Stanford Preview
In the pre-season you probably wouldn't have pointed to this game as being one of the decisive games in determining the Pac 10 championship. Washington's upset over USC last week and strong play through the season's first three games has changed that.
Washington and Stanford enter the game as co leaders in the conference race. If Washington can beat the Cardinal last week’s upset over USC will have a lot more national validity. Winning one game is great...proving you can continue to win on a week to week basis is how championships are won.
Washington and Stanford are in unfamiliar territory right now. The top of the conference has been dominated by USC, Cal, and Oregon over the past six to seven years. The Huskies and Tree's on the other hand are more used to facing off to avoid the conference basement.
Young coaches have made a significant difference for both programs. Jim Harbaugh knows what it is like to knock off USC for example. He got that one out of the way early in one of the most stunning upsets in college football history. What he has done since is recruit extremely well on a national basis. UW is having a strong 2010 recruiting class but Stanford is actually even doing better. The current Stanford class is rated #1 in the Pac 10 and #8 overall in the country according to Scout.
When you break down Stanford and Washington position by position you realize exactly how even these two teams are right now from an overall talent perspective. Even in areas where I gave UW the edge the Cardinal are very close.
What stands out for me right now the most for me is Jake Locker. Jake is the best player in the conference and he can burn you in so many ways. Luck is very good and is probably the #2 guy in the conference right now despite being a RS frosh. That being said the level of experience and proficiency is on Locker's side. The thing that really separate Jake and Andrew is Jake's ability to simply make big plays when he has to. The final drive of the USC game is testament to his play making ability.
The odds makers favor Stanford by 9 points in this one and I think the smart money out there should be on Washington if the line holds. Stanford historically has a lot of problems with mobile QB' and Jake is the ultimate mobile QB on this side of the Mississippi.
Position Match Ups
Quarterback - Washington...Jake Locker has completed 60% of his passes so far this season and he is a threat to take the ball to the end zone every time he runs it. Locker just may have evolved into the best player in the Pac Jake was masterful last week against a tough USC defense. The win over USC is a huge confidence builder. Andrew Luck is going to be a real good QB. The Huskies face a player that is much better than Aaron Corp this week. He is mobile and throws the ball really well when he has to. This may be the match up of the two best QB's in the Pac 10.
Tailbacks - Even...Toby Gephart is one of the top power running backs in the country. You have to hit him behind the line, you have to hit him low, and wrap him up at the ankles, or he can really hurt you. Chris Polk may not have the size that Gephart has but as we saw against USC last week he knows how to move the pile forward against a couple of the best defenses in college football.
Fullback - Washington...Homer only touched the ball once last week but his true value is blocking for Locker and Polk. Add in Fogerson when he is at H-Back and UW gets the nod.
Wide Receivers - Washington...Chris Owusu and Doug Baldwin are big play threats, and Ryan Whalen is very consistent, but Washington has more depth here than Stanford. The Huskies are a passing team and Stanford is a running team that can actually pass pretty well when they have to. James Johnson and Jermain Kearse have evolved into UW's go to guys but the huskies actually do a pretty good job of spreading it around which is the sign of having a good QB.
Tight Ends - Even...Kavario Middleton is still learning. He had a couple of mistakes last week that probably took points off the scoreboard. His blocking can be termed a work in progress. He does have sticky hands and has the potential of having many big days this season. Jim Dray and Coby Fleener return for Stanford. Dray is still shaking off the rust from a knee injury last season. Stanford has and edge in blocking while Middleton is the better receiver.
Offensive Line - Even...Washington's offensive line has surprised in the early going playing some pretty tough defenses. Ben Ossai has resurrected his career and had a fine game against USC last week. David DeCastro a Seattle native has claimed a starting job for Stanford. Andrew Phillips is probably the best player on the Stanford line. Early injuries have forced the Cards to start two RS tackles.
Defensive Tackle...Even...This is a pretty tough call because Stanford is led by Ekon Udofia who is four year starter. Washington gets a slight edge because of the flexibility they attacked USC with last week. Washington can go with big or small lineups based on speed. The move of Everette Thompson to DT last week was brilliant. Expect UW to go large this weekend.
Defensive End...Even...Another tough call because Stanford has some talented DE's. Daniel Teo Nesheim is one of the conference’s best and the addition of Talia Crichton on the other side is giving UW some true speed on the pass rush. Stanford's Erik Lorig and Tom Keiser both earned Pac 10 honorable all star status last season.
Linebacker...Washington...I think it is pretty tough to find a better trio then Washington has in Foster, Savannah and Butler. Another impressive factor was how well the depth played last week. Stanford sports a pretty good trio in Snyder, Amajoyi, and Powers.
Cornerback...Washington...Going into the season the CB position was a big question mark. Things have worked out better than expected. Quinton Richardson is having an excellent season and Desmond Trufant is going to be a four year starter. Trufant looks like his older brother out there and he will keep improving every week. his potential is quite amazing. Vonzell McDowell has been solid as a starter, fifth back, and backup.
Safety...Washington...Nate Williams is having a great year and he found a good running mate last week in Justin Glenn. Glenn was a factor all over the field. He tackles and hits well. He has great coverage abilities too. Bo McNally is a pretty good player but he has too many holes to cover as the Stanford as the Card center fielder. Delano Howell whose brother played LB at UW and just needs experience after moving over from RB.
Special Teams...Stanford...Erik Folk was the hero last week and Will Mahan had some good punts. Washington isn't giving up big plays in coverage, but they haven't created any big plays in the return game. The Cards appear solid so far in every single area. The thing that gives the edge in this one going in is the return game. they have brought it back to the house three times so far on returns.
Game Match ups
Washington running game versus the Stanford defense
Stanford has an active front seven that is used to facing a power running game each day in practice. They held SJSU to only 26 yards on 28 carries last week. They didn't do so well against Wake Forest. They gave up 250 yards and that was the tale of the game. They just couldn't figure out the Demon Deacon offense which is pretty tricky.
Washington has been able to run against everyone this year. You would think that LSU and USC would have been able to hut them down but they didn't. The Huskies haven't had any big plays yet but they do pick up big yardage on first down which has helped the offense become one of the national leaders in third down conversions.
Chris Polk is the best looking Washington back in over a decade. He has all the tools. He can catch the ball, run with power, and he has the speed to break the long one. What has really set Chris apart this fall has been his ability to make yards after contact. Polk carried the USC line for valuable extra yards last Saturday.
The last time Jake played in Palo Alto he had a field day running the football. If the coaches decide to give 10-12 pre designed running plays he is very capable of picking up 70-100 rushing yards against the Tree's.
Washington Passing Game versus the Stanford defense
Jake Locker has the potential to light up the Stanford secondary this week. Stanford has been giving up over 200 yards per game this season and it won't change on Saturday. I look for Jake to have a big game and go over the 300 mark.
Stanford has the potential to put together a pretty good pass rush. Locker's speed and mobility on the other hand allow him to avoid problems in the backfield. While another QB may end up with a coverage sack Jake can turn that into a 20 yard run.
Washington's receivers have been excellent so far this season. We only counted two drops against USC last week. James Johnson is playing like a senior only three weeks into his first Husky campaign. Jermaine Kearse has been a proven big play guy converting big time on third down to keep drives moving.
What separates UW from Stanford is the multiple targets Jake has to choose from each game. I wouldn't be surprised to see nine players pick up receptions this Saturday.
Stanford rushing game versus the Washington defense
The Cardinal are a power running team. They fumbled three times last week and that will be a big problem if they continue the habit against Washington. Gephart is very hard to bring down if you don't hit him in the backfield. If he gets into the secondary he runs like a freight train and is almost impossible to bring down.
A big key for Washington in this one is taking advantage of the turnover prone Cardinal. If the Huskies can create and extend an early lead it puts the onus on Stanford QB Andrew Luck rather than Toby Gephart. If you can take Gephart out of the game plan you are probably going to win this game.
The Husky defensive line did a great job controlling a big back in the LSU game. They adjusted in the first quarter and were able to handle the USC rushing game after the Trojans got off to a fast start. I think Washington should be able to contain Gephart for the most part but a back like that usually finds a way to get his yards if he gets the ball.
Stanford passing game versus the Washington Defense
Andrew Luck is a great looking QB who will most likely be playing in the NFL some day. He has a lot more mobility than I thought and he is a very accurate passer. The key to Luck as with any young QB is to rattle him early and keep rattling him throughout the game.
The special teams battle
Stanford's Chris Owusu returned the opening kickoff last week 94 yards for a TD against SJSU. Stanford has returned three kicks so far for TD's this year. Washington needs to be careful in coverage and take away the Stanford return game. UW was very successful against LSU and USC in doing that. Mahan is an excellent touch punter but he had a couple of muffs last week. He needs to be on his game against Stanford. Erik Folk was the hero last week with three FG's. He has been very accurate this season during games but fans hold their breath every time he approaches the ball. Last spring it was doubtful if we could convert a PAT or FG. Right now his kicking has become a team strength.
Washington needs to eliminate the big play return in this game to win this segment of the game. They need to keep the ball out of the hands of Chris Owusu.
The intangibles
Crowd noise is a huge factor on the road. Just ask Aaron Corp, Pete Carroll, or Todd Marinovich. Stanford on the other hand has little crowd noise because the games are so poorly attended. UW fans could conceivably outnumber Cardinal fans. UW has a large alumni base in the Bay Area. Expected attendance will be in the 30,000 range.
Three of Stanford's four turnovers resulted in all 17 of San Jose State's points last week. If they do that against a much tougher Washington defense they are going to be in big trouble.
"That's the best quarterback we've played in nine years here," Pete Carroll said when told Washington has beaten only Idaho and USC the last two years. " Jake Locker has ridiculous talent, and had he remained healthy last year, Tyrone [Willingham] would still be coaching there."
Washington needs to avoid enjoying the win over USC for too long. I Washington didn't start focusing on Stanford by practice on Monday they could be in for a long day Saturday. Coach Steve Sarkisian echoed that thought with this statement:
"There aren’t enough hours in the day to be looking at what everybody else is saying, or how we’re going to do something, or what we should do or shouldn’t do," Steve Sarkisian said. "This is about us, and our preparation. We can’t waver from who we are."
Washington is a football team that has to work very hard for everything they get. They can't forget that. Washington doesn't win football games by having more talent. They win by having their talent work harder and smarter than the opposition. As a team they can't get away from that no matter how good Jake Locker is.
Game Notes
Stanford won 35-28 last season in Husky Stadium.
Washington leads the all-time series 40-35-4.
Stanford DE Tom Keiser had three sacks against San Jose State and he's tied for first in the conference with four sacks and ranks first with six tackles for a loss.
Jake Locker leads the conference so far with five TD passes.
Jake's season ended early in the game against Stanford last season when he broke his thumb throwing a block.
The Huskies are third in the nation in third-down conversion percentage at 60%.
USC went 0-10 in third down conversions against the Washington defense.
Chris Owusu ranks No. 1 in the nation in kickoff returns. He's averaging 52.8 yards per return and has taken two back for touchdowns.
Stanford Safety Delano Howell's brother was a starting LB at Washington.
The Cardinal was up 17-3 at the half against Wake Forest and lost 24-17.
Toby Gerhart is one of the top tailbacks in the Pac-10 and a finalist for the Doak Walker Award.
Jim Harbaugh (11-16), third season. He was also the coach at the University of San Diego, where he went 22-2 from 2004-06. Harbaugh played 15 seasons in the NFL as a quarterback (1987-2001).
Harbaugh and Sarkisian have held the same position on the Oakland Raiders’ staff – quarterbacks coach. Harbaugh was there in 2002; Sarkisian in 2004.
In 2007, Stanford knocked off No. 2 USC in Harbaugh’s first season en route to finishing 4-8.
Three in-state high school players are on the Stanford roster – OG David DeCastro, QB Tavita Pritchard and WR Marcus Rance. Pritchard is a Clover Park High graduate, and an off-and-on starter the past two seasons.
The facilities arms race took on ridiculous extremes at Stanford, where, in the off season, Coach Jim Harbaugh had a bathroom installed adjacent to his office for an estimated $50,000 to 70,000, booster-financed.
0 recs |
57 comments
|
Comments
their double te o line against our front seveven
that’s where i feel we have the advantage.
it is going to be tough going between the tackles so our outside ‘backers should contain. foster is playing light’s out.
the matchup i want to see is cameron and mr decastro. i want him to understand what it will be like for four years playing against your home school. teach him well mr elisara.
all will be good when we see the student section sign that reads, ’’it’s ok, you’ll work for us someday.’’
maybe…….
but not on today.
GO DAWGS!
by PandG on Sep 25, 2009 8:11 AM PDT via mobile reply actions
Telecast
The game will be broadcast live on Fox College Sports (FCS). On Direct TV it is channel 617. There will be a repeat later in the evening on (FNW)…Fox Northwest.
Husky Defense
Some how we’ve got to stop the Cardinal offense. The D Line is going to have to get gap control and keep it. Doing this will not allow the tree running game to haul off for chunks of ground yards. LBs need to come w/ the same approach as the USC game and members of the secondary need to stay on their reads, get a run read and offer the run support we’ve seen from them early on in the season. But it all starts with gap control by the D linemen. When they get that it makes our LBs look GOOD! Not saying they aren’t good, it’s a give and take relationship between how effective the D linemen are and the end result of the filling/pursuing LB.
I’ve been hesitant about the Stanford game and I must say I am still hesitant and the thought is growing. Offensively Jake has got to get us in the endzone more then what we saw last week. If this thing turns into a scoring fest- Look out! To help our defense stay fresh on the road, our offense needs to stay on the field and cash in when the opportunity presents itself. I don’t mind FGs, but eventually we are going to need to cash in on a lot of TDs and that day might be this Saturday.
I don’t see any mental letdowns this weekend [knock on wood]. But if the Furd throws us a curveball, we’ve got to be ready to answer the call.
Go Huskies! WOOF!!!
All I saw was purple
Stanford is going to line up with two TE's
So what we need to do of course is stack thebox and slug it out with them. They key is how well our offense plays. If we get out to an early lead it forces them out of their game plan.
by John Berkowitz on Sep 25, 2009 9:35 AM PDT up reply actions
HERE ... HERE!
Completely agree- Jake’s got to hit his routes, O line has got to step up and open some lanes for Polk and Fogie, and would be ideal if we could get our TEs more involved in the passing game. Our offense is key, I completely agree. On the road (hostile or not), defense needs to make stops and can get that done when better rested.
All I saw was purple
Stanford will be less interested in getting the running game to the edges ...
…. but they will want to create short, high percentage passes to their WRs and TE in the flats. Our zone will have to be sharp and our LBs will have to be disciplined in order to not get burned. We need to play close to the line, but we can’t overcommit on the run.
Expect Luck to try to test Trufant repeatedly when he does pass.
Damn, my eyeball tastes good.
You got it Gekko
With a RS freshman QB- I see them playing the percentages in the passing game. Harbough will want to bank on the short to intermediate stuff and really on go deep to stretch the field. If they have more success I do see them trying to get our CBs on single man coverage deep to see how they respond.
LBs need to be crisp on run/pass reads because Luck is going there a lot! I think our LBs cover as well if not better then most in league, so we should be up to the task. Play action will be big and I see them using a lot of run, play action, and short to intermediate routes.
Also Harbough might’ve looked at footage of the LSU game. Les Miles caught us in 3rd and short a few times keying run. Both times LSU burned us because our CBs were in bump and run coverage and we got got. Hopefully we’ve corrected this. It worked wonders for Miles- don’t think for a second Harbough doesn’t come up with something quite simular.
All I saw was purple
I think our DB play has taken a quantum leap since LSU
by John Berkowitz on Sep 25, 2009 7:17 PM PDT up reply actions
even against LSU ... we are really only talking about two plays in that game
..however, we have yet to face a top tier passing QB. This is why ND makes me nervous. We definitely catch a break with their best WR out, but they still have a great air attack and we still have two very young starters back there.
Damn, my eyeball tastes good.
Oh I agree with both you guys
Quantum leaps and bounds! I think the issue more or less in both of those situations Gekko though was not our ability to cover, but are alignment that was geared to stop the run on 3rd and short. In both situations we were crowding the box bigtime and there you go. Those big, fast, elusive LSU wideouts caught us off guard.
I just think since it worked well for LSU a couple of times (both went for TDs), somebody is going to copy it because somebody had success with it against us. I was really surprised USC didn’t come with it w/ their tall, athletic receivers.
All I saw was purple
Either way, we'll know a lot more about them after tomorrow.
"Legends are made on the shores of Lake Washington"
"BOW DOWN TO WASHINGTON"
Fullback
You forgot that Owen Marecic is one of the best run blocking fullbacks around. He paves the way for Toby GERHART. all 6’1 245lbs of him. Two names you should see a lot of come game day
thanks for beating USC, but GO CARD!
by CardinalRules07 on Sep 25, 2009 9:14 AM PDT reply actions
Big game for both programs!
CR07- got to tell you I have tremendous respect for the young Jimmie Harbough. He’s tough as nails and is smart as a whippersnapper. What the hell is a whippersnapper anyway? I just heard it once and thought it would be cool to throw out there. But Harbough is a fine young coach and has the Furd looking good in the college football playing world.
This game is hard to call, because both programs are so young. We’ve got tremendous momentum in our corner, you guys have homefield advantage in yours. That should balance things out a bit. Like John said and I agree the talent level is balanced on both sides of the ball. So what will it come down to?
1) QB play will be BIG! I have to give the nod to Locker. He has composure, confidence, 3rd year starting experience, knows the feeling of losing and doesn’t want to go there EVER again, mobile, hostile, and his accuracy under Sark and Nuss if off the charts- BaBY!
2) Execution and Sideline decision making- Execution is always a HUGE key. Which team executes, the better chance of success. This coincides with coaching decisions and playcalling. Send in a bad play or a play without the proper personnel and the decision could cost field position or a possession or two.
3) Turnover margin- Who ever wins the turnover margin will undoubtedly have the upper hand. Not saying it is a given due to the fact the other team could go four and out and have to punt- making the turnover invalid. If both teams manage to hold onto the football and play a clean game [see No.1 and 2 categories].
I have a hunch that going down to the farm is going to be a tougher win for us then most think. I give the nod to Washington though for many reasons.
I Bark for Sark! WOOF!!!
All I saw was purple
Marecic is good FB
I think UW and Stanford are really pretty even all the way down the list position by position.
UW has the edge with the mobility at QB going against that leaky back seven.
dawg frenzy
I started as a Husky fan in 1951 but the level of excitement and expectation now is very high. Keep your seat belt on!
Thank God I dont play for the Dawgs
because I know we will win by 10+. Stanford will be lucky if we dont score 28+ on them. Their LB’s and DB’s are middle of the pack to lower end of the PAC 10. You cant tell me that Stanfords front 4 are better than USC or LSU and we did fine againist them. If I was playing I would be prime for a “Let Down” game but I’m not so i can boost all I want! How is this a “Let Down” game either…we are predicted to LOSE! How can a projected losing team have a let down!?! Also, Scott from LSU is just as big and faster than Gerhart and we did a fine job againist him. I have faith that Sark & Co will not let the Dawgs take a step back…we MARCH FORWARD!
I feel extremely confident…if you couldn’t tell.
Lets Go Dawgs!!!
Over-confidence can HURT
I want our team to continue to be the underdog. It keeps us hungry and NOT satisfied. But like you, I have a lot of faith that we manage to pull out the victory on the farm. A team this young that remembers the feeling of losing- does not want to relive that. This team will do just about anything imaginable to win on saturdays.
All I am saying is that Stanford might bring something that we aren’t prepared for. So the best way to manage a crisis situation is to come prepared for multiple obstacles. Being mentally and physically prepared is the upmost importance for this young team. “Confidence” is a double edged sword. Being prepared both menatilly and physically are concepts related to confidence- but it throws over-confidence out the freakin’ window.
Let’s GET IT ON! WOOF!!!
All I saw was purple
maybe ...
… but I agree with bigdave. Oregon and Oregon State are more difficult matchups for us then Stanford is based on our strengths compared to those opponents.
Damn, my eyeball tastes good.
Agreed
But if we take care of business this weekend, our confidence in ourselves grow exponentially. Going into Pac 10 play is going to be a guantlet. Besides WSU and Arizona, Stanford is one of the more winnable games on our schedule. If we win and come out injury-free, we are doing very well and are totally set up for the other Pac 10ers.
But don’t think for a second Stanford is not reading into all the stuff that has been published about their opponent this weekend, the upstart Huskies. Don’t think for a second that those guys would love to bring us down to ground zero for a week. Don’t think for a second that they would love to be 2-0 in Pac 10 play this early in the season. We look past these guys and our momentum is lost and we are 1-1 w/ and uphill battle to get to that sixth victory to qualify for a bowl game. That’s all I am saying. Bigdave be very confident in our Huskies. I am too. But when I say “over-confidence hurts”, I am referring to our players either looking back at their USC victory or looking beyond the Furd. Forget about USC and tackle Stanford this weekend. It doesn’t have to be pretty- just win and try to manage very minor injuries if any.
All I saw was purple
We Agree Crazi
All I want is a UW victory with no injuries. 2-0 in Pac 10 play and get ready for Notre Dame.
Crazi
I am very Cocky this week. I dont play the game so I can be as cocky as I want. Barring any major injuries, I cant see any way we lose this game. I hope the team doesnt feel like I do, they need to play the game, but I am as confident as I have ever been going into a game. I see a double digit Dawg win this week.
We match up well againist Stanford. I bet we have a very similar game plan to that of LSU. Stop the run and make the young QB beat us. Stanford doesnt have the weapons LSU had and we have different players on the field now that are capable of making open field tackles. Ta’ Amu will be the difference in this game. He will command double teams all game long. The only difference between this weeks Def game plan and LSU is we will bring a lot more pressure (IMO). Look for us to stack the box and beat the heck out of Luck.
Either way, my point is simple…We Win Big!
LETS GO DAWGS!!!!
That's what it's about
We need all fans …the conservative to the cocky to be behind the dogs. I’m veering towards cocky. I’ve seen Stanford play and they are clearly steps behind USC/LSU in talent. That being said I don’t think you take them lightly in their house but if the game comes down to each player beating his man to execute a play I’m liking our odds here.
GO bigdave!...
I like it!!!!!!!!!
Washington Husky Football-Undefeated 1991 National Champions 12-0!
Momentum...
…is a serious factor and we have it! GO DAWGS!! Paint the furd Purple!!
Washington Husky Football-Undefeated 1991 National Champions 12-0!
most of before the season started circled this game as an indication of where we are in the pac.
here we are and it is still true.
we just know how good we can be now.
if we continue to grow this week as we have every previous week we should win big.
if we have some brain farts i think we still pull it out. we do know how to win now.
i’ll pick the former scenario though.
by PandG on Sep 25, 2009 12:21 PM PDT via mobile reply actions
Gerhart
I think he’s better than Polk. In fact, I think he’s the second most dangerous back in the PAC-10 after Best. It’s not that he’s so explosive that he could burn you for 6 on any play, it’s that he can wear out the defense because he hits so hard and he never seems to tire. He hurts people. To me that’s about as valuable as big play ability.
I’ll be interested to see what happens in this game. Was the SC game a fluke or is Washington the real deal this season?
More on Gerhart
We don’t know if Toby gets tired. The problem w/ opposing defenses is they don’t know how to handle a dude of his caliber. You can’t muscle this kid, because he’ll make you pay. What do you do? You’ve got to hit him square in the money maker (below the belt strap). Take out his legs and he falls like a stump. Hit him high and he’ll bounce you like a rag doll. But if he is able to withstand your low hit- hang on for dear life until the calvary shows up, i.e. gang tackle the S.O.B!
Nobody is hitting this guy correctly. We hit him hard last season and he left the game with a concussion. I think Gerhart will tire if you can tackle him properly. He’s not superman, plus he is carrying a lot of weight- that weight gets heavy after awhile. But how much will we see Gerhart totting the pigskin?
I think we need to concentrate on all Furd RBs. From what I saw last season- it wasn’t Gerhart that killed us, it was the other Furd RBs that did the damage. Gerhart will get his carries, but I wouldn’t be surprised if some other RB got the headlines. Gerhart and Co. will be stopped dead in their tracks if we get gap control- huge in the USC game.
Go Huskies! WOOF!!!
All I saw was purple
Throw last year out
No Locker, no Gerhart. Last year was a waltz for the Trees after Jake went down and we all know why.
The one thing I love about this matchup is that Jake is the worst possible scenario for the Trees. I think he gets off huge tomorrow. If Sark took the riegns off he might approach Tui’s 300/200.
by DawgBreath96 on Sep 25, 2009 6:28 PM PDT up reply actions
Toby can tote it 40 times
He is a true workhorse.
by John Berkowitz on Sep 25, 2009 7:21 PM PDT up reply actions
Have to disagree John- Gerhart needs to get Dirty!
Gerhart can go and go and go like you said if he isn’t being beaten up. Like I said nobody is hitting him correctly. Folks are trying to manhandle him and he is big enough to rub off the nastiest defenders. But if we hit him below the belt strap more often then not, he is going to take some pounding, i.e. initial hit, compounded by a second hit, compounded by a third hit, and compounded finally by landing on the turf. Nobody so far has been able to get Toby dirty. And you get him tired by getting him dirty. We can be the first to see him taking in oxygen on the sideline tomorrow night. But in order to see that, he’s got to get dirty.
All I saw was purple
wow - 2nd most dangerous?
… I would think that Grigsby, McNight, Stafon Johnson and Quizz Rodgers might be a tad more dangerous.
Damn, my eyeball tastes good.
Well he is different than Polk and more experienced than Polk
I think it is tough to compare the two because they are such different runners. I will tell you one thing about chris and that he is very tough inside and carries guys with him for extra yards. If you are putting together a top five in the Pac 10 both Gephart and Polk are in there.
by John Berkowitz on Sep 25, 2009 7:20 PM PDT up reply actions
Stack the box...
…get up field and pressure the backfield. I might rotate both Tamu and Thompson to keep guys fresh. Locker just needs to manage the game and control the clock and time of possession. If we do those things we win!
Washington Husky Football-Undefeated 1991 National Champions 12-0!
...Oh and win the turnover battle!!!!!!!
Washington Husky Football-Undefeated 1991 National Champions 12-0!
Hello Dawgfans!
JB
I think you vastly overrate our 2ndary. We are green and vulnerable and Furd has better recievers than Idaho who got whatever they wanted through the air. Last week our DBs and LBs BOTH played well in pass coverage, but I think Corp was off and overwhelmed as well. (Nice to see an opposing QB once again intimidated at HS btw).
This game will come down to whichever offense can be the least 1 dimensional. If Polk hurts the Trees early and often UW looks to win, if Luck consistently hits spots when we stack up against Gerhart advantage Trees.
The x-factor just might be 2-1 against LSU,Idaho,USC vs 2-1 against WSU,WF,SJSU. Stanford hasn’t even sniffed the level of competition UW is torqued at right now.
Just want to add, a thanks for running a fan site w/o the unfortunate Dawgman BS.
I dont' think Idaho got "whatever they wanted through the air"
We were definitely too soft throughout – but Idaho burned our linebackers, not our secondary. UW was playing a deep zone all game. The backers were not disciplined in holding their part of the zone and Idaho worked the middle/in through the air. USC was CLEARLY trying to replicate Idaho’s success in their passing attack. The difference against USC? The backers were all over the place – Foster tipped down three passes himself, they sent pressure from the corners (Quinton altered a couple of short passes meant for the flats) and Butler got that huge interception.
The only times the secondary have been burned so far this season were the two long runs off of short passes against LSU. That was about the last time we saw man coverage. I don’t recall Idaho connecting on a single deep route. Hardly “whatever they wanted”
Damn, my eyeball tastes good.
We ran so many payers in and out against Idaho
I think of Idaho as more of an experimental game against a team that was a lot better than people give them credit for. I wouldn’t be surprised if Idaho wins more than they lose this year. Good fro them…they have worked hard to achieve that.
by John Berkowitz on Sep 25, 2009 7:32 PM PDT up reply actions
Secondary...vastlly is such a big word
Bob Condotta had the same opinion today so maybe we are both wrong….hope not. I think we have both observed a lot of improvement between game one and game three.
I think we will slow down and minimize the damage Gephart can do on Saturday. What that boils down to is that Andrew Luck is going to have to have a real good game for Stanford to beat us.
I guess we find out how good the secondary is when we stop the run.
by John Berkowitz on Sep 25, 2009 7:30 PM PDT up reply actions
I would love to have a great secondary,
but we don’t. Just being honest. They have improved over last year’s unit (same can be said about the whole team), but they are, as Holt put it, a work in progress. So far they played:
-OK against LSU, a passing team that can’t pass all that well.
-poorly against Idaho; yes they were rotating players in and tweaking coverages, but make no mistake, Idaho got JUST what they wanted in the mid-range pass attack.
-really good against USC with Corp who had a terrible game.
Stanford just might be the most balanced offense we have faced so far. It will be interesting to see what Luck can find out there. I too like what I see in terms of development, but I am hesitant to call advantage Wash in the position battle at DB/S. I really like how our LBs performed in pass coverage as well.
by DawgBreath96 on Sep 26, 2009 1:53 PM PDT up reply actions
Give me a break...
We have a secondary that is developing and getting better every game.
You are bing a little too negative. LSU can pass well…that QB is very good….I think you really underestimate Enderle…he is tearing up Northern Illinois today.
You really need to figure out what you are looking at from week to week. Enderle is going to play on Sundays….so is Jordan Jefferson and the majority of the tools that surrounded him.
by John Berkowitz on Sep 26, 2009 3:15 PM PDT up reply actions
I'd say Holt...
…has done amazing things so far. They’re going to be better though. His defensive unit really took U$C to the woodshed after they had settled down.
Washington Husky Football-Undefeated 1991 National Champions 12-0!
We were knocking some snot out of their nose
It was so old time Husky Football…when the opposition has multiple players squirming on the ground between plays it brings tears of joy to my eyes.
by John Berkowitz on Sep 26, 2009 4:47 PM PDT up reply actions
I felt the same way...
…it was cathartic and truly felt like the turning point of the Huskies reemergence. The DAWGS are back!
Washington Husky Football-Undefeated 1991 National Champions 12-0!
I'm starting to think our secondary is doing well.
They gave up some big plays to LSU, Idaho is much better then anyone would have expected, and they held their own against USC.
The coaching staff is doing a pretty good job of moving players, adjust schemes, and really coaching these guys up. They look vastly improved from last year, and are showing good improvement already this year. If the defense continues to improve and play hard, watch out.
"Legends are made on the shores of Lake Washington"
"BOW DOWN TO WASHINGTON"
Well ya....
Idaho is a good squad and they will continue to improve it all year and become bowl eligible.
by John Berkowitz on Sep 26, 2009 4:48 PM PDT up reply actions
and just think...
…you’ve got a true freshman back there on the corner and a RS freshman at Free Safety.
Washington Husky Football-Undefeated 1991 National Champions 12-0!
Ya...
I understand you but they are early 1990’s good.
I have followed Glenn for four years and Trufant may be the most athletic kid in his famly that prodiced an NFL first round draft choice…I like the way our defensive backfield is developing…there will be hiccups…but both of those kids are good.
The fist think Steve Sarkisian did after his press conference was visit Desmond Trufant at his home. to me that says a lot.
by John Berkowitz on Sep 26, 2009 5:09 PM PDT up reply actions
How 'bout now?
The entire defense was torn to shreds tonight, including the secondary.
They sucked in pass coverage and run support. And Stanford was extremely efficient with both the run game and passing. Pretty sure I had actually figured out exactly what I had been looing at from week to week.
Wasn’t ever trying to be negative BTW, it’s called obvective observation.
by DawgBreath96 on Sep 27, 2009 12:09 AM PDT up reply actions
I think you are a little misdirected
I wasn’t out there on the field.
Pass coverage was fine and and the run support was fine…I mean when a 235 pund power back gets into the secondary all day it isn’t the secondaries fault…they are the safety valve.
by John Berkowitz on Sep 27, 2009 6:47 PM PDT up reply actions
Secondary
I don’t think John is vastly overrating anything back there. I think John sees a secondary coming into their own. I personally think the kids in there now are finally figuring it all out. It’s not about covering the receiver, it’s about covering the route. As a DB, you got to know quickly what route the opposing reciever is running. When you can figure that stuff out, then you really have something, and as a DB the game slows down tremendously. Until then it’s a guessing game and you are force to cover the reciever instead of the route.
Our secondary is not great, but it has worked well so far and it is only going to get better as the season progresses. What I like is that our young secondary is offering tremendous run support. Hell fellas we got to be doing something right, we just beat freakin’ USC.
And Gekko is correct. The only two opposing passes that killed us were the two from LSU that went yard. Since then nobody has gone long on us back there. Our young secondary kids are picking it all up rather quickly. Luck may be a better QB then Corps, but I would argue that the Idaho kid (Enderlie) might play himself right into a big time NFL contract. Did you see that kid? He looked like a dam fine QB. All the tools were there except for a big league arm that can go the distance.
All I saw was purple
Enderle
Even Idaho fans described him as garbage. Got news for you…hey aint garbage…he has developed into a kid that is going to get a decent shot to play on Sunday. He impressed me with his poise, delivery, footwork, and zip on tha ball. Somebody has done a pretty good job working with him. Sometimes kids just blossom….he is one those kids.
by John Berkowitz on Sep 25, 2009 8:11 PM PDT up reply actions
Dawgs of War
Just finished the book. Read the whole thing tonight when I got home. Very good book that brought back fond memories of my playing days. I will admit that when the dawgs were playing in 2000 I was to concentrated on
high school and not getting the games that I forgot that came back in just about every game that year! That book should manditory reading for all dawg players. It shows that you play the game as a team, workout as a team and win as a team! I’m am so pumped for tomorrow I can’t fall asleep. Let’s go Dawgs! You got the whole dawg nation behind you now go win one for UW!
Also there was a lot of mention of “UW football”. Hard nosed, tough football that is relentless in it’s pursuit of greatness! It’s all in their hands. Make history!
Talk to you dawg fans tomorrow!!
Let’s go Dawgs!!
by bigdave967 on Sep 25, 2009 7:50 PM PDT via mobile reply actions
Gerhart...
you guys remember how to spell it now?
by CardinalRules07 on Sep 27, 2009 9:42 PM PDT reply actions
Ya...we got it down
He spelled it with his cleats on the backs of our defensive linemen
by John Berkowitz on Sep 28, 2009 3:38 PM PDT up reply actions

by 















