UW Dawg Pound: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
New Blog: Along The Olentangy for Ohio State Fans!

Washington vs USC Preview

KJR's Dick Baird is fond of saying that the leading indicator that Husky football is back when they beat USC. Baird knows what he is talking about because when you beat the Trojans it sends a signal up and down the West coast that your program can compete with anyone in the country. Baird knows beating USC is a stepping stone into gaining entrance into every HS recruits living room in the West.

Sark and company are already in a lot of those living rooms. Knocking off his former boss would give him even more leverage in bringing in the type of athlete needed to compete on the national stage every single year. USC will always recruit well, that is a given, but USC can't take every player.

I don't remember many years if any when Washington out recruited USC on paper when Don James was here. The key has always been to get the best in state, steal a few great one's from the Trojans, and fill in the rest with the kids who have been going to Oregon, and Cal the better part of a decade.

I am not predicting a certain upset on Saturday however this game is on every experts upset watch list. Washington has a 25-30 percent chance of beating these guys at home this week. The keys to winning the game are stopping the run, eliminating the big play, forcing turnovers, and winning the special teams battle.

Husky Stadium isn't a great place for the opposition when the place gets rocking. If Washington can come out and grab an early lead it is going to create momentum in the stands and on the field like it did against LSU. It isn't like USC isn't conditioned for that after playing in Columbus but the crowd is a huge factor.

Another huge factor is the Washington offense led by Jake Locker who is completing 60% of his passes this season. When your QB is capable of doing that plus has the intangible of being mobile it can drive a defense crazy.

Washington has a chance in this one. There will be opportunities and this young rebuilding team needs to seize the moment and take it to the next level.

Position Match Ups

Quarterback - Washington...Jake Locker has completed 60% of his passes so far this season and he is a threat to take the ball to the end zone every time he runs it. Locker just may have evolved into the best player in the Pac 10. Barkley has done well this season and doesn't play like a freshman. Matt has also completed 60% of his passes.Last weeks drive should give him a lot of confidence but he may not even start because of a shoulder injury. Aaron Corp is just as good as Barkley so if Matt doesn't go it shouldn't hurt the Trojan's much.

Tailbacks - Even...USC has better depth but you can't play ten players at one time. The duo of Polk and Fogerson is equal at this point to Johnson and McKnight. I don't know any analysts who would agree with me this early but Washington's run game is solid. McKnight has a propensity to fumble the ball. We haven't seen it yet this season but lets hope it comes this week on what should be a wet field at Husky Stadium.

Fullback - Even...Homer has one carry this season but his blocking has been superb. I wouldn't be surprised if they used him more as a skill player this week to throw a changeup at the Trojans. Stan Havili is the future of what the UW FB will evolve into. Stan is a dangerous skill guy who blocks as well as Homer. When you throw in Fogerson at H-Back you have to call this even.

Wide Receivers - Even...I would put UW's receivers up against almost anyone's in the conference. USC has better size but they don't have the advantage of Jake Locker delivering the ball. USC on the other hand has the advantage of going up against the Washington secondary. I call this even because I have seen what are unit can do against a strong and fast secondary.

Tight Ends - USC...Anthony McCoy is the complete package and arguably the best the Pac 10 has right now at the position. Depth, experience, and blocking ability wins out by a nose here. Kavario Middleton may just have the stickiest hands of any TE I have seen at UW. Once he becomes a better blocker he will be an AA TE.

Offensive Line - USC...UW has exceeded expectations so far but how many of these guys will play in Sundays? USC on the other hand has a couple of potential All American's and plenty of guys top to bottom who will play in the NFL. USC has to meet the challenge of Washington's interior. Ta'amu and Elsiara have been stellar this season against the run.

Defensive Tackle...Even...UW has been able to stop the run its first two games and that really is the way you judge the interior of the defensive line. USC has the potential to do the same. Both teams will try to take away the running game on Saturday.

Defensive End...USC...Daniel Teo Neshiem hasn't had a big game yet. Darrion Jones has only played one series this season but will be bak in the rotation this week. The Trojans have a lot of depth and even with the injury of Armistead have an edge if you look at the results of the first two games. Washington needs some big plays out of its DE's.

Linebacker...USC...At first glance you would call it even because the Trojans are breaking in three young guys and Washington has a lot more experience. Overall the Trojans have better athletes in the three deep even though the starters don't have as much experience as UW does. I have been impressed with USC's new trio.

Cornerback...USC...Shareece Wright is ineligible but the Trojans have plenty of plenty of depth. Keith Pinkard has moved over from safety to take Wrights spot. UW is still trying to find the right answers even though play has improved. Could any of the UW CB's get playing time at USC? Play at corner has improved dramatically for UW but the Trojans have the serious horses.

Safety...USC...Washington is still trying to find a tandem that works well together. Nate Williams is having a great year but somebody in the trio of Glenn, Aiyewa, or Walker needs to emerge beside him. taylor Mays is banged up but will probably play on his last trip to his home town.

Special Teams...Washington...USC has been less than special in this area while Washington has had only one mistake so far. This may be an area the Huskies can exploit. Expect UW to try to block some punts.

Game Matchups

Washington running game versus the USC defense

Washington has run the ball well in the past two games. We haven't seen huge plays but the Huskies are able to move the rock and convert. USC will try to take this dimension away and put the game completely on Jake Locker's shoulders. Washington's offensive line has exceeded expectations and they need to continue doing that this week against probably the toughest defensive front they will play all season.

The Huskies need to keep that going so the Trojans have more to focus on than just Jake Locker.

Washington Passing Game versus the USC defense

Jake Locker has been magnificient this season. Everything he does has improved and his ability to create with his arm rather than his feet has blossomed under Sarkisian. Washington just may be one of the better passing teams int he country right now. The Trojans are going to have trouble getting to Jake because of his mobility. If you chase Jake he just might burn you seriously a few times with the run.

USC likes to attack and Washington needs to take advantage of that tendency. Sark and Holt know the Trojans inside and out. It gives Washington an advantage because they know how Carroll thinks and reacts. When USC blitzes Washington needs to take advantage of that and burn them deep.Big plays can happen against an attacking defense.

The USC defense is rugged but teams do have success pasing the ball against them inside the conference. Washington should be able to move the ball through the air.

USC rushing game versus the Washington defense

USC is living by the run early this season to take the pressure off their freshman quarterback. the Trojans always have a strong run game and they use it effectively to balance their offensive production at the other skill positions. The Washington defense has done one thing exceptionally well this season and that is stop the run. They were already tested by a great offensive line is the LSU game and the talent they face this Saturday may even be better. Idaho by the way was no slouch in the offensive line and running department. Washington stuffed them most of the game.

Washington's goal is to control the USC running game and put the game on the shoulders of Matt Barkley or Aaron Corp. Nathan Endele who is no Matt Barkley or Aaron Corp picked apart the UW midsection last week which is probably something USC will try to do. The difference this week is that Washington will be playing its "A" team almost the entire game. Alameda Ta'amu and Cameron elisara need to have the biggest games of their careers this week. Ta'amu is the budding star nobody knows about. This week may just be his coming out party on ABC.

McKnight has a history of fumbling even though we haven't seen that this season. Washington needs to concentrate on stripping the ball to create turnovers.

UW's linebackers have been very capable in the cleanup department behind the defensive line. My take is that Washington will have success stopping the run and the game will be decided in the air.

USC passing game versus the Washington Defense

Matt Barkley and Aaron Corp are probably studying the Idaho film as I write this and I expect the USC coaches will arm them with a game plan that alllows them to go over the top of the UW linebackers with a high percentage passing game. Washington hopes they can get enough pressure on him to force him into freshman mistakes. The coaches admitted they were in a vanilla defensive plan last week designed to get the younger players more experience to help build the depth. This week expect the defense to resemble more of what we saw against LSU.

The special teams battle

If UW is going to beat USC they need a special teams victory. that means they need to eliminate returns like they have been doing all year and not make any mistakes which takes points off the board. Look for Washington to be very agressive in going after the USC punter. They are having problems with snaps and getting the ball off in enough time.

USC like LSU has incredible team speed so look for Washington to revert back to the short kickoffs to eliminate long returns. Look for Pete Carrol to try to figure a way around that.

The intangibles

USC has a habit of letting down after big wins. Last seasons let down was a loss to Oregon State after defeating Ohio State.

“I’ve said this before: I think Jake is one of the best players I’ve ever seen in this conference, in all the years we’ve been here,” said USC coach Pete Carroll, who has been with the Trojans since 2001. “He’s the most extraordinary athlete at the position we’ve seen, and I saw that as a freshman.”

Game Notes

UW is second in the nation in third-down conversions to Florida at 22-33.

The Huskies lead the Pac-10 in passing offense at 287.0 yards per game, which is also 20th in the nation.

UW is 36th overall in total offense at 436 per game.

UW is 101st in pass efficiency defense and 96th in pass defense, allowing 260.5 yards per game.

Jake Locker leads the Pac-10 and is 14th in the nation in total offense at 321.5 per game. He is also 37th in the nation and third in the Pac-10 in passing efficiency at 149.59.

Pete Carroll (90-15), ninth season. He wins 85.7 percent of his games, best of any active Division I coach with at least five years of tenure.

Safety Taylor Mays, an O’Dea graduate, is on six preseason award watch lists.

Washington has't beaten USC since Pete Carroll's first season at USC.

USC leads the series 49-26-4.

0 recs  |  Comment 49 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Great Job...JB

I love your articles. Your pulse on the Husky football scene and PAC10 football is about right on. Good Job

by bigdawgdaddy999 on Sep 18, 2009 6:01 AM PDT reply actions  

Amen Bro!

I’ll second that bdd. We have got to pressure the $C QB. I don’t care who is back there we have to bring pressure. I remember a few plays against LSU where we got blown up in our own offensive backfield. We’ve got to fix that against $C.

I hope we can get more depth in our kickoffs but like Holt said, we are what we are.

Washington Husky Football-Undefeated 1991 National Champions 12-0!

by dawgfan22 on Sep 18, 2009 6:38 AM PDT reply actions  

Great Article

I dont know what it is but I feel like we can win this…call it ignorance or whatever but I can’t stop that feeling like something crazy is about to happen. I dont like all the pundits putting this game on alert though…I like the underdog feeling and they are kind of taking the edge off that (though no one is picking us to win so we are still the underdog…20 points to be exact….) I think Ta ‘Amu is going to wreck havoc and I would bet we bring the house to rattle Baby Barkley. He’s still young enough to rattle into mistakes. Fingers crossed but I feel good….

by bigdave967 on Sep 18, 2009 6:39 AM PDT reply actions  

Hopefully $C...

…is thinking this game will be kind of a walk thru for them. As a player how do you view Washington? Since we were 0-12 last season and they destroyed us, that will be a big key to the game IMO.

Washington Husky Football-Undefeated 1991 National Champions 12-0!

by dawgfan22 on Sep 18, 2009 7:00 AM PDT up reply actions  

Turn Over Margin...Baby

For the season we are -1.+ and USC is 0.…I really beleive if we are plus 2 come tomorrow, we win.

by bigdawgdaddy999 on Sep 18, 2009 6:50 AM PDT reply actions  

Skyline vs Oaks Christian

7PM on ESPNU. That’s 614 on Direct TV.

Washington Husky Football-Undefeated 1991 National Champions 12-0!

by dawgfan22 on Sep 18, 2009 7:03 AM PDT reply actions  

GO Nick!!..

..GO Erik!!, GO Kasem!!

Washington Husky Football-Undefeated 1991 National Champions 12-0!

by dawgfan22 on Sep 18, 2009 7:04 AM PDT up reply actions  

Correction...

…Kasen Williams, next recruiting classes big get from the Evergreen State!

Washington Husky Football-Undefeated 1991 National Champions 12-0!

by dawgfan22 on Sep 18, 2009 7:07 AM PDT up reply actions  

I think this game is a hard one to pick. Odds on fav go to the Trojans. But USC hasn’t been exactly impressive yet. Meanwhile we looked very good vs. LSU and seemed to walk thru the Idado game.

And with that said I think we are going to see this weekend what Washington is really about this year. Are we LSU and USC good or did we catch LSU too early, where Idaho isn’t very good after all.

Saturday will convince me one way or another. Hopefully the LSU game was not a fluke- I’m betting it wasn’t.

We’ve got to attack that young LBing corps! They may be good run stoppers but can the cover is what I’d like to see. Go right at em’ right up the middle. Open up the middle and you will expose a not so great USC secondary.

All I saw was purple

by crazidawg on Sep 18, 2009 7:24 AM PDT reply actions  

crazi, I agree

we need to hit a lot of short passes and get the USC LBs running around trying to cover instead of just cheating up to stop the run. Use a lot of screens, short passes to TE and FB and slot guy, hopefully Johri or Polk where we can get the personnel mismatch. I disagree with johnb on the ST advantage , at best I think we are even. Folk is a mystery, i hope it doesn’t come down to a last second FG from 38 or longer out, his accuracy greatly suffers somewhere around that distance.

by prrbrr on Sep 18, 2009 7:31 AM PDT up reply actions  

What I liked about...

the Idaho game is that the coaches saw early apparently that they could win comfortably with a vanilla scheme and blood some youngsters. My glass is half full but that says to me that they know some things we haven’t seen yet.

by hairofthedawg on Sep 18, 2009 7:57 AM PDT up reply actions  

Sark was saying...

…that there is still a lot that we haven’t seen.

Washington Husky Football-Undefeated 1991 National Champions 12-0!

by dawgfan22 on Sep 18, 2009 1:47 PM PDT up reply actions  

Agreeing

Dont agree with Crazi to often…its hazardous to your health!

Kidding.

I agree with you Crazi…this is the week we can tell if this is legit or not.

by bigdave967 on Sep 18, 2009 10:23 AM PDT up reply actions  

Is this why Lear is missing in action? I think I might’ve wore him out- I tend to do that from time to time.

All I saw was purple

by crazidawg on Sep 18, 2009 1:24 PM PDT up reply actions  

MIA?

When was I MIA? Lately I feel like I’m checking the blog on a hourly basis!

I think the real issue is that we are actually agreeing a lot more now that the season has started.

"Legends are made on the shores of Lake Washington"
"BOW DOWN TO WASHINGTON"

by Lear Pilot on Sep 18, 2009 1:49 PM PDT up reply actions  

Mostly I agree

I think you are on target, but I’m going to postpone my decision until after the Stanford game. To me this is very much like the LSU game, we are playing a better team, we should lose, but we stand a chance. I also expect a very similar outcome to the LSU game. Next week is when we find out what this team is really made of.

We’ve lost to a very good opponent, beat a lesser opponent, what I really want to see is how we play against a mid range opponent that is beatable, but will still take a good performance to get the win. As many of us discussed a few weeks ago, Stanford is going to be a very pivotal game that will tell us what this team is or is not capable of.

"Legends are made on the shores of Lake Washington"
"BOW DOWN TO WASHINGTON"

by Lear Pilot on Sep 18, 2009 8:00 AM PDT up reply actions  

USC is the "if" Game

Lear if we beat USC (it’s conceivable), but if we do we will be target No.1 from that point on. If we beat USC It will push our confidence through the roof. If that happens we won’t take it for granted. I think every player on the roster will remember how losing felt.

But I don’t want to get ahead of ourselves. This is USC we’re talking about, a team that has been to the very top more then once. They know what championship football feels like, they know how to win tight games, they know how to get it done. We’re still learning how to compete and play 4 solid quarters of football. If we win, this would arguably be one of the biggest wins in school history, especially coming off an 0-12er.

But let’s not get ahead of ourselves. If we don’t take care of business, if we don’t know our assignments, if we take a play off, if we don’t fumble the football away. This game is the single biggest “if” game that I can remember. Let’s take care of all the ifs.

Go Huskies! WOOF!!!

All I saw was purple

by crazidawg on Sep 18, 2009 1:34 PM PDT up reply actions  

I think his point is this – beating USC would be awesome, a huge step forward. But it’s not expected. A more realistic expectation is that we can go to Palo Alto and knock off Stanford – doing so would show we can possibly be something other than the 8th or 9th place Pac-10 team, and the idea that we can get to 6 wins and a bowl game becomes a lot more plausible.

by kirkd on Sep 18, 2009 1:39 PM PDT up reply actions  

I think Sark might have other ideas- already

But in order to do that we need to fix the secondary. Either the young defensive backs figure it out rather quickly or we get one helluva great pass rush going. But we won’t survive our Pac 10 slate until we can figure out how to manage an opponents passing game.

But I do agree with both you and Lear. Just consider what is available to us if we do beat SC. Can you imagine? We’d be target No.1 from here on out.

All I saw was purple

by crazidawg on Sep 18, 2009 1:44 PM PDT up reply actions  

Similar to LSU...

…in the sense that the trojans have a lot more at stake here than we do. We should be playing loose.

Washington Husky Football-Undefeated 1991 National Champions 12-0!

by dawgfan22 on Sep 18, 2009 1:51 PM PDT up reply actions  

Let me clarify

IF we beat USC, I’ll know everything I need to know, and there will be no reason to wait for the Stanford game. But it’s more likely that this will be a repeat of the LSU game and Stanford will be the game that really tells us where we are at, and how far we’ve come.

"Legends are made on the shores of Lake Washington"
"BOW DOWN TO WASHINGTON"

by Lear Pilot on Sep 18, 2009 1:51 PM PDT up reply actions  

Dito

But I don’t think Stanford is all that. They didn’t impress me much from what I saw of them vs. WSU. But then again playing in Pullman is a headache in itself just getting there.

I think it’s a long shot at best trying to one up USC at this point. But Stanford pulled it off a few years ago, so the chance is always there. I think the 22 point spread is actually quite accurate. Then again I wouldn’t be the least bit surprised if we took them behind the wood shed and worked them over either.

We’re going to get there, but I don’t think this game is a W. Locker would have to play man vs. child out there and the defense would have to be playing over their skis to get the W.

I just want Washington to look good. Many recruits on the fence are waiting until after this game. Riley? Pullard? Burnett? Hatchie? Innes? Rowland? Hudson? Shaw? Wright? and Richardson? We make a good show vs. USC this weekend and we’ll be getting a few more top shelf recruits.

I Bark for Sark! WOOF!!!

All I saw was purple

by crazidawg on Sep 18, 2009 4:14 PM PDT up reply actions  

LOL!
and the defense would have to be playing over their skis to get the W.

Washington Husky Football-Undefeated 1991 National Champions 12-0!

by dawgfan22 on Sep 18, 2009 5:37 PM PDT up reply actions  

Ever wonder...

…why Stanford keeps coming up as a pivotal game for us?

Washington Husky Football-Undefeated 1991 National Champions 12-0!

by dawgfan22 on Sep 18, 2009 1:49 PM PDT up reply actions  

First Conference game againist a team NOT named USC...

Plus they are a projected middle of the pack Pac 10 team…if we win or lose we can judge where we are more clearly than by how we play USC (#3 team in the country.).

by bigdave967 on Sep 18, 2009 1:59 PM PDT up reply actions  

Agreed I hope we...

…can bring our A game after this “mightly men of Troy” game. I think they’ll be a lot to be fired up about, I mean our first roadgame and Stanford may be painted Purple on that particular Saturday!

Washington Husky Football-Undefeated 1991 National Champions 12-0!

by dawgfan22 on Sep 18, 2009 2:01 PM PDT up reply actions  

I don't think that the level of execution that UW showed in the LSU game was a fluke...

However, USC will probably be better prepared to play you guys than we were. UW is going to have to play a better game against USC to win than they did against LSU.

I just looked it up and here in Huntsville, AL we get the USC-UW game on ABC!!! I’ll be watching and pulling for you guys. Good luck.

by LSU Jonno on Sep 18, 2009 11:07 AM PDT up reply actions  

Preparation

I think Coach Carroll is the best in the business. His teams are well prepared. I agree…we need to be better in game three than we were in game one. There is an old adage that teams make the most improvement during the season between week one and three.

by John Berkowitz on Sep 18, 2009 12:08 PM PDT up reply actions  

Special Teams

I went back and forth on that one. I gave UW a slight edge because of punting, strategy during kickoffs, a slightly better FG kicker. SC obviously has more depth and talent but they have been sloppy on special teams. I think we have a good chance to block a punt.

by John Berkowitz on Sep 18, 2009 8:33 AM PDT via mobile reply actions  

UW Pass D

Hey Listen, I mostly agree w/ your analysis and, I understand that we went with a vanilla defense against a (very) vanilla Idaho team. But, did you see how many yards of passing offense that they got against us? Even with a very basic scheme, and trying to break in new guys to build out the depth for next year we should never have allowed them to pass for that many yards. We don’t need to wait until later in the season to know that Idaho is not a team that ought to be able to compete with a tier 1 team like UW. SC is a much better team, the best team UW will face this season, and you better believe that Aaron Corp will be a better passer than Nathan Endele. We did do a good job of stopping the run though, which as you mention has been SC’s bread & butter thus far this season.

Next, your treatment of the UW special teams… I don’t know, did you see how they covered the run-back against Idaho? It was ugly, and slow. They couldn’t get there in time and then they had some trouble tackling. I can’t remember a single time that Idaho didn’t wind up at least on the 30 – 35 yard line. Maybe that didn’t affect the outcome vs a team like the Vandals, but you can bet that given that type of field position the Trojans will take advantage.

Full Disclosure: I’m a UW student and big Husky Fan, but was stationed in Southern California for a long time and have been a USC fan since 2000 (pre-Pete Carrol Era, so all you haters out there that think that every SC fan is a bandwagoner, don’t even try w/ me). This Sat. will be a tough day for me, either way!

by UWJd on Sep 18, 2009 9:44 AM PDT reply actions  

You bring up some good points

Unfortunately for us, I agree with them. But there are a few other issues to add:

There is always an unknown when you start a QB that has never started before, nobody really knows how he’ll handle the pressure and noise. Idaho is better than their usual self, but we should never give up that many passing yards to a low caliber team.

Special teams have had their ups and downs, our punter is looking really good, our kicker is average to good, but you couldn’t be more right about field position, we’ve got to get better or else it’s going to be a long game.

Needless to say, there is a lof of work ahead for our coaches. I’m dying to see how we do against mid level teams like next weeks game at Stanford.

"Legends are made on the shores of Lake Washington"
"BOW DOWN TO WASHINGTON"

by Lear Pilot on Sep 18, 2009 10:44 AM PDT up reply actions  

Pass D Etc... .

I agree…the pass defense against Idaho is a huge concern. I think the Vanilla as we call it was a factor. Breaking in new DB’s was also a big factor. Playing reserves was a factor. UW wanted to get immediate experince for younger players and they didn’t want to wait till they had a big lead like some staff will do. They wanted to give them meaningful playing time when it counted.

I did see how they covered the runback against I daho and I also saw how they took it out of the game with strategically placed kicks against LSU. I think they go back to that this week. I don’t think we will treat SC like Idaho in other words. As Sark puts it we have to paint the black of the plate.

Haters?

We really don’t have any haters on the board. Everyone seems to have a mutual respect for good football.

by John Berkowitz on Sep 18, 2009 12:03 PM PDT up reply actions  

I did see how they covered the runback against I daho and I also saw how they took it out of the game with strategically placed kicks against LSU.

Well, what we did against LSU is keep Holliday from being allowed to break any big returns. Unfortunately, it came at the expense of consistently giving them very good field position to start their drives. LSU started each drive between their 31 & 39 yard lines, average start was 34.8. Contrast that with the UW – we started between the 8 (holding call) and the 27, averaging the 19.3. If we do that against USC, we are ceding a significant amount of yardage to them, and that has to be considered a “win” for USC. Unfortunately, I think kickoff coverage and returns is an area where we see our pronounced lack of quality depth.

by kirkd on Sep 18, 2009 1:29 PM PDT up reply actions  

The strategy worked pretty...

…well. We were close enough in the game to win. The flipside is kick it to him and maybe he breaks a couple big runs.

Washington Husky Football-Undefeated 1991 National Champions 12-0!

by dawgfan22 on Sep 18, 2009 1:58 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yeah, I get the risk that we were trying to avoid by not kicking off deep. I’m just pointing out that the result was that we were giving away about 15 yards of field position on kickoff returns vs. LSU. I guess my point is that we have a ways to go in special teams play to get to where we need to be.

by kirkd on Sep 18, 2009 6:07 PM PDT up reply actions  

I dont necessarily agree that Corp is better than Ederle

Ederle is a senior and Corp has only 4 passing attempts. Corp undoubtly has better player around him that can make him more dangerous. Ederle’s WR’s had a BUNCH of drops…if my count was right I believe it was 5 catchable balls.

by bigdave967 on Sep 18, 2009 12:08 PM PDT up reply actions  

sorry

Corp undoubtly has better playerS around him…

he has more than one better player.

by bigdave967 on Sep 18, 2009 12:08 PM PDT up reply actions  

I second that

He is more mobile…and has a better supporting cast.

Enderle impressed me enough to make me think he has a future. He had good zip on the ball. He has been well coached.

by John Berkowitz on Sep 18, 2009 12:09 PM PDT up reply actions  

The game wasn't really...

…that close. At one point the score was very lopsided. I do agree though it was disappointing that we seemed to allow them so much success in the passing game.

Washington Husky Football-Undefeated 1991 National Champions 12-0!

by dawgfan22 on Sep 18, 2009 1:55 PM PDT up reply actions  

You did pick...

…a good time to become a trojan fan!

Washington Husky Football-Undefeated 1991 National Champions 12-0!

by dawgfan22 on Sep 18, 2009 2:04 PM PDT up reply actions  

Minor correction

It’s Josh Pinkard not Keith.

I do find your calls of the running and receiving games as being even pretty interesting. I don’t really remember being greatly impressed with the WR group against LSU, Middleton does look like a future star. Polk certainly is a nice back but I don’t know if he has McKnight’s big play ability. He might be more consistent which is something I would like McKnight to be.

[DELETED ZOMG NO POLITICS]

by bluemax on Sep 18, 2009 11:28 AM PDT reply actions  

Minor

Thanks for the correction.

I think Johnson, Aguilar, and kearse are pretty impressive.

The thing with McKnight is he has a history of fumbling. I would like to see that happen on Saturday.

by John Berkowitz on Sep 18, 2009 12:05 PM PDT up reply actions  

Goodwin...

…is back in the mix now too.

Washington Husky Football-Undefeated 1991 National Champions 12-0!

by dawgfan22 on Sep 18, 2009 1:59 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yeah, RB was the one that jumped out at me

If I had the chance to swap Chris Polk and Johri Fogerson for Joe McKnight and Stafon Johnson, I’d do it, no question.

I mean, you could say McKnight has fumbling issues, but couldn’t you say the same thing about Polk?

Other than that, I’d maybe nudge the DT edge toward USC and the LB edge back toward UW a bit… but I thought the analysis was pretty good all-around. USC definitely has more talent than UW top-to-bottom, but UW is pretty healthy at this point and USC has some key guys that are a little less than 100%, so the differential won’t be as obvious as it might later in the season when both squads are relying more on their depth.

I also think Aaron Corp is the key to this game. We can talk about trying to rattle him or whatever, but he’ll decide whether he plays like a backup making his first start or yet another USC QB star-in-the-making.

by busplunger on Sep 18, 2009 12:45 PM PDT up reply actions  

Why the matchups?

Polk and Fogie won’t line up against Johnson and McKnight so why argue this? It’s Polk, Fogie, and the O line vs. the USC defensive front.

When it comes to the running game it’s all about what line dominates. Can our O line move a rebuilt USC D line? I think you might be just see it this saturday. From what I saw vs. LSU- I am more then confident we can play with USC. Can we win is another story…

All I saw was purple

by crazidawg on Sep 18, 2009 4:27 PM PDT up reply actions  

To me that is a tough sell

I’m more interested in seeing compible talent where it counts on the field. USC D line vs. UDub O line, USC secondary vs. UDub receivers, vice versa. Because really the game is won or lost in those areas.

On a different note, I stayed up late to watch the Boise/Fresno game and let me tell you. I’m getting a little tired of BSU’s act. Numerous taunting calls could’ve been made on the Broncs, and what about the helmet to helmet no-call on 4th down and 4? If that isn’t helmet to helmet then I don’t know what is. Actually it’s even more lethal then helmet to helmet. The BSU defender was using his helmet as a weapon. It use to be called “spearing”.

Now you know why I came out with the “LSU abuse” thing. I’m quite sure Chris Peterson doesn’t teach dirty play either, but it happens almost everywhere and I’ve seen this type of play a lot more down south. We need to get this garbage out of the game! Someone is going to get seriously injured if not. WOW!

All I saw was purple

by crazidawg on Sep 19, 2009 8:34 AM PDT up reply actions  

Great write-up John!

I’ve been in and out of town the past 2 weeks, this morning I caught a flight out of St. Louis for Dallas- and. . . .goodness gracious- I need to remember how beautiful the women are here in Texas!

Unfortunately, I won’t be able to even watch this game on TV- much less use the tickets I purchased for this long-awaited match-up of UW/USC in Seattle today. This business trip was unplanned, as I was a last-minute replacement to meet with principals and investors (my partner and his wife welcomed their first child into this world on the 25th of August and their infant daughter has been experiencing medical difficulties since her birth, he needs to be with his family in this time of concern). That said, I hope this game ROCKS!

Of course I’ll be rooting for the Trojans to win and come out of this without injuries- but at the same time, I’ll definitely hope for Husky success in all phases of play and performance. Jake Locker is prolly my favorite college QB, he’s just an incredible talent and natural-born leader.

I don’t know how this game will play out, I expect some aggressiveness from both head coaches on both sides of the ball. In my opinion, the game calling from Coach Jeremy Bates in the tOSU game was “so-so”- it appeared to me that Bates couldn’t quite work the team around the ferocious tOSU D-line “push” throughout last weekend’s game. Our O-line didn’t really come together and “push back” until the last couple of series last week, not sure why or how that happened? Did Bates keep the playbook “close” knowing full well a Trojan victory was likely despite tOSU’s unexpected D-line power in that game? I’m not so sure I’d buy that myself, because not putting away a team or not dominating a home team in a raucously loud stadium IS A PERFECT WAY to lose an away game.

For me, it’s “the game within the game” that I’ll be most into in this game. My attention is fully on coaches Holt and Bates.

Good luck Huskies! Give us HELL.

"As for being a Raiders fan, I wouldn't wish that fucking shit on anybody." [the venerable OTS at Roll Bama Roll}

by BixBeiderbecke on Sep 19, 2009 9:39 AM PDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the UW Dawg Pound an unofficial site for Washington Husky fans.
Start posting about the Huskies »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
My Pac 10 picks and why
Rainer_small
RECRUITING SPACE LEFT
Small
FSN Northwest: Will they show the BYU game?
New_picture_small
Gekko's Three-Putt
Scnw_logo_small
New Confrence Alignment Dynasty for 360
Learjet31a_1_jpg_small
The 2010 Husky Football Season as seen from 45,000'
Rainbow_small
Narrative of Husky Stadium remodel
Small
BYU Road Trip
Rainbow_small
Interesting comment from Locker on ESPN.
Bigpanda_small
Hey John! About the Media Poll,

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SBNation.com Recent Stories

Virginia Tech quarterback Tyrod Taylor celebrates with the crowd in the final moments of the fourth quarter of an NCAA football game against Tennessee Sunday, Dec. 13, 2009 in Atlanta.  (AP Photo/John Bazemore)

Week 1 College Football Buffet: Previewing Every Game So You Know Which To Consume

Photo +19 updates

QB Jeremiah Masoli Elgible To Play Immediately After Winning Appeal

North Carolina football coach Butch Davis responds to questions during NCAA media day in Chapel Hill, N.C., Thursday, Aug. 12, 2010. (AP Photo/Gerry Broome) +9 updates

UNC Announces It Will Be Without 12 Players In Opener As Investigation Continues

More from SBNation.com >


Managers

1959_huskies_small John Berkowitz

Dubs_small thecassino