The Monday Morning Wash
While I was on vacation this week I had to laugh while both Seattle newspapers defended WSU coach Paul Wulff despite the fact that he landed his former school on probation after failing to report numerous violations during his tenure as head coach. They also overlooked a couple of secondary recruiting violations that happened recently at WSU. Washington on the other hand lands on the front page for renting a fog machine and the more serious problems at WSU get shoved under the rug?
Posters who wrote into the Seattle PI were told there wasn't enough room in the paper to investigate or continue discussion on the subject.
No room? Are they trying to save some tree's during the last month of their existence in print?
The Seattle Times even had the audacity to run a poll asking readers who they thought was the worst offender...Paul Wulff, Rick Neuheisel, or Steve Sarkisian?
You rent a fog machine and have a bump while recruiting which happens all the time at all schools and equate that to what happened under Wulff at Eastern? How does Sarkisian get lumped into all this?
Give me a break!
Wulff didn't impress me at all by taking little responsibility and blaming most of the problems on the administration at Eastern Washington. Wulff get his hand slapped by having to sit out three days of practice this fall while Eastern gets a playoff ban and even worse could lose top some of their top players to other schools.
If Steve Sarkisian arrived at UW with similar baggage it would be beaten to death in the media for months. You have to wonder when the Seattle newspapers will stop persecuting the UW football program while continuing to give WSU and other schools a pass.
What happened at Eastern Washington was major and the NCAA agrees. Comparing Sarkisian to Wulff is an intentional low blow.
UW basketball team in first place
It was a great week if you were a Husky fan. First of all the Huskies are two games up on UCLA in the basketball standings after sweeping the Oregon schools. The Huskies travel to LA later this week and if they can gain at least a split they will be the odds on favorite to win the regular season conference crown. The Huskies will be very tough to beat at home.
How does that translate on the national scene?
Washington isn't getting any national respect at this point. They don't have that marquee player that shakes the roof even though I would put Brockman, Pondexter, Dentmon, Thomas, and the depth behind them up against almost anyone in the country at this point. This is a team that plays well together and teams that play well together tend to go deep in March.
All that matters in NCAA basketball is getting into the tournament and getting a good seed. The bracketologists predict the Huskies will be a 3-5 seed which puts them in a great position to make a decent run in the tournament. If UW continues to take care of business they will get the attention they deserve.
Dan Cozzetto Returns
Expect Dan Cozzetto to be officially named OL coach and running game coordinator sometime on Monday. Cozzetto brings 29 years of experience and a no nonsense attitude to a unit that really needs to make progress if the Huskies expect to improve in 2009.
I don't know what to think of the hire since the players hated him during his one year stop under Keith Gilbertson at UW. If I was a current Husky offensive linemen I would be shaking in my cleats because this guy is going to come in and demand improvement without showing any sort of mercy to these guys.
Juan Garcia told Kim Grinolds at Dawgman that those guys are going to die...they are just going to die. He also thinks that Cozzetto will make the returning players better in the long run even if they won't enjoy the experience.
20 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Dan Cozzetto
I’m curious about the purported bad blood with his previous players, and really haven’t heard about it elsewhere. Was he really poisonous to the team attitude, or did a hard-nose approach just rub Neuheisel-type recruits the wrong way?
Given his age and stage of career, one wouldn’t expect him to be much different now than he was then. Is he going to pull together the debris left over? Are we going to see an exodus of current players? Is he just going to play bad cop to Sark’s good cop? Or is he too divisive? It all makes a difference when trying to develop the right team chemistry, not to mention building short- vs. long-term expectations.
UW bashing
It’s obvious the Seattle Media loves to sensationalize anything minor-negative that happens with the Washington program turing every mole hill into a mountain, and minimize anything that is good. They do the exact opposite with the WSU program. A good case in point was the story exerting that WSU dominated the state in recruiting this year. Give me a break. The PI also wrote a story how WSU was so great in finding hidden gems implying that the current staff at WSU has done such. I will agree in the past the WSU coaching staff has been able to find hidden gems, but hasn’t every program turned up some hidden gems? I would think when your a program that has to constantly take lower level recruits then it just make sense that your chances for finding hidden gems is going to go up dramatically compared to a USC which recurit 95% 4 or 5 star recruits. And there is no way WSU uncovers hidden gems anywhere close to OSU. I persnally hope WSU keeps Wullf I’m convinced he is in over his head and he will set back their program worse tjhen TY has set us back. Atleast Ty left with a good recuriting class from 2007 and a potential great class from 2008 depending how they develop.
Go Dawgs
Cozzetto grinds on players
he used to call Stanley Danials at 6AM in the morning and tell him “Today is the day your going to quite”. He gets in players heads and messes with them in practice while he is screaming every name in the book at them. Some kids play harder and become much better players under this kind of pressure and some fold up and go home. Dan walks that line between abuse and intense coaching.
Coz
I’m going to have to disagree with all the Coz bashing. Some coaches are tough on their kids. USC is tough on their kids. Bear Bryant was tough on his kids and Gene Stallings was tough on his kids. Each one of these programs have won national championships. I think why the kids didn’t like Coz is because all that mental grilling and conditioning didn’t lead to any victories. They probably sat back after practice and said “why are we doing all of this … we sure as hell aren’t winning, so why?”
In order to be a champion you have to be tough mentally. You’ve got to be able to visualize success and that mental conditioning hardens your thought process, it conditions you to act accordingly and to carry out the assignment. Now look at the Gilby era. It was such a negative atmosphere back then. Neuheisel gettting fired and Gilby trying desperately to keep the team together. It was bound to fail.
Coz is a great fit with Sark and Holt. Both Sark and Holt know how to win- they come from one of the best winning programs in the country. Ty wasn’t a winner either. He failed at Notre Dame and had one good season on the Farm. Coz will get our O line functioning as one unit and it will be solid. Maybe not yet spectacular, but good. But spectacular is coming…
Go Dawgs! WOOF!!!
All I saw was purple
These guys need a shakeup....
after the fiasco of last season. The Oline was by far THE BIGGEST (NO PUN INTENDED) DISAPPOINTMENT OF LAST SEASON! If these guys were smart they’d get tough and take it as a personal challenge and kick some ass out there!
by doubledeucedawg on Feb 16, 2009 6:58 PM PST up reply actions
Cozzetto
After watching the horrible performance of our experienced offensive line last year they need their eyes opened. To me they were the most dissapointing unit to our whole team. They were overweight, out of shape and overmatched in game after game. I realize some of this was not their fault because obviously their coaching had lower expectations for them. Hopefully it works out with Cozzetto. I do think we have some talent. With the new conditioning coaches alone there should be improvement. I would not be suprised to see some departures. I don’t want to metion names of players but I know we’ve been reading about the same player for the last 4 years starting the season about 50 pounds overweight. He obviously doesn’t take it serious enough and is just coasting earning his degree. This has to stop!
Double-edged sword
The same Seattle media that televizes the hiring of a defensive coordinator and makes people like Jake Heaps believe that Sark is a good coach before he’s even coached a game… are also the ones that put you under increased scrutiny for recruiting violations.
Ultimately, being in a large market helps more than it hurts. The LA papers are all over USC when anything questionable happens. Think it affects them?
I can see this as a possibility
Washington sells, WSU is forgotten. News (good or bad) sells involving the Huskies. The Cougs are an afterthought. Maybe this would explain why two of Seattles largest media outlets ran these rediculous stories comparing Sark to cheater Wolff.
Sure did get a lot of attention.
All I saw was purple
Exactly!...
…no one cares what happens in Pullman with the cougars. They don’ t exist.
by doubledeucedawg on Feb 16, 2009 6:59 PM PST up reply actions
Washington sells, WSU is forgotten. News (good or bad) sells involving the Huskies.
Bingo. As much as my fellow Husky fans may think that there’s a vendetta against the UW by the local rags, the above statement contains the most truth – papers follow what sells the most copies, and news about the Huskies sells a lot more than news about the Cougars, good and bad.
That’s not to excuse the hatchet job the Times did last year in re-hashing the 2000 team (which was done by the news dept BTW, not the Sports dept) – that was lousy “journalism” and deserves scorn. But I have no problems with the way Condotta covers the Huskies. Yannity is OK, and while I get Moore’s schtick, it is wearing thin.
About hoops
Huge weekend, and we need at least a split. Our fate is in our hands, which is exactly the way you want it.
About the lack of a marquee player, while the team’s strength is definitely its depth, if the Huskies win the Pac-10, Dentmon has to at least be in the discussion for POY. It’s probably going to Harden because he’s been on the radar all year, but I don’t think he’s any more deserving than Dentmon, and I don’t think I’m being a homer. And the way things are, the Huskies have a shot at two 1st team All-Pac 10 players. Here’s how I see it:
James Harden and Justin Dentmon are the favorites, with Darren Collison, Chase Budinger and Jerome Randle vying for that 3rd guard/small forward spot.
And the forwards, Jordan Hill is basically a lock for one spot but the other one is pretty open. It’s going to be between Brockman, Jeff Pendergraph and Taj Gibson.
Isaiah Thomas could end up on the second team, and Pondexter is probably a 3rd team guy. Potentially putting 4 guys on Conference Teams is huge.
Don't know if they have a most improved
but Dentmon would certainly be in the running for that as well. I hope some of his tenacity toward improving has rubbed off on some of the younger guys.
by hairofthedawg on Feb 16, 2009 12:35 PM PST up reply actions
Yeah that would be nice.
But even if they only improve at a normal rate, Abdul Gaddy is the type of player who will make everyone around him better. This team hasn’t had a true point guard since Will Conroy.
Dentmon over Harden for P.O.Y.
I agree with you that Hardin has been on everyone’s radar. But who votes for P.O.Y.? From a coaches perspective and vote, I think Dentmon wins it. That guy has busted every teams chops except for Cal. He has put up more game changing shots then Harden all season long.
The rest of your all Pac 10 team I agree with. Harden has played good but not great. Dentmon has exploded this season and for that should be a lock for player of the year.
Go Dent! WOOF!!!
All I saw was purple
Don't be too sure Casino...
I think you’d probably crap your pants if Venoy Overton wins Sixth Man of the Year Award. It could happen…
All I saw was purple
I would be very surprised
If anybody but Calvin Haynes won it. Not a great year in the Pac-10 in terms of depth (which is understandable considering all they talent lost from last year), and he’s leading his team in scoring off the bench.
Haynes?
I thought Calvin Haynes was a starter, who got in hot water with Robinson, who benched him? No depth in the Pac 10 = Venoy Overton as the 6th Man of the Year recipient.
Go O! WOOF!!!
All I saw was purple
He has come off the bench for 9 of their 13 conference games
I’m not sure what the criteria are for being eligible, but it’s probably that you come off the bench for half or more than half of the conference schedule, so he’ll qualify.
Cozzetto and Dentmon
If Dan can’t get the lard asses to improve then nobody can. It was sickening to see the effort displayed by this group of underachievers. In today’s Dawgman, Garcia admits to being overweight and out of shape, while admitting to having a poor season. Duh!!! He has been invited to the Pro combine, but had better be more convincing than his contribution to an 0-12 season.
Dentmon…Why hasn’t this guy received payer of the week honors?
dentmon
It was rough watching dentmon over the years,i gave up on him and romar didn’t,it’s nice to see that dentmon finally turned it around,great job dentmon,go dawgs.

by 














