Would things be different today if Washington had gone to a bowl in 2006?
Bob Condotta of the Seattle Times writes about the supposed turning point for Coach Willingham and his tenure at Washington this morning. Bob points to Washington's 4-2 start and the injury to Isaiah Stanback against Oregon State in 2006 as being the turning point for the program under Tyrone.
Instead, UW lost its next four games after Stanback was injured, and the program has never really recovered. It's 5-19 since that day, 3-15 in Pac-10 games.
I remember that particular game and it was clear pretty early that the Oregon State defense had our number that day with or without Stanback being in the game. I do think that if he wasn't injured the team would have beaten Stanford, WSU, and maybe someone else which would have resulted in the team going to a bowl game.
The one thing that stands out from that time more to me than Stanbacks injury was the strange in season announcement before the Stanford game that Ty was going to pull scholarships from a number of fourth year seniors. I thought the logic of the timing was totally whacked. It was at that time that any private hope I had of Willingham turning things around began to fade. If you can't get your team up to beat a terrrible Stanford team at home your goose is cooked and it is just a matter of time. I don't buy the out of QB's excuse in 2006 either. If you play Jake chances are you beat Stanford.
Would things be different today if Washington had gone to a bowl game in 2006?
- It would have built some much needed confidence into the program at a time it needed it most. A bowl game in 2006 may have been the emotional boost the team needed to win the close one's it lost in 2007. Maybe Willingham could be coming off two straight bowl games.
- It would have given a boost to the 2007 recruiting class that finished in the mid 30's. It still wouldn't have been able to cover for the first two mediocre classes that Willingham brought to the table.
- Willingham most likely would have received at least a roll over year in his contract for getting to a bowl game in his second year.
- Todd Turner would still be athletic director because Ty's job wouldn't be in immediate jeopardy.
- The 2008 team would still be near the bottom of the Pac Ten with or without Jake Locker.
The seeds for the 2008 disaster weren't sewn when Isaiah Stanback suffered his lisfranc injury. The seeds were sewn when Ty didn't hit the road recruiting immediately when he was hired to run the program.
It happened again in his second class when he let Taylor Mays and Steve Schilling get away. The first two recruiting classes he had at Washington just buried him.
Not getting to bowl games in 2006 and 2007 when he had the talent to do so didn't get him the extra time he needed to overcome his first two mediocre recruiting classes.
All Willingham needed was 2-4 more victories during his tenure and he would likely have 3 or more years left on his contract at this point. The discussion to fire him would be moot at this point despite the program being in the same place as it is right now.
37 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Can I agree without be trashed as a Ty apologist?
At the end of the day, the game is still about players and success breeds success. We tend to over rate the coach when things are good and over blame them when they are bad. Stanback had the ability (and did, in fact) of winning the occassional game by himself. If he stays upright, do we win 2 or three of our last seven? Almost certainly. Does a bowl game stop the tide and give us a more firm foundation for the future. Sure it does. It would have improved the odds that a better outcome would have played out for the program.
Now, does that mean Ty should get a pass because of IS’s injury. Of course not. He wasn’t destined to fail when he took over. If IS had been able to get us to a bowl, Ty could have been successful. Who knows? But that did not happen. The bottom line is that it hasn’t worked out. Ty is still a good guy. He has done the program some services in terms of attracting some talent, instilling discipline and shepherding these young men. He probably is a good coach who under different circumstances will be successful again. However, this is not that situation and the clock has run out on his tenure.
Shake that hand that shook the hand of Hustlin' Hugh
Lipstick on a pig
I think it would have just put lipstick on a pig.
by John Berkowitz on Oct 16, 2008 11:01 AM PDT reply actions
Stanback's injury a blessing in disguise?
Think about it this way had Stanback not been hurt, we’d be stuck with mediocre football, at best, for a long time to come. I have no reason to believe that Willingham was ever, or will ever be anything more than a mediocre coach.
Ya, ya, he is a great guy, great leader, great mentor, but he can’t teach guys to win! Players take on the attitude/mentality of their coach, and that’s why are team is so even keel. They just aren’t fired up enough to care whether they win or lose! I’m really looking forward to getting some more passion out of our team.
Willingham will get the boot, and we will return to the top much faster than ANY situation with him as the head coach.
"Bow Down to Washington"
"Kick the tires and light the fires!"
Part of being a good coach...
Is building a program that has enough depth that losing a star player doesn’t mean complete implosion. I see many similarities this year with losing Jake to 2006 losing Isaiah… the difference is that the season has already been lost this year where in 2006 we still had a pulse.
I will give Ty credit though for not pulling the red-shirt off of Jake in 2006 but since then Ty has failed Jake. The 2007 season should have been the start of our BCS run culminating four years later in a National Championship with Jake as a senior. Instead you have your best offensive weapon, a Heisman Trophy caliber player, running as the lead blocker on a wide reciever reverse. Now he is gone for the year.
Ty’s failure started his first week on the job when he went golfing instead of working on recruiting players to surround his phenom red-shirt QB.
We have two seasons left with Locker. If Jake graduates without ever playing in a bowl game, or living up to half his potential, it would be unforgivable.
Time for a new coach with creative ways to squeeze every bit of talent out of these kids. Time to salvage what is left in the next two years… and that means not pulling the red-shirt off of any player on the roster this year… and it means not playing Jake at safety or any other crazy ideas that could jeapordize his future. I still believe we could have a very dominant team in 2010 but our new coach has to also be thinking about 2011 with Ronnie as a senior and beyond.
"I'm not a mean player. You'll notice I never pick on a player who has a number above 30." ~ Mike Ditka
Pro Ty or anti Ty ...
blaming a coach for any player’s injury is just a stupid thing to say. Especially Jake’s injury which was a freak occurrence – bouncing his thumb off a defender’s knee? Please. Criticize X’s and O’s, criticize motivation impact, criticize recruiting, criticize discipline. Whatever you like. But don’t be ridiculous.
Shake that hand that shook the hand of Hustlin' Hugh
Wow Minny...
Way to call a guy out for having an opinion… my favorite color is blue by the way, am I wrong about that also? Is that redicuous?
Any yes, a coach can be blamed for a players injury if the coach knowingly puts a player in a position that has an increased chance of that player getting hurt… if Ty puts Jake in as a fullback and he gets a concussion from lead-blocking for a whole game it is absolutely Ty’s fault for putting him in that situation.
But hey… that is just, like, my opinion… get off of your soapbox.
"I'm not a mean player. You'll notice I never pick on a player who has a number above 30." ~ Mike Ditka.
When Oregon fans go to bed at night they wear Jake Locker pajamas.
All dirt roads lead to Pullman!
by TheBigSweaty on Oct 16, 2008 2:15 PM PDT up reply actions
Not Jake's injury, but definitely the plague of injuries this season
The abysmal strength and conditioning program is the greatest indictment of Willingham.
Nice to see...
..someone else that see’s the biggest flaw with this program (besides Ty) – although “abysmal” might be putting it nicely.
yeah - guess it was too harsh
didn’t mean it to be. Just trying to highlight my strong objection to the point that a coach can be held responsible for a player getting hurt doing what football players do every day. Apologies.
Shake that hand that shook the hand of Hustlin' Hugh
Interesting conversation
I think I agree, a blessing in disguise. Mediocrity for a long time. Actually, given the circumstance at present, we might be happy with that.
I have felt for some time that Ty was a bit on the unlucky side in that he has not had, nor been able to develop a first quality QB. Stanback was a terrific athlete, but much like Jake was very erratic as a passer. He succeeded on pure athleticism, not QB ability. Bonell had some talent, but did not play enough to develop it. Jake has only played one real year, and now that defenses were able to completely take away his running, he was unable to pass to the level of a good Pac ten QB. Fouch could get there, but RS Freshman (like Jake last year), are rarely ready to take on the whole load.
Don James was fortunate enough, or smart enough, or both, to have Warren Moon early on in his career. Perhaps, if TW had the next Warren Moon, we would be talking a different tune. Or, more likely, we would be wondering why the coach had Moon blocking on a reverse!!
Speculation is interesting. When Christianson gets here, he will have two young guys with enough experience to make most offenses go. There will be some good young receivers too. I cannot wait to see that develop. I wish they could get started tomorrow!!!
if we went to a bowl it wouldn’t change anything since then.
we are still going to be ridiculously worse than we were the year before and if ty got an extension based on that bowl game, then since turner is gone it wouldn’t be anything more than a bit more money in a game played between multi-millionaires. big whoop.
if ty won with isaiah and went to a bowl then the only difference would be in how wood-ert makes the decision… they keep him or they fire him. if they keep him, then we’ll continue to see declining attendance, more of the ty-ron curtain around information and thus nobody would care and husky football and the millions of dollars to the local economy would start to dry up just as fast.
“a bowl” game is good, but it better be a trend up vis-a-vis an aberration or a spurrious correlation. willingham has made millions upon millions from aberrations and i ain’t buying.
I disagree with the thrust of most of the comments...
and see the more important point being the dismissal of the 4th year Seniors. It’s completely hindsight because at the time I still felt TW was a competent coach and was really getting rid of some deadwood. It’s not that any, and correct me if I’m wrong, went on to do anything great, but more that they would have provided useful experience and almost certainly led to a “WTF?” attitude from the rest of the team.
I wonder if the rest of the team was given the reasons those that were dismissed were let go or were left to wonder what the hell they had to to in the future to avoid such a situation.
If TW explained his reasoning satisfactorily to the rest of the team, cool, the standards are known. If not, it’s like walking on eggshells, bed of coals…pick your poison. I just don’t think it led to a healthy attitude.
Does anyone know if the reasons for dismissal were truly communicated to the remaining players? I’ve read quite a bit and don’t know what the specifics were.
Bloody Knuckles...
Does anybody else feel like we are playing bloody knuckles…I mean lets break it down. We all want Ty to go but have differing opinions about when. Ty is good at taking away bad “PR” images but turns that bad image into a bad team. Ty cannot control Jakes thumb injury but with better strength and conditioning he could have avoided the early season hamstring injuries and other players pulls/strains.
Let me tell you what Ty has done for me…He has turned loyal and dedicated fans againist each other and for that i hate him. He has taken away the fun of anticipating a game and replaced it with humiliation. He has made my beautiful Saturday afternoons into dark and pathetic days. He has taken our team from the bottom of the barrel to the depths of hell. He will forever be remembered as the worst coach in UW history. He has taken a tough mentality and replaced it with flower power pansies. He has taken a great talent in Jake and in two years has still not taught him that this is a football field not a pitchers mound…loft the FRIGGIN BALL!!!! These are the small little things that shows you he does not coach these young men. Piss poor back side blocking, missed tackles, poor throws, poor routes, no depth, injury after injury after injury, no senior leader, etc. This is why he is a horrible coach and this is why i hate him.
Speaking for myself...
yes…hate…anything wrong with an extreme dislike or antipathy? Heck, I hate getting up some mornings, or evenings, depending on my schedule. Big deal. I’m not certain what sinister things you’re ascribing to the word. I mean nothing of the sort when I use it.
He's not worth.....
the effort it takes to hate, Ty that is. Hate is a very strong emotion and from my perspective he’s not worth it.
Watching him from afar I’ve reached some conclusions; He’s not nearly as bright as he tries to talk, he’s not a good game day coach, he’s not a good recruiter, he’s not the molder of young men he wants to be otherwise he would be able figure out ways to work with kids that don’t toe his line. I’d be surprised if he ever gets another D-1 HC gig again.
I don’t hate him, I hate what he has done to my Husky FB, I’ve been following Husky football since the late 40’s, good times and bad, I don’t like him although I hear from Fetters and Grinolds he’s a great one to talk to in an informal setting.
I just want him gone. The longer they wait the longer it will take to heal Husky football. The real question in my mind…do they really want to heal Husky FB?
I know some hard core fans that will not go to another game until the upper campus proves to them they care. It will take more than a new coach to convince them.
In the meantime there’s salmon and steelhead to catch or hunting, sailing, soon to be skiing, there’s many thing to do in the PNW besides watching bad football and bad head coaching
You can't be mad about what he has done to Husky FB...
… because what he inherited was worse than what this is. He got a team with a horrible record and very little talent.
You MUST be mad about what he has NOT done to Husky FB, which is improve in the W’s and L’s. No argument here. But, it is hard to say that he hasn’t at least stabilized the discipline and improved the talent base.
And, “Hate” is a very strong word that would seem to ascribe personal feelings about a human being that you neither know or have ever had a single conversation with. Judging his performance in his job is one thing. Attaching an emotion like that to the human being is quite another and would seem to imply that you have any kind of grasp of perspective. I certainly will not be teaching my children that kind of behavior.
Shake that hand that shook the hand of Hustlin' Hugh
I'm mad
at his shutting out former players, fans and boosters.
I’m mad that he’s sucked all the fun out of the game day experience for me, like one of his former players said “He’s sucked the fun out of football for me”. I go for tailgating with a great tailgating crew but not one of us has any expectations of a sniff of a win.
IF things were soooo bad when he took over how did he win more games with those no talent players and can’t win with “his” players?
Hate
Hate is a very strong emotion and from my perspective he’s not worth it.
I don’t know if I truly hate anyone.
Ty must go
I may not hate him but I have absolutely no sympathy for him either.
I am completey with T-90 on this one.
This is worse than what he inherited
The state of the team is now worse than what he originally inherited.
I respectfully disagree
This team has alot of young talent. The team he inherited was awful other than a few players.
I think two people can disagree with civility
on whether or not the program is worse than what it was when it was inherited. I argue that the talent is better and that some of the questionable characters are gone. This is debatable.
But not having sympathy (fine) and hate are two different things altogether.
Shake that hand that shook the hand of Hustlin' Hugh
talent...
he brought in a top 25 class (15 i believe by Scouts) and then threw them in the fire. We would be better off starting all walk on’s and letting these kids develope than starting them now. We would still be 0-5 and have the worst defense in college football. He has wasted a year of these kids future on his last gasp of air.
Questionable characters?
You mean like the kid Ty recruited from Texas who was arrested for hijacking a Taxi Cab outside a strip club in Lake City?
You might mean the CB Ty recruited who will be doing twenty years in a federal pen for an armed home invasion?
Perhaps you mean the other CB Ty recruited who broke his girlfriends jaw in Pioneer Square?
Was it the underage TE who Ty recruited who blew a .241 reading after taking a voluntary breath test this summer at a local music venue?
Perhaps you mean the backup QB who beat the crap out of another student with the help of a Husky LB this past summer on campus?
This is all so confusing Minny.
by John Berkowitz on Oct 17, 2008 10:01 AM PDT reply actions
Hate...
I HATE HIM for what he has done…I cannot be any more clear. I hate a lot of people though so don’t think he is special.
He has RUINED Husky football for me. I used to look forward to Saturdays, talking with my old man about UW football and where the program was headed…now we talk about politics (don’t get me started on this one…). He has taken UW football, something that I hold very near and dear to me and made me disgusted to watch it. I don’t have to meet someone to know that they have ruined one of my favorite things. Its very similar to when my friend told me that Santa wasn’t real…I hate him for that. I am a very opinionated person and no matter what I will not change my mindset.
Minny,
He is 0-5, what has he done for this program?? If he would have recruited his first two years he wouldn’t be in this position. He dug him own grave…right next to the 18th hole on his nearest golf course…
Talent
I think they have adequate talent in the last two classes, unfortunately college football teams are made up of five classes.
We are in as big, or a bigger hole than when Ty started.
by John Berkowitz on Oct 17, 2008 10:09 AM PDT reply actions
Questionable characters part two...
William Gerberding
Barbara Hedges
Richard McCormick
Tyrone Willingham
Put the blame where it needs to rest.
by John Berkowitz on Oct 17, 2008 10:14 AM PDT reply actions
Perception and BS
I am so sick and tired of hearing how Willingham cleaned up a dirty program. It is all perception and BS.
We all have heard how horrible acadmics were under Lambright, Neuheisel, and Gilbertson. The newest ratings are out based on a six year span and Washington is #2 in the conference in graduating players. That record was compiled mostly under those three coaches.
We seem to be fighting this myth that the football team was out of control under James, Lambo, Neu, and Gilby but it is all about perception. The same crap that goes on now went on back then with all the same results except under Willingham the team is not competitive.
When you have a group of 85-110 people you are going to have some good apples, and bad apples. The perception that Ty’s team is made up of only good apples is ridiculous.
by John Berkowitz on Oct 17, 2008 10:33 AM PDT reply actions
It wasn't the football coach's responsibility
It was the athletic department and UW administration that was the problem. I’m not sure it isn’t still “dirty,” but it’s nice to see Woodward cleaning house.
by discovolante on Oct 17, 2008 12:04 PM PDT up reply actions
here we go again
a post I make on knowing the difference between hating a human being and disapproving of how he has done his job has become another flame session and labeling me as a Ty apologist.
You guys are so predictable its not even funny. You are kind of like little mosquitoes that fly right into the zapper.
It is possible to simultaneously respect another human being and to desire to replace him in his current position. But, I guess you do really HATE Ty. You probably HATE me because you cannot separate a differing point of view from some kind of immutable character flaw. Sad to see such small mindedness rage away on this blog.
PS – I did chuckle at seeing the Gerb show up on the questionable character list.
Shake that hand that shook the hand of Hustlin' Hugh
Minny C
I dont hate you…you havent ruined anything for me. In fact i like you because you make my day fun. I look forward to this blog and the conversations that take place within its posts. It gets me through the long days at work. Especially today…
I judge people by what they do for me. If you are nice and bring joy to my life, i like you. If you bring me misery, i hate you. Its pretty simple. I have a simple mind and i dont over complicate things…it tends to lead to confusion. You seemed confused about my hate for Ty…i tried to explain it in simple terms. For example I hate the man who invented the horrible alarm clock noise i hear every morning…
I hope this helps Minny C.
I agree Dave..
and my point was merely to say that I use words like love and hate, I guess, a lot more loosely than some. I love pizza and hate brussels sprouts. I absolutely hate chili beer, but love rogue-n-berry. Clay Bennett, the Mariners, Seahawks….Coogs and ducks are a slightly different story:) In the end…GO HUSKIES regardless of who’s coaching!
Well said...
Go Huskies regardless…blind faith is a ______ (lets keep it PG). No matter what I will always root for them

by 











