Trying to figure out Stanford's logic
The Pac-10 Conference, in conjunction with television partners FSN, ABC/ESPN and Versus, made its selections for Sept. 26 and did not select the Huskies' contest at Stanford as one of the three games in its weekly television package.
The Cardinal athletic department elected not to move off its standard game time of 6 p.m. and make a request for a league waiver for a local telecast - which could have provided the UW's partner, FSN Northwest, the rights to televise the game. The home team for all Pac-10 games controls the kickoff time when the game is not picked-up for a league television appearance.
FSN Northwest owns the UW's exclusive television rights, after the Pac-10 makes its weekly television selections. The network has the contractual obligation to televise every Husky game, provided the game time can be moved into a window that does not have a head-to-head conflict with a Pac-10 telecast.
If you are Pac 10 Commish Larry Scott you have to be taking a close look at this situation. Keeping conference teams from being televised for selfish reasons is not in the best interest of the conference. Every single game in the SEC is televised every single week and the Pac 10 should make every effort to follow suit in the next contract.
Stanford's official reason for not making the change is it would be inconvenience for their fans. They say the tickets were already printed with a 6:00 pm kickoff time and that is the reason they did not want to move the game back to 4:00 pm. The game wouldn't have generated much money for either school if it had been picked up so the Tee doesn't care. Coach Jim Harbaugh was never consulted.
This is a game that should be on TV and they should be working behind the scenes to obtain a waiver to make it happen. You can bet that Scott Woodward is still exploring every avenue out there to make it happen. One option is broadcasting it back directly to Seattle for closed circuit viewing at Hec Edmundson.
23 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
What a Joke!
Worried about an empty stadium then discount tickets for fans and give tickets away to students. The average person spends anywhere from $25-45 at a game once they are in. Thats why professional baseball teams and basketball teams give lots of give aways (as well as they need to to get ppl in games….80 home games is a lot) but still the seat cost you the same whether theres someone in it or not. Stanford is a big recruiter nationally too. You think they would want the exposure…bonehead move on their part.
Stanford and logic
seem to be mutually exclusive.
Like we used to say at Intel (I’m sure they still do)
“We make logic, we don’t use logic”
Now that's a one liner!!
"Legends are made on the shores of Lake Washington"
"BOW DOWN TO WASHINGTON"
We're not happy until you're not happy
I won’t mention where I used to work.
I thought that was the FAA's slogan!
"Legends are made on the shores of Lake Washington"
"BOW DOWN TO WASHINGTON"
from the SF cronicle via BC's blog
Stanford spokesman Jim Young said neither school was going to receive compensation for the telecast. “But mostly it came down to that we didn’t want to inconvenience our fans” this late in the process, he said.
E-mail Tom FitzGerald at tfitzgerald@sfchronicle.com.
This article appeared on page B – 2 of the San Francisco Chronicle
Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/09/16/SPM219NE8K.DTL#ixzz0RIS3xvWG
by mynameisdavid on Sep 16, 2009 11:45 AM PDT up reply actions
It costs at least $25,000 to $30,000 to produce a basic, bare-bones football game broadcast
This has nothing to do with a 6:00 pm start time, because all conference schools know that there is a 6-12 day window for FSN TV broadcasts. Something else going on down at Stanford, turning down money… BS. There excuse does not hold water.
Stanford has a history of not moving games and the PAC10 IS DOING NOTHING ABOUT IT. The hogwash of not making money does’nt holdup either
by bigdawgdaddy999 on Sep 16, 2009 11:47 AM PDT reply actions
Realdawg reports
I like that they jump on stuff early but I’ll wait for Dawgman and Rivals to report before I jump from my seat….Though I wont be surprised to read this tonight!
Either way, we need him and he will be a great pick up if it holds true!
Not confirmed yet
I agree Big Dave…wait till DM confirms.
by John Berkowitz on Sep 16, 2009 12:13 PM PDT up reply actions
What PAC10 Teams receive.
Teams get about $200,000 – from the conference’s revenue-sharing pot if the game is Televised .
by bigdawgdaddy999 on Sep 16, 2009 12:10 PM PDT reply actions
Just picked up Dawgs of War and Husky Football in the Don James Era
by Derek Johnson. Looking forward to reading them both over the next couple of weeks. Has anyone read either book?
http://washington.scout.com/2/899690.html (story from Dawgman)
http://www.derekjohnsonbooks.com/ (website to purchase them)
I’ve read “Husky Football in the Don James Era”. Lot of good recollections and stories in there. Some parts in there I thought weren’t entirely relevant to football and reflected personal bias by the author, but all in all a worthwhile read for a devoted Husky fan.
Ahhh
Gotcha…I guess I’ll know soon enough. Cant wait to read them.

by 














