Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Ray Allen Fighting Age, Injury And His New Role

Apple Cup moving to Qwest?

Rumors are flying around that the Apple Cup is about to make a permanent move to Seattle. Qwest is willing to pay each team $2 million per year to make the move, and neither school will pass on that type of payday.

WSU has always wanted the game in Seattle played on a neutral field; UW, however, wasn't willing to leave Husky Stadium. The current economic climate has changed Washington's thinking.

WSU, who annually plays a game in Seattle, will continue to play at least five games in Pullman each season.

Spokesman Review

 

 

Comment 52 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

My gut feeling is that I don’t like it. Will my UW season tickets get me tickets at Qwest every other year? Do they sell tickets separately every year? I love Husky stadium, and I like traveling to Pullman when possible to mingle with the WSU fans in their own stadium.

So while the money is good for the schools, what’s the upside for the fans, particularly those from eastern Washington?

by NeuroDawg on Apr 15, 2009 10:32 PM PDT reply actions  

I don't like it either...

…no more apple cups at Husky Stadium! Are you kidding me!

Washington Husky Football-1991 National Champions

by dawgfan22 on Apr 16, 2009 6:24 AM PDT reply actions  

That's just wrong

Emwood brings in a young energetic coach to supposedly bring Husky football back from the abyss and then sellout the fans for some dollars. What kind of a message are they sending? There is no way the 70+K that fill Husky stadium for the AC gets into qwest. So much for tradition, ugh!!!!

It’s the second worst idea I’ve heard this spring, the first being a state income tax.

Jack

by T9ODawg on Apr 16, 2009 6:33 AM PDT reply actions  

Husky Stadium

Don’t you guys think this kind of makes Husky Stadium LESS relevant . I mean here we are in the middle of this campaign to try and get the place renovated and now THIS! The timing couldn’t be worse.

Washington Husky Football-1991 National Champions

by dawgfan22 on Apr 16, 2009 6:34 AM PDT reply actions  

Martin Stadium

So who cares about Martin Stadium? I think coug fans will think less of it when the Apple Cup will no longer be played there.

Washington Husky Football-1991 National Champions

by dawgfan22 on Apr 16, 2009 6:37 AM PDT reply actions  

My thoughts

When your season ticket base drops below 50,000 you can’t use the Qwest/Kingdome facility is too small excuse anymore. With the construction of Qwest you also can’t use the argument anymore that Husky Stadium is the superior venue for football.

When you are trying to concince the state to give you $150 million you can’t turn your back on Qwest giving you an extra $1.2 million year to host the game which would be the case for UW.

Qwest can seat more than it’s current capacity for a special event like the Super Bowl….that may be part of the pitch.

Martin Stadium is a terrible venue in December for a football game because of weather. It is a dangerous drive for everyone involved. Since most Cougar fans live in Seattle anyway it makes sense for the Coug’s to move at least their half of the series to Seattle.

The combination of Boeing as a corporate sponsor, Qwest as a venue, and the television rights really adds up to quite a chunk of change that you cannot ignore in an economy like this.

The fans on both sides won’t like it initially.

I think the Cougars are giving up a lot more than the Huskies in this one.

by John Berkowitz on Apr 16, 2009 7:13 AM PDT reply actions  

When you are trying to concince the state to give you $150 million you can’t turn your back on Qwest giving you an extra $1.2 million year to host the game which would be the case for UW.

to become:

When you are trying to concince the state to give you $150 million you can’t turn your back on Qwest.

The fans on both sides won’t like it initially.

The only reason it’ll get to a point where people stop complaining about it is that they’ll be lulled into indifference the same way Husky fans have been lulled into indifference toward the football program itself. Of course, there will be also be the AD lemmings who’ll think it’s a great idea from the get-go simply because they never object to another slap in the face from old Woodmert.

by discovolante on Apr 16, 2009 10:03 AM PDT up reply actions  

Its the start of the permanent decline

The US income tax started at 1%. Saying you can make more money at Qwest relegates the need for a refurbished HS to an afterthought. We are going to become the Minnesota Gophers of the late 60s to 2000s.
I see luxury medical offices overlooking Lake Washington.
      As I’ve become older, I guess i am more cranky and distrustful of ideas. I especially do not like this proposal. If the Cougs want to have their AC in Qwest great. For me, Its time to draw a line in the sand.

by prrbrr on Apr 16, 2009 7:49 AM PDT reply actions  

That could happen...

I think the overwhelming consensus is no by the fans on both sides.

The Spokesman Review may have jumped the gun a bit.

by John Berkowitz on Apr 16, 2009 8:02 AM PDT up reply actions  

It works...

For Oklahoma-Texas and Army-navy. Those are two pretty big rivalries that seem to flourish on a neutral site every year. I realize tradition is a big part of it, but if it means I never have to go to Pullman again, I’m all for it.

It’s telling that more Coug fans are in favor of this than Husky fans. And the downtown Seattle bar business could use the jolt.

by Tunnelrat on Apr 16, 2009 8:50 AM PDT reply actions  

I agree with the second part

But I believe both of those rivalries you mentioned are played somewhere roughly halfway between the schools, instead of 10 miles from one and 300 miles from the other. The Cougar fans on the West Side probably love it though, because like you who wants to drive to Pullman, especially in the winter?

by johnnycougar on Apr 16, 2009 2:07 PM PDT up reply actions  

Nick Daschel

Nick Link

If they do move it to Qwest it does become a defacto hme game for Washington every year.

by John Berkowitz on Apr 16, 2009 8:51 AM PDT reply actions  

How do you figure?

In terms of travel, yes. But WSU drew 51,000 to Quest last year for OKst. WSU students are on week-long break and there are tons of WSU alum in Seattle. We will have no problem selling 33,000 seats. I think it is great for both teams, because more exposure is better for everyone.

by peaty411s on Apr 16, 2009 11:36 AM PDT up reply actions  

I'll say it again,

the UW leaders blew it 10 years ago. Paul Allen wanted to do everything to Husky Stadium that the UW now wants to do. The Montlake neighborhood complained, end of upgrade, same crummy benches instead of seats and long sight lines because of the track.

Its hard to justify two new beautiful football stadiums so close together, LA doesn’t even have one. The UW was in the drivers seat, and they passed and allowed Qwest to be built. Now we are stuck with safety and new jobs as the best reasons to rebuild. If new jobs were a valid reason, after its built we could tear it down and build it again.

I know this isn’t popular on this blog. On the positive side, the Apple Cup would be in Seattle every year. And by the way, if the Husky upgrade comes to a public vote, I’ll vote for it, it makes more sense than a lot of the other spending the government is doing.

by dawgdude on Apr 16, 2009 9:09 AM PDT reply actions  

Money doesn't have to decide every decision in our lives.

So I guess tradition and on campus games don’t mean anything?

Washington Husky Football-1991 National Champions

by dawgfan22 on Apr 16, 2009 10:24 AM PDT reply actions  

I guess I'm in the minority since I'm initially in favor of this idea in principle

On years when the game would have been in Husky Stadium, the fans get to take one game off of the schedule and move it to the nicest pro stadium in the NFL. Yeah, if/when the number of season ticket holders exceeds the capacity of Qwest, then that may present a problem. But they can work through that.

On years when the game would have been in Pullman, it’s in Seattle instead. That seems good to me.

On top of that, the athletic department gets an extra $1 million or so to help fund Husky sports. I know not everything needs to be about money, but the reality is that it takes a lot of money to run a major athletic department.

To me (and myself only, maybe), the energy boost from moving to Qwest perhaps offsets the loss of tradition of hosting the games on campus. And I’d hate for this to just be a convenient first step in permanently relocating the home field to downtown. I love Husky Stadium more than any other venue, but Qwest is great, too, and I wouldn’t mind putting one game a year there (especially alternating years where it otherwise would’ve been in Pullman). Seems like the players would dig the chance to play in a premier pro stadium once a year, too. Recruiting boost?

That being said, here’s the major, major caveats for my opinion: 1. I’m not a season ticket holder. 2. I’ve never actually seen an Apple Cup live. I’m out of state and I usually only make it to one game a year nowadays. So, I readily concede that those of you who: a) live in Seattle and/or b) are older than me and have established more of a sense of tradition and/or c) own season tickets… have much more relevant opinions than I do. So don’t rip me a new one, okay? I surrender. :-)

by busplunger on Apr 16, 2009 11:06 AM PDT reply actions  

busplunger

if you split the 66k capacity of Qwest in half for each school, that leaves 33k for the UW. Even after the TW debacle, there are still many more season ticket holders than that. Students will have to get some, staff and that leaves about a 10-12k shortfall that UW fans will have to buy from coug scalpers. Why give that up.
     Also, we truly question their numbers on net $$. They would lose concession, parking and other sales revenue, ie team store plus the loss of connection with the campus for alums. I also believe tailgating will be a big problem as the police will/have already come down hard on party goers. The pre function would be shoved into the Qwest field events center and at what entrance cost. Alcohol would be sold at the event leading to even more drunks who can’t see the field and ruin it for others. The noise of Husky Stadium will forever not be a factor much like the TW era. If the Cougs want to host their AC at Qwest, great, but for the UW its HS. Remember, there were only 30-40 k total tickets sold when UW played AF at Qwest in the start and precursor to the TW era. I believe that is the reaction you will get by permanently moving the games to Qwest.
        Not ripping you, but yes 1. we are Season ticket holders TYEE and attend every home game and most road games, 2. have seen numerous apple cups live (we don’t go to Pullman), a. live in SoCal, and b. are most probably older than you and do have an established sense of tradition. Tradition is good which is one reason even though I am retired Air Force, I truly respect the Marine Corps, US Army and Navy as they are much more established services with a long proud history and tradition.

by prrbrr on Apr 16, 2009 11:48 AM PDT reply actions  

You make very good points

And I respect that.

I would just add: as John notes below, I assume it would be a home game for each school in alternating years, rather than a split. If they were going to consider it a truly neutral site and include it in neither school’s season ticket package, then I’d be totally against the idea (your example of the Air Force game is perfect in that case, although I think WSU as the opponent would draw more fans than AF).

Also, Qwest is renowned for its noisemaking architecture, so even with fewer fans than Husky Stadium capacity, I think we could crank up the volume.

(I also rounded the $1.2 million net revenue down to $1 million to try to be conservative and cover some of the concession losses, etc.)

I tend to agree with you that the fan experience is reduced a bit, even beyond just the tradition aspects. Tailgating wouldn’t be as good, naturally, and I happen to like not having alcohol sales at Husky Stadium, too. I enjoy having a beer at a game but I can’t stand drunk fans and I’m happy to give up the privilege if it means less obnoxious idiots ruining it for everyone. I assume they sold beer when they played at Qwest before…? Is it more of a venue policy than an athletic policy?

by busplunger on Apr 16, 2009 12:28 PM PDT up reply actions  

Huge Points prrbrr

" Alcohol would be sold at the event leading to even more drunks who can’t see the field and ruin it for others. The noise of Husky Stadium will forever not be a factor"

Two monster points…I’m getting sick of the justifications being all about the money.

Washington Husky Football-1991 National Champions

by dawgfan22 on Apr 16, 2009 3:10 PM PDT up reply actions  

Have you ever had to sit next to...

…a bunch of drunken fans at Qwest Field. My wife and I did and sadly she told me she never wanted to go back. She’s a huge Rams fan and somehow when that much alcohol flows, it makes a lot of fans complete ass_oles!

Washington Husky Football-1991 National Champions

by dawgfan22 on Apr 16, 2009 3:55 PM PDT up reply actions  

I sat in the second row of the second level once

And the people in front of me were trashed… spilling beer all over the place and one girl puked over the ledge. I cannot imagine being one of the people below them.

http://www.spartyandfriends.com/

by thecassino on Apr 16, 2009 4:04 PM PDT up reply actions  

Drunks = Cougars

You guys are very right, nobody likes to sit next to drunk fans. So why is it I almost always end up sitting close to super drunk cougar fans at the Apple Cup AT HUSKY STADIUM!!!!!!!! If cougar fans, who pride themselves on their ability to drink, can be extremely drunk at a stadium that doesn’t sell alcohol, how much worse is it going to be when they can buy all they want? The more I think about it, the more I hate this idea.

"Bow Down to Washington"
"Kick the tires and light the fires!"

by Lear Pilot on Apr 16, 2009 8:22 PM PDT up reply actions  

Condotta's Blog

He questioning the numbers. It was interesting too that he got Mike Lude’s take on it. He basically said, no way would he let that scenario play out.

Washington Husky Football-1991 National Champions

by dawgfan22 on Apr 16, 2009 8:58 PM PDT up reply actions  

Alcohol

I don’t think they have to sell alcohol in the stadium for a college game.

At Sun Devil stadium they were set up to do that but the beer stands were closed for ASU games and open for NFL games.

by John Berkowitz on Apr 17, 2009 6:57 AM PDT up reply actions  

They won't split...they will alternate years as the home team

They will never split…they will alternate years as the home team.

by John Berkowitz on Apr 16, 2009 12:00 PM PDT reply actions  

Here's one side of the issue that I have yet to see brought up

With the Pac-10 having 9 conference games, inevitably the Huskies will have to play 5 road games every other season. Just looking at the schedule, the 2010 Apple Cup is a road game, so instead of a 4/5 home/road split it’ll be go 4/4/1 home/road/neutral. The flip side, of course, is that instead of years having a 5/4 home/road advantage it will (again), be 4/4/1.

Not a huge difference, but it’s something.

http://www.spartyandfriends.com/

by thecassino on Apr 16, 2009 12:54 PM PDT reply actions  

A fantastic point

And I guess it assumes that in the years where they have more road games, WSU is one of those games (and vice versa). If it were the case that the WSU game was in the minority half of the schedule, it would skew the balance even more, rather than correcting it.

If (hypothetically) the game at Pullman was one of four conference road games that year, the schedule would go from 5/4 to 5/3/1. The opposite also being true, of course: 4/5 would become 3/5/1. I assume the Pac-10 would play along and schedule it the balanced way…

by busplunger on Apr 16, 2009 1:03 PM PDT up reply actions  

Season ticket logistics

As a season-ticket holder who is far too young and poor to afford to be a Tyee, it’s a stretch every year to afford non-Tyee season tickets.

If they move this game to Qwest, myself and many tens of thousands like me, will likely get screwed out of the chance of buying a ticket for the Apple Cup. Definitely not a good incentive for me to keep my season tickets year after year. It will turn into an elite event catered to the richer UW/WSU fans.

And how about the students? Will they get the prime seats between the 20’s at Qwest? HIGHLY doubtful. They’d be lucky to get 5,000 tickets at three times the current student price. And if that happens, there goes at least HALF of the audience noise and excitement at Husky games.

by PhinneyDawg on Apr 16, 2009 2:25 PM PDT reply actions  

Just need to see how they structure it

If they take the game out of each teams season package and market it seperately people are not going to like it and you just may see a repeat of the UW/Air Force disaster.

by John Berkowitz on Apr 17, 2009 6:58 AM PDT up reply actions  

Q

Let’s face it, now a days, it is all about money. But so far nobody is looking at the BIG picture. If you move the Apple Cup to Qwest, the chances of moving all home games to Qwest increases greatly. Once that happens you can kiss money good bye. It’s a well known fact that the UW’s take at Qwest would far less than at Husky Stadium.

So my question to you: Is two Million dollars per year worth the risk of losing the tens of millions that is brought in at Husky Stadium for far less money at Qwest Field. Of course this is great for First and Goal, think of the extra income that would be brought in from 5-7 Husky home games each year.

Listen to reason, listen to history, Qwest Field will make us the Minnesota Gophers of the Pac10!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

"Bow Down to Washington"
"Kick the tires and light the fires!"

by Lear Pilot on Apr 16, 2009 2:33 PM PDT reply actions  

Good points!

The difference is Minnesota IS getting a brand new on campus football stadium. You bring up food for thought though, “If you move the Apple Cup to Qwest, the chances of moving all home games to Qwest increases greatly. Once that happens you can kiss money good bye. It’s a well known fact that the UW’s take at Qwest would far less than at Husky Stadium.”

Somehow my gut tells me there is a ton of truth to what you said. With this “deal” all of a sudden the move doesn’t look as bad.

Washington Husky Football-1991 National Champions

by dawgfan22 on Apr 16, 2009 3:49 PM PDT up reply actions  

Qwest permanently

That isn’t even being discussed at this point.

The Huskies will continue to play on campus even if they don’t remodel the stadium.

Even though they play it up that it is about to fall down that isn’t even close to the case.

by John Berkowitz on Apr 17, 2009 7:01 AM PDT up reply actions  

I realize it's not being discussed

But this proposal just gives the anit-sports people more leverage to push the Qwest Field idea. I’m afraid this could be the start of a very slippery slope. If Emmert and Woodward have ANY clue how to do their job, they will find a way to make the renovation happen regardless of what the state does.

"Bow Down to Washington"
"Kick the tires and light the fires!"

by Lear Pilot on Apr 17, 2009 8:50 AM PDT up reply actions  

Yeah, it's not like we're upset by the prospect of a whole season there

whenever HS may be remodeled.

It’s around 90% about the precedent such a move would create.

by discovolante on Apr 17, 2009 10:42 AM PDT up reply actions  

Can you imagine Husky Stadium...

…sitting there empty and quiet during the Apple Cup. Not something any true DAWGfan wants to envision.

Washington Husky Football-1991 National Champions

by dawgfan22 on Apr 17, 2009 3:07 PM PDT up reply actions  

Husky Stadium

Year after year it’s voted the best venue in college football, why, because of it’s prime location on the shores on Lake Washington with those picturesque views of Mt. Rainier. I don’t think it’s ever lost that number one position even though the stadium is falling apart.

Washington Husky Football-1991 National Champions

by dawgfan22 on Apr 16, 2009 3:51 PM PDT reply actions  

A couple of points

If the newspaper article linked to in the original post is to be believed, then tickets would be split between the schools. Last paragraph:

Under the terms of the proposed agreement, Qwest Field would be considered a neutral site, with a designated home team each year but the seating split between the schools, according to the source.

Seems to me that I’ll be spending more money for tickets for the AC, assuming my Tyee points have enough priority for the UW to even offer me the opportunity to buy.

Of course, the article doesn’t say a 50/50 split, so maybe the home team will get a 70/30 or 80/20 split. But it seems to me that it means 50/50 since it will be considered a neutral site.

Maybe this seems like a good idea when the team sucks (thanks, Ty) and we can’t put more than 45K butts in seats at Husky Stadium. But what happens when we win and pack the stadium every other year for the apple cup. What’s the economic difference in a)money made from ticket sales, b)money made from concessions c)money made from product sales? It probably doesn’t beat $4M ($2M each year), but what’s the price tag to sell out on tradition?

Who will set the ticket prices? The schools or First & Goal, Inc.? If it’s First & Goal, you can bet good money that ticket prices will be high enough that they make a tidy profit above the $4M plus costs the game will cost them each year. Does anyone know what it costs to operate Qwest for a day? We don’t really think that First & Goal plans on making their profit from concessions, pre- and post-game activities in the event center, and selling Seahawk paraphernalia, do we?

Lastly I echo the other comments when I say that I think that this is the start of the slippery slope to moving all games from Husky Stadium to Qwest.

by NeuroDawg on Apr 16, 2009 3:54 PM PDT reply actions  

Tradition Counts

Another point. This would mean that my kids will never get to experience an Apple Cup like I experienced in Pullman in 1992. The most miserable cold I have ever been in my life, coupled with one of the most miserable Husky performances, and a long drive home in the snow.

But a completely priceless experience I would repeat in a heartbeat, and one my kids are sick of hearing about. :)

by NeuroDawg on Apr 16, 2009 4:03 PM PDT reply actions  

I'm with ya...

…I was there too. unless you were there and we were one of the last to leave that endzone area. It got so bad that you were no longer watching the game. You’re head was down in an attempt to stop the freezing, pounding ice in your face. That’s when I had to make the decision to leave. I couldn’t let my wife continue to battle that.

Washington Husky Football-1991 National Champions

by dawgfan22 on Apr 16, 2009 7:07 PM PDT up reply actions  

92 Apple Cup

Horrible memory (I even forgot to bring a heavy jacket) / priceless memory.

If UW plays WSU at Qwest every year, we’ll probably never lose another Apple Cup.

"Greed is Good."
So is Rudy.

by Gekko Mojo on Apr 16, 2009 6:15 PM PDT reply actions  

Naming Rights For Husky Stadium

Wouldn’t you think this diminishes the value of this vital contract?

Washington Husky Football-1991 National Champions

by dawgfan22 on Apr 16, 2009 8:59 PM PDT reply actions  

It was also speculated how the numbers may or may not work out

Supposedly it’s somewhat less than 2 million. They’re thinking that it’s the sponsorship thing and possibly luxury seating that will pump up the numbers.

Washington Husky Football-1991 National Champions

by dawgfan22 on Apr 17, 2009 7:09 AM PDT up reply actions  

KOMO news last night at 11:00 was reporting a possible six-year $10M deal, with each team getting about $1.5M per year. Story was mostly about fan disagreement, and no other terms/ticketing were discussed.

by NeuroDawg on Apr 17, 2009 7:15 AM PDT reply actions  

Now there backtracking on the numbers...

….The last I heard was a “range” of between 1 and 2 million a year. That’s a pretty important distinction to me.

Washington Husky Football-1991 National Champions

by dawgfan22 on Apr 17, 2009 3:09 PM PDT up reply actions  

We already received the standard reply

from the AD to our email written yesterday. Basically, no decision has been made, blah blah blah and we need to serach for sources of $$.
      I am truly in the slippery slope camp on this issue.

by prrbrr on Apr 17, 2009 8:41 AM PDT reply actions  

I... just... don't... like... it...

I hate it, actually.

To summarize:

1) If I were a Cougar, I could only like this deal if I lived locally, or were eager to sell out for cash. And if counted amongst the former, I would therefore not be a student, and likely not be a loyal Martin season ticket holder (i.e. screw you guys).

2) As a Dawg, I’d have to be so pessimistic about the future of Husky Stadium that I’d believe it could never sell out, and that the renovation would never happen (if we’re playing at Qwest, what would be the point?). That ought to really help in recruiting.

3) As a Tyee Dawg, I’m going to see my seats downgraded for the Apple Cup, and pay dearly for the privilege. Do you think they’ll prorate my season tickets/donation to cover the Qwest cost? Unless Qwest charges NYYankee prices, can any of you MBA’s explain how (using equivalent management techniques) an entity (UW) can maintain a superior profit margin by leasing another facility instead of using one they already own?

4) If I were a non-Tyee Dawg, well, I suppose I could always get scalped tickets from the Cougars who won’t make the trip. Good luck, guys and kiddies.

5) When it’s the Thanksgiving holiday, the weather sucks, there’s little or no cover, and the game starts at 8:00 PM (because the Pac-10 sold FOX all the scheduling authority), why wouldn’t I pass on the venue and watch the game at home with my family gathered ’round? Remember how much fun last season those 2nd-halfs were against ASU and UCLA?

6) So it all comes down to the almighty buck. Tradition is for schnooks and whiners. After the resistance breaks down, it’ll be easy to just move the entire home schedule to Qwest. Then we’ll make lots of money and can sell off that Montlake property for a really scandalous profit (while maintaining a piece for our favorite patrons). Ticket sales?—we’ll just use the NBA model.

Like Steve Kelly said the other day, get used to it; it’s the future, it’s all about money. OK, so just push my rocking chair into the corner where I can kvetch to myself, and won’t bore the kids with stories about sell-out crowds in the darkest days of the Jim Owens era, etc…

by Verge on Apr 17, 2009 11:37 AM PDT reply actions  

Days of Jim Owens

It was the only show in town…things have changed.

by John Berkowitz on Apr 18, 2009 8:41 AM PDT reply actions  

Et tu, John?

I feel like Fred Sanford, clutching my chest: “I’m coming, Elizabeth!”

by Verge on Apr 18, 2009 9:50 AM PDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the UW Dawg Pound, an unofficial site for Washington Husky fans.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Learjet31a_1_jpg_small
Question of the Day:
T9odawgtest_small
A few Spring Game thoughts.
P1010006_small
Who Said College Basketball Recruiting was Supposed to be Clean?
Dubs_close_small
The Future Of Husky Basketball
Small
Updated: Arizona loses at home, Cal faceplants in style.
Dubs_close_small
PAC 12 Pickem Final Results
Dubs_close_small
UW Dawg Pound Tournament Challenge
Small
PAC 12 Tournament Tickets
Dubs_close_small
PAC 12 Pickem Results/Conference Tournament Schedule
Dubs_close_small
Tournament Challenge

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

1959_huskies_small John Berkowitz

Dubs_small thecassino

Editors

W_logo_small kirkd

New_picture_small Gekko Mojo

Beastquakerwallpaper_small Ben Knibbe

Profpic_small JLee2025

Authors

Learjet31a_1_jpg_small Lear Pilot

Dubs_close_small CODawg

Coda_head_shot_250_small S_o_Smith

2721_small ToddWilliams206

P1010006_small Randall Floyd