UW Dawg Pound: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
New Blog: Cowboy Altitude for Wyoming Fans!

UCLA 24 Washington 23

UCLA did everything they could to give Washington the game but the Huskies only scored 23 points despite being the beneficiaries of five turnovers and UW running back Chris Polk racked up up 132 yards on only 15 carries.

Erik Folk was 3-4 today in FGA's but missed a critical opportunity in the fourth quarter which would have given Washington the lead. Washington was driving again for the lead with less than two minutes left in the game when Jake Locker was picked off on the sidelines by Rahim Moore which pretty much ended the game.

The story in this one which we will rehash better in the morning is that Washington didn't play very well against a very mediocre UCLA squad. Washington left Kevin Craft beat them after knocking Kevin Prince in the first half with a concussion. The defense didn't play well today. They didn't get much pressure on the QB after shutting down the running game. UCLA outgained the Huskies 465 to 391. UCLA' two QB's were a combined 23 for 32 for 370 yards, 2 TD's, and two interceptions.

I will be back later with a complete wrap up and the game grades. Lets just say this was another one Washington should have won but I wouldn't call it a moral victory. This was a game they should have won and simply did not.

0 recs  |  Comment 47 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

More from UW Dawg Pound

UW Media Blast Notes

Aug 2010 by John Berkowitz - 56 comments

Puppy Chow

Aug 2010 by John Berkowitz - 10 comments

Comments

Display:

Horrible loss – simply awful. Blame this one on both the offense, defense and coaching staff.

Why Sark didn’t call for a review on that Austin TD “catch” is beyond me – another coaching error on his part. And why he only ran Polk 7 times in the 1st half when he had more than 100 yards rushing – I just don’t get that. We were gashing the heck out of the Bruin D, yet Sark kept having Jake throw the ball with moderate but limited success.

Jake himself didn’t have his best day, making some bad decisions that killed drives. One sequence there he tried twice in a row to force a ball to Middleton, and early in the first quarter ignored an open Kearse on an underneath route in favor of trying to force something further downfield that he eventually just threw away.

The defense generated some turnovers, but that was just about the only way they got UCLA off the field. Almost no pass rush yet again, and that’s against a UCLA offensive line that has been really bad. We shut down their standard running game pretty well, but were gashed repeatedly by the wildcat. They finally wised up and realized that when Knox was lined up at QB that he was keeping it (you knew he wasn’t going to throw the ball).

Just an unfathomable loss, and yet another missed opportunity that should haunt this staff and team in the off-season. We should be bowling, but this loss, along with the losses to Notre Dame and ASU will likely be the difference.

Better hope Sark the recruiter can hang on to the blue-chippers he’s got committed, because the UW momentum is slipping.

by kirkd on Nov 7, 2009 4:27 PM PST reply actions  

"moral victory"?

John—

I know you said it’s not a “moral victory,” but to even write those words in a blog post, in any context, in any way, is a complete joke. I can’t even believe you would begin to fathom the idea of writing about a “moral victory,” especially against a team that is 0-5 in the Pac-10. What a joke.

by Dawgfather11 on Nov 7, 2009 4:31 PM PST reply actions  

Sarcasm

It was a back breaking loss against an inferior opponent.

by John Berkowitz on Nov 8, 2009 7:55 AM PST up reply actions  

Facts

Fact #1: Sark is the worst red zone offensive playcaller in the nation

Fact #2: Locker is the most overrated QB in the nation

Fact #3: Our O-Line is a useless abomination

Fact #4: Our pass coverage is AT LEAST 9th in the conference

by Dawgfather11 on Nov 7, 2009 4:33 PM PST reply actions  

Wow

I think we are challeged in those area’s….the worst?

by John Berkowitz on Nov 8, 2009 9:13 AM PST up reply actions  

Kind of Harsh...

…might want to revisit this after your blood pressure stabilizes.

Washington Husky Football-Undefeated 1991 National Champions 12-0!

by dawgfan22 on Nov 8, 2009 1:36 PM PST up reply actions  

Sark needs to take some heat for this

I mean, some serious heat. Red zone playcalling vs. Notre Dame, Oregon, and UCLA was a joke. There have been instances of bad red zone playcalling all year. Clock management vs. ASU lost us the game. Also, he needs to grow some fu*king cojones and challenge some plays. Not challenging the 2 point conversion at ND and the touchdown today by UCLA is unforgivable. Those timeouts he saved really came in handy, didn’t they?

Did we make the right hire? I’m starting to think NO. Sark is a rookie head coach. ’Nuff said.

by Dawgfather11 on Nov 7, 2009 4:38 PM PST reply actions  

Jake Locker

No way is he ready for the NFL. You can’t turn the ball over on a critical last drive like that. It kind of reminds me of Brock Huard, the guy had so much hype but his career at Washington kind of went south. I’m starting to get the same feeling with Jake. It’s frustrating it’s like ucla did everything they could to give us the game and again our defense makes a third string QB look like an All American!

AT LEAST THE DUCKS LOST! GO DAWGS!! Get your sh_t together!

Washington Husky Football-Undefeated 1991 National Champions 12-0!

by dawgfan22 on Nov 7, 2009 4:54 PM PST reply actions  

Sark needs to check himself...

1) We should have run the ball alot more
2) We should have blitzed ALOT more
3) Can we throw the ball to Middleton down field..I mean more then 5 yards down field?
4) A complete and tota/ melt down by Sark, Holt & players…..unbelievably bad.

by Snostrebla on Nov 7, 2009 4:58 PM PST reply actions  

Sark needs to do some serious self-evaluation and honest critique of his decisions. He could really stand to sit at the feet of some great coaches and get some outside perspectives – maybe call up DJ and use him as a mentor.

He should also consider adding another vet coach to his staff when the opportunity arises to provide some gameday counseling.

by kirkd on Nov 7, 2009 5:16 PM PST up reply actions  

Redzone Problems...Again!

You win the turnover battle and you can’t close the deal. I knew this was going to be a close game. They were favored by the way, just wanted to remind you guys of that. We can’t go out there with so many freshmen and expect much more.

Washington Husky Football-Undefeated 1991 National Champions 12-0!

by dawgfan22 on Nov 7, 2009 5:04 PM PST reply actions  

I do expect more...we all should expect more...

UCLA turned over the ball 5 times and still beat us = Pathetic!!!!!

by Snostrebla on Nov 7, 2009 5:26 PM PST up reply actions  

Things will get better

The more I read the blogs the more I hate them. Let me see if I have this right. After going 0 and 12 and with a coach who would not recruit everyone thinks in a first year of a new coach UW should be going to a bowl game. This is not a quick fix we all should have known it would take some time. Sark is the right coach for some of the talk of getting a new coach is wrong. I said from the start 3 to 4 wins would be a great start.

For those of you who think you are a better head coach go apply for a coaching job and show me how great you are as a coach. When any of you turn around an 0 and 12 team and take them to a bowl in your first year let me know.

Things will get better we just have to be patient we have a great class coming in UW will get better

by Robert M on Nov 7, 2009 5:20 PM PST reply actions   1 recs

I disagree.....

we should have won this game pretty easily. We had a RB that was averaging about 25 yards a carry at half time. I like Sark and wouldn’t dream of talking of replacing him but come on…that was just striagt up horrible. This team just can’t get out of it’s own way.

by Snostrebla on Nov 7, 2009 5:30 PM PST up reply actions  

If that's the case...

…then why were we the underdog? We are not some kind of juggernaut. This was a close game and we won the turnover battle but continue to have problems on both sides of the ball. This program is going to get better but let’s not be delusional about the expectations.

Washington Husky Football-Undefeated 1991 National Champions 12-0!

by dawgfan22 on Nov 7, 2009 5:50 PM PST up reply actions  

Not the point...

  If you would have told Vegas, all the prognosticators and fans before the game that UCLA would turn the ball over 5 times and Prince wouldn’t make it past the first half – ALL OF THEM would have picked a pretty easy win for UW. Make no mistake UCLA played bad…we just played worse and that, in my eyes, is unexceptable.

by Snostrebla on Nov 7, 2009 6:48 PM PST up reply actions  

oops “unacceptable” – This site really needs an “edit” button.

by Snostrebla on Nov 7, 2009 6:51 PM PST up reply actions  

It was 3 to 6 points...

…in favor of Ucla depending on who you believe.

Washington Husky Football-Undefeated 1991 National Champions 12-0!

by dawgfan22 on Nov 7, 2009 7:36 PM PST up reply actions  

thats essentially a pick 'em

vegas adjusts their odds for the LA crowd & everyone knows you get about 3 points for being @ home. In the oddsmakers eyes UCLA & UW are pretty damn even.

by Bamer_ on Nov 7, 2009 7:38 PM PST up reply actions  

Why...

…don’t we do a better job of seeing plays and asking for a review? Obviously we got homered by the refs but the coaching staff has to be able to look at those.

Washington Husky Football-Undefeated 1991 National Champions 12-0!

by dawgfan22 on Nov 7, 2009 5:56 PM PST reply actions  

Jury still out on Sark.

like Robert said above me, what did you all expect? I know I personally wasn’t expecting us to beat ‘SC, and play wire to wire against some of our opponents this season. What I don’t like about Sark will honestly all be fixed with time and a more talented O-Line, Deeper Runningback core, and a pass rush. Our redzone offense sucks, and we don’t have a big bruising back, who we can use in the redzone to blast through the inside and score. As much as I love Polk, he isn’t that great in the redzone. But he is great every down back from 10 to 10. We are bringing in some good Linemen so the line problem should be fixed sooner rather than later, which would help all facets of the game. And Pass rush wise, we aren’t that great, but with some solid pass rushers we should be better, along with some good interior D-Linemen and a good corner opposite of Dez. I’m not worried about the next 3-5 years of QB play with the signing of Montana, and Cooper’s signing along with Chris Polk is a very, very solid young backfield already. Sark is one of the premier recruiters on the West Coast already, as evidence of a top 50 ranked class as a new HC of an 0-12 team, along with a top 25 class this season, potentially a top 20 class when all is said and done with a 3-6 team.
That being said, he is like a freshman quarterback, you see the potential, but you see the mistake a little bit clearer at times.
(not bad for a first post on here right ;))

by jballa838 on Nov 7, 2009 6:40 PM PST reply actions  

Freshmen etc...

We had 4 true freshmen starting or playing significantly on the Husky Defense. You don’t win a lot of games doing that. I think Holt and Sark are doing everything they can to build for the future and to try and find answers now. Obviously there is a downside to not having a rock solid veteran football team out there. We are going to get there but with a new scheme and new staff there are going to be growing pains. I think one facet that Sark needs to look at is that he seems to really like throwing the football. Running the football effectively makes the passing game better and makes protection easier. If a defense has to honestly defend the run it sets the table for the passing game.

Washington Husky Football-Undefeated 1991 National Champions 12-0!

by dawgfan22 on Nov 7, 2009 7:14 PM PST up reply actions  

Chris Polk

This kid is really looking special right now. We need to feed him the rock more.

Washington Husky Football-Undefeated 1991 National Champions 12-0!

by dawgfan22 on Nov 7, 2009 7:15 PM PST up reply actions  

Hoops is almost here!!!

The coaching staff needs to do a better job. I haven’t really seen any improvement in the team since the USC game. In fact, they’ve back slide some. It’s either that their talent has plateaued or that the coaching staff isn’t getting to Ty’s left overs. For the life of me though, why is Jake throwing 40 times and Chris is only running 15 . He had 130 plus yards. Give him the ball 25 times and he gets 250 and we’re talking about a win and one of the best games by a running back in team history. How is it possible that our defense gives up 400 plus yards to the second worse offense in the conference? If it wasn’t for the turn overs, we’d gotten flattening by 4 touchdowns. Finally, what was Jake thinking? Why is he throwing down the field to a covered receiver when we have a minute and a half, 3 time outs, and only needing maybe 20 yards to win the game? This is like that movie Ground Hogs Day, the same thing over and over. It’s been going on now for 5 years, more like 6 or 7 years. I’m tired of every teams finding their way and getting health against us. If we can’t beat UCLA in the Rose Bowl now, when will we ever be able too? I’m tired of the damn losing. Thank Good hoops starts in 6 days

by astanfi on Nov 7, 2009 7:27 PM PST reply actions  

Totally agree astanfi...

  this nightmare just won’t freakin’ end!!!!!!

by Snostrebla on Nov 7, 2009 8:14 PM PST up reply actions  

Ground Hogs Day?!?!?!

Is that something to do with Arkansas?!?

Wait, maybe it’s those great lines the Redskins had in the 80’s???

Bird Law in this country isn't governed by reason.

by whiskey chainsaw on Nov 8, 2009 12:23 PM PST up reply actions  

Come on!

Ok, I’m not satisfied either, it stings every time I sit down to watch the game. But seriously, we’re acting like this should be a totally different team! It’s nearly the same team. Our lines are obviously the root of the problem, but instead of calling for Sark’s head already, let’s enjoy the fact that the t.v. can stay on late into the 4th quarter! It’s going to take some time. Sark made mistakes, Jake made mistakes, our defense isn’t capable of stopping UCLA but seriously, 0-12 last year, I know we want to forget it, but it does explain a lot of this. I’m excited for the future of Washington football. Let’s stay on our teams side and not fall by the wayside.

by ReturnOfTheDawgs on Nov 7, 2009 10:20 PM PST reply actions  

Question for everyone that brings up “0-12” – what do you think our record would’ve been last year with Jake playing all 12 games and for a coach that the team hadn’t given up on?

Yeah, we were 0-12 last year. But that’s not what the talent level was. If we end up winning 4 games this year, I think that’s only about a 1 or 2 game improvement from last year’s true talent level.

I’m not saying fire Sark – not by a long shot. But we have the right to criticize things we see that don’t make a lot of sense. Only giving Chris Polk 7 carries in the first half doesn’t make a lot of sense. Not calling for a review of that Austin TD “catch” doesn’t make a lot of sense. Much of the play-calling inside the red zone was timid and uninspired. A defensive line that could barely get any pressure on the QB despite playing against perhaps one of the few offensive lines in the conference worse than ours was pathetic.

This coaching staff is obviously an improvement over the last one, but they also have a long ways to go to become the kind of coaching staff that has us competing for conference championships down the road.

by kirkd on Nov 7, 2009 10:32 PM PST up reply actions  

Exactly.

Good summary, couldn’t have said it better myself.

"Legends are made on the shores of Lake Washington"
"BOW DOWN TO WASHINGTON"

by Lear Pilot on Nov 8, 2009 2:10 PM PST up reply actions  

I totally agree Kirk...

and I can’t really see the side of those that just shrug their shoulders at a lose like this. I don’t think they truely “get” what happened today. We just took over 9th place in the PAC-10 after getting beat by the now 8th place team even though they turned the ball over 5 TIMES! Think about that.
   Also, based on our performance in our first 6 games this season I thought it was reasonable to assume that we would win 3 or 4 of our last 6 games that are against much easier opponents. That’s not going to happen and we are now going to be lucky to get one win and even that game is looking like no gimmie. In other words – this team looks like it’s progressively getting worse.
   And for the record I never mentioned replacing Sark.

by Snostrebla on Nov 7, 2009 10:51 PM PST reply actions  

Any time your team gets 5 turnovers.....

they should win. The Huskies are talented enough to have won 6 games this year. This new head coach talk is just nonsense.

by BackdoorBarkley on Nov 7, 2009 11:39 PM PST reply actions  

This is not a quick fix

Kirk If Jake had played all year I think they would have won two games. You have to remember the last coach was LAZY and all he wanted to do was play golf. This team just ran out of gas. Teams with the best talent will win 9 out of 10 times and tw never recruited any real talent. If you think I am wrong just watch the NFL how many ex UW players are playing on Sunday.

Sark was left with a big mess that will take time to fix. I don’t think any so called top coach would take this team to a bowl game. This is why I say everyone needs to be patient.

by Robert M on Nov 8, 2009 3:10 PM PST reply actions  

Running out of gas...Robert

Honestly more than anything else this team is out of gas and that is why we see these second half fades. We cam all toss around blame in a few directions but it really comes down to not having enough players left at the end of the season. The players we do have are nicked up and out of gas.

by John Berkowitz on Nov 8, 2009 5:39 PM PST up reply actions  

Kirk If Jake had played all year I think they would have won two games. You have to remember the last coach was LAZY and all he wanted to do was play golf.

But take Ty out of the equation. Imagine this team were playing for an OK coach, and a guy they hadn’t quit on – how many games do they win then? Because that’s the real gauge in determining how much improvement we’re really seeing under Sark.

There is improvement yes, but not as much as comparing 0-12 last year to 4 wins this year might indicate.

by kirkd on Nov 8, 2009 5:46 PM PST up reply actions  

Understand your point

Kirk I understand your point even with the last coach out of the equation you still need the top high school talent you can get. Without some top talent you are going uphill and I still think 3 wins. I think there has been alot of improvement take away two games UW has been in every one which is something no one could say last year.

We all know Sark can call a great game just go back to the Rose Bowl and I think the higher powers got it right with Sark. He can recruit and is showing everyone that he can bring in a top class. UW is going down a long road that will take some time to fix but Sark will fix it.

by Robert M on Nov 8, 2009 7:42 PM PST reply actions  

In general I’m pretty happy with Sark, and I do think we will get back to being a consistent bowl team under him.

But criticism of his play calling and game management is legitimate. The mistakes he’s made have been out there for all to see in the last few games – Arizona State and UCLA in particular.

I think he’s smart enough to not be too stubborn and to learn from these mistakes, but they are mistakes and they do need to be corrected.

He did well at USC, but he had elite talent there. I doubt he’ll get quite the same level of talent here, and really, relying primarily on talent isn’t the best way to go – you also need to out-scheme the guys on the other sideline, and Sark doesn’t always do that.

It’s my opinion that under a halfway decent coach and with Jake healthy all season and E.J. not suspended, last year’s team wins 3-4 games. So what we’ve seen so far this year is minimal real improvement in the win column.

The real tests will come next year and the year after. I’m a firm believer that you know what you have in a coach after his 3rd year, and the 2nd year will give you a fair guide of how the 3rd year will end up going.

I’m not giving up on Sark by any means, but I’m also not going to ignore things he does wrong just because I like the guy.

by kirkd on Nov 9, 2009 11:08 AM PST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the UW Dawg Pound an unofficial site for Washington Husky fans.
Start posting about the Huskies »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
My Pac 10 picks and why
Rainer_small
RECRUITING SPACE LEFT
Small
FSN Northwest: Will they show the BYU game?
New_picture_small
Gekko's Three-Putt
Scnw_logo_small
New Confrence Alignment Dynasty for 360
Learjet31a_1_jpg_small
The 2010 Husky Football Season as seen from 45,000'
Rainbow_small
Narrative of Husky Stadium remodel
Small
BYU Road Trip
Rainbow_small
Interesting comment from Locker on ESPN.
Bigpanda_small
Hey John! About the Media Poll,

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SBNation.com Recent Stories

Virginia Tech quarterback Tyrod Taylor celebrates with the crowd in the final moments of the fourth quarter of an NCAA football game against Tennessee Sunday, Dec. 13, 2009 in Atlanta.  (AP Photo/John Bazemore)

Week 1 College Football Buffet: Previewing Every Game So You Know Which To Consume

Photo +19 updates

QB Jeremiah Masoli Elgible To Play Immediately After Winning Appeal

North Carolina football coach Butch Davis responds to questions during NCAA media day in Chapel Hill, N.C., Thursday, Aug. 12, 2010. (AP Photo/Gerry Broome) +8 updates

UNC Announces It Will Be Without 12 Players In Opener As Investigation Continues

More from SBNation.com >


Managers

1959_huskies_small John Berkowitz

Dubs_small thecassino