (LGB) simulating Best. I think the Furd will expose the Bruins like we were. You said it perfectly, johnb, an ass thumping. It was like Corey Dillon against San Jose, trouble was we were SJSU.
Wow Prrbrr
I don’t think two losses will do that this year….three probably will.
by John Berkowitz on Sep 28, 2009 11:22 AM PDT up reply actions
My Perspective in League
John I think the team that manages success through out the season best will eventually win the Pac 10 title and I think that team will again be USC. I think Troy will win out the rest of the season.
Someone needs to knock off the ducks again! This team was shown the door early in the season and have crept back in the house. Cal is licking some wounds as are we. Don’t know much about the Arizona schools nor Oregon State. Ucla could be a darkhorse, but without a proven QB it’s not promising. And Washington State should consider playing in the Big Sky next season. Eastern Washington would rival them in the talent category.
Other then that, HuskyNation should be ticked off! We lost a game that should’ve been our 3rd victory closing on 6+. Besides WSU it doesn’t appear to be getting any easier, to the point we are going to have to lean on winning games at home.
As of now, every Pac 10 team has lost the weekend following success. The team that can manage success the best will eventually win the Pac 10 title. It will be USC.
All I saw was purple
My money would have to be on SC for a few reasons
1. They have more overall talent than anyone else.
2. They know how to win and are used to overcoming adversity.
3. Matt Barkley will continue to improve at QB.
4. Pete Carroll has a long history of not losing in November. This confeence should be wide open till November.
On a side note California has a very good chance of beating the Trojans on their home field this weekend.
by John Berkowitz on Sep 28, 2009 11:25 AM PDT up reply actions
USC at Cal will definitely be a litmus test for both those teams in the Pac 10
I think Cal could come in hungry and pissed off after what Oregon did to them this weekend, and USC looked totally disinterested in the 2nd half versus WSU. Although, Crazi you said it right…this is USC and they know how to win the Pac.
Stanford showed me something against UW. That run game is scary, and when Gerhart gets a head of steam he is tough to bring down. They have a pretty favorable schedule too with only USC on the road.
WIDE OPEN Pac 10. Should make for an entertaining season.
Matt...I would pick Cal
I haven’t made my predictions yet but I am really leaning towards Cal right now.
When we allowed idaho to score too many points in my gut I felt Idaho was good…funny but they are good…not BCS good…but good enough to finish second in the WAC.
That brings me to Stanford…I think they might be really good. I also think that Washington matched up with them poorly and they crushed us because of it. Matchups and hme field advantage are key this year when so many teams are so even.
Just developing into a fascinating year in the Pac 10.
by John Berkowitz on Sep 28, 2009 2:21 PM PDT up reply actions
WSU vs. USC?
I didn’t see it, and have yet to see a good post-mortem. Why after the first quarter was the game essentially a draw? Were the Cougs that good? Was SC that bad? Did they play their reserves the last 45 minutes? Just seeing the box score makes me wonder if SC will be the underachiever of the year?
USC
The Trojans are really having a problem getting their offense rolling. Carroll is keeping it simple and relying on his defense to get it done until the offense catches up. If they don’t turn it over they will win the majority of games they play until the offense gets back on track.
Think of UW in 1984…they finished #2 in the country without really having an offense.
by John Berkowitz on Sep 28, 2009 2:16 PM PDT up reply actions
yeah i think cal will have a good week of practice and come out executing well against sc. the sc defense just doesn’t have that “killer instinct” from previous years and when you combine that with an anemic offense it could be a long day come saturday.
Cal can be very good....
I think they match up really well against USC. I don’t think the Trojans can outscore them if they get back on track offensively.
by John Berkowitz on Sep 28, 2009 2:57 PM PDT up reply actions
Cal has something to prove...
…after that fiasco up in Eugene.
Washington Husky Football-Undefeated 1991 National Champions 12-0!
WSU if I'm not mistaken...
…didn’t score until 2 seconds before the end of the game.
Washington Husky Football-Undefeated 1991 National Champions 12-0!
Crazi's Prediction: Cal gets lit up at home
I’m not impressed with Cal. Riley is an unproven comodity and gets aggrivated when pressured. Look for SC to deploy as much pressure on Riley as possible. Javid Best is a fine back, but if any defense can get gap control- Best is a non-factor.
All I saw was purple
Holt
… I can’t help but to be irritated by the second reference to “bullets” that he’s made in the last few weeks. I excused the first reference as a coach not used to having a mic in his face and not thinking before talking. To say essentially the same thing a second time looks a lot like scapegoating to me. The personnel was known to Holt before he got here. Either take responsibility or ignore the question with some kind of cliche response. We all know what the situation is out there. There is no need for a coach to slam his own personnel in the media in this way. Holt needs to clean up his act when speaking to the media.
Damn, my eyeball tastes good.
Bullets
It certainly is a fine line and one that really turned off a lot of people when Willingham mentioned it.
I have to agree with you on this one. You can think it…we all know it is obvious…but maybe it is better off not said.
by John Berkowitz on Sep 28, 2009 2:59 PM PDT up reply actions
Hmmmm
Maybe Sark will have to give Holt some PR lessons.
Once was enough of the reference to personnel comment.
Yep
Holt isn’t exactly Mr Polish even thoughhe bears a striking resembalnce to Mr. Clean.
You would think after the first time it slipped it would have been addressed. I don’t disagree with the statement. It just needs to be left unsaid. Saying it doesn’t make Holt or the team look better.
With Willingham it was more of a joke because he was responsible for the empty chambers in the gun. He was saying stuff like that up till the day he left.
by John Berkowitz on Sep 28, 2009 3:09 PM PDT up reply actions
Holt
has alluded to not having enough “bullets” in interviews twice now. Personally, I don’t have a huge problem with him doing it because he didn’t recruit these guys….If he is still playing the “bullets” card in year 3 or 4 I’ll have a BIG problem with it as they would be mostly his recruits by then.
Completely agree
But how will his defensive players respond to this is the real question.
All I saw was purple
Aside from response to his statements,
Nick Holt is the most intimidating man I’ve ever seen.
Addicted To Quack [dot] com; Six-hundred and ninety-four yards of total offense.
Actually
he said they need more bodies not bullets but it still means the same thing….Ty left the cupboard bare.
and I, like crazi, wonder how the players will respond.
We complained last season of players not getting off blocks, etc and saw more of the same last Sat.
Maybe Holt is trying to tell them “crap or get off the pot”
Kim G. of Dawgman thinks there will be “Ty player” attrition in the off season
My response: "Crap or get off the toilet"
We can’t win if the defense is going to get blocked and locked up. We’ve got to have that gap control. It was huge vs. LSU, Idaho, and USC. Not so much for Stanford however. The Stanford game looked an awful lot like the defense that played last year. What happened from Week 3 to week 4? It was like DejaVu???
I don’t want to see another ill-faught game like that again this season. This team is on to something real special and we don’t need anymore 08 comparisons. I think it is time for the leaders of this team to step forward, voice their opinions of how poorly we played Saturday. We have to come out like week 1, 2, and 3 and play with our hair on fire. No more ass grabbing, no more pu—y footing around! I firmly believe Husky football is back and I’m not about to watch this season go down the toilet again.
Bring it or get the hell out of the way! WOOF!!!
All I saw was purple
I think what you saw...
…(obviously) is our worst game on ALL sides of the ball!
Washington Husky Football-Undefeated 1991 National Champions 12-0!
T 90
Count on it…and like all attrition some will be players you want to see go and others will be players you wish stayed.
by John Berkowitz on Sep 28, 2009 7:57 PM PDT up reply actions
you don't have a problem with a coach scapegoating the players that he is being paid $750k per year to lead?
… I disagree. strongly. He needs to realize that he is the leader and that the kids take their cue from them. If he keeps telling the media that they are not good enough, the kids will believe it.
Damn, my eyeball tastes good.
I have to side with you on this Gekko
However I think scapegoating might be a little strong, but you make great points. Willingham was taken to task on this and since Sark/Holt are in the honeymoon period it kind of gets swept under the rug. You play the hand your dealt and you don’t make excuses. Furthermore you don’t blame a bunch of kids.
by John Berkowitz on Sep 29, 2009 7:41 AM PDT up reply actions
I totally agree, Gekko.
Publicly, you can phrase that sort of statement in a way to motivate the players. Holt didn’t. You can also blame yourself for not preparing the players correctly, or not getting them to do the right things, etc.. But blaming the players will quickly become a self-fulfilling prophecy.
Even moderately knowlegable fans know what’s going on here. Being “truthful” comes across a lot like “saving face” when a coach like Holt blames a lack of talent for what happened. We all get it. Take the bullet publicly and do what you have to do as a coach privately.
I think Holt uses this...
…to motivate to some degree. Certain guys respond to encouragement and others to a kick in the ass.
Washington Husky Football-Undefeated 1991 National Champions 12-0!
I love Holt’s enthusiasm and fiery attitude. And there’s things to like about our defense this year. But I’m starting to see some warts with him as well – his tendency to place some public blame on the talent level of his players, the way he seemed to trash some USC players after we won and the comments coming from current USC defensive players about how Seto actually teaches them why they do stuff rather than just yelling at them.
I’m not saying I don’t like Holt – but I’m saying I’m seeing some things that make me think he’s got some work to do, especially if he ever wants another head coaching gig.
agreed...
… he’s the right guy for us right now and we should always allow room for people to grow, even highly paid assistant coaches. But he needs to be more measured with the media and needs to be sure that the kids know that, above all else, he has their back.
Damn, my eyeball tastes good.
A big reason he isn't a head coach
i like just about everyhting about Holt however he isn’t polished at all and there is really no excuse for it. He has been around the block plenty of times. He was under the scrutiny of the LA media. He has been a head coach before.
by John Berkowitz on Sep 29, 2009 7:42 AM PDT up reply actions
That's true.
His media, er, savvy, and his Idaho experience are the main reasons I’m not worried about him getting an attractive offer as a head coach any time soon.
He’s also getting past the point that a career assistant makes the move to “head guy.”
izbicki
is number 1 in the depth chart.
kavario has some sweet hands but he needs to start playing till the whistle blows.
Sark's Comments
He was saying Kavario is young and he tends to hang his head sometimes if plays don’t go his way. He just wants him to be able to refocus for the next play and keep his intensity up.
Washington Husky Football-Undefeated 1991 National Champions 12-0!
It is Izbicki OR Middleton
Pretty much the way it has been all season. I expect both of them to play as usual.
Not sure why we haven’t seen much of Izbicki. Sark needs to send a message to Middleton and sit him down for a bit. Although I’ll admit – I’m waiting for the day Sark puts Middleton out at WR on a fly pattern. Just have Jake throw up a jump ball – I like Middletons chances…..if he gives 100% effort.
Izbicki = Drops
Chris is the better blocker of the two which isn’t saying much. I guess the difference has been dropped balls in practice.
by John Berkowitz on Sep 28, 2009 4:13 PM PDT up reply actions
But Middleton is dropping balls in games?
The TE position is suppose to be one of our stronger units and we aren’t getting much production from it. I don’t know how many times this season I’ve seen Middleton drop passes in his hands.
I’m in favor of sitting Middleton down and see what Izbicki can do over the middle. I think one reason we are struggling on offense right now is due to not having “clutch” hands on the end. We need more productivity there and it just isn’t happening.
All I saw was purple
I love how Sark...
…wouldn’t throw the kid under the bus, as Softy said. The Coaching staff is taking the blame and they’ll get him back on track.
Washington Husky Football-Undefeated 1991 National Champions 12-0!
hello Crazi
Out TE’s are very questionable. None of them can block worth a crap…Kavario’s saving grace is he can catch more often than not….overall he is soft.
by John Berkowitz on Sep 28, 2009 7:39 PM PDT up reply actions
4 and 5 star TEs
That’s the thing about the star rating system w/ the recruits. It’s all based upon “potential” rather then football talent.
Either you’re a football player with football talent or you are not. These guys really need to start picking up their game. Stars all over these kids and damit we need to see something.
All I saw was purple
I'm not totally sure I agree with that assesment.
Izbicki has dropped balls in practice, but I certainly wouldn’t say at a greater frequency than Middleton. In fact, I’d say he’s the more reliable of the two.
Izbicki doesn’t have the same upside, though. Not even close. But I’d say that it’s Middleton’s potential that puts him on the field rather than Izbicki’s inconsistency.
Not only that, but Izbicki is a MUCH more physical player, both in the running game and the passing game.
Stafon Johnson
Did you guys hear what happened? He was lifting weights and apparently the bar slipped and dropped onto his throat. He undergoing surgery now. God Bless and hope he’s OK!
Washington Husky Football-Undefeated 1991 National Champions 12-0!
I think that happened to Cam Cleland or someone frome that era. Dropped 500 lbs on his chest. I think it broke a few ribbs. It’s amazing that was all that was hurt.
A shotputter I worked out with...
…got hit in the head while practicing throwing the shot! The kid was only out for a few weeks. I guess you could say he was lucky. This sounds WAY more serious!
Washington Husky Football-Undefeated 1991 National Champions 12-0!
Javelin to the heart
I flew with a guy that caught a javelin with his heart while cutting across the field to soccer practice at the AF Academy. On the humerus side, his surgeons had never worked on a young healthy heart before.
It happened to me
You can’t bench without a spotter. Somebody grabbed it…. pulled it off the minute it hit. Of course it was 75 pounds…now seriously….terrible if Stafon is hurt….really good kid we recruited.
FYI on Kyle...enough was enough
I banned Kyle and that means all Kyle reported posts were deleted with it. too bad because everyone was very eloquent about Kyle… I gave him plenty of chances….Explained the rules more than a few times…Duck fans gave him chances…but in the end a troll is a troll…he will be back one more time because he has two IP addresses…but that will last about three seconds.
Sorry Kyle you could have been a contender…you hostility won’t allow you to become a member ot the club we are building here.
They were related to Kyle...and so were mine...it sucks
That was a bad side effect…just sucks…but it had to be done.
by John Berkowitz on Sep 28, 2009 8:18 PM PDT up reply actions
No way
You are in big time…Kyle is the second poster we have banned in three years other than Gecko…
by John Berkowitz on Sep 28, 2009 8:19 PM PDT up reply actions
ohhhh .... are going to bring that back up again?
… and, to be clear, you didn’t ban Gekko … you banned Minny C!
ahh, our demented and tormented past will never leave us.
:)
Damn, my eyeball tastes good.
Well...I didn't ban the IP...and it was some guy named Minny C
I’m sorry…I overeacted and was wrong. As you can tell I really have a much longer leash out there these days. I even got chopped next door for awhile over at Coug Center. It happens.
by John Berkowitz on Sep 29, 2009 7:45 AM PDT up reply actions
Tried to encourage the lad but...
he was a troll monger and every response was an attact on us. I may or may not say something very pleasent about Oregon, but I seriously doubt it is to attact duck fans. I try to paint a picture as to what I see and add a little flavor, but never do I come out w/ a bag full of insults. That guy was definitely off his meds.
All I saw was purple
Ditto!
He has two IP’s one more comment on the other one and he is gone from SBN FOR EVER!….lol
by John Berkowitz on Sep 28, 2009 8:28 PM PDT up reply actions
On Gecko
He kept coming back and I didn’t ban the IP…he didn’t like my stand on Willingham…and I was wrong in giving him the boot…he is a great contributor…so my bad on that.
it's all good.
… on Ty, I only really ever argued one point: that we were better off maintaining some stability during the year versus the upheaval of a mid-year firing. While I still think it was a defensible if not popular point of view, I never really took into account the amount of emotion that was behind the opposing point of view and, well, it led to some heated exchanges. We are all in a better place now.
Damn, my eyeball tastes good.
It was defensible...
Didn’t work…but it was defensible at the time.
It did minimize some negative potential PR.
by John Berkowitz on Sep 29, 2009 7:46 AM PDT up reply actions
Oh gawd...lol
Maybe it was divine intervention when I banned Kyle….that is fowl…but we keep it.
Thanks for raising the quality level Matt.
by John Berkowitz on Sep 28, 2009 8:26 PM PDT up reply actions
I didn't realize it was possible
That photo must have been taken in Enumclaw.
by John Berkowitz on Sep 28, 2009 8:29 PM PDT up reply actions
Kyle Is Gone
JB- Thanks for banning KyleC. He was just trying to pick a fight. It is guys like him that make it so much fun to loathe the Ducks! Matt’s contribution rocks! Thank you very much for all your good work here!
Thanks man...changing the world's perception of duck fans
one Husky at a time…hehe
Hi, my name is Matt Daddy and I am a....
HUGE FREAKING DUCK FAN!!!!!!... "Hi Matt Daddy"
I think Kyle was about 18
You should have passion about your team. You should also have some common sense and manners. One bad thing it did topple over more than a couple good football posts. I predict Kyle will return at least one more time. I also predict that I will ban his other IP address immediately. no fooling around this time….next.
by John Berkowitz on Sep 29, 2009 11:50 AM PDT up reply actions
Usually I would have to take that one out...however
I don’t think I haver seen such an oddity.
Poor Duck!
No Harm…No Fowl!
by John Berkowitz on Sep 29, 2009 7:48 AM PDT up reply actions
AHAHHAHAH
I couldnt see it before….HAHAHAHA that is great
JB something tells me...
…you’re going to busy tonight!
Washington Husky Football-Undefeated 1991 National Champions 12-0!
Yo Crazi and John
sorry our comments got deleted…we had some good conversation going there about football. Anyway, good luck against Notre Dame (man, I hate that team). Talk to you after next week.
I missed it all?
I’m off the blog for a day and a half, and I miss all the fun!!
"Legends are made on the shores of Lake Washington"
"BOW DOWN TO WASHINGTON"

by 















