Grading the game
It's time to pull out the grade book for yesterday's game against Stanford. There aren't a lot of positives when you lose 34-14 and give up 350 yards on the ground. I will say that they looked quite a bit better than California. This is a year of parity in the conference and whoever wins the title may just have 2-3 losses by the time it all shakes out.
Home field advantage is going to be key in most games. Good thing Washington plays only four conference road games this season. The good news is the most talented teams with the exception of Stanford will be visiting Husky Stadium. Remaining conference road games against ASU, Oregon State, and UCLA are all in the winnable category.
Quarterback
Jake Locker was off on Saturday and it may have been his worst overall day as a Husky. There have been times he couldn't throw and there have been times he was shut down on the run. He has also made his share of mistakes over the past three years. This game was different because nothing ever really seemed to click for him. The run should have been there because he has dominated Stanford in the past with it but it just wasn't in the game plan. I didn't see a lot of spark in Jake on Saturday and that concerns me. He was still 16/31 for 191 yards but the playmaking ability we saw the last three games simply was not there. The three turnovers were just killers.
I don't think the NFL draft talk effected him that much because he is a pretty level headed kid. I do think that after this perfomance most of that talk will quiet down. Like I said earlier this week he has a lot of work to do to be a starting QB in the NFL. Jake came back to earth this week and I look for him to rebound with a good performance against Notre Dame.
Grade D
Running Back
Chris Polk had 75 yards on 19 carries going into the gut of a very physical defense. One thing that comes to mind is why they don't run a guy with his speed wide more times when the middle is clogged up? Chris also caught three passes out of the backfield. UW seems hell bent on making Polk a workhorse.
Grade B
Wide Receivers
They had an off game against a very suspect secondary. Washington isn't stretching the field and attempting to go long which is the coaching staffs call. Obviously they know a lot more about the teams capabilities than we do. Kavario Middleton was terrible and I hate to call any kid terrible. It looked like he was taking plays off and loafing which will be a huge no-no in the film room on Monday. His blocking needs a lot of work. Word to wise to Kavario...hit the weight room this winter. We have a nice group of WR's but they didn't play the way they had in the first three games which hurt Locker. The loss for the week of Devin Aguilar is larger than most expect. He may not be the leading receiver on the team but he sets the tone with experience and work ethic. We missed his downfield blocking.
Grade C
Offensive Line
After three pretty good games where they over achieved they ran into a bunch of better athletes who outplayed them on almost every single down. Stanford's front three-four dominated our offensive line. It wasn't like Stanford was doing anything tricky. They were never forced to blitz which didn't open up holes for our passing game to exploit. They just beat our guys up all night which is a testament to the way they practice every week. Physical guys playing physical guys in practice usually leads to physical games on Saturday. I am not going to write these guys off after a bad game but they need to step it up if UW is going to win six games this season.
Grade D
Defensive line
Washington threw a lot of different combinations at Stanford on Saturday and nothing seemd to work that well. Everrette Thompson however may have won himself a starting job at defensive tackle the rest of the season because the line works better when he is in there. The story here is Stanford simply made their blocks and our defensive lineman were not able to come off those blocks in time to make the play. Expect Holt to spend a lot of time in the film room today trying to figure out what went wrong and if he has the pieces to correct it.
UW has to fix this or teams are just going to run the ball at them the rest of the season. UW was exposed yesterday. Will Charlie Weis be smart enough to run the ball 40 times on Saturday? Don't count on it if you are an Irish fan. The obvious seems to escape Charlie Weis.
Grade D
Linebackers
These guys were off this week and seemed a step or two slower than they did against USC which is understandable because last weeks game was so physical. Cort Dennison is making a move on the outside in place of EJ Savannah. EJ is a little beat up and the coaches haven't liked the way he has free lanced so far this season. EJ missed most of the second half with an injury. These guys made a lot of tackles on Saturday which is a product of the defensive line not making as many as they should have.
Grade C
Secondary
Stanford only threw the ball 14 times on Saturday so the secondaries job was mainly run support. Since Stanford ran for 350 yards you really can't say the run support was all that great. Rough to blame the secondary for it since it seemed the lousy defensive day started up front on the line. Bottom line the Stanford running back shouldn't be in the secondary.
Grade C
Special Teams
Who made the call to kick it to Chris Owusu to start the game? What happened to the LSU pooch kick which stopped the nations top kick returner from making an impact? Put that one on the heads of the coaching staff. Washington had plenty of attempts to return the ball and didn't get anywhere on Saturday. The team with the best depth and most physical play usually wins this portion of the game. Put it on the board for Stanford.
Grade F
Coaching
I think Sarkisian was way to conservative in his play calling. When the pro set wasn't working he didn't try hard enough to spread the field to give his team a break and use Jakes ability to pass on the run. Some of his calls don't make a lot of sense. To be fair when there is poor execution even the best play call can look terrible. I would like to see him get Chris Polk out around the end more. UW didn't have any push up the middle last night and he kept trying to go there too many times. Another big question is why he is not calling more designed running plays for Jake against a team he has run well against? Obviously keeping him healthy is a priority but he needs to use Jake on the run more often.
Defensively Coach Holt who was a genius last week couldn't put together the adjustments to slow down Stanford's running game. Tough to hold the coach accountable when it is obvious that his players are being bulied from a physical standpoint. The defense didn't get much help from a sputtering offense that turned the ball over three times, scored only 7 points, and held onto the ball only for a third of the game.
Have to throw an F out to Johnny Nansen for allowing the ball to be kicked to Chris Owusu to start the game. nothing jumpstarts a team like an instant touchdown on the opening kickoff.
This was just one of those games when we ran into a better team on the wrong day. You can look for people to blame or just concede that Stanford was the better team and we just didn't match up well with them on Saturday. I don't think emotion was the problem either. We simple were outplayed by a better team that executed better.
Grade C
31 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
D-
John I have to give our O Line and our D Line a D- this week. I would go F, but I only give Fs out when the unit quits. We didn’t quit, but both units were borderline failing last night.
We couldn’t get gap control on defense and we had major issues with the 3 man Defensive front.
F for Special teams? Again I only give Fs when the unit quits. We struggled on special teams and for the most part I think we took special teams for granted last night- coaches and players.
All I saw was purple
Guess I am giving Nansen an F
You kick the ball to Owusu on the first kickoff and he takes it back to the house you have to take the responsibility for that…can you say momentum changer on the road?
That was pretty preventable…very sloppy in my opinion…I don’t hate the guy…you do have to call a spade a spade.
Folk...
…was supposed to kick the ball to the side but didn’t get it done.
by doubledeucedawg on Sep 27, 2009 4:45 PM PDT up reply actions
Word we have...
It was a miscommunication…put that on Nansen.
by John Berkowitz on Sep 27, 2009 4:46 PM PDT up reply actions
johnb, just got back from Stanford
I thought we played the late 80 early 90 huskies. Stanford basically kicked the crap out of us, most notably on the O and D lines. Jake did play the worst game I have seen him do, it appeared his mental focus wasn’t there. and he missed a few wide open receivers. Could have been worse then the 3 turnovers. J Polk didn’t appear to even go fight for the ball on one incomplete which should have been another Intcp, instead standing there waiting for it to come to him. I like J Kearse, he goes up for and after the ball. We (this blogs experts) had the right keys to the game, stop Gephart and the run, win the TO battle, and win STs. Didn’t do any, Gebhardt was amazing but he had a lot of help with his blockers. This loss neutralized the amazing win v USC. We will need to win half of the remaining eight battles against teams with similar talent levels. Back to the drawing board and basics.
On a funnier note, the Stanford band halftime show. Said Ty Willingham was able to take Stanford to a Rose Bowl and took UW to 0-12. And then said, remember Stanford beat USC before it was trendy. Got to hand it to them at least they are creative.
Prrbrr
Jake did play the worst game I have seen him do, it appeared his mental focus wasn’t there.
Yep..something wasn’t clicking for him and it happens…Brett Favre had games like that in his prime…you learn from it …move on…and have a better game next week.
On a funnier note, the Stanford band halftime show. Said Ty Willingham was able to take Stanford to a Rose Bowl and took UW to 0-12. And then said, remember Stanford beat USC before it was trendy. Got to hand it to them at least they are creative.
I love that band…and they make a lot of sense.
Back to the game…they just kicked our ass…time to get over it and do the same thing to Notre Dame.
by John Berkowitz on Sep 27, 2009 4:25 PM PDT up reply actions
On the Opening Kickoff,
“Sarkisian also said there was a mixup on the opening kickoff, that the play was designed for the ball to be kicked to the left and instead it went to the other side.
‘Whether that’s a miscommunication or not I’m not sure. I just know our guys were covering one side of the field and we kicked it to the other.’”
-From Condotta
http://tinyurl.com/y8a8p48
One note on Harbaugh
for a long time, I thought he was a midwest guy as he played for Michigan and assumed he would dump the Furd as soon as an opening occured at UM or ND. Looking at the game program, it said he went to Palo Alto High School so he might actually make a career there.
He likes it there
He also feels like he can build a champion…one look at his recruiting classes shows he has as much a chance to win here as anywhere else. Furd is a comfortable place for a hometown guy.
by John Berkowitz on Sep 27, 2009 6:11 PM PDT up reply actions
establish the run
haven’t seen the likes of this since they used to run BILLY PARKER into the line three times and punt. It’s called establishing the run. For you who remember BILLY PARKER he was a 170 pound halfback/fullback. We could actually call the plays in the stands.
Made no sense then makes no sense now. Give Polk a break the guy is a freshman. We must have another back to share the load? Are they trying to ruin him before he really gets a chance to show what he can do? Someone explain the logic here?
A couple of things
I think this loss might be a good thing for this team. I noticed when this game wound down that this team had a furious look, and I know the coaches are pissed off. Last year this team wasn’t angry after a loss, it got to the point where is was just a normal thing. I think this team is goin’ to South Bend with a giant chip on their shoulder. I predict it is going to be a very long, very tough week of practice for these players, and this team will be pissed off and show that they are for real. UW will not have another game like last night for the rest of the year.
Polk is great, he works for ever last yard, and when you think he is going down, he manages to stay on his feet. The only problem with him is his vision at this point, he needs to be able to hit the cutback lanes. The cutbacks were open for him last night, but his vision will only improve with more games.
A little off topic, but I have yo say it, thank you for this site, it’s great to discuss and get info from people who actually know something about college football and the Huskies. When I go to ESPN all I read is ignorant posts about how bad UW is, and how great Oregon is, and for some stupid reason every single (I mean every single) discussion ends up with an inevitable debate about which conference is better: the SEC or Pac-10, it gets very annoying and gets my blood boiling like none other. So thank you John for doin this, and thank you everyone who throws in their knowledgeable 2 cents.
Good loss theory
We did hear the players were upset after the loss which is good. One thing we have seen over the last two weeks is the end of apathy that had creeped in during the Ty years to affect the fan base and the team itself.
I don’t subscribe the good loss theory in general…winning is all that matters.
I think we just matched up poorly with Stanford and that happens. I didn’t see it coming but boy it sure came. We do match up better with the Irish. They have been struggling this season as usual under Weis.
Thanks for the comments on the blog…we do our best. The whole point of the blog was to create a place without any BS. We seem to do that 99% of the time.
by John Berkowitz on Sep 28, 2009 6:59 AM PDT up reply actions
One grade you missed...
…the broadcast. I give it a D-. The only reason I didn’t give it an F?

I actually thought Yogi’s analysis was pretty good, but his interview with Sark was a joke. The play-by-play guy was a total douche. Steele was funny and is obviously attractive, but she really didn’t add anything to the broadcast in terms of info. The production quality of the broadcast was just bottom of the barrel awful – it was the worst-looking standard def picture I’ve ever seen, they consistently were caught showing replays while missing live action and the sound was awful – Mr. Douche-bag play-by-play man’s mic was constantly pegging out.
A “quality” of broadcast to match the “quality” of our lines…just brutal.
Yogi's Sark Interview
It reminded me of two little kids on the couch playing sports announcer. Roth is just getting started….nobody is Keith Jackson on the first day except for Keith Jackson.
Anyway this broadcast team is really young and they are just learning.
There wasn’t much interaction with Dawgman except for Chris Fetters getting interviewed on the sidelines. Chris has trimmed his beard so he doesn’t resemble the Uni-Bomber as much anymore.
We all wanted to see the game…we all begged Woodward to make it happen…the only thing that I wouldhave changedis the score of the game.
by John Berkowitz on Sep 28, 2009 6:14 AM PDT up reply actions
I’m happy it was broadcast, but let’s be honest here – that was the most amateurish broadcast I’ve ever seen of a college football game involving D-1 teams.
Yogi has promise. The other guy, not so much. And whoever was directing the whole thing needs a loooooooot of work. And maybe they should provide them with cameras that aren’t 30 years old and on their last legs?
Totally agree Kirk
It was better then nothing…but pretty amatuer. We missed 4-5 plays due to the producer not cutting back to live play.
Oh well...I will take it
It was much better than listening to the Stanford feed on XM Radio…that would have sucked.
by John Berkowitz on Sep 28, 2009 11:58 AM PDT up reply actions
Jonh B
You thought my grading was tough…right on…the grading is about right what I thought. Not too tought but realistice
by bigdawgdaddy999 on Sep 28, 2009 1:22 AM PDT reply actions
That frightens me.
I need to lighten up!
by John Berkowitz on Sep 28, 2009 6:48 AM PDT up reply actions
Anybody see TW
rumor at pre game rally was that TW would be at game, heard he had yucked it up with a few of his Furd buds earlier. I looked into the boxes with my binocs but didn’t see anybody who looked like him through my crosshairs. Hope he liked the band skewering him during halftime.
Snap back to Reality...
Well i just went through an 8 hour surgery to remove the foot from my mouth. The worst part was that the hospital only served Crow Pie…not a very good day for me.
Didnt watch the game and I forgot to DVR it…sounds like I didnt miss much though.
On to Notre Dame.
You didn't miss a thing...
If you saw any games last year this, unfortunatly, look pretty similar except our passing was pretty good. Jake did have a few interceptions and bad throws but I’d put it more on our OL doing a very poor job as Jake was continualy hurried, pressured & pushed out of a quickly collapsing pocket. I don’t think our DL made one tackle and our LB’s looked a step slow.
If there was a bright spot it was Kearse keeps making primetime catches, Cort Dennison had a VERY nice game & Trufant is going to be a stud. Trufant may get alot of interferance calls but I like his aggresiveness and the fact that he is always on the WR. Beats the heck out the WR’s we’ve seen in the past running with no one around. Once Trufant gets it all figured out he looks to have all PAC-10 ability.
You know Sno
I guess my question is if most of the pressure is coming up the middle why they didn’t spread it out and roll Jake right or left more to avoid the crap in the middle.
i think the future is bright andlast week was more of a case of just not matching up well with Stanford. I think we have a very good shot with Notre Dame.
by John Berkowitz on Sep 28, 2009 8:55 AM PDT up reply actions
I agree John..
I think Jake, at this point, is at his best rolling out with a pass / run option. Kearse has shown the ability to seperate down field in these cases. Mix in Homer or Forgerson out in the flat on this type of play and your bound to have success.
Listening to Hugh Millen after the game it seems like this was a case of Stanford having some big / VERY strong guys in the trenches. We simply got over powered as they ran the ball down our throat. Stanford is going to be tough to beat for most in the PAC-10.
Like you originally said John – this team needs a couple of years in the weight room. They’ve made great strides in just 8-9 months but we saw Saturday that they still have a ways to go. It reminded me alot of what UW used to be able to do to people back in the 80’s and 90’s when they had good enough guys on their line to simply run over people.
I think ND will be tough because they can both run and pass pretty good. To win this Holt may have to order up alot of blitzes to put pressure on Clausen and leave our back field on an island. If Clausen has time he’s very capable of lighting us up.
It was power
It was simply smash-mouth. If we could have kept Gephart under 125 yards and if our offense had performed to its usual level we win.
We need to put a lot of pressure on Clausen because he isn’t mobile. They really have to be gimmicky at this point to gain any traction on the ground.
by John Berkowitz on Sep 28, 2009 12:01 PM PDT up reply actions
Just a reminder John – it’s Toby GERHART, not Dick GEPHART. That would’ve been even more embarrassing – what is he now, 68?
i know...one of my Freudian Slips
Where is my editor?
by John Berkowitz on Sep 28, 2009 9:19 PM PDT up reply actions
We have had a lot on our plate the last two weeks
When that happens the stupid typo’s start rearing their ugly head.

by 

















