Bye Week Fix It List
Let's take a close look at what the program will be doing during the bye week.
1. Get Healthy
The biggest thing you do during a bye week is simply rest your regular players and take some time to get them healthy. The laundry list of injuries gets pretty long this time of year. Most of these injuries aren't enough to keep players out of a game but it does effect their performance. A week off without contact does wonders for getting your regulars fresh.
Jake Locker (Quad), EJ Savannah (Hand), Nate Williams, Mason Foster, Donald Butler, Chris Polk (Shoulder, Ankle), Cameron Elisara (Stingers), Nick Wood (Stingers), Quinton Richardson (Ankle), and Daniel Teo Nesheim are all candidates for extensive time off this week.
2. Work on Jake Locker's mechanics
Jake has regressed over the past few weeks. One can say a lot of it is due to pressure and that is true, but one look in his eyes at the line of scrimmage tells you he has been flustered at times. The game needs to slow down more for him.
Like any QB Jake tosses the ball better when he throws off his front foot. When Jake throws off the back foot the ball tends to sail on him. Screen passes have been a big problem for him. Rarely does he hit the receiver on a screen on the correct target. When the receiver has to jump up, reach down, or lunge sideways for the ball it ruins the timing of the play.
The coaches also need to figure out a way to get Jake's legs back into the game plan. I think everyone agree's that the coaching staff has not done a very good job using the biggest weapon on the team. I agree that the Pro Set is best in the long term but they need to mix it up more and free up Jake.
While Jake is taking this week off for the most part that won't include time in the film room.
3. Identify who can help you during the stretch run
Bye week is like the Rose Bowl for the Scout team players. Typically the coaches look closer at those guys and try to indentify who they can coach up over th enext two weeks to contribute during the last four game sof the season. It is also the time the final mental notes are made for next season concerning who can help you and who needs to move on to make room for the next recruiting class.
Just for example Jordan Wallace is a kid that has been playing on special teams all season. This is the week that he will get a lot of time at OLB to see if his freshness factor can help out in the last quarter playing beyond that role. EJ Savannah's nickname this season should be the fugitive. He has been playing with one arm for a long time. Cort Dennison has done a great job filling in for him at times but Wallace is a kid with speed they need to take a closer look at.
4. Position changes
You can't very easily make position changes on the fly during the season. During a bye week you can sometimes move somebody from offense to defense of vice versa who can help you fill a glaring hole. Safety comes to mind as a place where the depth has been thinned because of injuries. We really don't expect anything earth shattering on this subject.
5. Play calling and game management
This is the perfect time for the coaches to experiment and rework their playbook and philosophy on both sides of the ball. Changes are seldom dramatic but Washington really needs to take a close look at their goal line offense and special teams. They also need to figure out a way to use Jake Lockers legs more over the next four games.
Sark also needs to take a deep look inwards and do a better job managing the clock. He has a lot of experience running an offense and you wouldn't think this would have emerged as such a glaring problem. He needs to gamble less in obvious situations and start playing the averages.
On the defensive and special teams side they need to encourage their players to call a timeout when things don't look right. Washington made poor use of its timeouts against the Ducks.
One thing this staff hasn't done all season is run a trick play. Why not gamble early in the game with a kid like Cody Bruns who can throw the ball?
6. Recruiting
The Huskies will practice on Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday. Expect a majority of the coaching staff to be on planes the later part of the week. The Huskies have twenty spots filled with approximately ten more to go by signing day. Typically you can expect most of those spots to be filled by Christmas.
Recruiting has gone well this season but the staff still has some big holes to fill on the offensive and defensive line. The catch phrase where's the beef has never meant as much as it does right now at Washington. I expect a good portion of that beef to come from Hawaii and it wouldn't surprise if Johnny Nansen is over in the Islands this week.
7. Spiritual Healing
As Sarkisan said in his press conference Monday this is a fragile group of players mentally and physically. The season has gone the way most experts predicted but along the way there were two very stinging losses that should have been wins. Last weeks game against Oregon was a real good indication of where this team is right now. They are worn out, shallow, and pretty nicked up. Teams don't play their best even with great effort under those conditions. As Nick Holt would out it this is a week where they need to love these guys up to prepare them for the four remaining games.
0 recs |
44 comments
Comments
Venting time...
Is it me or am i seeing the exact same defense on every play the whole year? i know we have issues with bodies on that side of the ball but i don’t think i’ve seen anything but a 4-3 all year! I’m sure this isn’t true but on passing downs i haven’t seen a pass defense. Do we really not have a third or fourth DB? Where is Teo Neshim, every game you here the analysts talk about him being a Sunday type player but i’m not seeing that either. For a D-line that is horrible i would think i would hear his name more often for how hyped he is, just not seeing it i guess. And on the recruiting I’ve seen a couple O-line and 1 D-line recruit already commit but if we truly want back into the PAC-10 elite this should be an area of focus, all other positions are fine but as we’ve seen here for a couple years we NEED a great line on both sides, especially once Jake is gone!
by DAWGFATHER91 on Oct 27, 2009 7:56 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
3rd or 4th DB?
We barely have a 1st or 2nd.
by thecassino on Oct 27, 2009 12:30 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
yup - our LBs are also our best extra DBs
Damn, my eyeball tastes good.
by Gekko Mojo on Oct 27, 2009 1:25 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I’ve harped on the infrequency of nickel and dime backs inserted into the game, but the flip side of that is that if they stay in base personnel all the time, they won’t be so thrown off by various different offensive formations and have to worry about getting subs in and defenses called in time.
Still, I can’t help but think there are guys standing on the sidelines (Richardson, McDowell, Walker, Aiyewa) that would do a better job in coverage in obvious passing situations than Savannah and Butler.
by kirkd on Oct 27, 2009 2:49 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Holt's got to change it up.
I’m not as concerned about the endless use of the 4-3 defense, I’m concerned that we are running some sort of zone coverage each and every play. The key to a good offense, keep the defense guessing, a balanced attack is sooooo much more difficult to defend. The key to a good defense? Keep the offense guessing. As the QB drops back to pass his most important/difficult job is to determine zone or man coverage. If he knows it’s zone before he takes the snap, all he has to do is determine what type of zone, cover 2, cover 3 . . .
If we want to stop making opposing QB’s look like All Americans we MUST have different packages, different coverages, different looks, disguises, and even the occasional man coverage whether we have the personnel or not. The only difference between the 2009, 2009, and 2007 defenses: attitude and effort. If Holt doesn’t change it up, he’s just going to repeat history. Holt – please learn from the past!!!!!!!!
"Legends are made on the shores of Lake Washington"
"BOW DOWN TO WASHINGTON"
by Lear Pilot on Oct 27, 2009 5:59 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree Dawg91 we need some beef up front – I think we have 5 linemen now ( counting Hartvigson as DE). It would be nice to get about 4 more linemen – a real thumper at MLB and safety and a couple of corners. We have a lot of offers out there hopefully we can snag a few.
by lorenzothedog on Oct 27, 2009 10:08 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Heal up, fine tune mechanics,
Recruit Recruit Recruit OL/DLs, Reflect on mistakes and how to correct them esp STs
by prrbrr on Oct 27, 2009 10:09 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
8.
John, go fishing! Take a breather.
Expect to Win!!!
by OLDDOG on Oct 27, 2009 12:09 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Fishing
Thanks Old Dog…I don’t have a lot for this week…we will have the picks on Thursday and that is about it.
If anything special comes up I will report on it but that is about it.
by John Berkowitz on Oct 27, 2009 2:50 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
gorgedawg and I
have a buddy that lives on the other side of I-5 from me. He’s getting quite a few Coho in his one boat hole in the Chehalis and Jerry’s brother Bobby knows some good spots as well.
My Dr was out with Bobby last Friday and when they checked in with the the fish checker only two boats had fish….Bobby and Jerry
by T9ODawg on Oct 28, 2009 4:20 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Why not gamble early in the game with a kid like Cody Bruns who can throw the ball?
That’s a great idea – where have I heard that before?
;)
by kirkd on Oct 27, 2009 2:50 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Jason Wells
Still waiting for his return. We need him badly. I don’t want to hammer too much on one guy but Nate Williams has not impressed me with some of his decisions being made in the secondary.
Washington Husky Football-Undefeated 1991 National Champions 12-0!
by dawgfan22 on Oct 27, 2009 3:10 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Nate
Can’t defend the decisions but Nate is just beat up.
by John Berkowitz on Oct 27, 2009 3:41 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Regressing
John I’m with you on Jake regressing in the pocket as of lately. For some reason he hasn’t looked very comfortable back there at times and the lack of offensive production reflects that. Do you remember how confident Jake appeared in the LSU and USC games? We’re not seeing that now.
On a different note, I think we don’t want to fall asleep during the bye week. I think a few of the Ty teams fell asleep during the byes and the league passed us up. Translation: the Pac 10 got better and we got worse. We can’t sit around on our collective butts and wait for the next game. We’ve got to fine tune stuff, work out some kinks and add a new scheme or two.
Putting in a new scheme during the bye is a huge plus. By now the entire league knows what you are running offensively. The bye is a perfect time to add a wrinkle or two.
Not sure if we want to add Locker to the running game. We can’t afford to see him get hurt again. But I would like to see him take off and run if the routes are covered. But the thing is the protection hasn’t been very good lately and the opposing defenses have been able to get in Locker’s grill before he can determine pass or run. The key to Jake running is the protection. It’s been breaking down lately and it’s killed the offense.
We’ve got to win two more games besides the WSU game to get bowl eligible. I know we can do it, their are a lot of winnable games out there, but addressing the protection has to be priority No.1 right now during the bye.
All I saw was purple
by crazidawg on Oct 27, 2009 4:58 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
It's Also Killing Us...
…that our running game isn’t very good. We’ve got to find a way to run the ball more effectively! That will open up the passing game.
Washington Husky Football-Undefeated 1991 National Champions 12-0!
by dawgfan22 on Oct 27, 2009 5:30 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
We agree again, spooky.
Good Stuff. Jake doesn’t look comfortable, very similar to Brock Huard his Junior year, pretty common when you have a piss poor o-line and you are getting your butt kicked on a regular basis.
Bye Week – Both the offense, and especially the defense, need to add new wrinkles to keep teams guessing. Right now everybody knows what we do, and it’s getting easier to stop.
Locker – Agree, I don’t want to see more designed runs for Locker, but I do want to see him take off more often when the plays break down. That’s how he broke the 56 yard TD, and how he’ll break more really big runs.
Bowl game – It’s possible, but it must start against UCLA. Beat UCLA, and WSU, and the team will have all the motivation necessary to beat Cal. But it must start against UCLA.
P.S. – Where have you been lat
"Legends are made on the shores of Lake Washington"
"BOW DOWN TO WASHINGTON"
by Lear Pilot on Oct 27, 2009 6:13 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Stupid computer
P.S. – Where have you been lately?
"Legends are made on the shores of Lake Washington"
"BOW DOWN TO WASHINGTON"
by Lear Pilot on Oct 27, 2009 6:13 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I've been around...
Work keeps me busy right now and I don’t have a lot of down time. But I have been reading the posts, some I agree and others I don’t.
I thought our defensive design vs. Oregon was a train wreck. It’s obvious we didn’t prepare enough to stop the Duck spread.
All I saw was purple
by crazidawg on Oct 29, 2009 9:28 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I can understand.
My job is real hit and miss. Stretches of really busy, and stretches of absolute boredom combined with tons of time off.
Can’t argue about the defense, didn’t look disciplined at all.
"Legends are made on the shores of Lake Washington"
"BOW DOWN TO WASHINGTON"
by Lear Pilot on Oct 29, 2009 11:03 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I have been buries this week too
by John Berkowitz on Oct 29, 2009 12:11 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
This is a good week to be busy with other stuff.
"Legends are made on the shores of Lake Washington"
"BOW DOWN TO WASHINGTON"
by Lear Pilot on Oct 29, 2009 9:03 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Marques Tuiasosopo vs Jake Locker
He ran the option for two years and the only injury he had was to his bum in 1999. Yet he still played the season out and a full season in the Rosebowl season of 2000. Why is it thought to be OK for Tui who was arguably the best and most valuable Husky quarterback in Husky history but it’s off limits to have Jake running more? I know not all Husky fans feel this way, myself included. I think if you have a lethal weapon to use, use it!
Washington Husky Football-Undefeated 1991 National Champions 12-0!
by dawgfan22 on Oct 27, 2009 5:28 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
That’s just it, we never saw Tui get hurt. But we’ve seen Jake hobble off the field or carried out on a stretcher the last two seasons. Not a lot was riding on Tui’s shoulders as they are with Jake. Tui had a lot of talented skilled guys around him and the opposing defenses weren’t locked in to stopping one guy, they had to stop a lot of guys. This opened stuff up for Tui. Jake hasn’t had that luxury.
All I saw was purple
by crazidawg on Oct 27, 2009 5:45 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Still Doesn't Change...
…the fact that he ran the ball a lot and took a lot of hits.
Washington Husky Football-Undefeated 1991 National Champions 12-0!
by dawgfan22 on Oct 27, 2009 7:16 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
The difference is this: while both very very important parts of their teams success, the dropoff from Tui to his backups in 2000 probably drops the Huskies from 11-1 to something like 7-5 or 6-6, whereas a dropoff from Jake to his backups this season drops us from 3-5 to 1-7, or possibly 0-8. This program right now simply can’t afford to have another horrible season and drastically needs as many wins as they can get. The 2000 team probably still would’ve gone bowling without Tui, and while 7-5 or 6-6 would’ve been a big comedown from what they actually accomplished, it wouldn’t have been nearly as horrible a blow to the program as losing Jake this year.
by kirkd on Oct 27, 2009 7:20 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Stay the course (sort of)
We all agree that no one on this team is as important as Jake Locker, and that he is an exceptional player. It can also be said that his talents are not being utilized to their maximum potential (i.e. running). But I’m going to stick with the coaching staff on the strategy for his development.
Jake is one of the few players that has a future in professional football, but he didn’t exit last season with the necessary skill set, and he (still) isn’t quite ready to step up to that level. He’s made great strides under this staff, and just this year has actually shown that he has the tools to play in an NFL-style offense. The mistakes he’s committing are mostly of the decision-making variety, and he clearly needs more experience before going pro.
But in addition to still being on the steep part of the learning curve, he’s stuck with an offensive line that would marginalize any of the other top QB prospects. It’s difficult for him to develop when he’s running for his life, and I’m sure that he’s still struggling with his instincts vs. the “plan”, which together make for a lot of errors.
Nonetheless, to turn him loose completely would be to stall or even reverse his progression. He’s already lost a half-step due to minor injuries, and I’d hate to see him go down with something serious just because we wanted to see him become the entire offense again.
Maybe the bye week will allow for some extra time with the coaches to fix his mechanics and help him see the field better. And hopefully they will tell him that it’s OK to take off sooner (we’re not going to see improved protection until next year). But we should appreciate what they’re trying to do for him, and show a little patience.
I’ve always thought that it’s unfair for us to put so much on Jake’s shoulders. You can hear on game days how many people think that it’s all about him and what he’s going to do, or should do. Yes, a QB has to wear that burden, and I’m sure that psychologically, he can. But at this point, I’d rather protect him and encourage his progress into something for the long run. We’re getting close to putting together a team that would make allow him to be a star, which is better than trying to make him the star.
by Verge on Oct 27, 2009 6:41 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
You`re assuming there is a long run...
there`s no guarantee Jake is coming back next year, esp. with thin o-line depth and a weak QB draft class. The only guarantee is 4 more games. On any team the best players shoulder the most burden, and this team needs Jake to run more. This team and this program need more wins, not close losses and blowouts. Otherwise, we might find out the hard way that recruiting isn`t done until the big boys say it is and a commit doesn`t count until it`s faxed to you in February. This program is shaky right now, there is no long run.
by 206 on Oct 27, 2009 7:16 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions 0 recs
Verge is Right
We are running a Pro Style Offense now. That helps us recruit and once we have strong line play again we will dominate. We are not running the spread anymore. The team has made huge strides going to the prostyle offense. We did not win games running Jake 20 times a game. His job is to get the ball to the running backs and receivers and get them involved and he has done a great job other than the Oregon Game. The real problem is we have had no offensive line the last 2 games and that will make a Heisman winner look very mortal.
Jake has missed running in for a TD a few times this season, but really the focus for Jake and our next QBs is run the offense by getting the skill players involved.
by Fighting Husky on Oct 27, 2009 9:00 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
By Doing That....
…you take away a potent third aspect of the offense. I totally agree that he shouldn’t be running like he did in 2007 when he gained almost 1000 yards but there are certainly situations where Jake should run the ball. Sark never said Jake wouldn’t run the ball, he just said they wouldn’t put a lot of emphasis on it.
Washington Husky Football-Undefeated 1991 National Champions 12-0!
by dawgfan22 on Oct 27, 2009 9:08 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
SOme good thoughts but
I think many of you are overestimating the rest of the team. Read Art Thiel today, he says it better than I can.
Has anyone noticed what happens when Jake does run? He gets pummeled. Defensive coaches in this league know they can beat UW by eliminating or at least neutralizing Jake. If he tries to roll out, they are waiting. Draw play? Hello, bam, bam. Anything that involves misdirection, they make sure they have Jake covered, and take their chances with other guys. In most cases, anything that takes time to develop gets blown apart because UW line sucks and they cannot hold anyone out long enough for a play to develop. Throw it deep you say, sure. They could not even give Jake time to throw a hail Mary last week, and OU only rushed three guys. Tui was awesome, but he ran behind what may be the best line in UW history. They simply wore out the other guys. By the fourth quarter, Tui could pick his nose as he either ran or threw it. The only thing Jake picks his himself off the ground. No wonder he throws off his back foot. If he stepped up he would be stepping on his teammates as they get blasted into the backfield with him.
On defense the problems are similar. You do not win in this league with a bunch of true freshman DBs, and a DL that is almost as young. Why do we not hear from DTeo.? He is blocked by two or three guys on every play. The other DL are not good enough to handle quality OL in the Pac 10, they are simply overmatched.
I have seen a variety of things from the Defensive coaches. ASU scorched a prevent defense for a TD. OU worked a man up matchup between a TE and Foster for about 30 yards and a first down. No matter what they try, it seems to get burned at bad times.
The bottom line is this: they are very fortunate to be where they are. They are competing with smoke and mirrors, and in most games have played way over their heads. Any coach will tell you it is not so much X’s and O’s, as who the X’s and O’s are. In most cases, especially on the OL, and the DBs, their X’s are bigger, stronger, and faster than our O’s. Oregon just exposed the Dawgs for what they are. Jake, and a bunch of try hards that are not that good.
The coaching is not perfect, it never is. We need to stop drinking the Kool aid and see the picture. UW will be good again someday, but right now, they are not.
by OlyDawgFan on Oct 27, 2009 9:30 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I do see a lot of what you are saying but i think effort and prep from our coaching staff to the players has played a big part in these games. Talent is a big issue but believing you can compete and putting some effort into it creates the situations like the ND, ASU and LSU games. I don’t know many people who were believing that we were destined for the rose bowl after the USC game but anyone who was has now realized this team still has a long way to go. I don’t think it’s all smoke and mirrors though, we have some talent on this team at the skill positions just nothing up front on either side of the ball. And as far as DTeo goes I just don’t see the hype and haven’t seen it in couple of years, I really don’t think he’s getting double and triple teamed every play, IMO i think he’s an average player. 3 plays are the difference in this year between wins and losses and it’s a great improvement from last year with a possible bowl bid.
by DAWGFATHER91 on Oct 28, 2009 9:36 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sark On Recruting
Bob Condotta’s Husky Football Blog
Washington Husky Football-Undefeated 1991 National Champions 12-0!
by dawgfan22 on Oct 28, 2009 6:44 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Recruiting Cont...
He also said they’d look to recruit two to three more offensive lineman.
Washington Husky Football-Undefeated 1991 National Champions 12-0!
by dawgfan22 on Oct 28, 2009 6:46 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
NO ONE SAID SCRAP THE PRO-STYLE
No one suggested that but you. If you are saying running Jake from the spread in goaline situations isnt a good football decision then i`m wasting my time.
by 206 on Oct 28, 2009 11:54 AM PDT via mobile reply actions 0 recs
Agreed
Why does it have to be one or the other? Most offenses ARE multiple these days. It’s a big plus to have a QB who can beat you with his running. Granted if Jake is banged up, you’re not going to have him run the football and he’s probably not going to be as effective in the pocket in a proset for that matter. I think it is a smart decision to make stretch defenses and make them defend multiple threats.
by doubledeucedawg on Oct 28, 2009 12:10 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
typo...
…to make defenses defend multiple threats.
by doubledeucedawg on Oct 28, 2009 12:12 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's a careful balance.
You must have one or the other as your base offense. Trying to be 50/50 doesn’t work, never has, never will. There is no reason we can’t be a pro-style team, but on certain occasions (4 and 1 on the goaline), spread the field and let Jake do what he does best.
"Legends are made on the shores of Lake Washington"
"BOW DOWN TO WASHINGTON"
by Lear Pilot on Oct 28, 2009 3:45 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yep. Important to remember that under DJ, we were primarily a pro-style offense. But he wasn’t afraid to mix in some option football too, especially near the goal line. I fondly remember the full house backfield option offense he installed in the late 80’s when we had a few good running, big FB’s. I’m blanking on the players and which specific years, but it was a T-formation, triple-option formation. But he would also run I-formation option plays throughout his career here.
Point being, you can be primarily a pro-style attack but still mix in some variation to take advantage of specific personnel and game situations.
by kirkd on Oct 28, 2009 4:03 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I had to look it up – James Compton was the FB I was thinking of, so it must’ve been around ‘87-’89 I’m thinking of for that T-formation.
by kirkd on Oct 28, 2009 4:08 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed, but coming off an 0-12er...
You got to use what ever is at your disposal.
Up to this point Jake has been groomed as a wing T or spread QB. That is night and day to the pro style. So why are we seeing a series or two of the spread? Sark is working in progressions with Jake. Jake has been confortable with versions of the spread so why not run some of that stuff. The next few series are pro style and very simplified pro style stuff at that.
We couldn’t send Jake out onto the field cold turkey with the pro style- opposing defenses would burry it right now in it’s fledgling state of being. So we brought in some stuff that Jake feels more confortable in. But don’t fool yourself- the pro style is the future of offensive Husky football. Next season I envision practially all forms of spread disappearing.
The pro/spread thing we are seeing his a phase out portion of what to expect from our Sark-led offense. Be patient…
All I saw was purple
by crazidawg on Oct 29, 2009 9:40 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm not so sure.
I am beginning to think that Sark likes a bit more “open” offense than Carroll. I expect that we will see more 3-4 WR sets, and more shotgun sets than you’d see at USC.
I don’t think the spread sets are going to disappear quite that fast. If Jake leaves, yes they will disappear much more quickly, but Sark is a smart guy, he’s going to use what fits his players best. The occaisional 4-5 WR set can be effective, even with Ronnie or Keith running the offense. But as we’ve discussed before, I do expect the designed QB running plays to drop off significantly.
"Legends are made on the shores of Lake Washington"
"BOW DOWN TO WASHINGTON"
by Lear Pilot on Oct 29, 2009 11:01 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 











