Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Troubled Yankees Join Troubled Red Sox In Last Place

Trying to figure out Stanford's logic

The Pac-10 Conference, in conjunction with television partners FSN, ABC/ESPN and Versus, made its selections for Sept. 26 and did not select the Huskies' contest at Stanford as one of the three games in its weekly television package.

The Cardinal athletic department elected not to move off its standard game time of 6 p.m. and make a request for a league waiver for a local telecast - which could have provided the UW's partner, FSN Northwest, the rights to televise the game. The home team for all Pac-10 games controls the kickoff time when the game is not picked-up for a league television appearance.

FSN Northwest owns the UW's exclusive television rights, after the Pac-10 makes its weekly television selections. The network has the contractual obligation to televise every Husky game, provided the game time can be moved into a window that does not have a head-to-head conflict with a Pac-10 telecast.

If you are Pac 10 Commish Larry Scott you have to be taking a close look at this situation. Keeping conference teams from being televised for selfish reasons is not in the best interest of the conference. Every single game in the SEC is televised every single week and the Pac 10 should make every effort to follow suit in the next contract.

Stanford's official reason for not making the change is it would be inconvenience for their fans. They say the tickets were already printed with a 6:00 pm kickoff time and that is the reason they did not want to move the game back to 4:00 pm. The game wouldn't have generated much money for either school if it had been picked up so the Tee doesn't care. Coach Jim Harbaugh was never consulted.

This is a game that should be on TV and they should be working behind the scenes to obtain a waiver to make it happen. You can bet that Scott Woodward is still exploring every avenue out there to make it happen. One option is broadcasting it back directly to Seattle for closed circuit viewing at Hec Edmundson.

Comment 23 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

What a Joke!

Worried about an empty stadium then discount tickets for fans and give tickets away to students. The average person spends anywhere from $25-45 at a game once they are in. Thats why professional baseball teams and basketball teams give lots of give aways (as well as they need to to get ppl in games….80 home games is a lot) but still the seat cost you the same whether theres someone in it or not. Stanford is a big recruiter nationally too. You think they would want the exposure…bonehead move on their part.

by bigdave967 on Sep 16, 2009 10:54 AM PDT reply actions  

Stanford and logic

seem to be mutually exclusive.

Like we used to say at Intel (I’m sure they still do)
“We make logic, we don’t use logic”

by T9ODawg on Sep 16, 2009 10:55 AM PDT reply actions  

Now that's a one liner!!

"Legends are made on the shores of Lake Washington"
"BOW DOWN TO WASHINGTON"

by Lear Pilot on Sep 16, 2009 3:36 PM PDT up reply actions  

LOL

That reminds me of “The beatings will continue until morale improves”

by T9ODawg on Sep 16, 2009 11:50 AM PDT up reply actions  

No

I thought TW’s deal was…you’ll be on ice in perpituity

by T9ODawg on Sep 16, 2009 12:03 PM PDT up reply actions  

I thought that was the FAA's slogan!

"Legends are made on the shores of Lake Washington"
"BOW DOWN TO WASHINGTON"

by Lear Pilot on Sep 16, 2009 3:37 PM PDT up reply actions  

$

Why don’t they make money when game is televised? does UW? I thought TV had to pay the schools.

by mynameisdavid on Sep 16, 2009 11:38 AM PDT reply actions  

from the SF cronicle via BC's blog

Stanford spokesman Jim Young said neither school was going to receive compensation for the telecast. “But mostly it came down to that we didn’t want to inconvenience our fans” this late in the process, he said.

E-mail Tom FitzGerald at tfitzgerald@sfchronicle.com.

This article appeared on page B – 2 of the San Francisco Chronicle

Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/09/16/SPM219NE8K.DTL#ixzz0RIS3xvWG

by mynameisdavid on Sep 16, 2009 11:45 AM PDT up reply actions  

It costs at least $25,000 to $30,000 to produce a basic, bare-bones football game broadcast

This has nothing to do with a 6:00 pm start time, because all conference schools know that there is a 6-12 day window for FSN TV broadcasts. Something else going on down at Stanford, turning down money… BS. There excuse does not hold water.
Stanford has a history of not moving games and the PAC10 IS DOING NOTHING ABOUT IT. The hogwash of not making money does’nt holdup either

http://stanford.scout.com/2/801403.html

by bigdawgdaddy999 on Sep 16, 2009 11:47 AM PDT reply actions  

Realdawg reports

I like that they jump on stuff early but I’ll wait for Dawgman and Rivals to report before I jump from my seat….Though I wont be surprised to read this tonight!

Either way, we need him and he will be a great pick up if it holds true!

by bigdave967 on Sep 16, 2009 12:11 PM PDT up reply actions  

Not confirmed yet

I agree Big Dave…wait till DM confirms.

by John Berkowitz on Sep 16, 2009 12:13 PM PDT up reply actions  

What PAC10 Teams receive.

Teams get about $200,000 – from the conference’s revenue-sharing pot if the game is Televised .

www.cosida.com/formpdfs/July31CoSIDANews.pdf

by bigdawgdaddy999 on Sep 16, 2009 12:10 PM PDT reply actions  

Just picked up Dawgs of War and Husky Football in the Don James Era

by Derek Johnson. Looking forward to reading them both over the next couple of weeks. Has anyone read either book?

http://washington.scout.com/2/899690.html (story from Dawgman)
http://www.derekjohnsonbooks.com/ (website to purchase them)

by bigdave967 on Sep 16, 2009 12:34 PM PDT reply actions  

I’ve read “Husky Football in the Don James Era”. Lot of good recollections and stories in there. Some parts in there I thought weren’t entirely relevant to football and reflected personal bias by the author, but all in all a worthwhile read for a devoted Husky fan.

by kirkd on Sep 16, 2009 1:32 PM PDT up reply actions  

Not so much “who” as it is “what”.

by kirkd on Sep 16, 2009 2:14 PM PDT up reply actions  

Ahhh

Gotcha…I guess I’ll know soon enough. Cant wait to read them.

by bigdave967 on Sep 16, 2009 2:16 PM PDT up reply actions  

I liked the first book

very much and will be getting the second pending the Times review

by T9ODawg on Sep 16, 2009 2:32 PM PDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the UW Dawg Pound, an unofficial site for Washington Husky fans.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Learjet31a_1_jpg_small
Question of the Day:
T9odawgtest_small
A few Spring Game thoughts.
P1010006_small
Who Said College Basketball Recruiting was Supposed to be Clean?
Dubs_close_small
The Future Of Husky Basketball
Small
Updated: Arizona loses at home, Cal faceplants in style.
Dubs_close_small
PAC 12 Pickem Final Results
Dubs_close_small
UW Dawg Pound Tournament Challenge
Small
PAC 12 Tournament Tickets
Dubs_close_small
PAC 12 Pickem Results/Conference Tournament Schedule
Dubs_close_small
Tournament Challenge

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

1959_huskies_small John Berkowitz

Dubs_small thecassino

Editors

W_logo_small kirkd

New_picture_small Gekko Mojo

Beastquakerwallpaper_small Ben Knibbe

Profpic_small JLee2025

Authors

Learjet31a_1_jpg_small Lear Pilot

Dubs_close_small CODawg

Coda_head_shot_250_small S_o_Smith

2721_small ToddWilliams206

P1010006_small Randall Floyd