Arizona State Preview
The Arizona State Sun Devils achieved greater heights than anyone thought possible in Dennis Erickson's first year as Head Coach. Setting the bar at such a level was a double-edged sword, as the Devils proceeded to fall further than anyone predicted in his second year due to problems on both sides of the ball which only recruiting and time will fix.
Arizona State had arguably the most disappointing season of any college football team in 2008. Entering the campaign as a top contender to unseat USC from their perch atop of the Pac 10, ASU failed to reach a bowl game and even tallied a losing record in conference play.
For the Sun Devils to going to rebound in 2009, the onus is squarely on the defense. Make no mistake, the defense is loaded, clearly led by Dexter Davis. The senior defensive end, who tallied 11.0 sacks and 15.0 tackles-for-loss in 2008, is expected to have a huge final season in Tempe. With Lawrence Guy also returning to the defensive line, the Sun Devils front four ought to be one of the best in the conference. The linebackers are equally talented with the return of Mike Nixon and Travis Goethel, who ranked first and third, respectively, on the team in tackles. The secondary has some rebuilding to do at safety, but corners Omar Bolden and Terrell Carr are now both experienced upperclassmen with tremendous talent.
Last season, Arizona State ranked 100th in the nation in total offense despite a four-year starting quarterback in Rudy Carpenter, a talented tailback in Keegan Herring, and a superb playmaker in Michael Jones. The problem was an offensive line who never got the job done and--as we know at Washington--it takes some time to rebuild that unit.
Carpenter, Herring, and Jones have graduated and on paper, it appears the offense could be worse in 2009. Dimitri Nance is a capable rusher and Danny Sullivan is certainly a solid option at quarterback. Sullivan is a strong-armed senior, and will have some playmakers downfield. Chris McGaha can pick up where Jones left off, and Kerry Taylor showed plenty of promise as a sophomore in 2008.
Four starters return on the offensive line in 2009, led by tackle Shawn Lauvao. If the line can give Sullivan time and create holes for Nance and fellow back Shaun DeWitty, perhaps there will be some improvement. We are talking about a lot of wishing, as this is an offensive line that gave up nearly three sacks per game during the 2008 campaign and paved the way for an absolutely awful ground game.
The special teams should be solid overall, sporting Thomas Weber, one of the nation’s premier kickers.
Consensus
We all know what type of coach Dennis Erickson is: he finds a way to win with the talent he has. He recruits well and knows how to get the most out of his players when they hit campus. The challenge, however, is it takes 2-3 years to rebuild an offensive line, even for a miracle-worker like Erickson.
Most experts expect ASU to win more than they lose in 2009, with six-to-eight wins and a minor bowl game. Throw me into that camp, too. If they can solve some problems on the offensive line, the Sun Devils should be able to score enough points to let a very good defense carry them.
Early Prediction
ASU was a team that Washington would have beaten with Jake Locker in the lineup last season. They are also a team that Washington has a good chance to beat in 2009, with the greatest challenge being the game taking place in Tempe. While I enjoy watching a game in Tempe, it is bad for Washington because Sun Devil Stadium is a very difficult and noisy place to play in these days. It makes Husky Stadium look like a morgue.
Going into this one the Huskies are probably going to be 3-3, so it is a must-win against a team they are capable of beating. I know I called ND a toss up, but winning in South Bend isn't a gimme by any means. If we arrive with at least a 3-3 record I am thinking we leave Tempe 4-3 with bowl hopes solidy in place.
0 recs |
29 comments
Comments
Erik Kohler
Hey what’s up with Kohler? It sounds like he may be committing to Washington.
Washington Husky Football-Undefeated 1991 National Champions 12-0!
by dawgfan22 on Jul 14, 2009 12:06 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
We will know soon...before August
by bigdave967 on Jul 14, 2009 12:10 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Interesting comments...
California offensive lineman Erik Kohler says he now favors Washington solidly over UCLA, California and Notre Dame. "The coaches at U-Dub really stand out to me," Kohler said. "I think they are absolutely amazing and they are great recruiters too. I think great things are going to happen there. I think that the campus is awesome. It’s a great place. But it’s all about the coaches. They are…"
This is from Dawgman.com
Washington Husky Football-Undefeated 1991 National Champions 12-0!
by dawgfan22 on Jul 14, 2009 2:25 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Things are looking good for the UW with Kohler. But even if he commits soon, I’d caution everyone that it’s a long time until February and the next signing day – a lot of things can happen between now and then.
It’d be great to get Kohler to commit, but don’t for a second believe that the recruiting battle for him will be over…
by kirkd on Jul 14, 2009 3:00 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Recruits and coaches
I love the fact that these recruits like our coaches so much. If Sark can have a decent season and pull in these high quality recruits the future is really going to be bright. If this staff has this much success in already, how much recruiting success are they going to have when we are winning 9+ games each year and Husky stadium is rocking once again.
"Bow Down to Washington"
"Kick the tires and light the fires!"
by Lear Pilot on Jul 14, 2009 3:16 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Montana was a big name that helped and will help
I agree with kirkd that february is a long way off. For this program to keep the commits committed they need to make a decent statement early on in the season and stay in the spot light during the season.
During the offseason all the west coast talk has been about Washington’s ability to recruit after such a dissasterous season. To keep the spotlight we don’t necessarily have to win 8+ games. I think if we maintain a competitive spirit win anywhere from 5 to 7 ball games those commits will keep the commit. So a lot is riding on how well the season plays out.
Actually I am very surprised to hear Kohler is close to committing to the UofW. I thought for sure the kid would sign with Cal- then again the Bears are breaking in a new O Line coach.
Big selling points are:
1) The University of Washington is an AWESOME place!
2) Hired an offensive minded head coach.
3) Will be in the same college offense w/ his buddy Nick Montana for the next 5 years.
4) If he works his tail off- playing time can come quickly!
5) Nothing more intimidating in the Pac 10 then the DAWGS! It’s a Husky and Trojan world- BABY!
Go Dawgs! WOOF!!!
All I saw was purple
by crazidawg on Jul 15, 2009 4:25 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yup
When people look at the overall spectrum, UW and USC are THE teams in the Pac10. The giant that is UW will wake up, say “wtf happened, why am I missing my lateral incisor?” and then proceed to absolutely whoop the dog s**t out of our little brothers that have got too big for their britches.
by ChazzReinhold on Jul 15, 2009 4:39 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Kohler Wud be Great Get
I’d also love to see Arizona’s Nick Rowland come on board as well. From what I read earlier, it seemed like we have a reasonably good chance here too.
Kohler and Rowland, along with Riva and Porter, and I would be more than happy with Sark’s OL recruits.
by ThaiDiamond on Jul 14, 2009 6:45 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Kind of interesting
ESPNU has Colin Porter graded out higher than Rowland and Kohler. Not that that means anything per se. It’s really just splitting hairs.
I don’t know anything recent about Chris Ward, but I hope the Dawgs are still in it for him as well.
by Sundodger on Jul 15, 2009 9:24 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
He said something about the odds being 50% that he'd go to the UW
And, 50% that he’d go to either Cal, UCLA, or Notre Dame.
Still a long way to go on this, and like kirkd says, it won’t be over even then until next February.
Seal the deal, Sarkisian. This is a guy you really need to get.
by Sundodger on Jul 14, 2009 7:09 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think he'll be a Dawg
Just a gut feeling. Heaps said some of the same comments about UW but his comments were more obligatory statements to keep the locals happy. Kohler doesn’t need to say how much he loves UW, and you feel the excitement for UW in his quotes. He’ll be a DAWG, i’m pretty confident
by ChazzReinhold on Jul 14, 2009 7:36 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think so too...
…why wouldn’t he want to block for his buddy Nick Montana?!
Washington Husky Football-Undefeated 1991 National Champions 12-0!
by dawgfan22 on Jul 14, 2009 7:52 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Exactly
Then they’ll get Alani Fua to join them and next year their stud WR will come as well. An Oaks Christian pipeline would be sick.
by ChazzReinhold on Jul 14, 2009 7:56 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hopefully they get these guys to commit – that’d be the good news to counter the bad news that Tivao sounds unlikely to qualify at this point.
by kirkd on Jul 15, 2009 2:44 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Great to hear about kohler, But?
What about Montana’s and Kohler’s defensive tackle buddy, Cassius Marsh? Last I heard he is still open too everyone.
by Juneautom on Jul 14, 2009 2:22 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I read some of his comments recently about how he doesn’t want any part in a rebuilding project, just wants to win. The way he was quoted made him sound pretty douchey
by ChazzReinhold on Jul 14, 2009 7:33 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Rebuilding
A lineman shouldn’t play much for two years…so rebuilding shoudn’t be a concern.
by John Berkowitz on Jul 14, 2009 9:36 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
The Lie...
you have to remember that most coaches are probably telling this kid he’ll be a starter freshmen or RS freshmen year. He probably believes them. Let me take that crap attitude and go to another school…when we beat him in 2 years (depending on the school he picks) then we can ask him about his rebuilding project. I personally want kids who want to win and do all the extra stuff it takes to make UW #1
by bigdave967 on Jul 15, 2009 6:15 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I can see coaches saying....
…“We think you can start but it’s always going to be based on competition.” I can see where a lot of stuff gets lost in translation though, for obvious reasons.
Washington Husky Football-Undefeated 1991 National Champions 12-0!
by dawgfan22 on Jul 15, 2009 3:32 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
ASU
John, dont forget about Vontaze Burfict, the #1 MLB from last years recruiting class. More highly rated the Manti Teo (sp?) and with his already massive frame could play next year.
Either way, I think we take this game. Especially if we are 3-3 going into it with momentum. They will be young on Offense and I think we will play well againist their horrible O-Line (they are very similar to us by the way…bad O-Line and Def Backs). We do have the experience at QB which will be a huge plus come game time.
by bigdave967 on Jul 14, 2009 12:14 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Year 3 is an interesting one for Erickson.
In two of the three stops that he’s actually HAD a year three, it was the worst record of his tenure. At the other, it was the best. It’s almost like this is the time that Erickson starts getting itchy feet.
I’m not sure how many people can actually see him staying at one place for much more than 5 seasons. I think this year either sets Erickson up for one last hurrah on a bigger stage than Tempe, or starts him sailing off toward the sunset.
It’s interesting to think that, with as bad as they were in 2008, the UW might actually have the 6th best o-line in the conference this season, ahead of WSU, Arizona, ASU, and UCLA.
by Sundodger on Jul 14, 2009 12:27 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
itchy feet
I don’t know if Erickson gets itchy feet this time around. Tempe isn’t Corvallis or Pullman. Its actually a place you want to stay long term, especially if you’re nearing retirement like Erickson.
I don’t see Erickson leaving unless he’s fired. There’s no better job (USC, UCLA, CAL) he can jump up to at his age really and I’m sure he knows that.
by PhinneyDawg on Jul 14, 2009 12:40 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Itchy Feet II
I think the only job he would jump at would be the right position in the NFL.
He never had the type of success he wanted there so if the right job came up he would be tempted.
It probably won’t so I can see him retiring in Tempe.
by John Berkowitz on Jul 14, 2009 1:42 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I really don't disagree with you.
ASU, given its size and location, probably has the most potential outside of USC and UCLA to dominate the Pac 10.
But, I’m sure you know people, as I do, that just can’t sit still for too long, no matter what. Doesn’t matter how great a situation is, there just comes a time when even a lateral move starts looking better than mowing the same grass over and over again.
Coaching is a strange fraternity. There are guys that get second, and third, and even fifth chances that have no obvious reason to get them. Maybe that means the NFL. Maybe it means a short-term shot at a place like USC after they get put on probation and Carrol bolts, and USC is grooming the guy they really want. Maybe it’s a Big 12 tweener like Colorado for a couple of seasons to keep them afloat while they get the guy they really want. Stupid stuff happens in coaching all the time. Erickson has proven himself to be the type of guy that jumps on those stupid opportunities for no real good reason.
All that being said, I actually agree with you. This is the end of the road for Erickson, whether it be after 2010 or 2012. He’ll either retire fat and happy or get fired fat and happy.
by Sundodger on Jul 14, 2009 12:59 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Another winnable game
although the talent gap is in favor of ASU, I like our chances again. Interesting comments on Erickson’s 3rd year so far. I really believe this will be his final retirement spot unless he gets canned, and I don’t see him getting fired for not winning. DE is a winner. What might get him out the door is if his past history continues in this job, and the arrests and bad actors of his previous teams rears its head again in Tempe. I expect that ASU will become again soon a “dirty” team with lots of hitting after the whistles and out of bounds plays.
by prrbrr on Jul 14, 2009 1:13 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
ASU
is my away game for this year, hopefully it isn’t like last year when we went to Tucson but we’ll have a good time with friends either way
by T9ODawg on Jul 15, 2009 12:00 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
The Arizona Split
Fresh new Sundevil QB, so the offense should sputter a bit. Here’s the thing about ASU that has me thinking (right now). We should split the Arizona schools. That said I think we beat the Wildcats.
Arizona State doesn’t have one particular kid that stands out or one unit that completely stands out above the rest. What do they have? Better athletes across the board and a coach that knows how to coach. We are an up and comer and we have good athletes too, yet ASU might be a little better in that department right now. They have a veteren coach and we have a first year coach. I think coaching balances out, but better athletes is a tall order. Split the Arizona schools and we are in good shape.
All I saw was purple
by crazidawg on Jul 15, 2009 4:36 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I think both Arizona schools will be relying on salty defenses this year to be bowl teams. Replacing Tuitama and Carpenter will be tough for each, but they both have a lot of talent on the defensive side. OL questions will need to be addressed for both.
Outside of USC at the top and WSU at the bottom, I think the rest of the Pac-10 is up for grabs. I’d give Cal a big edge in finishing at #2 (and maybe even knocking off USC) and Oregon has a lot of offensive talent to compete, but beyond that there are as many question marks as answers at this point in the Pac-10. Stanford could make a big leap forward with their experience and growing talent level under Harbaugh, but people may be forgetting that 3 of their 5 wins last year were very close and could’ve easily been losses.
This is part of the reason I don’t think it’s crazy to think that the Huskies could pull off 6 wins in ’09.
by kirkd on Jul 15, 2009 4:44 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 











