UW Dawg Pound: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
New Blog: Cottagers Confidential for Fulham FC Fans!

The Monday Morning Wash

Washington is in the unusual position of trying to avoid the same pitfalls that USC did last weekend in Seattle. The goal for the Huskies is to avoid a major letdown after pulling off one of the biggest wins in the schools history last week after a 16-13 win over the Trojans.

USC didn't have an emotional let down this past Saturday. They hit the field with a high level of intensity from the very first snap. What undid Troy was turnovers, penalties, and mental errors. Washington needs to avoid all of the above going forward because Stanford is very capable of beating the Huskies.

The bookmakers in Nevada have made Stanford a nine point favorite in this one. Obviously they aren't sold on Washington at this point and feel the Huskies will fold on the road against Stanford in the first road game of the year. This was one of the games we all circled in the pre-season as being winnable. In fact we circled it as a must win on the road to a possible 6-6 record and bowl qualification.

A little more is on the line this week because Washington's upset win actually put the Dawgs in the drivers seat to the Rose Bowl. You may snicker all you want but if you can beat USC you should be able to beat anyone. USC coach Pete Carroll actually commented after the game that Washington is capable of winnning every single game left on its schedule.

If you are facing your first road trip...Stanford is the place to do it. The Card's don't draw well despite being in a new stadium and having one of the brightest young coaches in the game. Washington fans will noticeably swell the crowd on Saturday night. Stanford is an easy road trip from Seattle for Husky fans and there are a lot of Washington alumni in the Bay Area.

The key for this week is to stay focused and forget what happened last week against USC. Washington isn't good enough to play through a let down type of situation. Washington isn't good enough to win making the type of mistakes USC did. The only way the Huskies win the majority of their games this season is to approach each game like it is their last.

What sets Washington apart from every team in the league is QB Jake Locker. No other QB in the league is close to his level of proficiency. He can throw for a high percentage and if they unleash him he can burn you for 100 additional yards on the ground. The goal for the first three weeks was just keeping him healthy for the rest of the season. Now that the gauntlet of LSU and USC has passed expect his mobility to become more of a factor as we face slower teams.

Coach Sarkisan has a rule about victories. Celebrate for twenty four hours then get back to business. This team will face a bunch of new distractions this week because the national media is going to be all over them. The coaches challenge this week is to minimize all those distractions and keep the team focused for Stanford.

I have watched every single Pac 10 team play at least once this season and I don't think there is a team out there we can't beat at this point. Now that we have that statement out of the way I also want to make the point that with the exception of Washington State there isn't a single team left on the schedule that can't beat us. For Washington to continue winning they need to stay healthy and keep a big chip on their shoulder. They need to focus like they did for LSU and USC every single week. Washington cannot afford to take anyone lightly.

Stanford is going to be a tough contest. The Cardinals are playing a physical brand of football and Harbaugh continues to upgrade the talent with top rated recruiting classes. Despite the toughness Stanford is too one dimensional on offense. If you can stop or slow their running game you should be able to beat them. They are also prone to turn the ball over so Washington needs to take advantage of that. The Tree committed four turnovers against SJSU.

Defensively the Tree is tough up front and they face a smash mouth offense every single day in practice. The weak link however is the secondary. A QB like Jake Locker has the ability to pick up quite a few yards in the air if he can avoid the pass rush.

Everyone in the media is declaring that Washington is back. If they can put together a win on the road against a tough and physical team that statement will have much more meaning.

.Pac 10 Round Up

California 35 Minnesota 21

Jahvid Best ran wild in the first half for three TD's and 114 yard then disapeared from the offense in the second half. He was back in the game for the fourth quarter and helped Cal vanquish the pesky Gopers with two more TD's. You have to wonder what Tedford was thinking in the second half. Hand it off to your Heisman candidate till they prove they can stop him!

Oregon 31 Utah 24

Some unknown guy named LaMichael James rushed for a career-high 152 yards and a touchdown. Oregon overcame four turnovers and an abysmal performance by quarterback Jeremiah Masoli to beat the No. 18 Utes 31-24 which snapped the nation's longest winning streak. Masoli ran for two touchdowns, but had two fumbles and an interception in the second half that allowed Utah to rally from a 21-7 deficit to within 28-24 by the end of the third quarter.

Stanford 42 San Jose 17

This game was never in doubt as Stanford rushed out to an early lead and coasted the rest of the way. Chris Owusua opened the game with a 94-yard kickoff return and also caught a touchdown pass, Toby Gerhart ran for 113 yards and two TDs. Next up is Washington at home with the early and unexpected twist of championship implications.

WSU 30 SMU 27

Nico Grasu kicked a 39-yard field goal in overtime as Washington State came back to beat Southern Methodist 30-27 on Saturday for their first win of the season. Southern Methodist led 24-7 in the third quarter and seemed to be cruising to victory. Then the WSU defense took control. Linebacker Alex Hoffman-Ellis picked off Mitchell at midfield and ran the ball back 52 yards for a touchdown late in the third. But the snap for the conversion was fumbled, and the Cougars trailed 24-13. That missed extra point would end up costing them a chance to win in regulation. Linebacker Myron Beck picked off a scrambling Mitchell and outran the Mustangs for a 67-yard touchdown that cut SMU's lead to 27-20 with 10:07 left. The Lobster hit a diving Jared Karstetter in the end zone with 28 seconds left. Grasu kicked the extra point to tie the game at 27-27. The Mustangs had 504 yards of offense, compared to 276 for WSU.

Cincinnati 28 Oregon State 17

Tony Pike led Cincinnati to a road victory against Oregon State.The senior quarterback completed 31 of 49 passes for 332 yards and two touchdowns. I thought the Beavers pass defense was suspect since game one and this game proved it. Pike hit Mardy Gilyard with an 18-yard scoring pass in the fourth quarter to stop a second-half Oregon State comeback bid. The Bearcats (3-0) snapped Oregon State's streak of 26 straight nonconference victories at Reser Stadium, dating back to a 67-28 win over Northern Illinois on Nov. 16, 1996.

Iowa 27 Arizona 17

Freshman running back Adam Robinson rushed for a career-high 101 yards and two touchdowns. Iowa held Arizona to just eight first downs in a 27-17 victory Saturday. Nic Grigsby was held to only 75 yards rushing and that is how you beat Arizona. The Wildcats entered play with the nation's fifth-best rushing offense at 305.5 yards per game, but couldn't get the run or the pass going against an Iowa defense that took control of the game in the second half.

UCLA 23  Kansas State 9

Rick Neuheisel faced the challenge of beating the worst BCS team in the country this side of Washington State and SMU. He came out with a win despite the loss of his starting QB and the suspension of four key players for discipinary reasons. It wasn't pretty and the Bruins needed 10 fourth quarter points to ice the game. Freshman Johnathan Franklin rushed for a career-best 119 yards on 23 carries and Kai Forbath kicked three field goals without a miss for the Bruins. Kevin Craft completed 13 of 24 passes with one interception including a game-clinching 51-yard scoring pass to Terrence Austin with 6:18 left in the game. The Bruins have a much needed bye next week.

Arizona State 38  Louisiana Monroe 14

Exhibition season continued for Dennis Erickson and his ASU Sun Devils in Tempe this weekend. Omar Bolden returned the opening kickoff 89 yards for a touchdown, picked off a pass, and Arizona State routed Louisiana-Monroe 38-14 on Saturday night in a tuneup for its trip to Georgia. The Sun Devils have limited teams from the Big Sky and Sun Belt Conferences to a total of 17 points which makes me think maybe they should move down a level.

Pac 10 Power Ratings

1. California...The Bears win by 14 in a tough environment at Minnesota. The Gophers arent' that good and Cal is one dimensional with a questionable defense. The game was closer than the final score. Oregon will give us a better idea of how good the Bears are.

2. Southern California...Take away the three turnovers and USC beats Washington by around 17 points. USC may not lose another game all year but Saturday's loss shows what happens when you cough up the ball on the road.

3. Washington...Jake Locker is the best player in the league and until someone can stop him Washington will keep winning. Nick Holt's defense was masterful after a shaky first quarter. Imagine that...a Washington coach capable of making game day adjustments!

4. Stanford...The Cards put a USC type of beating on the Spartan's to rebound after the loss to Wake Forest. I thought this one would be a lot closer and it wasn't. Nice rebound game for Stanford. Tomey says it is the toughest Stanford team he has seen in thirty years.

5. Oregon State...Cincinnati will win the Big East this year and be in a major bowl. The Beavers on the other hand will recover and keep getting better. The OSU pass defense needs to tighten if they want to get anywhere this year.

6. UCLA...A 3-0 start and a victory at Tennessee gives these guys the benefit of the doubt, but SDSU is terrible and so is KSU. The Bruins struggled against both opponents and if Tennessee hadn't self destructed so terribly they wouldn't have beaten them. Rumors floating out of LA this week indicate that Neu and Chow aren't getting along well.

7. Arizona...Stoops and his team underperforms at Iowa. Nic Grigsby was held to 75 yards and that is how you stop the Wildcats. The lack of offense caught up to them in game three. Until the Wildcats prove they can throw the ball the box will be loaded to attack Grigsby. Iowa struggled with little Northern Iowa in its opener and had to block a FG at the end to win it. Bud Withers and Bob Condotta keep touting the Wildcats but I have never been able to buy in.

8. Arizona State...We will see what the Sun Devils are made of when they face Georgia next week. I will give them this...They are the best team in the Sunbelt and Big Sky so far this season. The fans in the Phoenix area have been ignoring the team this season. The stadium was only half full for the last two games. Maybe the honeymoon is over in year three.

9. Oregon...The Ducks are 2-1 which is a major achievement after the way they started the season. Utah was way over-rated and even struggled with SJSU last week. Purdue who the Ducks beat in the last seconds at home last week was pounded by Northern Illinois at home today. Put it up on the board as a win but the truth is the Ducks are still struggling on both sides of the ball. Masoli was terrible despite two TD runs.

10. Washington State...The Coug's rally to beat SMU in overtime. So they will end up 1-11 and not 0-12. This is not a well coached team. A victory however is a victory. A season with one win is better than a season with no wins. Knowing your not the worst college football team in the country has to be comforting.

Pac 10 Offensive Player of the Week

Jahvid Best rushed for 131 yards and a modern school-record five touchdowns to help the No. 8 Golden Bears vanquish a road curse in a 35-21 victory over scrappy Minnesota. I know most of you are going to ask this question: What about Jake Locker? Tough choice but five TD's tips it Jahvid's way big time!

Pac 10 Defensive Player of the Week

UW linebacker Donald Butler help hold the USC offense to only 13 points in the college football upset of the year so far. Butler was declared the NCAA defensive player of the week by the gang at Sports Center. The Walter Camp Foundation named him national defensive player of the week. He had one of the better performances I have ever seen from a Husky linebacker. Couldn't happen to a nicer fellah.

Washington Offensive Player of the Week

Jake Locker led UW to a 16-13 upset of USC. He was 21-35 on the day with no interceptions and had one rushing touchdown. Jake is going to have better weeks in the future because he won't face a better defense for the rest of the regular season. Give him a little more time to set up and some room to run and we just may see a challenge to Marques Tuiasosopo's 200-300 game!

Washington Defensive Player of the Week

Donald Butler had the best game of his career. Sark and Holt said Butler was the one of the guys on our team that could have started for SC last year. Looks like they really meant it. Mason Foster comes in with a very close second. He keeps getting better every game.

Media Quotables

Lets start it off with a few lines from Art Thiel's column in the PI

But there is no doubt that the Huskies, after 0-12, are again a serious college football team. There is even less question that they are in possession of the most majestic 1-0 conference lead in the history of ball by the lake. Didn't take long at all.

Bob Condotta of the Times beat his readers to the punch with the first quote quote. That is OK Bob because even I picked the Trojans by 7 points! Bob also adds a couple of wise words in a later entry about Washington moving from hunter to hunted status.

"The first grade goes to me, a big, fat F for thinking that the Huskies weren't ready to win a game like that yet."

"It's a heady climb for the Huskies, a year removed from an 0-12 season that's looking a little more unfathomable by the day, and the challenges now change for UW --- you go quickly from hunter to hunted in college football, especially with a history like Washington's. But those worries are for another day. For now, this is more proof of UW's re-entry to college football's center stage."

This in from ESPN's Ted Miller who hasn't been drinking any purple Kool-Aid up till now.

Washington is nobody's patsy: A corpse was rolled out of Husky Stadium on Saturday evening. It was Sucky Husky, who went 12-47 from 2004 until 2008. He's been on life support since Steve Sarkisian was hired and injected him with enthusiasm and hope, which proved deadly for Sucky Husky, who finally succumbed when Erik Folk's short field goal gave Washington a 16-13 victory over No. 3 USC. Suffice it to say, the funeral will be sparsely attended. Washington once was the top alternative to USC in the Pac-10. It was once a program that groused about playing in the Sun Bowl. In a few years, it feels certain that Husky fans will once again grouse about playing in the Sun Bowl.

This in from Jerry Brewer from the Seattle Times

In one game, they punctuated their rapid return to significance, altered conservative preseason predictions of four or five victories and, most likely, launched themselves into the Top 25 for the first time in six years. Oh, and they avenged a 56-love loss from last season.

Bill Plashke of the LA Times drilled Pete Carroll unmercifully and gave little credit to the Washington players. Bill used to write for either the Times or the PI...can't remember which. Too bad he wasn't up in Seattle during the Willingham years. We could have used him!

Don't blame this on the fact that USC was playing without starting quarterback Matt Barkley, because it still out-gained Washington.

Don't blame this on a defense that was missing star Taylor Mays, because it still held Washington to barely 200 yards before its final drive.

Like the man said, blame it on Pete. It has been written here for several years that Carroll is the best coach in college football, but for several hours Saturday he was inexplicably out-coached by a former pupil, Steve Sarkisian, while allowing his team to be outplayed by a former national joke.

Chris Dufrense of the LA Times pursues this angle.

"Nostradamus once predicted Washington and Washington State would undergo years of simultaneous toil and upheaval only to one day rise to win games on the same day -- but this soon? As usual, this is what always happens when you play the games. It was Payback Saturday, not so much for Florida and Texas, but for Washington -- a 56-0 loser to USC last year in the Coliseum."

Husky Quotes 

"I believed that because everything they say has come true," said linebacker Mason Foster, who had a big game with three pass breakups. "From the off-season workouts, to practicing so hard, to now. They said, do this stuff well, and we'll win."

"I thought we had the talent to win last year. We just found ways to lose them," Locker said. "You saw the opposite of that today."

"I think the difference in this game was Jake," said USC coach Pete Carroll. "We kept him under wraps for a while, but when he had to have it, he made it. That's what a great player does."

"I will never forget this day," senior linebacker Donald Butler said. "I will tell my kids about this. I will tell my grandkids about this. Man, this is crazy."

"That's the difference this year. We expect to win," Butler said. "Believe! We all believed we would win."

"To have the moment when the crowd rushes the field, those are things you dream about as a kid -- never mind as a coach -- when you're laying in bed at night throwing the ball in the air," said Steve Sarkisian.

"I don't think this was Jake's best night," Sarkisian said, "but when we needed him, he made plays. He found a way to stay in the game."

0 recs  |  Comment 120 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

More from UW Dawg Pound

Grading the game

Dec 2009 by John Berkowitz - 33 comments

Grading the Game

Nov 2009 by John Berkowitz - 50 comments

The Apple Cup Primer

Nov 2009 by John Berkowitz - 13 comments

Puppy Chow

Nov 2009 by John Berkowitz - 102 comments

Comments

Display:

johnb, amen

if I had written this artical it would be exactly the same. Avoid the letdown, we need to smack stanford in our first road game, ete etc. JL is PAC 10s best, reading stuff that says he might leave this year, big mistake, he needs the second year of instruction from Sark, Nuss et alia.

by prrbrr on Sep 21, 2009 6:59 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I actually started off talking more about Rose Bowl

It is so easy to fall in that type of trap isn’t it?

For this team the achievable goal is taking it one game at a time and completely focusing on the opponent.

If we do that we are going to be just fine.

I think the reality of the win that everyone has to remember is we beat a better team this week. If USC eliminates the errors they win the game by around 17 points. Turnovers, defense through three quarters, and special teams play were the big factors on Saturday.

We need to keep playing with a chip on our shoulder.

by John Berkowitz on Sep 21, 2009 7:08 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

EXACTLY!!!

I think the best thing to happen this week is for Stanford to be 9 point favorites, I’d have that up in the locker room so fast, and I’d keep reminding the team all week that people still don’t believe, then tell them to come out and prove it against Stanford.

If we continue to play with a chip on our shoulder, the sky is the limit.

"Legends are made on the shores of Lake Washington"
"BOW DOWN TO WASHINGTON"

by Lear Pilot on Sep 21, 2009 2:15 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Do you think...

…Tree Stadium will be painted Purple!?

Washington Husky Football-Undefeated 1991 National Champions 12-0!

by dawgfan22 on Sep 21, 2009 5:07 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

revenge factor

one of the few benefits from last year is to make up for it this year.
saturday we learned how to win now we have to know how to win.

have to feel good about our rushing defense from here on out. which this week means toby should be under a 100 yds. their starting tackles are banged up or not playing again so the de’s should shine.

one game at a time.

not thinking about the poinsettia bowl or anything beyond that.
although i’m not making my xmas holiday plans yet…………..

by PandG on Sep 21, 2009 8:06 AM PDT via mobile reply actions   0 recs

Revenge

When you are coming off 0-12 there is plenty of revenge to go around.

I wouldn’t count on Toby being under 100 yards this week either. He will get his yards. They key is keeping him out of the secondary.

by John Berkowitz on Sep 21, 2009 9:28 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Toby is going to be a tough stop

Little crease here … little crease there, Gerhart crushes the ball between the tackles and before you know it, he’s ran off 10 yards before you slow him down. I think we can keep Gerhart out of the secondary for the most part. I can’t see Gerhart on a break away with a Holt-led defense.

I think what is important is that we keep him out of the endzone. Make someone else come up with scores besides Toby.

USC ran wicked quite a bit last week on us. But we limited them to a single touchdown. Run all you want Toby, but you’re not crossing the goal line on Saturday. WOOF!!!

All I saw was purple

by crazidawg on Sep 21, 2009 6:52 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Keep getting better...

…we have plenty we can improve on, let’s keep working.

Washington Husky Football-Undefeated 1991 National Champions 12-0!

by dawgfan22 on Sep 21, 2009 9:04 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

ironically ...

… game plan for Stanford is the same as the game plan for USC. Load the box, neutralize the run game and try to confuse the young QB with blitzing and defensive alignments that he hasn’t seen before. Because of the different nature of their runners, maybe we get Ta’amu back in there.

While on offense – run, run, run and then hope to get a few big plays with some play-action. I’d like to see a bust out game for Polk.

Damn, my eyeball tastes good.

by Gekko Mojo on Sep 21, 2009 9:50 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Gekko...pretty spot on...

I think that is pretty much it. the bulk of Ta’amu is a nice option to have.

On thing to keep in mind is Andrew Luck is a much better QB than Aaron Corp. He also has the same type of wheels.

by John Berkowitz on Sep 21, 2009 10:01 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Although...

…one of the keys to stopping $C’s running game was to take Tamu OUT and insert Thompson to get more speed and athleticism on the field.

Washington Husky Football-Undefeated 1991 National Champions 12-0!

by dawgfan22 on Sep 21, 2009 11:05 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yes, but keep in mind USC runs the same zone blocking scheme that we do which relies on more athletic linemen. It seems that Thompson’s greater speed compared to Ta’amu was a better fit vs. USC’s scheme. Not sure if Stanford runs a zone blocking scheme or a more traditional man scheme. If it’s the latter, I suspect Ta’amu is the better choice to clog the middle.

by kirkd on Sep 21, 2009 11:15 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well Regardless...

…it’s nice to have options and bring more depth into the equation.

Washington Husky Football-Undefeated 1991 National Champions 12-0!

by dawgfan22 on Sep 21, 2009 11:21 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

It’s nice to have coaches that relize there ARE options.

by Snostrebla on Sep 21, 2009 11:59 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Amen Bro!...

…and do you think we might have some depth that we didn’t think we had previously? Talia Chreighton is going to be a beast! Everette Thompson is coming on strong now too!

Washington Husky Football-Undefeated 1991 National Champions 12-0!

by dawgfan22 on Sep 21, 2009 12:34 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, probably lots of Ta'amu.

Stanford will look to cut just like USC did, but Gerhart doesn’t have the lateral quicks that Johnson and McKnight did.

What a great adjustment by the coaches. It takes solid brass ones to put in a true sophmore at a new position in his first action of the year. And Thompson has the frame and the motor to add 25 or 30 pounds and be the three-technique guy that Holt’s defense needs. Even at his size, Thompson looked strong enough while going against two All-Americans in O’Dowd and Byers. Thompson and the emergence of Crichton sure make the d-line look a lot deeper.

I’d love to see 200 yards rushing against Stanford.

by Sundodger on Sep 21, 2009 10:28 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Polk is the most underrated Halfback in the conference...

great speed. Good decisions making on his cutbacks and deceptive agility and speed to get those few extra yards. Reminds me alot of Quizz rodgers for OSU. He takes alot of the pressure off Jake Locker to have to make a play. A real fun kid to watch play. I have no doubt the Husky D can step up and contain Gerhart…its all about wrapping him up and not giving up on the tackle, because a majority of the time ive seen plays were he should have been stopped in the backfield and breaks free for huge gains. With Savannah and Butler who are good tacklers I dont think that should be a problem.

best of luck stopping Luck too, he’s a playmaker, totally agree with Gekko the key is to get him rattled and off his comfort zone.

by Wazzucrazed on Sep 21, 2009 11:28 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I guess he was...

…challenged this week to run hard and be physical. He did that.

Washington Husky Football-Undefeated 1991 National Champions 12-0!

by dawgfan22 on Sep 21, 2009 12:35 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

You can wrap Gerhart- He's too big

You have to take out his legs. Hit him up high and he’ll bounce you like a pillow. It’s very important we know how to take down this furd, and that’s at the knees.

All I saw was purple

by crazidawg on Sep 21, 2009 6:56 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Totally agree Crazi

Gerhart is too big and too strong to hit up high. He’ll run you over or drag you down the field if you do that. It’s all about hitting his legs and wrapping them up.

by Snostrebla on Sep 21, 2009 8:19 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Completely agree Gekko

Nothing’s changed except for personnel. This game is a must win and it’s ripe for the taking if we go in with the right make up.

All I saw was purple

by crazidawg on Sep 21, 2009 6:53 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

pointless bowl

or is it pointsettera bowl – 6th place. I like that kind of talk. One at a time and them we pick a bowl. Lay low huskies. Stanford undoubtedly is a better team USC. Put it on the bulletin board. How long can the coug-its stay in the pac-10 drawing crowds of 20,000 per game?

by Purpledawg on Sep 21, 2009 10:15 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Poinsettia

I would take any bowl at this point but Washington has a chance right now to do some damage.

by John Berkowitz on Sep 21, 2009 10:56 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

John, you nailed it
I have watched every single Pac 10 team play at least once this season and I don’t think there is a team out there we can’t beat at this point. Now that we have that statement out of the way I also want to make the point that with the exception of Washington State there isn’t a single team left on the schedule that can’t beat us. For Washington to continue winning they need to stay healthy and keep a big chip on their shoulder. They need to focus like they did for LSU and USC every single week. Washington cannot afford to take anyone lightly.

Amen. Everything is coming so fast for this program, I hope that the players are both enjoying the fruits of their hard work in their 24 hours after the game and getting back to business once that 24 hours is up. This has the potential to be the sweetest season in Husky history considering the context. Keep playing hard, smart and with an attitude and we could witness the greatest turnaround season in history.

I have no doubt there will be some heartbreak along the way – we’re simply not deep enough to withstand the inevitable injuries – but this team can go bowling and stay in the Pac-10 championship hunt into November.

by kirkd on Sep 21, 2009 10:54 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

One thing about this coaching staff

They have been here before…in fact they have been in this position for the last 7-8 years. They know how to prepare a football team for what lies ahead. They know that if the team loses its focus they will definitely lose to Stanford and that is true of any game on the schedule. If they approach each game with the same intensity anything is possible.

by John Berkowitz on Sep 21, 2009 10:59 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

True enough. And it sure seems like things are lining up beautifully for the Dawgs this year. Not to look too far ahead, but Notre Dame lost their best player on offense for the season in WR Michael Floyd, and QB Jimmy Clausen is battling foot problems. If we can beat Stanford and prove we can play well on the road, I think this may (finally) be the year that we beat the damn Irish.

by kirkd on Sep 21, 2009 11:11 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not to mention...

Arizon (who we play after ND) lost their best player Gradkowski for the year…..the ball seems to be bouncing our direction after years of no luck.

by Snostrebla on Sep 21, 2009 12:05 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yep, that was another injury that caught my eye. And if Prince is battling injuries all year for UCLA, that’s another break for the UW. We just have to knock on wood that we don’t suffer similar devastating injuries…

by kirkd on Sep 21, 2009 12:38 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

EJ Savannah

I guess he rebroke his hand.

Washington Husky Football-Undefeated 1991 National Champions 12-0!

by dawgfan22 on Sep 21, 2009 12:55 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

One thing that's sure...

…is that there will be no lack of hunger for this team! They will play hard!

Washington Husky Football-Undefeated 1991 National Champions 12-0!

by dawgfan22 on Sep 21, 2009 11:07 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Couple quick questions and some stats..

When is Wells expected to be back?

Where can I find that comment from Carroll about us being “capable of winning all our games” ?

I don’t think getting the team excited for the Stanford game will be too much of an issue, these coaches are very good at getting the team pumped. My concern is that Stanford should be a lot better than USC was at converting 3rd and short (and 4th for that matter). If we can limit them to 3rd and longs I think this game is easily ours. The Dawgs are 3rd in the country in 3rd down conversions, 19th in the country in 3rd down conversion defense, and 17th in the country for time of possession. The teams ahead of us? You can’t convince me that more than one or two of them have played a tougher schedule through 3 games. What that says to me is that we control the ball well with long and successful drives (converting on 3rd down can completely demoralize a defense) and step up in big situations when the pressure is on. The offensive 3rd down % will probably drop a little as we play our road games but with only 5 road games this year and Husky Stadium rocking again, this season could end up being very special.

by JoeinFW on Sep 21, 2009 12:05 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

If you mean Jason Wells, don’t count on him playing again.

by kirkd on Sep 21, 2009 12:37 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Stanford is lining up to be...

…another key/huge game on our schedule. The media is just swarming over the DAWGS, I hope we stay hungry and refocus on Stanford.

Washington Husky Football-Undefeated 1991 National Champions 12-0!

by dawgfan22 on Sep 21, 2009 12:37 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Huskies are the GREATEST!!!!!!!!

They should be on National TV every WEEK!!!!

Why aren’t they ranked #1? Must be east coast bias.

They’ll go undefeasted the rest of the season…mark it down!!!!

Jake Locker is the greatest football player in the histroy of the WORLD!!!!!!!

Just kidding puppy fans. Don’t get too far ahead of yourselves. A 6 win season would be a major victory for you, and a total disappointment for the Ducks. My how things have changed.

by Matt Daddy on Sep 21, 2009 12:43 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Gee what a surprise...

..a duck who comes into OUR house and tries to talk smack? Good luck against Boise State….Oh that’s right that games over. Sorry about the outcome! maybe when you play Portland State you can get a 50 point win. What happened with Massoli? I thought he was a shoe in for the Heisman?

Washington Husky Football-Undefeated 1991 National Champions 12-0!

by dawgfan22 on Sep 21, 2009 12:54 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

All in good time Matt...

I hope you enjoyed the spot light while you had it. Those days are over. Not even Daddy Knight will get you guys to being a team that matters once the Dawgs take back the Northwest!

by bigdave967 on Sep 21, 2009 12:58 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

1 win does not mean you have taken anything back

you have 8 more teams looking to knock you off your stoop. In all honesty, good luck, you just painted a GIANT target on your chest for the rest of the PAC 10 season

by Matt Daddy on Sep 21, 2009 1:13 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thats true and why I said

once the Dawgs take back the Northwest….we havent yet but I think we will soon enough. Gotta actually beat a NW team first.

by bigdave967 on Sep 21, 2009 1:17 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

You did beat a NW team.....Idaho (hahahahahahahah)

but seriously, this could come back to haunt you. If Stanford had any thoughts of over looking the game this weekend, I don’t think they will now. And if any coach has a problem getting their players to focus before playing you, all they have to do is say, “Remember, they beat USC”

Remember, OSU beat USC after USC beat Ohio State, and then went and lost their next game…which was on the road.

Just trying to impart a little reality…

by Matt Daddy on Sep 21, 2009 1:22 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

You have to admit

I will say this…its a heck of a lot more fun to jaw back and forth when both teams are winning. The past 6 years I have had to bite my lip but not now.

I would bet just about anything I own that we win 6+ games this year. I could easily see us winning 8 games.

Can’t wait for Oct 24th!

by bigdave967 on Sep 21, 2009 2:11 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Can't Wait!...

…bring your A game! We don’t want you to cry with a bunch of excuses! Blount’s gone, deal with it!

Washington Husky Football-Undefeated 1991 National Champions 12-0!

by dawgfan22 on Sep 21, 2009 5:08 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hate to be the break the news to Matty

… have you realized that nobody is talking about the Ducks? Were’n’t you guys vying for position to win the Pac 10? Within seconds after the punch landed people stopped talking about Oregon and frankly I think it is rather silly for you to come on here and start talking smack. What’s the zeros done this year? Lost to a mid major program (Boise St.), a come from behind victory over a Big 10 opponent that will be lost forever in the win/loss colum (Purdue). Had to grind out a victory over another mid major at home (Utah). Not much to brag about Matty.

Do all us Husky fans a favor: stick with the Chipper. Have you seen his interviews and press conferences? That guy and Paul Wulff are not ready to be BCS head coaches. I’m loving everything I see at Oregon, it’s all going to come crashing down on the zeroes- fast and furious. Don’t think so? Take a look at the 2010 recruiting classes for UDub and Oregon. Our little victory over Troy was just a taste of what’s in store.

P.S. since “the punch”, Matty you are the very first zero fan to come to this site. Could it be that zeroNation got a glimpse of what they really are and what the program has become? It’s coming down Matty, just hope you can deal with it ok.

I Bark for Sark! WOOF!!!

All I saw was purple

by crazidawg on Sep 21, 2009 7:13 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

They see the writing on the wall...

…crazi and they’re afraid. As they should be their short window of domination is closing. The thing is what did they really accomplish in that window? How many Pac-10 titles? Nada that’s how many and now Washington is back!

Washington Husky Football-Undefeated 1991 National Champions 12-0!

by dawgfan22 on Sep 21, 2009 7:54 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thanks Crazi you made me see the light...

I mean I can’t believe I wasn’t backing a team that went 0-12. What was I thinking…just kidding. But on a serious note, Oregon has A LOT to prove, not only to the Pac 10, but to the fans of Oregon as well. All the hype blew up in one quick second. Since then, the coach has responded appropriately (suspension for the season) and the team has responded appropriately, two wins.

All I am saying, is this is one win (a great win) but one win, lets not get ahead of ourselves about who or what the Husky program has become.

by Matt Daddy on Sep 21, 2009 8:20 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Now this is a conversation I can get involved with. Thanks for cutting down on the smack talk, I think we all appreciate that.

But Matty, I think you are forgetting one critical part of the win over USC and what it truly represents. Yes Sark and Holt know the personnel down at USC, but did they know what new schemes they were going to run? Knowing personnel is a plus in gameplanning, but knowing schemes and tendencies are HUGE. That part Sark and Holt had to pick apart by studying game film.

Also the game day adjustments by Holt. In the first half USC was kicking our collective asses with their vaunted running game. Holt makes a switch on the D line and we for the most part shut them down. USC scored only one touchdown my friend- ONE! To this Husky purple bleeder that is the making a good defense, especially in a league that has a lengthy history of offensive execution. We gave up only one touchdown to USC. Moreover, we shut down USC on 3rd downs. 0-10 on all 3rd down opportunities- can I get a “Hell Yeah!” from the congragation?

Yeah if you care to look at the USC game with blinders on- be my guest. But if you don’t see the ramifications of how this game was won then all you are doing is procrastinating. We dominated USC and you can’t see it because you’re covering your eyes with duck feathers :)

Sark and Holt are not about to coach a 2 win team this season- clearly you do not see the serious momentum this team has by winning this early in the season. Every single player on the roster is buying into what Sark and Holt are selling. From what we Husky fans have experienced thus far- outplaying LSU (but losing), beating Idaho, dominating USC. From what we’ve seen and by looking at our schedule we fans believe that we can run the table. Now stop right there! Like John has mentioned we also believe we can lose to everybody on our schedule minuse Washington State, so there you go.

I predicted 6+ wins prior to the start of the season and the way we look right now, I think we’ll achieve that and then some.

Sure you can throw daggers out there like the 0-12 thing. If that suits you go for it- nobody over here is listening. Its a new day my friend. But if we do we’ll counter with the fact that Belloti has failed to reach the promise land (Pasadena) the entire time Washington has been down- simply not one Rose Bowl and that is what Pac 10 football is really about.

I’d be a litte apprehensive about what you are seeing from the Chipper. Kelly didn’t make one bold move in the Boise State game- he was frozen on the sideline. I didn’t see him coaching on the sideline, nor was he chatting to his assistants in his headset. He just stood and watched and didn’t respond to anything BSU was doing. Then came his smug halftime interview. I hated Bellotti for many reasons, but I had to respect the job he did on the sidelines. Yet from what I’ve seen of the Chipper, the verdict is still out. Not sure if he is the right guy. To me, he looks more like the guy that is holding the team together until Oregon can hire Chris Peterson away. But I love the fact that the zeroes have given the job to Chipper. I’m out … peace!

All I saw was purple

by crazidawg on Sep 22, 2009 4:57 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Actually, duck blinds and feathers don't work well for me...

Huskies did dominate USC. Having good returning D players and a confident leader like Locker helps a hell of a lot. Plus, you are right the coaches made some good adjustments after USC’s first couple of drives.

One thing I would watch for is, UW has played near perfect ball so far. All teams are going to have to eventually respond to adversity in this league. I want to see how Sark, and Holt respond when not only other teams throw a curve ball at you, but your own players as well (i.e. turnovers, miss tackles, bad reads, etc)

As for “the Chipper” I actually wrote a post on ATQ after the BS game that I was totally disappointed in Kelly and Helfrich’s ability to adjust the game plan when what BS was doing was so obvious. I don’t think all of the blame for that loss falls on their shoulders.. The players didn’t do much to help themselves either. What I will say, is they have stared adversity in the face and shown they can respond.

Does that mean it is all rosy sunshine and cherry blossoms from here? Not at all. 3 ranked teams in the first 4 weeks leave little room for error. I don’t think the Ducks are the best in the Pac (actually I think Cal is, and have been saying so all year). But 9th???? come on…

As for Roses, I would contend that yes I think Roses are important, but times have changed (blame the NCAA with their stupid BCS system). So BCS games are important and we have had one of those. But I agree I would prefer a Rose bowl, and unless your name is USC you haven’t played in a rose bowl from the Pac 10 for a looooooooong time….so U of O is not alone. Your finger pointing is actually at 8 teams. I will say, that even though USC has been the dominant team (while as you put it, UW was down) Oregon has been pretty damn competitive and kept up a much more potent program and we don’t need one “big win” to hang out hats on in order to proclaim that “we are back, WOOO HOOOOO”

by Matt Daddy on Sep 22, 2009 8:49 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Huskies did dominate USC.

You must have watched a different game than I did. We beat USC because they turned the ball over and committed too many stupid penalties. If USC plays an error free game we lose by 17 points.

Near perfect ball?

Are you blowing smoke up our heinie’s?

We won this game because we played smarter and made less mistakes than USC. You can play this game over ten times and USC wins nine of them. It was just a perfect convergence of circimstances and that is what college football great.

by John Berkowitz on Sep 22, 2009 9:03 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

No no smoke..

dominant in the categories that matter…college football can be broken down to a couple areas. Rushing, turnovers, 3rd down effeciencies, and a general feel of who is controlling the line of scrimmage Now, you tell me, which category did USC play better at.

As for near perfect. How many turnovers does UW have this season….3 How many minutes has UW had to play from more than 2 scores behind…1 minute 54 seconds. I would say having played 2 top 10 teams, that is near perfect.

by Matt Daddy on Sep 22, 2009 9:27 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

There’s a lot more to “perfection” than avoiding turnovers. The UW played well, no question. But there was certainly room for improvement – cut out some of the stupid penalties, have Jake play better (he played well, but missed some things in that game), have Sark call a better game (too many shotgun read option plays, not enough play-action and bootlegs).

by kirkd on Sep 22, 2009 9:34 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Oh no team ever plays a perfect game

but lets be honest here…does anybody think they are going to beat USC without playing one of their best games, and NEAR perfect. And at the same time hope to hell USC does some stupid stuff to give you a few more shots at it,,,

All I am saying is adversity will come, and UW (and the players that were there) showed that they crumbled under it last year. You have yet to face that adversity…

by Matt Daddy on Sep 22, 2009 9:37 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Like John has said..its not just one win

it is the succession of wins that matter…UW better bring it this weekend against the trees and not squander this momentum or I will be…well lets just say….disappointed

by Matt Daddy on Sep 22, 2009 9:39 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

As will we all. We all recognize the importance of following up on the big upset of USC. I’m sure the players do as well, because this staff clearly recognizes what’s important.

by kirkd on Sep 22, 2009 9:43 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Matt your still here?

I am going to have to ban you…lol.

Seriously I like you…lets talk about football in general and shelve the UW/UO stuff for a few weeks.

by John Berkowitz on Sep 23, 2009 8:16 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Last year is last year. That coaching staff is gone, that loser mentality is gone.

The only thing that worries me about this team’s mentality is what happens if Jake goes down again. I’d bet on a better response under this staff than what happened under the Fraud…

by kirkd on Sep 22, 2009 9:45 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

One TD & 0-10 on 3rd downs is Dominant

I agree with Matty that we dominated USC. Every statistical category that led to the victory we completely dominated. Their is something to be said about a “bend but don’t break” defense. Some fans call it cheesey. I call it smart defense. What does bend but don’t break mean in the coaching field? It means don’t letem’ score. Go ahead and thump your chest and rush for 200+ yards. At the end of the day, if we do our job by not allowing you to cash in, who laughs last? That is what you ulimately saw last saturday.

Penalties … schmenalties! Coaches don’t mind penalties if they don’t cripple your chance to score, ie. a 10 yard holding penalty. 10 yards for holding will cripple your offense. Everything else other then personal fouls are swept under the rug.

And I also agree with Matty that although the USC win was awesome- nothing other then beating the Trojans has been accomplished yet. We still have a long road ahead of us. We loose to Stanford and the win over USC goes for really nothing. Because then we’ll be 1-1 and fighting an uphill battle for 4 more victories to get bowl eligible. Isn’t that our initial goal of the season? A bowl game should be goal No.2. Goal No.1 is what Sark always says. We need to simply “get better”.

Matty one last comment- when a team goes 0-12 and the entire team quits on the ousted ex coach, a win over USC is something to go “WOOO HOOOOO” about! We’ve tasted success for years, hell generations my friend. Losing is an uncomfortable thing to us. And when we beat USC, to quote Bobby Bushie “It Feels GOOD!” Believe me, the WOOO HOOOOing won’t last because it’ll all come rushing back to us, meaning our winning ways.

I Bark for Sark! WOOF!!!

All I saw was purple

by crazidawg on Sep 23, 2009 8:02 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

One Win Means nothing...but

One win means nothing…it is the succesion of wins that follow it that mean something.

One win can however be a huge turning point. I think this win is as big of a turning point for Washington as the Wheaton interception was for Oregon.

I think that is why you are here Matt…you are worried and deservedly so.

As for the target…everyone team has a giant target on their chest every single week. As Pete Carroll says this is the Pac 10.

by John Berkowitz on Sep 21, 2009 3:23 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Great point John. One win is one win.

Worried? No not really. Actually, happy is more like it. I am glad our rival is relevant again. I am happy you put the University of Spoiled Cokeheads on their preverbial arses. Very happy to have you in the FBS, Pac-10 conversation again.

Welcome back.

by Matt Daddy on Sep 21, 2009 3:27 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

You should be worried if you are a Duck fan

UW turned the corner and got out of a huge hole. Seattle will always have a huge recruiting advantage over Eugene, Corvallis and Pullman. You put the right type of staff in Seattle and it is very hard to overcome.

by John Berkowitz on Sep 22, 2009 9:08 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I would be worried about trying to get recruits out of Seattle (except for Jonathan Stewart)

but Texas, California, Oregon, Idaho, Utah, Colorado…not really. And you are right, staff, system, and national coverage have a hell of a lot more to do with recruiting, then some stupid space needle and some dumb music center for fish market.

We will see

by Matt Daddy on Sep 22, 2009 9:31 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yep, we will. The UW has recruited well even considering how poorly they’ve played the last 6 seasons. When the wins return, the recruiting will only get better. And you bet you should be worried about recruiting in California. Oregon has had a nice run as a “trendy” school, and the money Uncle Phil has poured into your facilities and the sports marketing power of Nike and the nudge-nudge wink-wink stuff that happens with recruits as a result of that means Oregon will remain on the recruiting radar.

But Sark has the connections in SoCal to revive the UW’s recruiting pull there, and with continued success the baton of “trendy” school outside of California will pass from Oregon back to Washington where it used to be. And the UW’s superior tradition and history will once again matter to recruits.

And the final factor is this – Sark has a history of developing great QB’s that have NFL success. Spread option offenses like Oregon’s have a growing rep of not developing NFL ready QB’s. As more and more top QB prospects start aligning themselves with “QB gurus” like Steve Clarkson and the Barton’s, which school is going to have the most success recruiting QB’s?

by kirkd on Sep 22, 2009 9:42 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Oregon is recruiting back East

One thing I have heard is Kelly is recruiting back East and turning his back on the connections and relationships that Bellotti built in the Northwest and in California. you have to be your own man and follow your own path but the rumor is Kelly is turning a ot of HS coaches off with his abraive personality.

by John Berkowitz on Sep 23, 2009 8:20 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Especially when...

…it’s ONE win against $C something Oregon hasn’t been able to pull off!…and when they have they’ve choked!

Washington Husky Football-Undefeated 1991 National Champions 12-0!

by dawgfan22 on Sep 21, 2009 5:10 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

The DAWGS are back!!!!!!!!!

WOO! HOO!

Washington Husky Football-Undefeated 1991 National Champions 12-0!

by dawgfan22 on Sep 21, 2009 1:01 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

“A 6 win season would be a major victory for you, and a total disappointment for the Ducks.”

No one is going to argue that with you, but through the first 3 games it certainly seems to be trending that way for both teams. Win or lose, don’t disappear on us after October 24th.

by JoeinFW on Sep 21, 2009 3:53 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

6 win season - it's the context that is important

Let’s not think that Oregon is at a point where they expect to win more than the UW. The 6 wins is important for THIS SEASON considering we play an Non Conference schedule that has LSU and Notre Dame compared to the Ducks Boise State, Utah and Purdue.

Oregon has no depth. They won last year with a senior laden team and are now squeaking by.

We’ll see how they do against Cal.

by murchy on Sep 21, 2009 4:05 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

wait wait wait....when Oregon plays Portland State???

Oregon has played:
Boise State – Top 10 in the country (on the road)
Purdue – Big 10 team
Utah – longest winning streak in the FBS

Puppy’s have played:
LSU – loss (at home)
Idaho????
USC – great win (BTW)

And yet Ducks and Puppy’s have the same record. Lets see how you fare when you aren’t playing either a) the worst team in the WAC or b) the team you took the OC and DC from.

You’re playing Stanford next week right? Maybe you can call Harbaugh and get him to be your Offensive Coordinator for the week.

by Matt Daddy on Sep 21, 2009 1:03 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Wait! Wait!....

…your actually giving us credit for something!?

Washington Husky Football-Undefeated 1991 National Champions 12-0!

by dawgfan22 on Sep 21, 2009 1:06 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Of course...that was a great win for your program

Its about damn time you finally made yourself relevant again. Duck fans are tired of picking on the Beavers. Thanks for joining the Pac-10 again

by Matt Daddy on Sep 21, 2009 1:08 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thanks! Happy to be back!

Washington Husky Football-Undefeated 1991 National Champions 12-0!

by dawgfan22 on Sep 21, 2009 1:09 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Now call that other team in your State and tell them to do something too

or we’re going to call Uncle Phil and get him to pull some punches and get them thrown out of the PAC-10… :-)

by Matt Daddy on Sep 21, 2009 1:11 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

WOW! I don't know if...

…I really WANT to do that but maybe eventually they’ll get there.

Washington Husky Football-Undefeated 1991 National Champions 12-0!

by dawgfan22 on Sep 21, 2009 1:12 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah sure were get right on that Daddy..

with the plethora of talent and expierenced healthy players over in pullman…its just been killer we arent getting more quality play from them….location, location, location…Just cause Oregon is in eugene and gets a lot of looks from top notch players and a few blue chippers, doesnt give them the right to blame wazzu for sucking, because WSU does’nt get those looks…we currently have 7 or 8 seniors playing on our team. Most our Juniors and seniors never even got looks from other BCS schools as well…Why we suck? Loads of injuries, lack of talent…Wulff redshirted all but 2 of his class this year, which means Wazzu is playing with Doba’s recruits; a majority of those recruits got kicked out due to academic and dicsiplinary actions….Tough to compete in a Pac-10 conference when you have very few Pac-10 caliber players..Wazzu has always been a school that has spiked in performance every few years, due to not receiving an influx of talent, and having to develop the recruits we get til their junior and senior years. Have some decency man…

by Wazzucrazed on Sep 21, 2009 1:59 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ok, sorry Wazzucrazed, I know you are on hard times right now

I didn’t mean to kick you while you are down. I truly apologize.

by Matt Daddy on Sep 21, 2009 3:15 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Nice to see the Ducks in the house ...

… but this argument carries little weight. If you actually watched the game, you would observe that the Ducks have had to rely on a ridiculous number of defensive/special teams scores, have had to overcome some of the worst quarterbacking in the country, and have lucked out in getting what look like good teams (Purdue who just lost to something called NIU and Utah who have struggled horribly before almost knocking off the mighty Ducks) but who have been easy outs.

UW, on the other hand, dominated the line of scrimmage in all three games, have played virtually error free in two of the three, have the best QB in the Pac 10 (statistically valid) and have the biggest upset in college football so far this season.

UW is clearly playing at a higher level than Oregon at this point.

Damn, my eyeball tastes good.

by Gekko Mojo on Sep 21, 2009 1:23 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Actually, I would agree

Oregon has struggled mightily this year (and I think they will continue to do so). They are young on both sides of the ball (7 seniors in the top 44 players, 4 starting) and have a new head coach and new offensive coordinatior.

That being said. The Huskies have yet to play on the road. Beat a TERRRIBLE Idaho team. And won a major upset (BTW again, great win) against a team they got their OC and DC from. I think your coaching staff knew a little about USC.

I will say it again. Lets see how you fare against teams 1) on the road, 2) who aren’t over looking you anymore 3) you aren’t intimately familiar with their system.

by Matt Daddy on Sep 21, 2009 1:29 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ducks fans sure aren't very smart.

You are kidding right?? After embarrassing your school and the entire conference you are coming over here to talk smack? Do they have a course at Oregon that teaches common sense?? One name for you: Legarrette Blount, enough said?

Scheduling – Boise isn’t a great team, they are a WAC team that lost to TYRONE WILLINGHAM, yet they schooled the ducks. Purdue just got HAMMERED by Northern Illinios, and Utah barely beat the same SJSU team that Stanford CREAMED!! Needless to say, your schedule has been a joke so far. Our schedule – two top 10 teams, and an Idaho team that is better than it has been in YEARS. It’s going to be a LONG season for the ducks.

"Legends are made on the shores of Lake Washington"
"BOW DOWN TO WASHINGTON"

by Lear Pilot on Sep 21, 2009 2:26 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

So a loss to Boise State is an embarrassment to the school and the conference

but going 0-12 isn’t. My how quickly you forget thyself, Poodle fan. Your entire season last year was an embarrassment. I’ve refrained from talking smack to Husky fans for years, OUT OF SHEER PITY!!!!

I’ll admit, Blount’s an idiot. It will be hard to find a duck fan who thinks differently. But I love “Rational” husky fan. “Boise isn’t a great team, they are a WAC team…” “…an Idaho team that is better than it has been in YEARS.”…huh? Idaho is a WAC team, and a TERRRRRRIBLE one at that (they were 2-10 last year, which I know, looks pretty good to you doesn’t it?). Just because you played them doesn’t make them all world.

And that other Top 10 team you played…you lost…at home. So before you ride in on your holier than thou dawg sled, realize, you have one big win (a great win) and that is it. It’s been a long time since you were even in a positive conversation about this conference.

Finally, you are right it will be a long season for the ducks, a 6 win season will not be considered an accomplishment by us. You on the other hand, well….

by Matt Daddy on Sep 21, 2009 3:12 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hey Duck – how about you guys win a National Championship before you come here spouting off. Or even just a Rose Bowl – it’s been how long since you’ve done that? Heck, how about winning more than 40% of the time against us?

You’re scared, and you have every right to be.

by kirkd on Sep 21, 2009 3:29 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Actually it was an embarrassment

Oregon had no business losing to Boise again even though I enjoyed it. The mighty Ducks losing two years in a row to a WAC school?

The wheels are coming off down there even with the 2-1 record. Purdue isn’t very good, and neither is Utah. California is visiting this week and we will find out what your team is truly made of. Oregon will struggle in conference play this year…bet on it.

by John Berkowitz on Sep 21, 2009 3:29 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Idaho

They are good enough to beat Oregon this year, but that’s not saying much. :-)

"Legends are made on the shores of Lake Washington"
"BOW DOWN TO WASHINGTON"

by Lear Pilot on Sep 21, 2009 3:53 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Wow how many Rose Bowls has Oregon won?

Matt

You guys that the Snapple of the division. You don’t want to be #1 or #2 you peacefully co-exist happy with your 3rd place finishes.

Medocrity. You lost the last Rose Bowl you lucked into. Don’t come on here acting like your underachievent is something for us to fawn over. You guys couldn’t even take advantage of a down UW.

You play as bad as your unis look.

by murchy on Sep 21, 2009 4:33 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

You play as bas as your unis look

OUCH!!!!!!

"Legends are made on the shores of Lake Washington"
"BOW DOWN TO WASHINGTON"

by Lear Pilot on Sep 21, 2009 6:56 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Paybacks...

…are a BEEEE-YOTCH!!!!!!!!!

Washington Husky Football-Undefeated 1991 National Champions 12-0!

by dawgfan22 on Sep 21, 2009 7:02 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sorry fellas

If you scroll up I laid it on rather thick, but not until after you all got through with Matty.

That guy was talking smack from the get-go. I agree with John that if a good customer waltzes into the store we should be courteous. But when they come thru that door being obnoxious, boisterous, and bragging- I’m not going to let that go.

Really, what was his intensions on here anyway? The zeros are the butt joke of the season from what happened in Boise. Meanwhile UDub is kicking ass and taking names. Not sure what his motive was other then to try to persuade us that what our team did over the weekend wasn’t all that. I got news for Matty, Oct. 24 is going to get here rather quickly and his precious little ducks are going to get squashed! WOOF!!!

All I saw was purple

by crazidawg on Sep 21, 2009 7:33 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

The first visit is always this way...

Next time Matt comes back you will like him…he is just testing us out…the reason he is here is he is a college football fan and this is a great place to talk college football.

by John Berkowitz on Sep 21, 2009 8:01 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

We'll see

Washington Husky Football-Undefeated 1991 National Champions 12-0!

by dawgfan22 on Sep 21, 2009 8:11 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thanks John.

Love to talk football, but once it got to calling ME names, I backed off. I will say it AGAIN…great win by UW. Just remember, the season isn’t over, its one win, and UW has a lot of Pac-10 football to play.

P.S. Not the first visit. Just the first post on Dawg Pound. Like I said., never felt like talking junk when you team was down. Now that you are back…we’ll see

by Matt Daddy on Sep 21, 2009 8:13 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Welcome Matt

Always good to see new people on here. Also nice to get a Ducks perspective on things. I’m kind of with you it was a GREAT WIN but it is only ONE WIN. We do need to string a few back to back to back before we start talking Rose Bowls. After watching 5+ years of pathetic football you’ll have to forgive us for being a bit excited. There hasn’t been much to cheer about. I think most of us feel like our best friend, who has been missing for the last 5+ years, just walk through the door with a half rack of beer and some good tales to tell.

by Snostrebla on Sep 21, 2009 8:32 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I totally get that Snostrebla...and in all honesty I wish you well

As a matter of fact, it’s also like the guy I used to play one on one hoops with, got fat lazy and drank way too much beer for way too long, lost a bunch of weight, got a decent jump shot and showed up ready to play again.

I would never say I hate him, or that he was stupid, but when he makes that first three and starts prancing around like he’s the next MJ, you better believe I’m gonna make sure he realizes he still ain’t won anything yet.

by Matt Daddy on Sep 21, 2009 8:37 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Just remember...

…we’ve got the history/tradition. You guys have that short window of good football. Of course you had Uncle Phil trying to buy it for you but that’s another story.

Washington Husky Football-Undefeated 1991 National Champions 12-0!

by dawgfan22 on Sep 21, 2009 9:58 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Seriously though...

…lose the wings, tacky very tacky!

Washington Husky Football-Undefeated 1991 National Champions 12-0!

by dawgfan22 on Sep 21, 2009 9:59 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Oh and one final note to all of the Husky fans

Don’t worry I will be here to make sure you don’t think the sky is falling when you LOSE that game you thought you should win.

That’s the great thing about a rival…they help you keep things all in perspective. They’re are there to build you up (or at least not crack on you while you’re down) and there to bring you back to reality when you get too high.

We shall talk again. Until then.

-M

by Matt Daddy on Sep 21, 2009 8:46 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thanks for the visit Matt

Keep in mind that you are welcome but there is no consistent trolling allowed around here. That goes for Husy fans and visiting fans like yourself.

by John Berkowitz on Sep 22, 2009 8:42 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Tolling? wouldn't dream of it

Only here to spark the conversation between ducks and huskies that has been absent for way too long. Good luck, see you on the 24th

by Matt Daddy on Sep 22, 2009 9:26 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

As Nick Holt would say AWESOME!

Trolling not Tolling…lol..this place is free of charge.

I relish great conversations between Husky and Duck fans.

What I would really like this blog to develop into is a place where the opposing fans can join us in civil discourse before and after the games. Thename calling and all that stuff doen’t fly here. What flies is intelligent converation about college football.

One of the cool things about the blog is we have a lot of fans from other teams that visit and post. We want it to stay that way.

Glad you get it Matt…welcome to the blog.

by John Berkowitz on Sep 22, 2009 7:47 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well, John, while we are being Civil

What is up with Oregon ranked 9th. First a couple of questions:

1. is that a ranking based on how you think the teams will end the season? If so, I think if you look at Oregon’s schedule we have a much better chance than that of ending at higher than 9

2. Is that based on how you think teams are playing? Well, I think you are being a little intellectually dishonest when you look at who OSU, UA, and ASU have played and what their records are in comparison.

I believe their is a little personal emotion involved in that ranking…and that is ok, but I can tell you if anyone from ATQ put UW at that much lower of a ranking because of emotion, they would get called to the carpet from me too.

by Matt Daddy on Sep 22, 2009 8:55 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Seriously...

…you’ve GOT to get rid of the fowl wings on your shoulder pads…who was the genius who came up with that! YUCK!

Washington Husky Football-Undefeated 1991 National Champions 12-0!

by dawgfan22 on Sep 21, 2009 5:16 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

That was last season...

…get into the NEW Huskies!!!!!!!! 2-1 and ready to take back what’s ours!!!!!!!! The Media is going nuts over us right now, in case you haven’t noticed! And by the way what the hell kind of a mascot is a duck!!!!! GET REAL!!!!!!!

Washington Husky Football-Undefeated 1991 National Champions 12-0!

by dawgfan22 on Sep 21, 2009 5:19 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

We ARE being mentioned in the National Media...

…RIGHT now!…and you’re NOT! When they bring it up on Monday night Football it’s BIG!!!!!!!!

Washington Husky Football-Undefeated 1991 National Champions 12-0!

by dawgfan22 on Sep 21, 2009 5:22 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Matt, matt, matt ...

… you keep citing last year as proof that this year’s teams are somehow tarnished. UW of 2008 is not the UW of 2009. Idaho (2-1; same as Oregon) is not the same team this year as they were last. Oregon is clearly not the same team as they were last.

You should have talked your smack when you had the chance. While we appreciate your sentiment of pity, you missed an opportunity that Duck fans will probably not have again. We both have new coaches and new outlooks. The only thing that is the same is the long-held tradition of UW dominating the little brothers to the south.

Damn, my eyeball tastes good.

by Gekko Mojo on Sep 22, 2009 7:23 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

It is nice to see a Duck once in awhile

Sort of a canary in a coal mine and this one is quacking.

by John Berkowitz on Sep 21, 2009 3:25 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Load the guns

It’s time for some duck hunting!!

"Legends are made on the shores of Lake Washington"
"BOW DOWN TO WASHINGTON"

by Lear Pilot on Sep 21, 2009 3:53 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

And they're one dimensional...

…Massoli can’t throw the rock!

Washington Husky Football-Undefeated 1991 National Champions 12-0!

by dawgfan22 on Sep 21, 2009 5:13 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Dietrich Riley has a top 4 and UW is in there

http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/blog/index?name=West_Recruiting

It’s Notre Dame, USC ,UCLA and UW as his top four with it looking like all four will have scheduled visits.

by john_s on Sep 21, 2009 1:34 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

It’ll be interesting to see where he goes. He says nice things about every single school

by ChazzReinhold on Sep 21, 2009 3:52 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Love this quote

Savannah had five tackles in the game and said he didn’t think the injury impacted his play.

“Not really,‘’ he said. "It was obviously broken and I’ve got two broken bones in it now. But it’s football. It’s not for everyone.‘’ from Bob C’s blog

Now that is what I love about football!!! Broken bone, no problem!

by bigdave967 on Sep 21, 2009 4:34 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

On a down note

John Timo tore his ACL this weekend.

by bigdave967 on Sep 21, 2009 4:45 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

eesh...so did Wroten

he’s not playing Basketball this year.

Hopefully he (Timu) gets a greyshirt to heal up.

by B Money on Sep 21, 2009 5:29 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hey Bix

are you out there? I’d love to hear what you think about the game.

And the rest of you guys: Don’t be talking trash to anyone…. not Cougs or Ducks or anyone. Just hold your heads high and believe in what we can do.

GO DAWGS!!!!

Expect to Win!!!

by OLDDOG on Sep 21, 2009 7:19 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Olddog...

I have a hunch that Bix is staying low keyed right about now. He’ll be back you can ask him then.

All I saw was purple

by crazidawg on Sep 21, 2009 7:40 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I like your signature OLDAWG!...

…we all Bark for Sark!

Washington Husky Football-Undefeated 1991 National Champions 12-0!

by dawgfan22 on Sep 21, 2009 7:56 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

600 tickets have been sold...

…recently. An unreal accomplishment considering it’s just within the last couple of days!

Washington Husky Football-Undefeated 1991 National Champions 12-0!

by dawgfan22 on Sep 21, 2009 7:57 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

and a lot of those...

…are season tickets! GO DAWGS!!

Washington Husky Football-Undefeated 1991 National Champions 12-0!

by dawgfan22 on Sep 22, 2009 7:53 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the UW Dawg Pound an unnoffical site for Washington Husky sports fans.
Start posting about the Huskies »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
SB Nation Survey + Chance to donate $500 to a charity of this community's choice
12dsb2jhbc9dcvzxveoagafdl3rpbguvmc8ymtaznwaaaaaaaad4ce8k_small
Canzano reporting Bellotti Resigning as AD
Small
UW got a better draw than Cal or Gonzaga
Olympiabeer_small
See you in 2011, Masoli. Well, maybe. Thoughts on Masoli's suspension and Sark.
Jeff_mug_h2_small
SB Nation's Pac-10 Tournament Preview
Jeff_mug_h2_small
VOTE on SB Nation's Pac-10 all-conference awards!
Small
UW makes best in the west rankings
Small
Donald Butler
Olympiabeer_small
Hey Quacks, it isn't just us in the PNW that are seeing your program as outlaw...
Learjet31a_1_jpg_small
Another Oregon player in trouble. . . .

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SBNation.com Recent Stories

Maryland's Greivis Vasquez, of Venezuela, tries to block a shot by Houston's Aubrey Coleman in the first half of an NCAA first-round college basketball game in Spokane, Wash., Friday, March 19, 2010. (AP Photo/Rajah Bose) link

In Progress: After Early Struggles, Maryland Putting Away Houston

Michigan State's Kalin Lucas drives around New Mexico State's Jonathan Gibson in the first half of an NCAA first-round college basketball game in Spokane, Wash., Friday, March 19, 2010. (AP Photo/Don Ryan)

Lane Violation Helps Michigan State Move Past New Mexico State, 70-67

Oklahoma State's James Anderson (23) is defended by Georgia Tech's Glen Rice, Jr. (14), in the first half of an NCAA first-round college basketball game in Milwaukee, Friday, March 19, 2010.(AP Photo/Morry Gash)

Georgia Tech Remembers How To Shoot Free Throws, Tops Oklahoma St. 64-59

More from SBNation.com >


Managers

1959_huskies_small John Berkowitz

Dubs_small thecassino

Official Partner of CBS Sports