Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Seahawks Trade for TE Kellen Winslow

Molly Yanity - New kid on the block

Of all the Seattle Post Intelligencer writers I have written about during the past week or two Molly Yanity has the least tenure at the newspaper. She started with the PI about nine years ago and did a very nice job on HS sports and Husky women's basketball before being given the Husky football beat assignment.

She has had the unenviable and challenging assignment of succeeding the legendary Ted Miller as the Huskies beat writer when Art Thiel kicked him upstairs. I think everyone here is a big fan of Ted Miller and that is because he truly understands college football better than just about anyone. I can't think of anyone who cranks out more information than Ted does on his ESPN blog.

According to his old Seattle PI Bio Ted Miller is capable of benching 275 pounds. Getting back to Molly I am pretty sure she can't bench press as much as Ted Miller. 

Her biggest challenge had to be that her entire Husky coverage tenure has coincided with Tyrone Willingham's four year reign as coach at Washington. Imagine the challenge of being a beat writer when you don't have proper access to the team, practices, or at least an informative press conference.

During Willingham's tenure I had almost as much access to the team in Chicago as the beat writers who follow the team in Montlake did. All I had to do was turn on the weekly press conference to get the same limited information the beat writers were getting.

According to Molly's Seattle PI Bio she is the grand daughter of a Big Ten official and spent a lot of time during her childhood watching college football games in the Midwest. Prior to joining the P-I in 2000, Yanity had worked at ESPN Internet Ventures editing WNBA.com and NBA.com. She also covered sports at the Daily Pilot in Costa Mesa, Calif. and at the Imperial Valley Press in El Centro, Calif..

Molly has done a decent job with her blog and she scooped everyone on the Nick Holt moving to Washington story earlier this year. Lately she has been on a mission to finish her assignment at the PI with a bang of information about the 2009 team.

One of those explosions that ruffled a few feathers was her coverage of two minor recruiting violations committed by new coach Steve Sarkisian. To put it mildly it didn't go over very well at Montlake.

Even though they weren't deemed as front page material by Molly (see below) the story ended up being dissected by Art Thiel and Jim Moore in their columns which just happen to be on the front page if memory serves me correctly.

In reporting and writing a couple stories on Steve Sarkisian's secondary recruiting violations over the last couple weeks, I am starting to see a bit of sensitivity and defensiveness with which Huskies fans deal with the topic.

Some don't think minor violations are worthy of print. While I don't think minor violations are front-page material, I will go on record saying these stories are important.

On this message board and elsewhere, we have read countless posts over the last several years from Huskies fans trashing former athletic director Barbara Hedges. Why? Largely because she lost control of her department.

How does a lack of control start? By letting small things slide.

Later when it came to light that WSU coach Paul Wulff had committed major violations at EWU along with some minor ones at WSU this past recruiting season the PI didn't give it the same type of coverage because of what they called space limitations. I actually had to buy that argument since the paper is closing and print space is very limited.

To be fair to Molly I agree with her argument that Barbara Hedges lost control of the athletic department by letting the little things slide. You can also make the argument that Hedges let about everything slide. I think the media in general gave Hedges a pass until she finally hung herself with the double whammy of the Neuheisel Final Four pool, and Dr. Feelgood, but that is a story for another day.

In my opinion Molly really shines when she writes feature articles on the team or on any other subject. Unfortunately coach Willingham didn't let her close enough often enough to really showcase that part of her talent.

I am sure she leaves with mixed emotions because the "Purple Curtain" we have all been dealing with over the past six years has finally been torn down by Steve Sarkisian. The Seattle PI likely will likely close down before spring practice starts and we will lose the opportunity to see her crank out what I think she really does best.

2010: A UW recruiting odyssey

This is Molly's latest Husky article and it details the progress Steve Sarkisian and his staff are making on the in state recruiting trail this year. I really like the way she relates to the kids she is interviewing. You can tell they feel comfortable talking to her.

A handful of the state's top underclassmen lounged around the Huskies football office during a recruiting visit a couple of weeks ago. They laughed with coach Steve Sarkisian, enjoyed rapid-fire banter with defensive coordinator Nick Holt and connected with a handful of other assistants.

Molly always did an exceptional job when she was allowed to observe what was going on from behind the scenes. This is a piece she wrote last year concerning what the team was doing during the summer months.

Daniel Te'o-Nesheim dangles from an iron bar, biceps bulging, straining to lift all of his 263 pounds. The Washington defensive end pulls his chest to the bar. He does it again and again and again, until his face is crimson and sweat washes over his temples.

Unlike the other PI writers I wrote about over the past couple of weeks I have never had the opportunity to communicate with Molly on a personal level. From what I have heard everyone likes her and respects her talent. I have also heard she is considering using this downtime to go back to graduate school.

Most of us are going to miss having the voices of two major newspapers covering Husky athletics. Molly was one of those voices over the past four years. Her readers are going to miss her and the Seattle Post Intelligencer.

 

Comment 14 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Totally agree with your assessment

She writes great feature stories.

Bob Condotta’s strength is churning out accurate, relevant information, but I think Molly’s more in-depth, interview-heavy work really added something to the sum coverage. In other words, where Bob excels as a reporter, I think Molly excels as a writer.

In any case, it will be unfortunate for all of us to have one less beat reporter covering the Huskies.

by busplunger on Mar 4, 2009 7:17 AM PST reply actions  

They all have different talents

The shame of it all is Willingham really curtailed access so finding subjects to write about and people to talk to was pretty tough.

by John Berkowitz on Mar 4, 2009 7:57 AM PST reply actions  

Great Article by Molly

Its a shame, i liked her blog and articles.

by bigdave967 on Mar 4, 2009 8:43 AM PST reply actions  

I could never manage to respect Yanity very much

The way she constantly sucked up to Willingham was completely absurd in my mind (don’t fire Willingham in December 2007 because the team had a winning record in the first half of games in 2007). It is especially confounding now, considering that it didn’t exactly benefit her in any way.

by discovolante on Mar 4, 2009 11:36 AM PST reply actions  

Oh, something I'm wondering if anybody has the info

Has there been a discussion about archiving all the PI materials? Like, is there a dedicated website that plans to archive the entirety of the website? I feel a site like archive.org wouldn’t be sufficient. Will the Times take on the responsibility (I imagine they’ll take charge of the print archives)?

by discovolante on Mar 4, 2009 11:43 AM PST up reply actions  

There is money in archives

They won’t be throwin any of it away so I imagine it will still be available through the skeleton operation.

by John Berkowitz on Mar 4, 2009 12:58 PM PST up reply actions  

I see your point...but

I actually liked most of Molly’s work.

I just don’t feel like kicking someone in the butt by focusing on the negatives.

I tried to be kind and accurate regarding her strength as a writer.

I think you would have to be in Yanity’s or Condotta’s shoes to realize what a tough spot Willingham put them in.

For example Willingham refused to answer Condotta’s questions during part of the final season for simply repeating a UW press release in his blog. Tyrone was very hard to deal with.

I suppose Molly took the road that you get more bee’s with honey.

by John Berkowitz on Mar 4, 2009 1:53 PM PST up reply actions  

Molly has grown on me recently. I would agree with the idea that she’s a good writer; where I’ve had issues with her is that I don’t think she’s a good analyst, though it certainly didn’t help that she followed Miller who was an excellent analyst. I never really trusted Molly’s judgment on football matters, not after the way she bought hook line and sinker the Willingham myth until last season when it became obvious to even the true believers that Ty was a fraud. The extent to which she also has relied on info from the loon in the eastern part of the state for recruiting info also tarnishes her IMO.

But with the change to Sarkisian and the openness of the program that has engendered, it’s allowed Molly’s strengths to come to the fore.

by kirkd on Mar 4, 2009 12:05 PM PST reply actions  

The first draft on Molly

I wrote the first draft on Molly a couple of weeks ago and didn’t like reading what I wrote because the focus was too negative. I wrote about all the things she didn’t do rather than the great things she did do.

I almost didn’t post anything on her because first of all I never developed any type of relationship with her. She is the Husky beat writer so not posting anything about her when I am doing a series of articles on the writers who cover Husky sports in the PI would have been a grave omission.

In the end I think I was fair, accurate, and showed better taste by zeroing in on what she did well rather than dwelling on what she did not do as well.

I also figured that the posters would end up bringing up the weak parts anyway.

I always thought the assignment was a strange fit because while she was more knowedgeable than the average fan she wasn’t an actual football analyst. Just because your a football analyst doesn’t mean you are a good writer or reporter either. Molly happens to be a ver good writer.

Once again on Willingham I think she was just trying to find a way to survive and not be completely cut off. I don’t think any of us respect that but that is the reality. I guess you would have to aske her what her reasoning was.

The connection with RD always seemed like a girls club sort of thing to me. "They hate us because we are women covering football so lets band together." Any sane person knows that RD is a problem. Giving RD credibility isn’t using good judgement IMHO since I know RD all too well.

I think if the PI had survived we all would have developed a better appreciation of what Molly brings to the table.

by John Berkowitz on Mar 4, 2009 1:58 PM PST up reply actions  

I honestly think that many men don’t like her because she’s a woman. She’s had some pretty sexist things thrown at her in the comments section of her blog. Totally uncalled for.

Say what you will about the Willingham sucking-up (which is a bit of a stretch) she always seemed to get more of an in-depth look at the team working out and in the hallways. Likely because she was more friendly with the head-honchos.

There was no use with her competing directly with Condotta as the Willingham-doubter (which was totally fine by me). She took a different route and focused on the players more, rather than the coaches.

It’s a shame we won’t have both Yannity and Condotta working the beat at the same time this season.

by PhinneyDawg on Mar 4, 2009 12:51 PM PST reply actions  

Based on her written opinions of Willingham you could definitely say she sucked up. I don’t know whow much good it did and that is a choice every reporter has to make on his/her own.

by John Berkowitz on Mar 4, 2009 1:02 PM PST up reply actions  

Sexism

Bingo on that one.

I used to cringe when I read that stuff.

I am guy and I played football in high school and college. That doesn’t make me an expert on the subject. I think a woman has as much potential to do just as good as a man when it comes to covering football. I also think that because of sexism the job can be harder too.

by John Berkowitz on Mar 4, 2009 12:57 PM PST reply actions  

Yeah, I feel bad devaluing her football analysis because I’m sure some will view it through the lens of sexism. I usually avoid the comments sections of the newspaper blogs, so I’ve missed all of that ugliness written about her, but I see some of it on the Dawgman boards.

That said, I feel comfortable in saying that the quality of her football analysis suffers in comparison to Miller, Condotta, Fetters and Ecklund. It has nothing to do with her being female and the others male, and everything to do with the quality of what they write. If others perceive that as necessarily sexist, I can’t help that – all I can say is read all of them and draw your own conclusions.

On the other hand, I appreciate that her gender makes it harder for her than for the male beat writers in a lot of ways. For a certain segment of the population, her gender automatically devalues her opinion, and I wouldn’t be surprised if she garners less respect from some of the people she covers due to her gender as well.

by kirkd on Mar 4, 2009 1:22 PM PST up reply actions  

Analysis...etc... .

I didn’t think her analysis was bad at all…in fact she did a credible job.

Ted Miller and Bob Condotta are very, very good. They may be among the best in the country at what they do. Was Molly better at analysis?…no…Was she bad?…absolutely not!

Molly was much better than either of them on feature articles and that is why I chose to focus on that.

Everyone has their strenghts.

It is really easy to criticize… but Molly has the ability to write a lot better than I do and I respect that. (That is why she gets paid and I don’t…lol) If someone were to write about my failings as a psuedo journalist the laundry list on me would be a lot longer than Molly’s.

I think in general when you focus on what people do well it is a better road to take

by John Berkowitz on Mar 4, 2009 1:43 PM PST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the UW Dawg Pound, an unofficial site for Washington Husky fans.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Learjet31a_1_jpg_small
Question of the Day:
T9odawgtest_small
A few Spring Game thoughts.
P1010006_small
Who Said College Basketball Recruiting was Supposed to be Clean?
Dubs_close_small
The Future Of Husky Basketball
Small
Updated: Arizona loses at home, Cal faceplants in style.
Dubs_close_small
PAC 12 Pickem Final Results
Dubs_close_small
UW Dawg Pound Tournament Challenge
Small
PAC 12 Tournament Tickets
Dubs_close_small
PAC 12 Pickem Results/Conference Tournament Schedule
Dubs_close_small
Tournament Challenge

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

1959_huskies_small John Berkowitz

Dubs_small thecassino

Editors

W_logo_small kirkd

New_picture_small Gekko Mojo

Beastquakerwallpaper_small Ben Knibbe

Profpic_small JLee2025

Authors

Learjet31a_1_jpg_small Lear Pilot

Dubs_close_small CODawg

Coda_head_shot_250_small S_o_Smith

2721_small ToddWilliams206

P1010006_small Randall Floyd