Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Two Minutes Of Thunder Basketball Wins The Game

Big play Beavers too much for Washington

Washington actually looked a lot better yesterday on both sides of the ball despite losing to Oregon State 34-13.

The Huskies had their first 100 yard rushing game by a running back this season. Terrance Dailey showed that he has a lot of talent and the coaches were correct in playing him the second half of the season. He simply is better than Brandon Johnson and Willie Griffin at this point.

D'Andre Goodwin had his best day catching the ball during his Husky career. he finished with five catches for 136 yards and a long of 48. Devin Aguilar added five catches for 73 yards and a had a couple of very nice punt returns for positive yardage.

Ronnie Fouch despite four turnovers had a nice touch on most of his passes yesterday going 17 / 32 for 276 yards. Three interceptions and a fumble took a bit of the luster off the performance but the RS frosh showed a lot of improvement in his second start.

His offensive line didn't give him a lot of help last night. He was constantly hurried throughout the evening and the fact that he was only sacked once was a miracle. Overall the Husky offense was able to gain 377 yards in total offense which is usually enough to win a football game if you don't turnover the ball four times.

What hurt the Husky offense were turnovers and a lack of efficiency in the red zone. UW only punted once yesterday but they only put 13 points on the scoreboard. I am not going to hang all the turnovers on Ronnie Fouch. The offensive line simply had him running for his life most of the night in desperation trying to make something happen.

Lack of performance in the red zone cost UW 13-20 points on two missed FG's and the failure to run it in to the end zone from the one yard line on four straight plays in the fourth quarter. UW also was stalled by a couple of interceptions in the end zone. If you put those 13-20 points on the board you have a completely different ball game with UW in it till the end of the game.

Washington Drive Summaries
START QTR POSS. YRDL PLAYS YARDS RESULT
15:00 1 02:33 UW 31 3 -15 Punt
09:25 1 04:31 UW 6 8 66 Field Goal Good
02:23 1 01:33 UW 33 3 -9 Interception
14:09 2 02:56 UW 35 7 16 Fumble
08:43 2 05:15 UW 19 11 58 Field Goal Missed
01:25 2 01:00 UW 26 6 47 Field Goal Good
08:29 3 04:30 UW 32 9 46 Field Goal Missed
02:27 3 02:10 UW 48 4 22 Interception
12:52 4 00:53 UW 27 3 73 Rushing Touchdown
05:20 4 03:27 UW 32 9 67 Turnover on Downs
01:12 4 00:11 UW 41 1 0 Interception

Defensively Washington looked a little better than they had the last two games but the story of the game was the old fly sweep to WR James Rodgers. Rodgers finished with 110 yards rushing on three carries and scored on runs of 55 and 52 yards. He also caught three passes for 53 yards and one score, and had another 53 yards on kick returns.

Jacquizz Rodgers did his part too, adding 94 yards on 20 carries and a 1-yard touchdown early in the second half but UW had him contained for most of the evening. Most of his yards were gained in the second half while running down the clock after the game was out of hand.

Oregon State quarterback Lyle Moevao had the most efficient passing day of his career, completing 18 of 22 passes for 191 yards. He had just one incompletion in the first half.

The big plays to James Rodgers are what killed Washington last night. You eliminate those three plays and combine it with better performance in the red zone and you have a close football game.

Overall even though there are some moral victories you can take from this one Washington simply wasn't very competitive. It is going to be very tough for this football team to win more than one game this season.

The big worry going in was whether the Washington players would quit once they fell behind. The team kept scrapping till the last play and you have to acknowledge that. They all know the season is over and the coaching staff is going to be fired. You have to give the kids some credit for continuing to fight under those circumstances.

Comment 20 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Dangerous Play Calling

Was anybody else really nervous about Fouch getting hurt on the last series?

2 minutes to go in the 4th quarter, down by 21, and 2 out of 4 plays Fouch takes big hits while trying to score. I’m all for trying hard, not giving up, I like a guy will to sacrafice his body for the team. But down by 21 with 2 minutes to go, why risk getting Fouch hurt? Hand it off the the fullback four times, don’t risk injury to your only healthy QB that’s game ready! What’s the worst that can happen, you dont score? Ooops, we didn’t.

Could you imagine the outrage today if Fouch had got hurt on that last drive?

"Bow Down to Washington"
"Kick the tires and light the fires!"

by Lear Pilot on Oct 19, 2008 12:36 PM PDT reply actions  

Agree with your assessment

I think what you are seeing is the gradual maturation of what will one day be the foundation of a pretty good team. They are so young in so many places that it takes quite a while to get anywhere useful. I have said many times before, the new coach, whoever he is, is going to look pretty good next year, and even better in two years.

I cannot wait for this dreadful season, and this depressing time in Husky history to be over and new attitudes to take hold.

by OlyDawgFan on Oct 19, 2008 12:37 PM PDT reply actions  

Amazed

Frankly, I am amazed he did not get killed several times. OSU beat him up pretty good. Kind of like the Dawgs used to do to people.

by OlyDawgFan on Oct 19, 2008 12:39 PM PDT reply actions  

Fouch

I thought the play calling became very questionable inside the red zone. I have really lost faith in Lappano’s ability to call game.

Exposing Fouch to more contact than necessary is stupid.

by John Berkowitz on Oct 19, 2008 12:48 PM PDT reply actions  

Especially when the game is out of Reach!

"Bow Down to Washington"
"Kick the tires and light the fires!"

by Lear Pilot on Oct 19, 2008 12:52 PM PDT up reply actions  

I really liked Lappono's play calling

the first two years but last year was a little suspect and this year has been horendous. I don’t think he has done a good job of utalizing the talent we have.

by Snostrebla on Oct 19, 2008 12:57 PM PDT reply actions  

I am setting myself up but....

does anybody else think that Fouch is a better overall QB than Locker? I know that Locker adds the extra athletic dimension but Fouch seems like a lot better passer. Besides 4 turnovers (that will change with experience) his numbers seemed very good. Team (statistically speaking) played a good game…100 yard rusher, 100 yard wr, Fouch’s completion percentage wasn’t great but 275+ yards in only his 2 start. I am going out on a limb here and saying that Fouch will get very serious consideration in the spring or at least when Locker returns this year. I don’t know, just talking out loud…

by bigdave967 on Oct 20, 2008 6:27 AM PDT reply actions  

I can see why you'd say that ...

… but look at how stalled our Offense has been since he took over. We were able to somewhat move the ball with him in there. We were leading the league in third down conversions with Locker and now we convert less than 20%. What Fouch does better than Locker is stay in the pocket a little longer in order to let deep plays develop. Fouch also is fearless in just letting it go (thus the turnovers). Jake is much more selective in the passing game, less willing to take risks.

Fouch is a good back up to have. But Jake is clearly the better all around weapon and has the potential to be special. We need him back in there.

Shake that hand that shook the hand of Hustlin' Hugh

by Minny C on Oct 20, 2008 7:10 AM PDT reply actions  

Jake

Jake is the better QB. The only thing that Fouch does better than Jake is the long ball. Fouch is a very good back up, and will be a great QB when Jake graduates. But Jake’s athletic ability keeps the defense honest and gives them so much more to worry about on each and every play.

"Bow Down to Washington"
"Kick the tires and light the fires!"

by Lear Pilot on Oct 20, 2008 8:20 AM PDT reply actions  

I'll chime in to agree

Ronnie has thrown a few nice passes but hypothetical healthy Jake is still the better QB today. Give Ronnie a few more games under center and I expect he’ll close the gap a little bit; he still doesn’t look 100% comfortable standing in the pocket yet. Looks like a redshirt freshman QB, albeit one with talent and a promising career ahead.

I also get the sense that the receivers are growing up on a game-to-game basis. Factor in the slightly-reduced talent of the last couple secondaries (compared to Oregon/Oklahoma) and I think if Jake stepped back in right now, he’d look better as a passer than he did earlier in the season, just due to those factors.

by busplunger on Oct 20, 2008 1:22 PM PDT up reply actions  

Maybe but...

when will we see this? When I watch Locker I see over thrown balls that are rifled in there with zero touch. I see a QB who is quick to run (O-Line doesnt help) and is injury prone. He is a stellar athlete who keeps Def honest but they rely way to much on his legs…it seems that teams don’t even worry about the pass with him in the game. Like i said i knew i was setting myself up but I am not a big fan of the spread option to begin with so that has a lot to do with it. I love single back offenses that rely less on QB running the ball but still allow to have mulitple WR sets. If we infused the spread option with more single back for Fouch, i think we could really see the offense open up…In my own opinion

by bigdave967 on Oct 20, 2008 9:00 AM PDT reply actions  

Spread Option

I must admit, I’m in love with the spread option. It sure makes an exciting game. I think our coaches either haven’t fully committed to it, or don’t fully know how to run it.

I think people fixate on the over throws, and forget how he does on the short to medium range throws. I think the coaches have failed Jake. By now they should have taught him more touch, and they should have done a better job teaching the offensive system to the team. I really hope he hits it off well with the new staff, and they both suceed greatly.

"Bow Down to Washington"
"Kick the tires and light the fires!"

by Lear Pilot on Oct 20, 2008 9:14 AM PDT reply actions  

Spread Option

I think it’s time will come and go before UW masters it.

by John Berkowitz on Oct 20, 2008 9:34 AM PDT reply actions  

I think you're right

I watched a bit of the Northwestern/Purdue game and instantly recognized what a “real” spread offense is supposed to look like. Northwestern takes pedestrian talent at most positions (RB Tyrell Sutton is awesome, though) spreads Purdue’s defense all over the field, and then takes advantage of mismatches with conservative but effective play calls, many of which are simple option reads.

You don’t even have to see them run a play to instantly notice the difference: NU’s O-line takes very wide splits, creating lanes and gaps to work with. UW lines up and everybody is jammed in tight, including the defense. It’s hard to make option reads on the DE when he’s breathing on you during the snap count.

As has been discussed quite a bit, UW’s O-line talent is currently better suited for a power run game, but the three big interior linemen (JWF, Garcia, Bulyca) are all leaving, anyway. I suppose the line will be a little more balanced next year, which will give the new coaches some flexibility. I’m guessing they keep some spread in the plan, considering the skills of the QB and the number of emerging receivers. Plus you can move Kavario around, use some of the RBs out wide, things like that. Fun times for an ambitious offensive mind. (Paging Dave Christensen…)

by busplunger on Oct 20, 2008 1:36 PM PDT up reply actions  

The future of the Spread Option

I’m sure we could do a whole post on this, but what is the future of the Spread Option?

It definitely is effective, just look at scoreboards around the country. In college football, spreading the defense out, and running the option both seem to take advantage of the skill level and speed of college players. But the Wishbone came and went, and the power running game came and went. The west coast offense came and is slowly being used less. I guess the question is, what’s next?

"Bow Down to Washington"
"Kick the tires and light the fires!"

by Lear Pilot on Oct 20, 2008 10:45 AM PDT reply actions  

Spread option is a crap shoot...

to many QB’s go down to injury…runningbacks are built for running the football not QB’s (in my opinion). Look at Oregon and their quarterback situation. You cannot allow your QB to take that many hits. I like the spread offense for passing and i dont mind spread option plays to keep people honest, but i do not like running this offense week in and week out as our primary goal.

by bigdave967 on Oct 20, 2008 11:29 AM PDT reply actions  

Spreads seem to be working ok in a lot of places ...

… it goes back to my favorite observation – it’s not the plays, its the players.

Shake that hand that shook the hand of Hustlin' Hugh

by Minny C on Oct 20, 2008 1:45 PM PDT reply actions  

Spread Works...

I do agree again with you Minny C, only to disagree with you…again. It is very much the plays that coaches give their players that determine what happens. As a coach you HAVE to put your players in a position to succeed and for a coach that is by picking the right plays for the right situations. If a defense is over loading the one side and you pick a run play to go at that side it will fail 90% of the time. Luck could be in your favor but i would rather be good than lucky…luck runs out!

by bigdave967 on Oct 20, 2008 1:55 PM PDT up reply actions  

Players

“it’s not the plays, it’s the players” – if this is true we can fire all the coaches and save a few million dollars every year!

"Bow Down to Washington"
"Kick the tires and light the fires!"

by Lear Pilot on Oct 21, 2008 9:13 AM PDT up reply actions  

Lack of success

This coaching staff has done a lousy job of putting players in a place to succeed. The overall record speaks for itself.

by John Berkowitz on Oct 20, 2008 2:05 PM PDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the UW Dawg Pound, an unofficial site for Washington Husky fans.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Learjet31a_1_jpg_small
Question of the Day:
T9odawgtest_small
A few Spring Game thoughts.
P1010006_small
Who Said College Basketball Recruiting was Supposed to be Clean?
Dubs_close_small
The Future Of Husky Basketball
Small
Updated: Arizona loses at home, Cal faceplants in style.
Dubs_close_small
PAC 12 Pickem Final Results
Dubs_close_small
UW Dawg Pound Tournament Challenge
Small
PAC 12 Tournament Tickets
Dubs_close_small
PAC 12 Pickem Results/Conference Tournament Schedule
Dubs_close_small
Tournament Challenge

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

1959_huskies_small John Berkowitz

Dubs_small thecassino

Editors

W_logo_small kirkd

New_picture_small Gekko Mojo

Beastquakerwallpaper_small Ben Knibbe

Profpic_small JLee2025

Authors

Learjet31a_1_jpg_small Lear Pilot

Dubs_close_small CODawg

Coda_head_shot_250_small S_o_Smith

2721_small ToddWilliams206

P1010006_small Randall Floyd