Looking ahead to Stanford
Jim Harbaugh has done a marvelous job rebuilding a football program that was down even more than Washington was when he arrived. Many speculated the year before he arrived that Stanford may have just been the worst team in Pac 10 conference history. That myth was dispelled when they beat Washington in Seattle after Ty Willingham had demotivated his team by announcing Suddenly Senior Day.
Stanford was picked by most experts to go bowling this season and climb into the conferences first division. The Tree likes to run the ball and they have the conferences best big back in Sr. Toby Gephart. Stanford ran the ball down Washington's throat last year in Husky Stadium and they will try to do the same thing this Saturday on the Farm.
Andrew Luck is a real good looking QB with great mobility. He doesn't have Locker like speed but he can run a good 4.6 which can help keep him out of trouble. The Cards prefer to run a power offense and try to keep Luck under 20 throws per game. Luck only threw the ball 12 times last week. He had 9 completions for 170 yards, one TD, and one interception.
One area of concern for Stanford had been on the offensive line. The Cards are starting two RS frosh at tackles. Washington has played against two of the best offensive lines in college football over the past couple weeks and done well. Even Idaho had a surprisingly good OL with an NFL candidate or two. Our DE's could be able to exploit the Cardinal inexperience out on the edge. DTN going up against a RS frosh is a big mismatch.
Harbaugh likes to run the ball and Washington has proven itself to be very tough against the run despite giving up 250 yards to USC last Saturday. 114 of those yards were generated by the Trojans in the first quarter. Once the Huskies settled down and made adjustments they kept the Trojan RB's in check and out of the end zone the rest of the day.
I think Stanford is too one dimensional and that is why they lost on the road at Wake Forest. If you contain Gephart, and Washington has that ability, you can force them into making mistakes. Turnovers were a problem even in a convincing win over SJSU. The Tree fumbled three times and were intercepted once. It won't bode well for Stanford if they are minus four in the turnover ratio against UW on Saturday night.
The Tree returns eight starters on a defense that is definitely on the upswing. Linebacker Clinton Snyder has all league potential and is the leader of the defense, but the strength should be up front. Defensive ends Tom Keiser and Erik Lorig are capable of wreaking havoc in the backfield and tackles Brian Bulcke and Ekom Udofia are both good looking upperclassmen. They held SJSU to only 24 rushing yards on 28 carries last week which is a big improvement over the 251 they gave up the previous week against Wake Forest. They sacked the Spartans 6 times for a total loss of 57 yards. Washington's offensive line has gone up against two top ten defense in the past three weeks. I don't think what Stanford is going to throw at them is going to be intimidating.
The Cards needed to improve their pass defense. This season they have given up 200 yards through the air to SJSU, 207 to Wake Forest, and 247 to WSU. Bo McNally is a capable centerfielder but he needs more help back there. The Cardinal yielded 18 touchdown passes and picked off just seven in 2008, despite getting plenty of help from a healthy pass rush.
The last time a healthy Jake Locker played Stanford was on the road in Palo Alto two years ago. Locker dominated the Cardinal on the ground and through the air. He arrives this time a more polished player with better and more experienced tools surrounding him. I don't think Stanford can stop the Washington passing attack. I also don't think they can contain him on the run when Washington decides to use him that way.
Washington is among the top in the Pac 10 in passing offense but they also have the ability to run the ball well. The tandem of Chris Polk and Johri Fogerson have been effective for three straight games. Theoretically they should have an easier time running the ball against Stanford than they did USC.
The key to the game for Washington is to adapt to playing on the road, avoid all the distractions following the USC upset, eliminate mistakes, and methodically pound the Cardinal into submission by wearing out their depth. Locker should have a big day against the Stanford DB's. Polk should be able to find all the holes he needs to keep the offense in balance.
Defensively the Huskies need to tackle well, aim low, and wrap up because Gephart is a real load to bring down once he gets a head of steam going. Andrew Luck is a better QB than Aaron Corp so the Washington defensive backfield will be tested more this weekend. If Washington controls the run and builds a lead the Tree will have to turn to the pass. Luck throws a very good ball and because of his mobility is hard to sack. UW needs a good game out of their secondary.
The Cards are well coached, motivated, and are playing at home. They have the ability to win this game if they outplay Washington. Even if it isn't a big crowd there is always a home field advatage. They have talent and are capable of making some big plays which can put the opposition on its heals. Chris Owusu returned the opening kickoff 94 yards for a TD against SJSU which put the Spartans into a hole they never recovered from. Washington needs to eliminate big plays like that.
Overall I like the Huskies chances in this game even though the oddsmakers opened with Stanford as a nine point favorite. Kickoff is currently scheduled for 6:00 PM and the game will be broadcast live on Fox College Sports.
0 recs |
62 comments
|
Comments
Stanford's Offense
If we can bring pressure with our outside defensive lineman and control their running game, we should be golden…er I mean PURPLE!
Washington Husky Football-Undefeated 1991 National Champions 12-0!
the line has gone down to 7.5 points
the gamblers are noticing the play of jake locker. as j.l. goes so do the huskies. i expect him to have a good game.
by wolfmanshowlforever on Sep 22, 2009 11:34 PM PDT up reply actions
It is Washington money
In Reno and Vegas you always have a lot of people from Washington state who will bet on the game and drive the line down. That is why they artificially set it high at 9 to open. They know by Friday it will be at round 6 which is just about right.
Six or nine it doesn’t really matter because UW is going to win.
by John Berkowitz on Sep 23, 2009 6:58 AM PDT up reply actions
Thats how I am looking at it
I saw 9 and liked it but to be honest I like any spread that UW is getting points
Coach Sark
Check out his website for some aWesome pics! I really love the panorama shot of Husky Stadium being “Holt Rushed” by the fans!
Washington Husky Football-Undefeated 1991 National Champions 12-0!
“That’s the best quarterback we’ve played in nine years here,” Carroll said when told Washington has beaten only Idaho and USC the last two years. " Jake Locker has ridiculous talent, and had he remained healthy last year, Tyrone [Willingham] would still be coaching there."
-Pete Carroll
It is looking like a REAL possibility that Jake won’t be back next year. On Colin Cowherd this morning He said that Trent Dilfer told him that Jake will be the first QB taken whenever he comes out.. Trent is one of many at ESPN who are starting to say this now.
If he's projected that high...
…he’ll be gone. I wonder who might be the starter next season? I guess it’ll be a great competition.
Washington Husky Football-Undefeated 1991 National Champions 12-0!
Jake isn't ready
There is a lot of hype floating around this week but Jake isn’t ready for the NFL yet. When he can start hitting deep balls with his receivers in stride then he will be ready.
He really needs another full year of coaching from Sark.
I do feel there is some urgency on the money side of things. You would think the Angels contract would give him enough change to be able to stick around another year.
by John Berkowitz on Sep 22, 2009 8:46 AM PDT up reply actions
At this point...
I don’t think he’s ready either but if he keeps doing well the NFL will come calling because he has ALL the tools to be a great NFL QB. Tough to turn down 20-30 million dollars of guarenteed money.
There are also changes
coming with the NFL salary cap and I’ve heard rumors of restrictions on draft pick salaries. Depending on how that shakes out, it may be to his benefit to leave after this year.
by hairofthedawg on Sep 22, 2009 9:20 AM PDT up reply actions
Don't be so sure
Remember, guys like Matt Leinart and Sam Bradford were projected as the #1 QB and both opted to come back for a year.
http://www.spartyandfriends.com/
by thecassino on Sep 22, 2009 8:49 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions
IMO, even if Jake does have an amazing season, he won’t leave….least i hope he doesn’t. So selfish of me!!!
by ChazzReinhold on Sep 22, 2009 9:04 AM PDT up reply actions
i think jake locker would come back if we won 7 or 8 games
i seriously think the play of locker, polk and the rest of the team could contend for a national championship next year. hopefully no injuries. we played incredibly well vs lsu. they won the title 2 years ago and we beat usc. i think of it as unfinished business for next year. on the downside sam bradford will never be a number 1 pick because when he won the heisman he had all the time in the world. in the byu game he just got hit by one large pretty fast byu player and he got injured. i think the nfl scouts would consider him pretty risky with a high pick. jake locker is much more mobile so that is to his benefit. i sure hope he comes back. no doubt it would be washington and usc for pac-ten title and probably a pre-season ranking of 9 or 10th in the country. i love what steve sarkisian has done. he will no doubt get coach of the year if they win 7 or 8 games. possibly even nine if the huskies stay injury free. peace out ramble on!
by wolfmanshowlforever on Sep 23, 2009 2:46 PM PDT up reply actions
7 or 8?
I think we can run the entire slate.
by John Berkowitz on Sep 23, 2009 8:12 PM PDT up reply actions
OK, John, put down the kool aid!!!
"Legends are made on the shores of Lake Washington"
"BOW DOWN TO WASHINGTON"
This game is one I felt preseason was
winnable and a must win, (thought we needed the W to be 1-1 in Pac10). My opinion hasn’t changed, just the eventual goal. Stop the run, force a 1st year QB to beat us with his arm. The Furd is a lot tougher team physically than in a long time, but so are we. The tipping point is a healthy Jake all game long. I like the fact they are starting the young OL, Teo needs a break on getting double teamed and having a breakout day.
Since Rodriguez appears to be getting it done at michigan, I now see Notre Dame getting their 2nd coach from Stanford, maybe as soon as next year. I truly doubt Harbaugh is there at the Furd for a career.
WOW!
Good call prrbrr! I think most of us counted this as a loss. The thing is when it actually came up to game week, I think most of us were optimistic and even believed we had a chance. Amazing what the power of believing and positive thinking will do.
Washington Husky Football-Undefeated 1991 National Champions 12-0!
Good point Prrbrr
Harbaugh isn’t going to stay at Stanford much longer. I am surprised he didn’t leave last year. Every coach has a list of jobs he wants and I am sure when one comes up that is on Harbaugh’s list he will make the move. On the othe rhand he is a young coach and still learning the game. He hasn’t achived the goals he wants at Stanford yet. It is also a pretty nice area to live in.
And he just got that sweet bathroom
http://www.spartyandfriends.com/
by thecassino on Sep 22, 2009 8:53 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions
It kind of depends on what kind of life he wants to have
… Stanford can be a very special coaching experience for man. It combines high integrity/high achieving student athletes with a special academic backdrop in one of the most beautiful places in the country. If the coach has kids who are in high school, the idea of a free ride at one of the most prestigious universities in the world doesn’t hurt. Not to mention the who’s who of alum globetrotting around the world.
If your ambition is national championships, than Stanford is a stepping stone … but it can be a special experience for the right person.
Damn, my eyeball tastes good.
Fantastic Gekko
I am thinking that Harbaugh may be reluctant to leave exactly because of that. He has the ability to stay at Stanford as long as he wants. He is also building a championship football team. As excited as we are about the 2010 UW recruiting class the Stanford class is one for the ages.
by John Berkowitz on Sep 22, 2009 8:11 PM PDT up reply actions
Yeah, Harbaugh is building a heck of a class there, and that’s on top of a very good class last year and a pretty good class the year before that. He clearly is a good fit there in terms of recruiting, and they’re getting there with on-field results as well. Stanford under Harbaugh could very well turn into one of the top teams in the conference.
Now if...
Now if they could get more than 30,000 into the stands they would be on to something.
by John Berkowitz on Sep 22, 2009 8:24 PM PDT up reply actions
Really is puzzling to me that they can’t do better than that, though Wilner seems to have pegged a pretty good reason why…
I didn't read Wilner's article ...
… but having lived there for a long time before moving to NYC, I can tell you that a huge chunk of the alumni move to wherever they originally came from or to major metropolitan centers (e.g. NYC, Chicago, LA). On top of that, Stanford does not really draw from the local scene – Palo Alto is not really that nice, its a little bit of a hike from the population in San Jose, it can be a big hike from the city if 101 traffic is bad and it is not realistic to get the East Bay crowd to come out. And, of course, for many of the students football is not a very high priority.
Damn, my eyeball tastes good.
I have seen full houses at Stanford
The Bay Area like Chicago, or New York is a pro sports town. It has been that way since the 1950’s. Stanford and Cal have had a few resurgences over the years but it takes time to rebuild a fan base. Tedford has done it at Cal and Harbaugh has a chance to do it at Stanford once the team starts winning more than they lose. The Cards are really close to doing that and a top ten recruiting class in 2010 is going to push them over the top.
Stanford’s program has been down a long time. Willingham’s Rose Bowl team was more of an aberation than anything else. The new stadium is a big step in the right direction because the old one was in danger of being condemned. I really think they will start filling the place up in a year or two if the marketing department at Stanford can get there crap together. Can’t believe they wouldn’t move the game time to be televised this weekend. They don’t get it.
by John Berkowitz on Sep 23, 2009 2:01 PM PDT up reply actions
The Game is a "MUST-WIN"
I agree with prrbrr. Stop Stanford early and score points early. The “D” must come into this game and “take no prisoners”.
by bigdawgdaddy999 on Sep 22, 2009 9:50 AM PDT reply actions
Stanford is about to run into a buzzsaw
Yeah my post is laced with homerism but I’m looking at other teams play and I have a hard time not thinking “man we look better than these guys”
The only ? is how this team can play on the road. Talent wise they have the right stuff to shut Stanford down for the whole game.
I’m actually glad we’re playing Gerhart. He’s not a guy that’s going to beat you around the corner. I hope he has fun trying to run through 290lb Elisar and 340lb Meda all game long. You’ll be a daisy if you do.
Yeah I think...
…compared to playing all those speed burners that U$C had this may have the Husky Front Seven licking their chops a bit! We need to get off to a fast start and keep putting pressure on them.
Washington Husky Football-Undefeated 1991 National Champions 12-0!
Stanford
I can see them throwing the ball more against us. I mean they have Toby but they’re going to look at the Idaho film.
Washington Husky Football-Undefeated 1991 National Champions 12-0!
Throwing the ball against the UW
Taking from the Pac-10 statistics page.
Pass Defense
Pass Defense
1. ASU
2. Arizona
3. USC
4. UCLA
5. Cal
We ended up in 6th place. I think the kvetching over the Idaho game speaks more about a lack of understaning about what Holt was doing rather than a systemic deficiency in talent. Damien Williams had a pretty mediocre game partially because of Corp’s play but also Trufant was right behind him on many plays.
I hope rook QB think the UW is a creampuff in the secondary. I think they’ll find their luck isn’t quite what they imagined it would be.
We need to get after that kid...
…third start ever? Turn up the heat! When you look at their two most inexperienced offensive lineman they’re the tackles, you could make an argument that that’s the strongest part of our defensive line with DTN and Darrion Jones. There is also Creighton who appears to be our outside speed rusher. They’re going to try and run the ball and not make the freshman hurt them by having to throw the ball. We need to stop the run first.
Washington Husky Football-Undefeated 1991 National Champions 12-0!
If they throw against us ...
… they will play right into our hands. First, they will be keeping the ball out of the hands of their best player. Second, they would be putting a freshman QB in a position to make mistakes and thus allowing one of the most efficient offenses in the Pac 10 to capitalize.
I hope you are right.
Damn, my eyeball tastes good.
Stanford passing game
Andrew Luck is the best Pac 10 QB we will face this season.
by John Berkowitz on Sep 22, 2009 8:13 PM PDT up reply actions
I'd say Riley, too.
…. and we don’t know enough about Danny Sullivan yet – but I’d probably take him, too.
Damn, my eyeball tastes good.
The main thing that concerns me about Stanford’s passing game is Owusu – that guy is a play-maker. We’d better make sure we don’t lose safety containment on him, because he’s their big-play guy.
I saw Riley and Luck on TV
I think Luck is better and riley is too stiff. It is early so all that can change as the season goes on.
I think Owusu is great and it pains me that he chose Stanford over UW. you have to look at the level of teams Stanford has played so far…it doesn’t compare to who Washington has played. Idaho for instance will beat SJSU like a drum.
by John Berkowitz on Sep 22, 2009 8:30 PM PDT up reply actions
This is "looking ahead to Standford"
Not how winning 2 games in a row yields a NC, Heisman trophy, and the first pick in the next NFL draft.
Bradford, Tebow, and McCoy had solid careers before their shootout last year. Jake may turn out to be better than all three, but he needs a longer track record. Coming out the year after those 3 leave might not be a bad strategy, either. In 2011, the first rounders will get less money than the 2010 first rounders. That is the best reason I see for someone like Jake to come out early. He still needs more experience, those prior years were wasted. If Pete C was right (Jake wins, Ty stays), then Jake’s shattered thumb was his best career move.
Prr was right, preseason this is a game we could steal on the road. Nothing has changed except we kicked a FG at the end of the last game. Stanford is favored by over a TD and its a young team’s first road game. But this site is almost neutral. It sounds like the game is a place for the elite to park their kids after the big soccer game, for free, while they wait for their dinner reservations. Stop the crowd quickly, and this could be just like a practice, except no music. And we practice hard.
Bark for Sark, and get another W.
Lord Byron needs a rewrite in "Destruction of Sennacherib"
The Sarkisian come down like the wolf on the fold,
and his cohorts were gleaming in purple and gold,
and the sheen of their spears was like stars on the sea,
and the purple wave rolls nightly on deep Galilee
SWEET prrbrr!....
…I like it!!!!!!! GO DAWGS!!
Washington Husky Football-Undefeated 1991 National Champions 12-0!
Stanford Info
Bob C’s blog says projected attendance at Tree Stadium is 33,000. Gosh I would love to fly down for that game!
Washington Husky Football-Undefeated 1991 National Champions 12-0!
$29 Bucks Each Way to Fly on Virgin America
If I lived in Seattle I would pony up $58 to fly down for the game.
by John Berkowitz on Sep 22, 2009 10:55 AM PDT up reply actions
Checked it out and...
…it’s a bit more depending on the dates. I think I’m going to watch it on TV. I just got back from Peru and I still feel a bit spent. Of course last Saturday’s game took me down a notch but it was damn well worth it! GO DAWGS!!
Somehow I found a way to yell even though my voice was gone!
by doubledeucedawg on Sep 22, 2009 5:26 PM PDT up reply actions
Fouch is still the backup
But I think the prevailing thought is that Price , with a year in the weight room and another Spring/Summer will overtake Fouch for the backup spot.
He’s very athletic so while he won’t be Jake Locker Lite he’ll be another touch guy to corral.
Fouch might be making noise in a controlled pro-style offense...
… he’s very cerebral and he’s tough. He had a tough year last year, but he did demonstrate a lot of grit and the ability to stand in there.
Damn, my eyeball tastes good.
Fouch and or Price
You see the improvement in Locker this season…you can bet that Ronnie Fouch has also experienced a quantum leap. Price is going to be quite a player by next spring. He has all the tools. Think of him as a Dennis Dixon clone.
by John Berkowitz on Sep 22, 2009 8:15 PM PDT up reply actions
Good comparison John...
which is why oregon was trying like crazy to steal Price away from us. Glad he stuck with his commitment.
Price
Price is going to be a very good QB. The coaches are really happy with the way he has progressed over the last two months. Fouch is no slouch either. he was handed a raw deal last season and didn’t get a lot of help. Give him credit for giving 100% and the experience he received will pay off in the future.
by John Berkowitz on Sep 23, 2009 2:05 PM PDT up reply actions
Cellar Dwellers
Just for fun. Has anyone looked at the standings for the Pac-10 conference lately and noticed who the two teams are that are on the bottom?
on defense our line will look like lsu
our rushing defense is for real. we made adjustments against usc in the first half and that was it. stanfors is nowhere nearly as versatile.
ta’amu and elisara plugging up the middle with dtn, thompson and crichton crashing in those frosh tackles.
our ‘backers are improving each week and dennison looked really good when in for ej.
what is mason’s vertical leap? geez he a was disrupting corp(se) all day.
stanford only has one deep threat so pressure negates that play.
these players are too hungry to let down, they have something to prove to everyone they play.
this is still the most important game in the 1st half of the season imo and will tell us where we through october.
I know. It's hard not to sound overconfident
This “is” a road game after all but we match up really well against Stanford. I don’t mind if they try to stuff the ball down our gullets the whole game. If Ta’amu and Elisar get tired we’ll put in Matthews and Duncan and if they get tired Tokalahi will come in.
We’ve got enough depth to keep pounding their ball carriers.
Don't forget Thompson...
…he can play in the middle too.
by doubledeucedawg on Sep 22, 2009 5:28 PM PDT up reply actions
Gerhart and Co.
Our offense is going to move chains and score. Sark, Nuss, and Locker have every member of the offense in sync. Offense won’t be a problem. The key to the Stanford game in defense. Gerhart is a load, but not the only ballcarrier. Remember last season’s game where Gerhart tore it up on us in the 1st quarter and then sat the rest of the game out with a concussion? Most of the running damage we sustained in last season’s contest w/ Stanford was the “other” runningbacks. Our job on defense is to stop or just slow down the Stanford running game. Like the USC game, we don’t necessary have to shut them down yardage wize, we just need to keep them out of the endzone. If Stanford is going to score, the freshman Luck is going to have to get them in there. Force Luck to beat us, Like Corp.
I don’t think we necessarily have to sack Luck to win the passing game. As a freshman, just the thought of DTN running him down will scare the bejesus out of him. We need to really put on the pressure. Force the young Luck to release the ball faster then he wants, get him out of his confort zone quickly. DEs need to contain him to the pocket where the pressure will really mount. We don’t need to sack him, just make life for him in the pocket very uncomfortable and harass him all day.
But slowing the running game is HUGE and keep in mind they have plenty of running options besides Gerhart. Who knows Harbough might use Gerhart as a decoy for a series or two. Stop Gerhart and Co.
All I saw was purple
You know Crazi
I have spent a lot of time analyzing the Stanford lineup vs the UW lineup and it seems to be pretty even on both sides of the ball with the exception of Jake Locker. Jake is the X factor inall games going forward.
Andrew Luck is the best looking QB in the conference other than Jake Locker. Forget Matt Barkley and the drive. Luck can do it when called upon.
Turnover ratio and the play of locker will decide this game.
Our D-line & secondary
… are still weaker links that need some cushion for error. No turnovers and time of possession give them that. We need Chris Polk grinding out some yards to make that happen. I wouldn’t mind seeing a few dive plays called for Homer, either.
Damn, my eyeball tastes good.
Turn over margin is the key to the Game
Like last Saturday. If we are +2 in the TurnOver margins…Huskies Win
by bigdawgdaddy999 on Sep 23, 2009 10:30 AM PDT reply actions

by 















