UW Dawg Pound: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
New Blog: The Nova Blog for Villanova Fans!

The Monday Morning Wash

I traditionally hate bye weeks because they take me out of my usual fall schedule which is either flying out West for a game or just watching it on the couch with my wife and our trusty Golden Retriever. This week I feel differently. The one thing that this Washington team needs more than anything is a week off to simply rest and get healthy for the stretch run of the Pac 10 season.

It's time for the team and its fans to take a week off and regain focus on the goal of making it to a bowl game this season. I personally probably need a week off of football too which means that we will probably load up the SUV and head over to Michigan for a little rest and relaxation next to the Western shores of Lake Michigan.

Last second - never should have been - losses to Notre Dame and Arizona State have clouded that picture a bit but Washington will be facing three teams over the final five weeks that lost by a collective score of 118-19 against the very same Oregon team that beat us on Saturday. The first stop after the bye is a road trip to Pasadena, but lets put that off for a few paragraphs while we examine what is going wrong for this team.

The big question going into the bye week is what is wrong with Jake Locker? He certainly wasn't himself against Oregon and it just wasn't their tenacious defense. Can he pull himself back together for what may be the final stretch run of his career at Washington?

Ever since Washington upset USC the talk has been all about Jake being the top QB on the NFL draft board. We all love the potential but the Jake we have seen the last few weeks hasn't been very good. In fact I would rate a number of Pac 10 QB's ahead of him now just based on performance. Locker isn't sure of himself out there right now. The QB who used to play the game like a LB now seems very reluctant to run the ball.

He had a sure TD against Oregon in the first half which would have changed the complexion of the game if he had tucked it in and ran it. Instead he inexplicably tossed the ball away. The drive ended on a fourth down interception in the end zone which allowed the Ducks to start taking control of the game. If Washington gets seven on that series it could have been a different game.

Is that the coaches or is it just Jake? You would think he would have the green light to run the ball if he see's a hole the size of the Grand Canyon which just happened to exist on that play. We all have bought into the theory that Jake needs to be a passer first and a runner second this season if the Huskies are going to get to a bowl game. That being said the biggest weapon the Huskies do have is his ability to run the ball. He only ran it three times against Oregon for nine yards. To me that kind of play calling is just a waste of resources.

Jeremiah Masoli by the way isn't nearly as fast as Jake Locker is. He was wearing a knee brace out there after missing two weeks because of a sprained MCL. MAsoli had no problem running the ball on Saturday and that was a huge factor in the Oregon win. Once the Husky defense couldn't solely focus on LaMichael James it became a different ball game offensively for Oregon. That was a coaching adjustment on Oregon's part that helped open up the game.

Many fans are starting to question the game day ability of this coaching staff. We all know they have potential, enthusiasm, and an incredible work ethic. We are also left sometimes shaking our heads by what is happening out on the field. Coming away with no points from the Oregon two yard line is a real head scratcher.

Another head scratcher is clock management. Last week that aspect of the game cost Washington a victory on the road. This week it happened again in the waning moments of the first half. UW had three time outs before its last series with 1:06 but didn't use any of them. The Huskies still came up with three points to finish the half because of a gift 15 yard penalty on Oregon and a 47 yard Erik Folk FG with one second remaining. You really wonder though why it had to come down to that? Why did Sarkisian let 36 seconds of the clock run out without calling a timeout?

Another coaching problem right now is special teams management. Washington had a punt blocked and returned for a TD which gave Oregon a lead they never relinquished. To make matters worse they faked the PAT and Costa ran uncontested into the end zone for two points because Washington only had ten men on the field. Why not call a time out to get it right?

Later in the first half the Ducks put together the most improbable TD drive of the game. At one point the Huskies had them backed up with sacks to 2nd and 36. The Ducks actually ate up that yardage on the next two plays with some nifty passing and catching to keep the drive going with a first down. What is maddening is Washington ended up stalling the Duck drive again and forced them to kick a FG which would have minimized the damage. Enter Nate Costa who again ran the same darn fake and picked up the first down. If you stop Oregon there like you should do it is a completely different game.

The coaches need the week off to reaccess what they are doing on game day. You can blame whatever you want on the players but the fact is the coaching staff has not done a great job of putting the team in a position to win over the last two weeks. You can even make a good case that it extends all the way back to the Notre Dame game.

What does it take for these guys to figure out that they need a hammer inside the five yard line to score TD's? The one time they were successful yesterday they used Paul Homer as a lead blocker for Chris Polk. Washington has done a poor job this year of using its 240 pound FB in short yardage situations. That has to change during the final stretch of the season. The one back offense isn't going to work at the goal line for this Washington team.

Next up for Washington is UCLA in Pasadena. Even though the Huskies haven't had much luck in Pasadena against the Bruins over the years this is a game they should win. Of course we said that about Arizona State. UCLA is terrible right now and they are not going to get any better between now and the time that we face them in two weeks.

Rick Neuheisel used three QB's against Arizona on Saturday in a desperate move to try to find the a winning combo on offense. It isn't going to happen and a strong defense which keeps them close enough gets more nicked up week by week. UW will end its road losing streak in the Rose Bowl!

After UCLA the Huskies travel to Corvallis to take on OSU who left it all on the field Saturday in a track meet with USC losing 42-36. Washington can score on the Beavers. Most teams in the country can actually score on the Beavers this season but taming that offense may be a pretty tall order for this Washington team. It isn't out of the realm of possibility for Washington to beat these guys but I am not betting on it.

Washington State is the worst team in the Pac 10 and the BCS. We also have them at home. Now you can always say that the record book should be thrown out in the Apple Cup but Washington has way too many pieces for WSU to contend with. Mark this down as an indelible W!

What that should set up in a perfect world after another well deserved bye week is a contest with California at home with bowl eligibility on the line. What exactly will the Bears be playing for at this time of the season? The last place in the world they want to be is in Seattle during December. If Washington is 5-6 when the Bears roll into town they will be playing for a lot more than California. Washington needs to keep their bowl hopes alive until the finale.

In conclusion when Pete Carroll took over at USC everyone laughed. Pete was their fourth or fifth choice and it seemed like he was just another version of Paul Hackett to kick around for a couple more years. Carroll's first USC team opened the 2001 season going 2–5. However after that a slow start he was able to close the season with enough wins to go 6-5 and become become bowl eligible.

Steve Sarkisian is going to be a very good head football coach. Like his mentor Pete Carroll he is going through some growing pains with his team in his first year. What he needs to do is finish strong like Pete did and set the table for an incredible future. The pieces are all in place to do exactly that. Perhaps this bye week will be the launching pad that makes it all a reality.

Around the Pac 10

USC 42 Oregon State 36

Allen Bradford rushed for a career-high 147 yards and two touchdowns as USC avenged its only loss of last season. The USc defense better tighten up quite a bit for next week because Oregon State shredded them for a season high of 482 yards. Sean Canfield passed for 329 yards and a career-best three touchdowns for the Beavers, while Jacquizz Rodgers rushed for 113 yards and a score and also caught a TD pass on an injured ankle. Even though OSU dominated the stats at the end of the game they never had the lead. USC came out early and built a 21-9 lead at the half. Holding the Beavers to three FG's in the first stanza was the difference in the game.

Arizona 27 UCLA 13

Nick Foles threw two touchdown passes to Juron Criner, and Arizona overcame five turnovers to defeat UCLA 27-13 on Saturday and keep pace in the Pac-10 race. Foles had a hand in all of five of Arizona's turnovers. The Pac-10's leading passer threw three interceptions, had a fumble returned for a touchdown and botched a handoff that led to a fumble. Even with the gifts the Bruin defense helped create an inept offense was unable to take advantage of them. UCLA fell to 0-4 in Pac-10 play for the first time since 1994 when the Bruins lost their first five conference games.

Stanford 33 Arizona State 14

Andrew Luck threw for 236 yards, Toby Gerhart ran for 125 yards and a touchdown and Stanford greatly boosted its bowl hopes with a 33-14 victory over Arizona State on Saturday night. the Cardinal built a 24-0 lead at the half and coasted to the victory.

California 49 Washington State 17

Kevin Riley threw for touchdowns on his only three passes of the first quarter, Jahvid Best scored three touchdowns and California routed Washington State 49-17 Saturday. After two dissapointing back to back losses to Oregon and USC the Bears are back on track with a two game winning streak.

Pac 10 Power Ratings

1. Oregon...The Ducks are the best team in the conference right now. Next up is a showdown for what looks to be all the marbles against USC in Autzen Stadium. Can you say College Football Game Day?

2. Southern California...Next weeks game against Oregon will make or break the Trojan's season. If they win they might have enough juice to play for the national championship.

3. Oregon State...The Beavers left it all on the field against USC on Saturday coming back in the second half to take the game to the wire. If they were just a little better on defense the Pac 10 title might have been settled in the Willamette Valley this season. Next up is UCLA at home.

4. Arizona...The Wildcats did what they had to against UCLA and that was simply win the game. Five turnovers however have raised some eyebrows. Next up is a bye that sets the Cats up well for the stretch run.

5. California...Nothing like getting well against a string of patsies like UCLA and WSU. The buffet continues this week against ASU.

6. Stanford... A much needed win over ASU means the Card are only one win away from bowl eligibility.

7. Washington...Last second losses to Notre Dame and ASU haunt this team even thoug a lighter schedule in the last quarter of the season still holds the hope of bowl eligibility. Huskies have the week off then head to UCLA to end the current losing streak.

8. Arizona State...The Sun Devils may not win another game this season which makes last weeks last second win over Washington even more dissapointing to Husky fans.

9. UCLA...The 0-4 Bruins are off to their worst conference start since 1994. Another loss beckons next week against Oregon State on the road.

10. Washington State...If you need a confidence builder the Cougars are the right team to play. Next up is Notre Dame in San Antonio.

Pac 10 Offensive Player of the Week

Oregon's LaMichael James ran for 154 yards on 15 carries and scored two TD's in Oregon's victory over Washington.

Pac 10 Defensive player of the Week

UCLA free safety Rahim Moore, the national interception co-leader, picked off his sixth and seventh passes of the season.

Washington Offensive Player of the Week

Chris Polk had the second 100 yard game of his career against an Oregon defense which has been stifling against the run so far this season. What makes polk even more  impressive is facotring in that he is playing through an injured shoulder and sprained ankle.

Washington Defensive Player of the Week

Safety Nate Fellner served notice that he is going to play quite a bit over the next four years at Washington. He made mistakes and at times was physically overmatched but on a whole it was a very nice debut for the true freshman. A year in the weight room is going to make him a very tough player to dislodge out of the starting lineup.

Quote of the Week

Steve Sarkisian: "We've got to assess what we are doing schematically and from a personnel standpoint, and it's going to be great to have a bye. We are obviously a pretty nicked-up football team right now so the bye couldn't come at a better time to hopefully get our guys back fresh, get our minds fresh, and go into this last quarter of the season with a vengeance and finish strong.''

0 recs  |  Comment 53 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

More from UW Dawg Pound

Grading the game

Dec 2009 by John Berkowitz - 33 comments

Huskies Pound Cal 42-10

Dec 2009 by John Berkowitz - 62 comments

Grading the Game

Nov 2009 by John Berkowitz - 50 comments

Comments

Display:

I couldn't agree more...

It’s been very frustrating watching this team the last 4 weeks with opertunities wasted. The Notre Dame game I chalked up to inexperience of the coaches, but ASU was a complete disaster. It seems like Sark kinda loses focus when it comes to key plays. Jake in shotgun with a run pass option in the red zone seems like a no brainer, not a qb sneak with his frame not having any forward momentum. Having a minute plus with all timeouts in the ASU game and needing 45-50 yards seemed ideal, really not understanding the game management lately. Jake may have his confidence down due to the play calling during these times, not sure. As far as Jake going to the NFL after this year I just don’t see that! I don’t think these Scouts are watching games, many of Jake’s passes are completed by exceptional catches, he needs work on his touch, decision making, game and clock management, and accuracy. Don’t get me wrong, he could be a great NFL quarterback but if he were to go to the NFL next year he will not be successful especially for a bad team.

by DAWGFATHER91 on Oct 26, 2009 8:55 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Potential

It is an extremely down year for eligible college QB’s with the potential to start in an NFL game. That is the number one reason that Jake’s name has been mentioned. In my mind he isn’t even close to being ready to go. In a pro scouts mind though they figure they can coach him up for a year or two on the sidelines as well or better than a college program can.

We all know Jake enjoys being a Husky and a student at the University of Washington. You only get to do that once. He has some money in his pocket from the baseball contract so there isn’t a whole lot of financial pressure on him. I think what he needs to decide in his own mind is if the current staff will give him what he needs to be more succesful in the NFL over the long term if he stays one more year.

I have heard all the arguments about changes in the rookie cap. Those are things to consider but what is most important in the financial success of an NFL QB is the second and third contracts. That is really where all the huge money is.

Jake needs to decide what will realistically get him into that position over time. He knows what he has with the current staff at Washington. The NFL is more of a crap shoot depending on where he gets drafted. Lets just say he ends up in a place like Oakland. That wouldn’t work very well in his favor as far as the future is concerned.

by John Berkowitz on Oct 26, 2009 9:10 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Potential yes..

Agreed, if he went to a team with a solid running game and decent pass protection like Oakland or Tennessee it would be a good fit and i did fail to mention how he’s become an incredibly different qb from the last 2 seasons with the scheme changes anf his ability to adapt as well as be very productive. I guess i might be looking at the issue with purple colored glasses, i just don’t want to start a different qb next year with what would be coming back!

by DAWGFATHER91 on Oct 26, 2009 9:24 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

We need him more than he needs us at this point.

by John Berkowitz on Oct 26, 2009 9:32 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

ASU

… you guys hammered me earlier in the year for not considering “scoreboard” when I argued that UA should be higher in the power rankings than UW. So, how does ASU slip in behind us :)

Seriously, we are at best 8th in the Pac right now and that is debatable until we get on the field with UCLA.

Damn, my eyeball tastes good.

by Gekko Mojo on Oct 26, 2009 9:52 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I don’t remember hammering you.

by John Berkowitz on Oct 26, 2009 9:54 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

that was tongue in cheek.

Damn, my eyeball tastes good.

by Gekko Mojo on Oct 26, 2009 12:23 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

take the money and run

this Washington Husky team is very young and next yeat it gets younger. Take the money and run. The best life available is a million or two a year as a backup in the NFL with the main duties being to sit on the bench and look at game pictures.
Just look at Sam Bradford, loyalty got him nowhere witha freshman offensive line. And now a string of injuries and he may not be drafted at all.
Let’s face it the regular season in football now is stage dressing for the TV and TOP BOWLS to invite their pre selected favorites. Doubt it, watch Taylor Mays, USC, rip off a players helmet after the play is over, NO CALL.
Money is king, there is no sporting fair play left. JAKE we appreciate your loyalty to the Huskies but it is a stacked deck. TAKE THE MONEY AND RUN.

by Purpledawg on Oct 26, 2009 9:52 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

really?

I seriously doubt that Bradford will not get drafted.

by jacobcda on Oct 26, 2009 11:20 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions   0 recs

Bradford

is projected to go in the mid 1st round. Injuries and all.

Also I would highly dispute that the best life available is as a rich backup (paraphrasing). A lot of people, I believe Jake included, really enjoy the life of being a student athlete.

The money isn’t going anywhere, and I doubt Jake is either.

by Bamer_ on Oct 26, 2009 5:32 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Bradford became White

The moment Bradford went down with that devastating shoulder injury, he became the next Jason White. Heismen winner, big time college career- BUST professionally.

Projections are nothing. They’re going to tell you anything you want to hear just to get you motivated to come out. Every scout had mentioned he was too frail and wouldn’t survive a season without serious injury. Bradford looked great with that senior-led offensive line. But once it graduated, Bradford’s frailness came out like every scout thought.

Bradford will be at best drafted in the 5th round or lower. Scouts are going to stay clear of that shoulder. And since he is a spread guy he can’t read defense and hasn’t been taught to read defense. The coaching staff on the sideline read the defense for him and send in the play/audible. College spread QBs are at a disadvantage when it comes to QBing. They might appear they can hit all the routes, but usually they are floated into open routes and appears as if the QB can make the throws. It’s a different game when the pro scouts want you to make the throw in tight coverage and you have a fraction of a second to get it in there.

Bradford’s done … and Tebow will convert to TE or H back.

Best pro QB prospects:

1. Jimmy Clausen
2. Jake Locker
3. Jevan Snead
4. Colt McCoy

All I saw was purple

by crazidawg on Oct 26, 2009 7:07 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I mostly agree, but Jevan Snead? Are you kidding me? I know college stats aren’t the most accurate factor in assessing future pro success, but the guy has completed less than 55% of his passes in his career and thrown 26 picks in 570 attempts. And whereas Jake’s numbers are not much better, he’s shown major improvement this year under Sark in a pro offense, while Snead’s numbers are down this year (just 52.6% completion pct).

The guy has the prototypical physical tools, but his performance is lacking. I think he’ll get drafted in the first 3 rounds, but he needs a lot of work, more than Locker IMO. And while Bradford doesn’t have the same physical tools and has played in a spread offense, his accuracy is not just a product of his system. His accuracy will show through in workouts, enough to offset mediocre arm strength and his injury issues. Maybe not a 1st rounder, but I wouldn’t be surprised to see him picked ahead of Snead.

by kirkd on Oct 26, 2009 7:16 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Snead is having a bad year ...

…but I suspect will still go pretty high in the draft.

Damn, my eyeball tastes good.

by Gekko Mojo on Oct 26, 2009 8:31 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Snead needs QB coaching

The guy can play in a pro style. But he plays for Ole Miss and the reverend. Nutt is not the sort of coach that puts out potential pro QBs. But don’t kid yourself, Snead has the tools to play pro ball- he just needs to get away from SEC coaching, where grooming pro QBs is not a high priority.

All I saw was purple

by crazidawg on Oct 27, 2009 5:12 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree Snead has the tools, but a lot of guys have had the tools but weren’t refined. Stanback has all of the physical gifts that Jake does, but he wasn’t as refined as Jake has become with Sark’s coaching. Jake still has a ways to go, but he’s a lot farther ahead than Isaiah was when he graduated.

No doubt an NFL team will draft Snead (and probably in the first 3-4 rounds) and hope they can refine him. I’m just saying his low completion percentage is a red flag that he still needs a lot of work, and thus pushes down his value.

by kirkd on Oct 27, 2009 6:50 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Stanback didn’t have a big league arm. Nor does Tebow, nor does Bradford, and I have my doubts about McCoy.

To play at the next level you can’t hide your inability to make big throws. You either do it or you don’t- it’s that simple. You’ve got to have a John Elway arm and if you don’t then you can call it a career. Name recognition will get you drafted if you are an elite athlete. But at QB- if you aint got it you don’t play and the pros won’t waste their time with you.

All I saw was purple

by crazidawg on Oct 29, 2009 10:23 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I beg to differ on Stanback – he had a very strong arm. His issues were his lack of experience in pro-style offenses, not a whole lot of refinement in his throwing mechanics and a late start on taking film study seriously. With 4-5 years of coaching by Sark & Nussmeier, Stanback could’ve been a pretty good NFL QB.

And no, you don’t need John Elway arm strength to succeed at QB in the NFL. Joe Montana didn’t have the strongest arm in the world. Steve Young didn’t have Elway’s arm strength. I don’t think Peyton Manning has Elway’s arm strength (though he’s got enough arm). Matt Hasselbeck certainly doesn’t have the strongest arm.

by kirkd on Oct 29, 2009 11:54 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I've got to go with kirk on this one.

Stanback had a cannon for an arm, remember the hail mary in the Arizona game, it traveled a good 70 yards in the air. Stanback lacked refinement, had he played under Sark (or any other true QB coach), he could have been a pretty good NFL QB.

Having big league arm is step one, step two is being able to connect on the really long throws.

"Legends are made on the shores of Lake Washington"
"BOW DOWN TO WASHINGTON"

by Lear Pilot on Oct 29, 2009 9:10 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Jason White was not a bust

Nobody ever expected him to be an NFL QB. He went undrafted. He didn’t have the tools that Bradford does.

If you think Bradford goes in the 5th round or lower, well, then I respect your right to have wrong opinions.

by thecassino on Oct 26, 2009 7:32 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Right on.

It was well known that White would not have a future in the NFL. Even Josh Heupel was highly suspect coming out of college, if memory serves he was a low round draft choice because nobody expected him to have NFL success. You can’t be a “bust” if nobody was expecting success.

Bradford is different, he has the tools, the only question will be the injury. Could he be a bust? Of course, but only because he has an above average chance at NFL success.

"Legends are made on the shores of Lake Washington"
"BOW DOWN TO WASHINGTON"

by Lear Pilot on Oct 26, 2009 7:50 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

College accuracy is apples and oranges to pro accuracy

Bradford can hit wide open targets down field, I agree. But can he hit a receiver across the field 20 yards down field with a nasty defensive back on his ass and connect? We haven’t seen Bradford do this in his entire college career yet. Clausen and Locker can…

And I didn’t expect much from White. I used his name to illustrate my point. Bradford won the Heismen because he had all the time in the world to find guys open on “safe” spread routes. Once that O line graduated, what has Bradford done other then sustain major shoulder injury? Bradford will get drafted, but he’s a No. 2 all the way.

All I saw was purple

by crazidawg on Oct 27, 2009 5:20 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Jake is not ready

but since when did that matter? There are countless cases of unprepared potential heading off to the NFL. There are nearly as many cases of guys who are never heard from again. If Jake leaves, I think there is a good chance he will not get the great coaching everyone thinks is available. Instead, there will be huge pressure to play him because of the money. He will be on a crummy team, that will likely stay that way, because in the NFL, the good teams stay good for the most part, and the bad ones keep wasting their draft picks and firing their coaches. Goodbye Jake, I hope we still know your name in ten years as something other than a “What coulda been.”
I think we will know very soon what type of coach we have. The game management needs to improve. If Sark takes steps to improve that over the next few games, or perhaps by next fall, we are blessed. If it continues to be a problem, it wont matter how well he recruits, practices, or sells the program, they will continue to loose games they should not loose. When he was hired, a number of SoCal posters complained about this very issue. Hopefully, he will learn, listen, consult etc. and come up with a way that works for him. It would be a shame if game and clock management turns out to be his achilles heel.

by OlyDawgFan on Oct 26, 2009 10:15 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

After fielding that mess on Saturday the whole staff desreves a TON of harsh criticism. Everyone in my living room knew that was going to be a fake FG. And how many times has Oregon run that 2pt/PAT play? Inexcusable.

However, I too still believe that Sark could be a special coach. I will defend his playcalling at ND to the end. There were multiple TDs left on that goaline due to excecution and poor decisions by Locker. Yes, that reflects back on the staff, but at least the calls were enough to succeed IMO. ASU was an interesting game because I think the D played an improved game up until the last play. I also thought the playcalling was great until the last drive.

In the end I think Oregon was the best offensive team we’ve played so far given the injury list when we played USC. Didn’t help that we we’re outcoached to such a degree.

by DawgBreath96 on Oct 26, 2009 10:22 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Constructive Criticism

What they need is some positive contructive criticism. There is quite a difference if you know what I mean.

I think this staff may be their own harshest critics.

I have full faith that they will learn from the listakes and continue to improve.

by John Berkowitz on Oct 26, 2009 12:52 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

My wife called it too...

…and I’m thinking, “therefore it ain’t happenin’!” You know it’s like when you call it, therefore NOT gonna happen! Lo and behold it did! I did however see the complete logic of them going for it. The worse thing that happens is you give the ball back on the 6 yard line. You already have a nice lead and if you DO get it you really drive the preverbial nail in the coffin!

by doubledeucedawg on Oct 26, 2009 7:02 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I had a strong hunch Oregon would call a fake on that FG attempt. The field position, the yardage needed, the momentum Oregon had – it just seemed ripe for a fake, and sure enough that’s what they did.

by kirkd on Oct 26, 2009 7:17 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Jake looks hurt

I was at the game saturday and have watched all the away games, and it seems to me that Jake has been noticeably limping the last two games. Against Oregon, he could not get to the corner against two Oregon defenders when he normally would have, and had to cut back to try to score.
I think Jake one or both ankles sprained and it has really affected his mobility and decision-making to run, because he knows he can’t outrun anybody right now. Hopefully the bye week will allow him to heal and he can get back to making runs like he did against Arizona.

by Carne Guisada on Oct 26, 2009 10:30 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

What I am hearing is bruised quad muscle and a sore back was bothering him. I have had a bruised quad and he just may not have too mobile…that would explain a few things.

People need to remember that Jake has NFL talent but he is also learning a new system after not getting much in the way of coaching his first three years. There will be days like this.

by John Berkowitz on Oct 26, 2009 12:54 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

"They destroyed us on special teams," said head coach Steve Sarkisian.

It was more than just the special teams. The Huskies got beat in all phases of the game including coaching. Also, another game of questionable game calling calling on both sides of the line scrimmage.

This kind of game is what you expect to see in the first game of the year for a new head coach at a BCS school, not in the eighth game of the year.

Jake Locker was absolutely horrible in his play against the Ducks. He only ran three times for nine yards, was sacked 4 times and rushed for a -16 yards. Locker was 20-for-40 for 234 yards, no touchdowns and two interceptions.

Numerous times Locker could of have taken off running with the field wide open but decided to throw into coverage. Locker is a big play type of player, but it seems like Sarkisian might have taken it out of him.

by bigdawgdaddy999 on Oct 26, 2009 11:24 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Following up on Your Quote Week...JB

With this coming week being a bye for Washington, Steve Sarkisian and Nick Holt need to get there proverbial heads on straight and refocus where the the Washington Huskies are going.

I am a Husky Fan and I bleed Purple and Gold, I do understand about the growing pains, but to be totally embarrassed and blown out by your most hated rival on your home field, is a hard pill to swallow

by bigdawgdaddy999 on Oct 26, 2009 11:38 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Oregon is good....very good

If the Ducks win next week they could possibly set themselves up for the BCS championship game. Folks need to remember that we lost to probably the best opponent we have played this season last Saturday. Just because we hate the Ducks doesn’t change that.

by John Berkowitz on Oct 26, 2009 12:56 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I’m not yet convinced. I think the Ducks are very good, but they need to knock off USC and take care of business with Arizona and Oregon State. They can do it, but I also wouldn’t be surprised by a Duck loss to any of those teams.

by kirkd on Oct 26, 2009 1:10 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

They're tough

but I don’t think they’ll get by both USC & OSU. OSU, as always, just keeps getting better as the season progresses.

by Bamer_ on Oct 26, 2009 5:36 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Don’t sleep on Arizona. With Foles, I think they’re capable of hanging with Oregon, especially if they get healthier at RB and get back Grigsby and/or Antolin.

by kirkd on Oct 26, 2009 7:18 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Arizona's schedue is brutal

… WSU, @Cal, @ASU, Oregon, @USC …maybe not in that order, but I think I have it right. I can’t believe that Ariz goes any better than 2-3 the rest of the way and going into ASU or a rivalry game is a big “if”. In fact, if UW goes 3-1 the rest of the way, they are going to end up in a better bowl than Arizona.

Damn, my eyeball tastes good.

by Gekko Mojo on Oct 26, 2009 8:34 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Let me clarify – I’m not saying I think it’s likely that Arizona challenges Oregon (or USC) for the conference title. I’m just saying I think they’re good enough that they have a reasonable shot at beating Oregon. I highly doubt Arizona gets more than 3 wins the rest of the way (WSU for sure, ASU likely), but they are one of the top 4 teams in the league IMO.

by kirkd on Oct 26, 2009 9:01 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Also, Arizona gets Oregon at home…

by kirkd on Oct 26, 2009 9:02 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't like UA going into ASU in a rivalry game against their D-line...

… but I’ll go out on a ledge and say they will one of Oregon or ASU.

Damn, my eyeball tastes good.

by Gekko Mojo on Oct 26, 2009 9:13 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

ASU is not a very good team. Their defense is obviously pretty good, but so is Arizona’s offense. And ASU’s offense is terrible. Sure, it’s a rivalry game, but on paper Arizona should win that game by 2 TD’s.

by kirkd on Oct 26, 2009 9:30 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thank you johnb

for calling out the coaching staff on everything I feel can be corrected. I love Sark, but he needs to get his and his stafff act together quickly. He needs to sit down and think through various situations and have a plan and decision already made before it happens. Various yardage situations, time remaining, time outs left, field position etc. Honestly sometimes I think he is just winging it with a gunfigther mentality based on his days with Pete, but he doesn’t have the horses, YET. He also needs to reasses whom of his coaches can call a time out. When you only have 10 on the field, or your D is in great confusion, use one to regroup.
        I have not conceded the bowl yet, it just looks harder to do. UCLA worries me only for 2 reasons, our history there of being snake bit and RN, who showed last year how he loves to shove it to the UW. I have not felt this confident of a victory there since 1999, when coming off a stirring victory at UA, and facing UCLA very patched up OL, did a face palnt and we lost in OT when Tui fumbled. We also had another excellent chance to win in 2007, when UCLA started the second half with their 4th string walk on QB due to injuries to the other QBs, but our genius of a HC and DC decided to play soft and not stack the box to stuff the run against said 4th string QB walk on. Still the biggest idiot coaching in the last 3 years. Ore St will be the hard one. I like our chances with WSU, and I think Cal will not want to play on a very cool day in Dec. Jahvid best will be saving himself for the NFL draft.
         Like you said earlier, we can win out or lose out. This team and staff need to get the juices flowing again. I really did think they let Ty give the halftime speech to the team against the ducks. flat flat blase. Lastly, I think many of those pushing JL asa #1, have only watched the highlights. I believe JL will come back as he knows he needs to get better on his management, deep ball accuracy, decision making, looking off WRs, and still more touch esp on screens, they have been horrible. Where he will get that instruction will be from Sark, Nuss and Dougherty. IF he leaves, he will become the next David Carr.

by prrbrr on Oct 26, 2009 11:44 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I don't believe...

…you can compare what Sark inherited vs Carroll. Carroll had more talent to work with.

by doubledeucedawg on Oct 26, 2009 7:04 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Never said Sark inherited as much as Pete

What I said is Sark is a protege of Norm Chow and Pete C and thus gambles a lot on plays. Look how often Pete goes for it , but he has the horses to do it. I think Sark learned that mentality of going all out, but he needs to look at the horses he has in our stable. In a few years when he gets better talent in here, he can be more succesful on those plays.

by prrbrr on Oct 26, 2009 8:54 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

If Jake leaves he becomes the next Brock Huard.

by John Berkowitz on Oct 26, 2009 12:57 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

That’s a Joey Lawrence style…… WHOA!

by DAWGFATHER91 on Oct 26, 2009 2:39 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Very good comparison.

"Legends are made on the shores of Lake Washington"
"BOW DOWN TO WASHINGTON"

by Lear Pilot on Oct 26, 2009 6:14 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Brock was a statue, JL can run to protect himself a little better

but I agree with you , if he leaves early he will have a similar career to Brock success wise. At least we know he won’t be a Ryan Leaf.

by prrbrr on Oct 26, 2009 8:57 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Jake & Future QBs

I live in Bellingham and have followed Jake’s career since he was a sophomore in high school. I don’t know him or any of his family, but I just get the impression that he’s the kind of kid who’ll finish what he started at the UW. Apparently he has been playing with an injury and I think the bye will do him and all the rest of the team and coaches a lot of good. Also, we’ve got to remember that he already has a baseball contract, so he isn’t in any kind of bind for the start of a financial future in sports. In any event, if he does leave early, I have been saying for quite a while that Keith Price is an exceptional player, and I think we would see him as the starting QB next year.
I still have hopes for these guys. They have been through a lot over the last couple of years, and I won’t surprise me at all to see them in the Poinsettia Bowl.

Mush you Huskies!!! GO DAWGS!!!

Expect to Win!!!

by OLDDOG on Oct 26, 2009 4:30 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Bowl Game

Possible but it has to start at Ucla!

by doubledeucedawg on Oct 26, 2009 7:06 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I think Sark has proven to be an excellent hire by the UW, and hope he’s with us a long time. However, my feeling is that he is having difficulty during the games when it comes to being both the head coach and offensive coordinator. By needing to concentrate on what plays are going to be run, he loses track of time management and the overall feel and flow of the game.

by NeuroDawg on Oct 27, 2009 10:37 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I think that’s probably true. He needs to re-think his process, and perhaps offload some responsibility to his assistants to help him manage the game flow, as well as take a page out of DJ’s book and think about game situations ahead of time before each season and make rational, sober decisions at that time rather than emotional, from the hip decisions in the heat of the moment.

by kirkd on Oct 27, 2009 1:36 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Shouldn't...

…Cozzetto and Nussmeier be helping him with that?

by doubledeucedawg on Oct 28, 2009 5:52 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the UW Dawg Pound an unnoffical site for Washington Husky sports fans.
Start posting about the Huskies »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Olympiabeer_small
See you in 2011, Masoli. Well, maybe. Thoughts on Masoli's suspension and Sark.
Jeff_mug_h2_small
SB Nation's Pac-10 Tournament Preview
Jeff_mug_h2_small
VOTE on SB Nation's Pac-10 all-conference awards!
Small
UW makes best in the west rankings
Small
Donald Butler
Olympiabeer_small
Hey Quacks, it isn't just us in the PNW that are seeing your program as outlaw...
Learjet31a_1_jpg_small
Another Oregon player in trouble. . . .
Bigpanda_small
Huskies Impressive on Gameday
Small
walk-on QB Taylor Bean leaves the program
Learjet31a_1_jpg_small
The Blind Side

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SBNation.com Recent Stories

Duke students cheer prior to Duke's matchup with North Carolina in an NCAA college basketball game in Durham, N.C., Saturday, March 6, 2010. (AP Photo/Gerry Broome)

Bracketology FAIL: How The NCAA Tournament Selection Committee Botched The Field

Iowa coach Todd Lickliter calls to his team from the sidelines in the first half against Illinois in an NCAA college basketball game Tuesday, Jan. 5, 2010, in Champaign, Ill. (AP Photo/Heather Coit) +1 updates

Iowa Makes It Official: Fires Todd Lickliter As Basketball Coach

Charlotte coach Bobby Lutz directs his team during the second half of an NCAA National Invitation Tournament Tip-off second round college basketball game against Duke in Durham, N.C., Tuesday, Nov. 17, 2009. Duke won 101-59. (AP Photo/Gerry Broome)

Charlotte Fires Coach Bobby Lutz Following 49ers' Late-Season Meltdown

More from SBNation.com >


Managers

1959_huskies_small John Berkowitz

Dubs_small thecassino

Official Partner of CBS Sports