More empty excuses from Willingham
Saturday's loss to Washington State in the Apple Cup was perhaps the bitterest loss in Tyrone Willingham's four year tenure at Washington. The Huskies outplayed the Cougars nearly the entire game but missed three field goal attempts and ended up losing to what was until yesterday the worst team in college football. Now the University of Washington owns that title for the first time in a history that stretches over 100 seasons.
Art Thiel of the Seattle PI had this comment.
Losing this game means the Huskies are last in everything: Last in the conference, last in the college football nation, last in all statistics.
Willingham refused to take sole responsibility for it after the game.
"Obviously, if you're the head coach at this time, you take responsibility for what's going on," he said. "But it should also be noted, the day that I arrived, what the state of the program was. I take responsibility for where we're at, but there's also a process."
What Willingham is trying to say is that the program was in such a shambles when he arrived that he needed more than four years to clean it all up. That doesn't adequately explain why four years later with most of his own players on the roster his current team is 0-11.
Later he was asked if he would definitely be on the sideline for the Cal game.
Willingham stared at the questioner without giving a response, then after a follow-up said "I think it's a bad question.'' Willingham then said "you should stop asking the question'' and said he would have the ''same answer'' every week.
Willingham needed to step completely down for the good of the program after the USC game and he didn't do it. That was really the only thing that was going to give this team a chance to win a football game this season. So what we get is one more week of uninspired football before a potential savior is named to rescue the football program.
The most debated call of the game was Willingham's decision to punt on fourth-and-three with the ball at the WSU 36 and 1:04 left in the game. Willingham thought it was better to try to make WSU go the length of the field then trying to run the ball for three yards and just end the game right there. UW punted the ball into the end zone which meant a net gain of only 16 yards.
One UW player, RB Terrance Dailey, questioned it afterward.
"We were going to run a stretch to the right. It's a three-yard stretch in open field and I really thought I could get it. Coach just wanted to be safe and punt it, but I don't know, we might have been able to get
that.''
That play call really sums up the entire game and Willingham's tenure at Washington. He wasn't playing to win. He was playing not to lose. You don't win football games doing that. Washington built a ten point lead at the half and played tentatively the entire second half. Willingham has become completely gutless and it showed on that play call.
Willingham had this excuse.
"Well initally we thought we might go for it and then I thought we made the right decision to go and punt the ball and giving them the field to go. They had not had that much success all day driving the football. We had been in control most of the day so you figure you that you give yourself the best chance to win by making them go as far as possible to make a play and we gave up a big one and didn't allow ourselves to do it.''
Willingham had these comments concerning the long pass that broke the teams back in the fourth quarter allowing WSU to tie the game and send it to overtime.
“We just didn’t track the ball. We let them get behind us and that’s a situation you can’t let happen.” He added, “It was the right defense.”
It may have been the right defense but one of the players that was in there was injured only a few plays before and shouldn't have been in the game. Quinton Richardson was thrown under the bus by Willingham who had this to say about him on the play.
"I don't know what was going through the young man's head on that play."
Well coach you are the guy who has been coaching him for two years. Perhaps you should know what it is going through his head.
Willingham was asked what words he had for his 0-11 team after losing to the worst football team in the country.
"Let's go home."
Let's go home?
Encouraging words from the supposed molder of men.
There is only one more game left in this season gone wrong. Hopefully Scott Woodward will give us a break and pull the plug on Willingham and send him in to retirement early before the California game.
One can only hope.
17 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Sorry....ooops
Sorry guys deleted the post by mistake when I was self deleting a comment. Once again sorry about that because it took some good comments with it.
Will Ty ever accept responsibility
for the mess he’s created?
How will his blaming RN and Gilby for leaving him a mess sit with other coaches?
Four years is plenty of time to turn things around and one hellova lot more time than you would get in the real world.
Jack
I hate TY!!!!!!
Bye Bye Ty…I cannot wait for the Cal game to end.
Leach losing to Oklahoma may be a good thing. He will be available earlier.
I thought we werent going to go the Asst Route for a new coach…obviously we know nothing!
My list has been refined after this weekend...
1. Leach – tough loss but i loved that he went for it on 4th down twice in the first half…though the one at the 50 yd line was a little crazy, its nice to see a coach with some brass and trusting his offense.
2. Mora – Again only because everybody else loves him so i will half heartedly join your band wagon, but will jump off at the first sign of trouble.
3. Brian Kelly – He can FLAT OUT COACH. He has gone through 5…yes, 5 QB’s this year and is one win away from the Orange Bowl. Do you think Locker could use a QB coach like that???
4. Whittingham – Utah is going bowling big time this year. He showed he can coach and might be wiling to leave after a very successful year.
5. Petersen – Boise State is year in and year out some how right in the BCS mix and ranked top 25 with less than stellar recruiting classes. I still worry that Oregon is his dream job and he might jump ship.
6. Kiffin – Dark Horse…i do not blame him for the Raiders fall and he is a great recruiter. Not a bad OC at USC either but how much of that was the sheer talent he had at his disposal. I do love USC’s offense schemes though.’
7. Christensen – UW alum and has helped put together a pretty good offense in Missouri. His scheme could fit well with the players we have in place.
Anybody have any others to add, just let me know or if you disagree with the above i am sure i will hear about it…
guys - really - the Ty horse is very dead. AsWill Smith says "holding on to hate will consume you, too"
as for the list … I’m surprised Franchione is not on Big Dave’s list. I think that we need to get used to the notion of debating him. In addition, I still like Tedford at the top. cl
"Greed is Good."
So is Rudy.
Sorry Gekko, as long as he's on the sideline, he's not dead
Any and everybody has every right to say anything they want about Ty’s performance, it was that bad.
Why should we get used to the idea of Franchione? Because one website calls him a leading candidate? Get real, after the newsletter scandal, he’s not coming to Washington, it would be suicide.
I like Dave’s list, but I’d replace Kiffin with Tedford, and unfortunately if we really did offer the job to Muschamp, we better take Mora off the list.
"Bow Down to Washington"
"Kick the tires and light the fires!"
At least one question was answered
and that was my quandary for a long time. That is was it the coaches or was it Ty? Looks like Lappano called for the run to try and get the first down and win the game, but was overruled. I am guessing some of the other calls in the past were more of the same such as Hawaii, AZ last year, and getting real conservative on the last offensive series against WSU. Maybe I need to apologize to Kent Baer and Lappano for past debacles.
Exactly prrbrr
What is the common denominator in these long time coaches suddenly appearing to have lost it?
TYRONE, as long as that idiot is still on the Husky sideline he IS fair game
Blaming other coaches for a share of his mess is BS…it wasn’t any of those guys that took forever to name a staff, didn’t get out busting his butt recruiting, that is all on Ty
John,
A quick question. Did you hear the one of the FSN commentators (don’t know which one) on Saturday say that he saw an out of work head coach walking through the Seattle airport when he was travelling to Pullman? He wouldn’t say who he saw, just that he saw him. Any ideas who it was, and was he in Seattle interviewing?
Franchione?
I amnot sure if that is who it was. I can’t imagine them hirin someone with that much baggage.
by John Berkowitz on Nov 24, 2008 12:49 PM PST up reply actions
Current Coaches
I have wondered for some time about that one. There are some experienced, quality guys on that staff. Hart, Tormey etc. Have they forgotten how to coach, or are they hamstringed by the HC? I tend to think the latter is closer to it. They have not had much to work with this year, but the lack of fire and emotion is a deliberate move by TW. It wont happen, but it would be very interesting to see what a new HC with most of the current staff would do. Most likely, they would show marked improvement almost immediately. I would have loved to see Tormey run the team after Ty was dumped. I think it would have been night and day over what we actually got.
i guess my point is that if one of the two regulation missed FGs go in
… no one would be giving Ty credit for “managing the game” because we are all still so eager to lynch him. Its a double standard that I understand given how horrible this year has been … but has become very monotonous.
Execution matters a little bit in all of this. I’m not sure how you can really blame Ty for two missed FGs … but I’m sure one of you will educate me. I know this will not surprise you, but I was one of those that turned to my buddies during the game and said “I hope they don’t try something stupid like going for it” on that fourth down. The truth was that the Cougar D had had much more success against our running game in the fourth quarter and that our D was stuffing Lopina and shutting down the air attack. Their prospect was to go at least 50 yds with less than a minute with no timeouts when they had not managed to move the ball all day. A coach “playing to win” has to play the probabilities that give him the best chance to win and I think, in that case, it was the right call.
I do agree that his post game comments were shameful. While I wouldn’t characterize it as throwing someone under the bus, he continues to fail to take responsibility in a contrite fashion.
As for continuing to harp on Ty – I, for one, quit worrying about this season and about Ty after Stanford. Its the only thing that makes the weekends bearable.
"Greed is Good."
So is Rudy.
Sorry Gekko but...
if UW beats WSU by only three points, to me, it is still a mismanaged game and mismanaged team. Let’s remember that the closest WSU came to any other D-1 opponent was 25 points. They are terrible and have far less raw tallent than Ty has had yet Ty still found a way to lose. Beating WSU by three, while being a win, is still a horrible coaching job against such a bad opponent.
don't disagree ...
… I was only specifically talking about the decision to punt which I did not find all that misguided. I would concur, however, that when I looked at the halftime score of 10-0, I couldn’t help but to ask myself why the conservative game plan given the situation. Why not just let it loose and let the kids play full out? Obviously, Ty has lost faith in his own players (thus the ultra conservative game plan) which is probably the worst crime he has committed.
"Greed is Good."
So is Rudy.
I also think it is funny that there is some belief here that the staff is somehow not responsible for this mess
… after all, they clearly do not communicate with their squads without the HC’s approval, they don’t recruit at all, and they have no influence over gameplans and play calling.
right.
They are culpable and a clean sweep is warranted.
"Greed is Good."
So is Rudy.

by 














