The Monday Morning Wash
Game week is finally here, and after a day off on Sunday the Huskies begin their regular preparatory routine to be carried out 12 (hopefully 13!) times over the season. In a perfect world, a new coach for a team coming off an 0-12 season would be warming-up against an Idaho, a San Jose St., or a Nevada. This isn't a perfect world, and therefore the new-look Huskies open up on national TV against SEC-giant LSU.
Let's take an early look at what to expect Saturday night from an LSU perspective.
LSU had some issues on offense in 2008, and for that matter, the defense wasn't up to its usual standard, either. The Tigers managed an 8-5 record, which would have brought forth in a ticker-tape parade in Seattle. In Baton Rouge, however, such a finish got some assistant coaches fired.
The Tigers are likely to enter this game with little--if any--respect for Washington. Expect LSU to come into Husky Stadium on Saturday night with swagger and confidence, potentially working to the Huskies advantage should Washington come out early and hit them in the mouth. If that happens it has the potential to throw the Tigers off balance early; never underestimate the difficulty of playing on the road in a BCS conference.
I believe LSU will attempt to keep things simple, looking to run the ball down Washington's throat, minimize mistakes, and control the clock. Senior running back Charles Scott is their go-to guy; expect the Tigers and to keep handing him the ball until Washington shows they can shut down the run. LSU's offensive line has the potential to be dominating, taking pressure off of their young sophomore quarterback, Jordan Jefferson.
Washington must force LSU to air it out more than they would like. Jefferson is a young guy likely to make mistakes on the road on opening night. If LSU simply runs the ball all night and controls the line of scrimmage, Jefferson's mistakes will be minimized. Washington has to take the Tigers out of their offensive game plan and comfort zone.
Defensively, the Tigers will follow the blueprint teams have been using against Jake Locker since early 2007: contain Locker and you contain Washington's offense. They will attempt to shut down the run and force Jake to beat them with his arm, something Jake has yet to do since arriving at Washington. Washington must take advantage of LSU's defensive youth and inexperience early to prove they can move the ball with balance. That being said, the Tigers have plenty of talent and speed defensively; like USC, this roster is loaded with four and five star recruits. UW isn't nearly as fast in most positions, so they are going to have to play smarter than the Tigers in order to beat them.
Washington needs to make some big plays early to throw the Tigers off balance. There is no way Washington can beat these guys going head-to-head all evening. Look for some trickery and creativity on offense. Expect the defense to take risks and go after the QB. Washington won't be playing it safe on Saturday; Sark and company are going to throw everything they have at the Tigers.
Special teams are going to be huge. Will Mahan needs to punt the ball well and force fair catches. If he doesn't, the Tigers have the ability to bring it to the house and score some cheap ones. The Wild Bunch (as Sark calls his special teams) needs to be truly special; Washington must win this area of the game.
In past seasons, we have watched Washington teams with similar talent take opponents (like USC) to the very last snap of the game. We saw a Jake Locker-led team in 2007 lead Ohio State midway through the third quarter. With the right game-plan, effort, and a vocal home crowd Washington is capable of hanging with these guys.
Washington needs to shock the Tigers by taking an early lead and make them play from behind. Playing from behind usually has the effect of taking a team out of its normal game plan. Take away the normal game plan and you have the opportunity Washington hopes for.
2009 Game Changing Factors
Let's take a quick look at four factors which I believe will make Washington a much better team in 2009 than they were in in 2007, and 2008. Obviously there are more than just four but lets start off with the obvious as we start the week.
The Locker Factor
As many as 2000 fans have seen Washington practice on a single afternoon this pre-season. No matter how many times you watched the offense over the past three weeks you never actually saw how they are going to play the game offensively on Saturday night. The reason is Jake Locker has been practicing being a drop back QB in the pro set without the wrinkles that make him one of the most dangerous players players in the country.
Missing from practice for the most part has been Jake's ability to tuck the ball under his arm and take it down the field for a long gain. Jakes mobility promises to make an offensive line that is struggling to be adequate look a lot better once regular season play begins.
The team you see out the field on Saturday night is going to resemble the 2007 edition a lot more than the 2008 edition of the team. I just happen to think that there is also more overall talent in the 2009 squad than there was in 2007 even though the depth is about the same at most positions.
If Washington can put together some balance in the early going Jake is going to be a big factor in this one. If Jake can minimize the mistakes and make the most of his opportunities this one will be a lot closer than people think.
The Sark Factor
There is a very good reason that Steve Sarkisian has mentored a continuous string of Heisman contenders and that is he simply makes talented players better over time. USC of course always had a lot of talented players to work with but without quality coaching you don't end up being a first round draft choice.
As mentioned above I don't think any of us have seen what Jake Locker is capable of this year in practice because we have only seen one dimension of his game so far. When they give him back his wheels on Saturday and match that with improved accuracy he is going to impress.
Sark and his staff bring a lot more to the table offensively than the previous staff. They are used to thinking outside the box and making sure all the possible pieces are involved in their game plan. How many times in the previous four years was it obvious to all of us what Washington was going to run when they stepped up to the line of scrimmage?
I don't expect Sark to turn it all around one single season but I do expect this team to be a lot more entertaining, competitive, and much less predictable in 2009. I also don't expect to see that deer in the headlights look from the Washington head coach on the sideline anymore.
The EJ Factor
If there was one player Washington missed as much as Jake Locker last season it was EJ Savannah. EJ returns to be an anchor to an already strong linebacking corp. What Savannah gives Washington is a player that could start for almost any other team int he country and we don't have a lot of players like that.
Savannah is a playmaker on the other side of the ball who makes all who play with him better. Great players do that because they take the pressure off the rest of the team. No offense to Jon Gage but if you throw him in instead of EJ you lose approximately three quarters of a whole body on defense because EJ plays like one and a half players when he is on the field.
Nobody has to worry about covering up for EJ which means that plus effort he is capable of can be used to cover up some other deficiency the Huskies may face such as lack of speed and experience on the corner.
You can say the same thing about Daniel Teo Nesheim too. Daniel and EJ are all conference type performers who if free'd up to do their thing can wreak havoc with an opposing offense.
The Holt Factor
On the defensive side of the ball Washington has looked solid up front in the pre-season. The Huskies have the makings of a very good defensive line. If the promise shown by the interior players allows the DE's and LB's the freedom they need to make plays this team will surprise people.
The backfield has more experience and depth but still lacks overall speed compared to an LSU. The Huskies need to scheme and make adjustments to overcome this. Expect Washington to be very aggressive in it's defensive play calling. They are going to go after Jefferson all night and try to force him into mistakes.
The most important factor added to the 2009 defense is DC Nick Holt and his staff. Emotion is not going to be something these players are going to be lacking on Saturday night. Holt is going to have these kids sky high and ready to play. I think we can safely say the days if the Huskies coming out flat are behind us.
Holts first goal in 2009 is not to be the worst defense in the conference and the country. Washington was that bad last season even though WSU made noise that they were just as worthy for that distinction. I think Washington can climb back to a mid conference level as far as proficiency is concerned this year. Leadership is a big part of that climb out of the basement and Washington has the right guy in the leadership position.
More Game Week Notes
Practices for the general public have been closed for the rest of the season but the media, Tyee members, plus friends and family of the team are invited to watch on Monday thru Thursday. The Huskies will be practicing late this week to simulate the late start on Saturday night.
Bob Condotta of the Seattle Times hasn't made his prediction yet for Saturday's game but he thinks it will be a high scoring affair for both teams. bo makes a very good point when he says the wrapper hasn't been taken off Jake Locker yet in practice which i allude to above.
Former Husky WR DJ McCarthy returns to Husky Stadium on Saturday as a member of the LSU coaching staff. Dick Baird has a feature story on him over at Dawgman.
LSU comes in ranked as the #11 team in the country. Future UW opponents USC, Cal, Oregon, and Notre Dame are also rated in the top 25 to start the season.
69 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Can't wait for the season.
The biggest opportunity for UW, though cliche, is turnovers. LSU gave up a lot last year, and didn’t receive many. If Washington is a +2 or better in TO’s in this game, it will probably be tight.
Good luck to you guys!
Nice to have well spoken LSU fans
I’m glad to host them and I hope their fans enjoy their stay. I look forward to a great game.
Should be fun!...
…I like the fact that it’s going to be a sellout! These type of games are EVENTS!…and like Sark has said he want’s the gameday experience to be an ALL DAY EVENT. Gosh I’m getting a little nervous just thinking about the whole thing! GO DAWGS!!
Washington Husky Football-Undefeated 1991 National Champions 12-0!
Funny that was going to be my post!...
…Turnovers, turnovers and more turnovers, we have to win that battle in order to have a chance. In my opinion, that’s a huge key to this game. Jake cannot throw picks out there if we’re going to have a shot at winning this game. Obviously we can’t fumble it either. Let’s get a few of those and give our selves a chance to win.
Washington Husky Football-Undefeated 1991 National Champions 12-0!
Washington is a lock to win...
If Washington is +2 or better in turnovers in this game, they win.
by bigdawgdaddy999 on Aug 31, 2009 8:48 AM PDT reply actions
Game on
We’re gonna have the house rocking. LSU is a great test for us. Yes…we’re gonna be slightly overlooked but by half time I’m sure it’s gonna be clear that these canines have a bit more bite than last year.
Let’s get the season started.
I may be the worlds biggest cynic
But I’ll be damned if I don’t think this game could put us back on the map.
If we play hard and hit early, a win is a real possibility. Here’s my clairvoiancy at it’s best
Scenario:
Opening kickoff fumbled by LSU, and after a missed route from crowd noise (on the first play from scrimmage), UW takes a 6-0 lead on an EJ interception returned 26 yards for a TD. Huskies take a 14-7 lead into halftime. LSU comes out strong in the second half when the athletic gap takes over. UW scores 10 late points to close the gap, but a last minute drive comes up short around the UW 20. Huskies fight till the end, but come up short, 35-31. Post game Les Miles praises Sark, and on ESPN Gameday, Lou Holtz proclaims UW as his sleeper NC contender in 2010.
How say you?
by B Money on Aug 31, 2009 9:22 AM PDT via mobile reply actions
B Money
The day Les Miles praises anything except the image he see’s in the mirror each morning while shaving will be the day I become an Oregon fan.
by John Berkowitz on Aug 31, 2009 10:22 AM PDT up reply actions
I'll hold you to that!
Although I do find it extremely unlikely.
"Bow Down to Washington"
"Kick the tires and light the fires!"
the miles and holtz
Bit was heavy with sarcasam (Holtz called for ND to go the the NC game this year, shocker I know). Although that is my actuall call for the game.
by B Money on Aug 31, 2009 11:30 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions
5 Days to the return of Jake Locker!
If you need a Locker fix here ya go!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BMfiq9CXss8&feature=player_embedded
Sark
He has got to have plays that use his legs…he is to big of a threat running not to. I trust Sark & Co but man watching that video reminded me of what a game changer Locker can be.
I've seen plays at practice . . .
Sark is a smart guy, he will use all of Locker’s abilities.
"Bow Down to Washington"
"Kick the tires and light the fires!"
I hope we have...
…a myriad of quick passes. Just in case they do sell out to blitz Locker to rattle him early, we need to have some quick on rhythm stuff to counter that. I’ve always thought the draw play was a good play to counter that too. I haven’t seen it for years though. Locker is going to be a serious “key” or the LSU defense, but that QB draw up the middle could be something else that opens things up.
Washington Husky Football-Undefeated 1991 National Champions 12-0!
Yeah that has GOT...
…to be a part of the game plan. I think they may have some kind of “spy” following him at all times. Then again they may just be so overly confident that they decide not to do that.
I think one of our main advantages this season is that just about everyone on our schedule is going ot assume they can just show up and get a win against us. We need to rock them early!
Washington Husky Football-Undefeated 1991 National Champions 12-0!
LSU is going to be thowing pressure in spades...
…at Locker. How our offensive line holds up to that is going to be another key. Although it’s possible they may believe they can get it done with the front four rushing the ball. I just can’t believe they are going to give the DAWGS any respect.
Washington Husky Football-Undefeated 1991 National Champions 12-0!
Turnover margin
Turnover margin is huge in any contest and if memory serves me correctly LSU lost two games they should have won last year because of shoddy play at QB. What I am hearing is that Jefferson even though he is young has done a decent job taking care of the ball this past spring and during the current camp.
I think it all goes back to what I said in the article. UW needs to put pressure on the young QB and force him into making mistakes.
by John Berkowitz on Aug 31, 2009 10:19 AM PDT reply actions
Totally agree...
…too many times in the recent past have I seen opposing QBs have tons of time to throw the rock. No pressure whatsoever do you think this put even more pressure on a young secondary!? We can’t cover forever we have to get there!!!!!!!!!
Washington Husky Football-Undefeated 1991 National Champions 12-0!
ORdawg
My buddy Kirk (ORdawg) is bringing a couple of LSU fans up from Coos Bay for the game and they will be tailgating with the usual suspects including Taft , he is making it out from Virginia for the game as well.
I would love to be there...
Funny how things are working out this Fall but the first game I see in person will be Idaho. I have to be out there on business so that is just how the cards fell. One good thing though is I will actually be able to witness a victory in person for the first time since the Cal game in 2007.
I am pretty sure Kate does not have any type of surprise party going and I won’t be on a boat…so chances are good I will see you during the Idaho game.
I also have the good fortune close enough to South Bend to be able to take that one in too.
by John Berkowitz on Aug 31, 2009 10:53 AM PDT reply actions
sark calls a great game
the last rose bowl was a work of art. he had joe pa’s shorts in a knot.
we hold onto the rock and execute we should be ahead at half.
and i know we won’t know how to react to some adjustments, but that should play to our advantage also.
i like our weakside, we should get to jefferson.
would also like to see a dtn/forsett get together with mr scott early on to set the tone.
you’re right john, the first defensive series we need to punch them in the mouth.
regardless i will have no voice on sunday.
Special Teams Is Going To Be Huge!
When you’re undermanned, special teams makes such a huge difference.
It will be huge if Mahan and our coverage team can pin LSU deep in their own territory and make them drive deep.
Also our KR’s and PR’s need to string some good returns.
Question for you guys.
The only game I’ve seen Locker play in was the USC game in 2007. I’m sure he’s much improved since then, and since you guys have probably seen more of Tebow than LSU fans have seen of Locker, are those two comparable? Tebow is obviously a better player, but it seems Locker isn’t all that far behind from an athletic ability/competitiveness stand point.
Teabow throws better
But Locker has the advantage of being a better runner. See Youtube highlights of Locker versuse Ohio State in 2007 as well as the USC game.
If Jake can improve his accuracy he’ll be tough to game plan for.
Tebow is HORIBLE!
The guy will never cut it in the pros. He throws a Bernie Kosar-side arm special! He always throws off his back foot. And can’t read defense! All you guys that love the spread- I’ve got news for you, the reason they are running spread is because it is easier to recruit and a much more simplified offense.
Tebow is GOOD for one reason. Reason: Because their is only one Tebow. He’s a Mike LB that plays QB, and throws like one too.
All I saw was purple
Ya, that Heisman trophy just tells you how much he sucks!
Talk all the crap you want, he has TWO BCS Championships, and one Heisman Trophy. Talk is cheap, WINNING IS EVERYTHING!
"Bow Down to Washington"
"Kick the tires and light the fires!"
You said "Sucks" not me
Tebow is a talent, but he is not a very polished QB and every pro scout in the business knows it. But to think he is the best QB in the land is like saying Vince Young was the best college QB when he played- we all saw how that turned out. I could probably name 50 college QBs that have better QB mechanics then Tebow.
Again- Tebow is GOOD for one reason. Reason: Because their is only one Tebow. He’s a Mike LB that plays QB, and throws like one too.
What makes Tim Tebow the best at what he does? He’s as big as a linebacker, strong as an ox, more durable then a Mack truck, and has unmatched leadership skills. But a QB he isn’t and it will be proven once he is drafted.
All I saw was purple
What makes Tim Tebow the best at what he does? He’s as big as a linebacker, strong as an ox, more durable then a Mack truck, and has unmatched leadership skills. But a QB he isn’t and it will be proven once he is drafted.
Careful – what you said about Tebow could (and has) been said about Locker too. And for a guy you claim throws like a LB, his 66% completion percentage and lack of interceptions is pretty impressive.
Am I saying he’ll make a great pro QB? No, I think the concerns you’ve brought up are valid. He’s not a classic drop-back QB, and it’s questionable whether his passing skills will be good enough for him to be a successful NFL QB. But there’s no question he’s been an outstanding college QB. Best ever? I won’t go that far, but he’s in the conversation.
Coversation- Really?
Not even in the same zip code is more like it. Tebow is great because let’s face facts. Their is no one like him period! Look at it this way- Florida is loaded with talent, yes Lear I agree. Tebow is everything I said above and probably more! Those two combined will make him a star college football player without question.
Are you kidding with best EVER? I don’t think he is the best in 2009. Not better then Elway at Stanford, not better the Marino in Pitt, not better the Flutie at BC, Not better the Aikmen at Ucla, not better then Manning at Tennessee, not better then Michael Vick at Va Tech, not better then Carson Palmer at USC, not better then Matt Linehert at USC, not bettet the Mark Sanchez at USC, not better then a whole slew of QBs and that list is just off the top of my head.
And the verdict is still out on Locker. Right now, from what we’ve seen Locker hasn’t done anything yet. But I will say this about both Locker and Tebow. Both haven’t been groomed to play pro style QB and in both situations it shows. Tebow is a very awesome talent in college, I’ll give him that. He is a matchup problem from hell. And although his completion percentage looks good- as a defensive coordinator I want to see him throw the ball to beat me, rather then use his girth. Great athlete who plays QB- but really, not a very good QB. He just plays the position and it works because again the guy is a Mike LB with the ball in his hand. Wonder what Brian Urlacher would look like if he could hold onto the ball and could dump off to a RB coming out of the flat? Urlacher and Tebow are more alike then Peyton Manning and Tim Tebow- your “best ever” will be switching positions before or after he is drafted.
All I saw was purple
The disconnect here crazi is it seems you are using pro careers to judge college careers. Elway had a pretty good college career, but it was muted by the team he played for. Marino was pretty good in college, but not dominant – remember, he was the 6th QB taken in the 1983 draft.
I agree whole heartedly with the idea that Tebow has been helped tremendously by his supporting cast, and by playing in an offensive system that maximizes his talents. But the fact is, he’s produced in that environment in a way very few other college QB’s can match.
I have to wonder – have you stopped to really look at the numbers Tebow has put up, both passing and running? When you look at that, plus the record Florida has compiled with him at QB, his Heisman and National Championship, and yes – I think he’s had a better college career than Elway, Marino, Flutie, Aikman, Manning, Vick, Palmer & Sanchez. Leinart is arguable.
And even though I think Tebow is in the conversation for best college QB’s ever, I agree he’s far from a sure thing as an NFL QB.
It just comes down to different ways of evaluating things. You clearly view college football through the prism of the NFL – I take the college game for what it is.
The guy is a freak of nature and that makes him a great player. We are seeing stuff that evolves the game. Sort of like how Lew Alcindor and Wilt Chamberlein evolutionized basketball.
Folks thought Michael Vick’s game was likely to evolutionize the game. Maybe .. maybe not. But over the course of time in the game of football, the play of QB has been quite consistent over the years. The spread is an evolutionary process stemming out of what use to be option football and notice most of the teams that were tradtionally option or wishbone are running spread? Now let’s not get into that anymore then we need to.
But if you look at the simularities of the spread QBs of today and the option QBs of yesteryear, you’ll see a striking comparison. They weren’t being taught great drop step footwork and the QB mechanics were hardly noticable. Same thing applies today in today’s spread QBs.
I guess I am a pro style guy that loves pro style, that was the sort of offense I was raised on and teach to this day. On a different note I can’t stomach pro ball. Too much money involved, to many “me” guys, and to corporte for my taste. I love college football like a religion, but I’ll admit, I do rate QBs on how they perform at the next level. The NFL is all about the pro style offense- will never change because option, veer, and spread offenses are not corporate enough.
And I still have to disagree on your take of Tebow being in the conversation. Again back then Title IX was just being congegated by Kennedy. Back then their were no scholarship limitations. Pittsburgh with Dan Marino would’ve annilated the crap out of the current group of Tebow-led Gators. With only 85 scholarships, the Gators are forced just like everyone else to play underclassmen. In 1980 Pitt would’ve come with all juniors and seniors and they were the best of the best my friend. We are talking 145 scholarship football players. Nowadays with only 85, kids have no choice to to find schools that will offer them a good chance to compete early, i.e. Boise State, Louisville, and TCU. Do you remember 1980? Dan Marino and Pitt beat Hershal Walker and Georgia in the Sugar Bowl (an SEC team). Not sure but I do believe Pitt won the national championship that year.
I would argue that Marino’s college career was better then his pro career. That is HUGE considering he has become one of the greatest signal callers EVER in the pro game. Its all argumentative, but I stand firm Tebow has the worst footwork and QB mechanics since Vince Young, maybe worse with his Bernie Kosar-side arm special.
All I saw was purple
It’s always fun to debate with you crazi, because you don’t shy away from strong opinions :)
Pittsburgh won their National Championship in 1976 with guys like Tony Dorsett. Yes, that 1980 team was loaded, but they lost to Florida State and undefeated Georgia won the National Championship. Marino certainly had a great run at Pitt, but I’ll point out again that he was the 6th QB taken in the ‘83 draft, so as talented as he was and as nice a career as he had, guys like Elway, Todd Blackledge, Jim Kelly, Tony Eason and Ken O’Brien were picked ahead of him. Marino didn’t win a National Championship, didn’t win the Heisman (it was Hugh Green the place the highest in Heisman voting from that team) – he was good, but he didn’t dominate the college game the way Tebow has.
Locker is solid like Tebow, but faster.
His arm strength is widely considered to be better, but his accuracy has been the issue. Locker has obviously taken much more physical punishment than Tebow over the years.
Damn, my eyeball tastes good.
Locker has better arm strength than Tebow but Tebow is a tad more accurate. I don’t know if it’s really an apples to apples comparison given the talent around them.
I would say Locker is more elusive but Tebow is more apt to break tackles. And Locker is way faster than Tebow.
Tebow has a big advantage...
…when it comes to experience too.
Washington Husky Football-Undefeated 1991 National Champions 12-0!
Prediction
Can you give us your’s LSU Jonno? Or your take on the match-up?
Washington Husky Football-Undefeated 1991 National Champions 12-0!
My take on the game followed by a prediction...
Locker is going to give us trouble. LSU hasn’t effectively stopped a running QB in the Miles regime. DJ Shockley, Tebow, and even Stephen Garcia last year gave us fits… Having said that, with an all new defensive staff, plus the entire summer to prepare, who knows?
Offensively I expect us to march down the field at will. I expect this to look a lot like the 2007 LSU-Va Tech game. Crowton is just too creative and we have too much talent on offense for UW. The counter to this point is, how much of the offense will we want to show? My thought is, enough to get people scared, without blowing the wad so to speak.
Final score? I think the spread is 16 I say we’ll cover. 35-17 Game never in doubt in the second half.
Agree with above...
Tebow is more accurate but Jake is a WAY better runner and has a better arm. But Jake has had problems with accuracy as well as putting some touch on the ball when a WR is only 10 yards away. He’s had a tendency to fire a 90 MPH football at them.
Locker
I think it’s important that Jake gets it going early. If our first drive goes well that’ll be a huge condfidence booster for the whole team. We cannot go three and out and be punting out of the endzone!
If the defense forces a three and out on the first drive that’ll be huge for them.
Washington Husky Football-Undefeated 1991 National Champions 12-0!
Gregory Christine!
Is listed as the starting guard on the official depth chart?! Is that a mistake or what? I haven’t heard zip about him? Also Desmond Trufant is listed as a co starter with Vonzell McDowell, another huge surprise!?
Washington Husky Football-Undefeated 1991 National Champions 12-0!
Yup
shockers indeed but Sark says G.Christine has had a good camp. We know Holt is liking Trufant’s play.
Isn't it funny though...
…that we’ve heard like nada about him?
Washington Husky Football-Undefeated 1991 National Champions 12-0!
Christine
Christine has been a solid jorneyman back up ever since he arrived. He picked up some experience last season and with the lack of depth is suddenly getting an opportunity. Schaeffer is still going to play quite a bit this season and perhaps they wanted him to watch a series or two to obtain a softer landing. Chris Fetters has always felt that Christine was capable of winning a scholarship.
They are very high on Trufant and they also think he may be the only true CB in what their mold of what a CB should be on the squad right now. They really aren’t in to running mighty mites out there. Justin Glenn if he can get healthy will be the starter.
by John Berkowitz on Aug 31, 2009 1:59 PM PDT up reply actions
It's too bad...
…Trufant missed the first part of camp.
Washington Husky Football-Undefeated 1991 National Champions 12-0!
My Take on the game
I think LSU is going to throw a lot of stuff at Locker. They are going to come with the blitz heavily early on to see if they can rattle his cage and confidence. When we read blitz coming, we need to check out of our play and give them something that will back them up a tad. We’ve got to try to get these guys to play base defense on us. Because when defenses are stuck in base defense vs. the pro style, they can be suspect and bite on play action. Also if we can force them to play base defense then that will open up a lot of lanes to opperate out of- would be nice to hit Kavario Middleton down the seem a lot in the second half! And see Chris Polk coming open on wheel route.
The key to having a chance to win is to keep the game VERY close at halftime. This will give us a chance to win the second half. Stalemate the first half and deaden it if we can- this will make it a 2 quarter game and with homefield advantage and supersonic volume level coming from the fans- anything is possible.
I expect to win this game and I expect our guys to come out of the tunnel and enter the game like they expect to win. USC-North BaBY!!!
Go Huskies! WOOF!!!
All I saw was purple
Right Crazi...
…we HAVE to recognize it (pressure) and make them pay for bringing it. If they bring it and have success, they won’t stop doing it and we’d do the same thing if it was us. When they get out of the pressure mode, run more of your base offense. We have to be able to run the ball effectively, we cannot become one dimensional! Mix it up and frikken EXECUTE! Keep LSU defense on the field and wear their butts out!
Washington Husky Football-Undefeated 1991 National Champions 12-0!
We need to call some screens and draws early to give LSU pause on going all out with blitzing. We also need to hope that Locker and the WR’s are on the same page with LOS adjustments – if Locker sees a blitz coming, he needs to be able to know he can change a slot WR to a hot route in the area where the defense is blitzing from. If we can successfully burn LSU when they blitz and get them to play D more straight-up, we’ll have a chance.
Agreed Kirk...
…I think playing at home gives us a great chance offensively to get it done. Defensively with the crowd noise also gives us an advantage. I just hope the crowd shows up and brings the noise level to “old” heights!
Washington Husky Football-Undefeated 1991 National Champions 12-0!
The noise will be there at the start of the game. As long as the Dawgs are in the game, the noise will be there. But years of losing take their toll – if (heaven forbid) LSU pulls way ahead, the noise will fade.
What we need is for Sark’s crew to reward the noise we bring. Too many times over the last 5+ years, we’ve cheered our guts out on 3rd and long for the Dawg D only to experience the gut punch of seeing the opponent convert, time and time again. If Holt’s defense can make some stops, generate some turnovers and play hard, the crowd will stay in the game.
Best case scenario for us is we get an early turnover or tow and convert, force some punts and see Jake lead the offense into the end zone a few times and we carry a lead into halftime, and unlike in the past, we make the needed adjustments in the 2nd half to keep the lead. Upsets happen, and there are a few things that do work in our favor. Nothing would be better for the start of the Sark era than to shock the country and knock of the Tigers…
Kicking Game, Holding calls, & LSU abuse
- I think the kicking game is going to be huge for us if we succeed in it or could be devastating if we give up a lot of field position.
- We can’t find ourselves going backwards in this game, i.e. “Holding”. That call kills drives the most.
- I won’t be surprised if LSU comes in and tries to abuse Jake Locker a few times. The SEC is notorious for getting away with abusive sh—t like helmet to helmet contact, hands to the helmet, basically all the garbage that is considered personal fouls. The mad hatter is going to do everything in his power to disrupt and destroy our QB. One thing for sure- I hope Sark and Nuss has got it in Jake’s head to slide. Better to slide the risk injury- again [knock on wood]. Locker has to learn to “live to fight another day”, he is no good to us if he is banged up on the sidelines. Expect the bayou Tigers to want to hit us in the mouth and rough up Locker.
All I saw was purple
They've been teaching him...
…that crazi. Especially when a couple extra yards is inconsequential. If the game is on the line and he tries ot take someone out to get a crucial first down, well now, that’s different.
Washington Husky Football-Undefeated 1991 National Champions 12-0!
LSU Abuse? ...
Contrary to what “crazidawg” would have you to believe, LSU is not the boogieman and the SEC, nor its coaches promote illegal actions carried out by players. This is a full-moon, campfire story and posturing to make excuses for an outcome that may or may not even occur. The SEC may play a more aggressive brand of football, but that doesn’t make it illegal. Football is “abusive”. As is most sports where contact is made between competitors. It’s not touch nor flag football on the gridiron. The 7-on-7 and no-contact jerseys are off. With a handle like “crazidawg”, I wouldn’t have expected a post about an opponent being “too physical”. However, you do spell crazy with an “i”, though. (j/k).
Anyway, it should be a fun event and we hope to have a good time in a nice area of the country. Your new AD is an LSU Alum. Your current chancellor and our WRs coach (McCarthy) all have ties to both universities. You’re not in any way a rival to LSU and will not become one overnight. So hopefully some of our “fans” will cool their jets on the accusations and negative comments. Just let it be a little harmless jaw-jacking to amp up the gametime experience and that’s it. No need for attacks and smear campaings over a 3-hour encounter on Saturday…then a 2500 mile separation until 2012.
I tend to agree...but
So hopefully some of our "fans" will cool their jets on the accusations and negative comments.
I haven’t really seen a lot of that and if I do it will get deleted. Just want to make the point that visitors from other schools are more than welcome on this site at anytime as long as they behave themselves. That goes for the members who are Husky fans too. That being said we have never had much of a problem with politeness around here.
I don’t think a football team can be too physical. In fact physical is what football is all about.
I won’t be surprised if LSU comes in and tries to abuse Jake Locker a few times.
Name a single football team that didn’t try to do that over the last two years other than Syracuse? It is just part of the game. I don’t remember too many Husky fans feeling sorry for Todd Marinovich.
I have to agree with the LSU poster on this one. Calling out the SEC is a bunch of crap.
by John Berkowitz on Sep 1, 2009 10:07 AM PDT up reply actions
It's in the game ...
Playing aggressive is what football is about. LSU will not just be coming after Locker. They will be coming after anyone not wearing an LSU uniform. Your team should be taking the same approach.
I, nor any other LSU affiliate, will not expect your team to roll out the red carpet, lay down, and let us beat you. We are not silly enough to think that your guys won’t be trying to lay wood to our QB and any other LSU player that dare steps on the field.
That’s football! And I’d be disappointed if LSU players didn’t shake hands with your guys and thank them for a good contest when it’s over. We leave it one the field.
by Bayou Bengal on Sep 1, 2009 10:31 AM PDT up reply actions
Football is a violent game. Some people around here were upset with Shareece Wright a couple years ago when he put a hard hit on Locker just out of bounds, but that’s football. Wright may or may not have been conscious of the fact he was about to hit Locker out of bounds – I tend to think it happened so fast he didn’t know it was going to be an illegal hit – but he absolutely was determined to lay a big hit on him, and I applaud that.
The Huskies used to be like that – laying the lumber and making teams remember playing the Dawgs with the bruises (and more) to show for it. Sometimes those hard hits were late or out of bounds – it happens with aggressive play.
I expect the Tigers to hit hard and fast, and I expect the Huskies to dish it right back at them. Whether we win or lose, I want the Huskies to play tough and earn the respect of LSU.
You hit the nail on the head, John
I don’t rememeber any Husky fans complaining about how abusive the 1991 defense was, or about how badly they hurt the other team. If I remember right, we liked it, we encouraged it, and we’d kill to have it back.
Any fan, of any conference complain about “abusive” teams, should really look into a sport like ice skating. Now if you want to complain about how fans treat other fans, that could be worth discussing.
"Bow Down to Washington"
"Kick the tires and light the fires!"
Fellas you are reading way too much into my comments. I’m not saying LSU or the SEC plays dirty. I am saying they play a very aggressive brand of football, the same sort of football USC plays.
Again I am not calling anyone out so stop right there. Every program is taught to get away with everything they can- if the refs don’t call it keep doing it. Example: holding could be called on every single down.
Bayou Bengal if you’d read more of my posts, you’d see that I am offering LSU tremendous respect. I mentioned that it’s going to take everything we’ve got to say with them. Not win, but to just stay with the bayou tigers.
But let’s not fool ourselves, sometimes players take matters in their own hands to do stuff- legal hit or not. I do recall Rey Malaluga knocking the crap out of our QB, who was running out of bounds and knocked him into section B, row 4, seat 8! Is that in the game? Should it been called? Both teams are going to play aggressive and to try to get away with whatever they can as long as it’s not being called. You guys saw the word “abuse” and took it to an entirely new level. Maybe I should’ve used “roughed up” or “knocked unconcious”. Let’s keep it simple- let’s just say LSU is going to want to bring the heat on Locker. When they get to him, they’re not going to say “pardon me … but do you have any grey poupon?” The mad hatter is going to want his defensive stalwarts to rattle Locker’s cage, get him dirty, and make him feel a little pain (football related). Sorry I used a word like “abuse”- but don’t you think that is what the LSU defensive front is thinking right now in regards to No.10?
Get Real…
All I saw was purple
And if you look at footage of Rey Malaluga hitting our QB, who was running out of bounds, that hit that sent him sailing was helmet to helmet. Do you recall two years ago in Corvallis when Jake got hit helmet to helmet?
Never did I say anything about these tactics being taught by a coaching staff. Stuff happens in games and players (on occasion) do loose their heads now and then. All I am saying is that LSU is going to pursue Locker endlessly, drill him into the turf whenever they get the chance, hit him square in the mouth, try to destroy is concentration level- all of which is accurate in regards to how defensive linemen think. LSU is going to play a phyisical brand of football, especially on defense. Our job is to protect our quarterback, give him enough time to make plays.
Now if someone where to say the Washington defense is going to want to abuse a certain opposing offense- hell fellas I’d take that as a compliment! I was merely using the word as a colorful verb to discribe how the LSU defense is going to come after us. We abused Todd Marinovich like a rag dall that brisk September afternoon in Husky Stadium in 91. What the hell is wrong with the word? This country is gettin way to over the top in political correctness. Everything is taken out of context and distorted and for what? Why bother…
All I saw was purple
Are you sure you aren’t talking about the hit Shareece Wright put on Locker? This one: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jnhFY3BkXMI
I don’t recall any late hits that Maualuga put on Locker, but maybe I’m forgetting it.
Nope on Carl Bonnell...
racing down the sideline, then decided to ditch it, and when he made the move to the sideline, Malaluga came in and blind sided him in the ear hole and it was helmet to helmet. Sent Bonnell flying. And no flag???
Now the hit was within the rules because, although everyone in the stadium knew Bonnell was ditching and going for the sidelines, but the helmet to helmet no flag sucked!
Everyone who watches college football has to agree that their are a lot of helmet to helmet contact with QBs or hands to the helmet that isn’t called. Even the announcers imply that it should be a penalty. Like I said players “tend” to use stuff and continue to use stuff if the refs don’t call it.
Offensive linemen are taught to “get into the inside V” of the opposition. What is the inside V? it’s getting your hands inside the chest plate of the shoulder pads of a defender. Getting your hands in there and your fingers underneath the chest plate is holding. Because you’ve got the guy locked up, the only way the defender can escape is by using a forearm downward hacket, yet even then a quick O linemen will see it, react to the downward hatchet, and reapply the holding technique inside the V quickly so that he maintains his blocking leverage.
Some of this stuff is taught whether you don’t think so or not. I know trust me. Many coaches (not all) but many teach to use tactics legal or not until a ref calls a penalty.
All I saw was purple
So hopefully some of our "fans" will cool their jets on the accusations and negative comments. Just let it be a little harmless…
I assume you meant “your fans”? Totally agreed, let’s just go out and play a physical but legal game and have fun. This game is not for the meek. There is enough hitting going on without anyone having to resort to dirty tactics. Just so you know, with very few exceptions Husky fans are some of the best/nicest fans in the country.
Washington Husky Football-Undefeated 1991 National Champions 12-0!
Glass house?
I mean “both” fan bases. There are some Husky fans trolling a couple of LSU forums. I won’t cut/paste their comments because it’s harmless jawing and our forum fans understand that. For that, I won’t label your entire fanbase nor the people of the northwestern United States.
I believe that you guys have a wonderful institution and fanbase. I’ve traveled plenty and it’s no secret that people and cultures vary locally, regionally, nationally, etc. That doesn’t make anyone better. Just makes the people different. Just because you don’t understand it doesn’t meant that it’s bad. The south/southeast is a different place with a different motivation and mentality. To get a glimpse of it, you’d have to revisit the history. Then, visit the area in 2009 so that you’re current.
All institutions have the best and worst of fans. To think that you don’t have any fans that you’d like to not claim is pretty “arrogant” (i.e. SEC). UW and WSU are not very cordial to one another.
by Bayou Bengal on Sep 1, 2009 10:22 AM PDT up reply actions
Huksy Trolls
You won’t fond any of those guys over here.
by John Berkowitz on Sep 2, 2009 9:34 AM PDT up reply actions
Miles giving respect ...
Washington did not have success last year, but that was last year. If you look at a team that returns eight starters on offense and defense, the truth is that they have talent, they had a great recruiting class, their quarterback (Jake Locker) is back healthy and the likelihood is that they will be a much improved Pac-10 team. We will have to play well and execute to do what we want to do on the west coast. When you return a veteran quarterback to a team, there are just so many things that you can do. (Head coach) Steve Sarkisian was a great offensive coordinator at USC. He coached two Heisman Trophy quarterbacks, and I’m certain he’s thrilled to be at Washington with Jake Locker….. Nick Holt, the defensive coordinator, and coach Sarkisian will prepare that team extremely well. I know that it will be a great challenge to our football team and look forward to it.
There’s a lot more that Coach Miles said about UW and the things that Coach James accomplished there, but it may be too much to post.
LSU will not treat your squad like an 0-12 team. They will be played as if they are a 12-0 team. Last year has nothing to do with Saturday, September 5th. You guys have talent, energy, attitude, and new coaching. You’re not UW from 2008 and neither is LSU.
Typical coach speak
I wouldn’t read much into what he said, every coach says the same stuff. Basically, Miles was making sure he didn’t give us any bulletin board material like his comments about the Pac10 a few years ago.
"Bow Down to Washington"
"Kick the tires and light the fires!"
Agreed
Fans typically forget when it is convienent for them when their coach talks to the media. I think it would crazi for Miles to come out and say something as followed in regards to their upcoming contest with Washington:
“We’re going to land in Seattle, plan a walk thru at the smallish stadium, take a tour downtown and watch folks throw some fish. And oh by the way, we plan on kicking some ass on Saturday as well, then we’ll board the plane and chalk one up in the win column.”
Miles is going to say all the right stuff. If you don’t know that then you haven’t been involved in the game long enough. I believe LSU will prevail, but all this chatter about how Miles is offering us respect is harmless stuff. I expect Miles and LSU to be in a tougher then thought game. They will win, but it won’t be nearly as easy as they think.
All I saw was purple
"We’re going to land in Seattle, plan a walk thru at the smallish stadium, take a tour downtown and watch folks throw some fish. And oh by the way, we plan on kicking some ass on Saturday as well, then we’ll board the plane and chalk one up in the win column."
He won’t say that, but wouldn’t it be fun and refreshing to hear a coach say what he really thinks? I dunno, maybe Mike Leach is crazy enough to do that…

by 


















